Title: Intermediate I: CH11 Depreciation, Goodwill,
1Intermediate ICH11 Depreciation, Goodwill,
Impairments
2What is Depreciation?
- An allocation of cost of LT assets to expense in
a systematic rational manner - Theory Matching
- Not
- Decline in Market Value
3Depr. Vs. Amort. Vs. Depl.
- Depr on PPE
- several methods SL, SYD, DDB, Activity
- Amortization
- Write down of Intangibles
- Almost always use SL, no separate Accum.
- Depletion
- Write down of Natural Resources
- Almost always use Activity Method
4Issues
- Depreciable base
- Cost Salvage
- Useful life
- Method/pattern of cost allocation
- Activity (Units of Production)
- SL
- SYD
- DDB
- Should follow the pattern of benefits
5Straight Line
- (C-S)/Useful Life this yrs depre.
- Rationale
- Equal amount each period
- Assumes equal benefits over time
- Example -- Building?
6Sum of the Years Digits
- If 5 yr life
- SYD denominator n(n1)/2
- 5 (6)/2 15
- Yr 1 5/15 (C- S) depr1
- Yr 2 4/15 (C-S) depr2
- Yr 3 3/15 (C-S) depr3
- Yr 4 2/15 (C-S) depr4
- Yr 5 1/15 (C-S) depr5
- Rationale
- More benefits in early yrs --
7Double Declining Balance
- Usually 200 of SL rate
- 5 yrs 1/5 20 X 2 40
- Rate is applied first year times COST
- Yr 1 40 X cost Depreciation
- Yr 2 40 X Remaining Book Value.
- . ETC Force the last years depreciation to
make the ending BV equal salvage value .. P. 524 - Rationale More benefits in early years.
8Activity Method
- Rate (C S )/ Total Est. Activity
- Rate X This years activity This yrs depr
- OR (C-S) (This yr Activity/Total Activity)
- Rationale
- Good method when usage varies greatly from year
to year - Example Truck wears out more gt mileage
9Group or Composite Depr.
- Group Similar Composite Diverse assets
- Purpose To minimize record keeping
- P. 529 example SL approach.
- Disadv. of GROUP approach
- P. 529 entry
- Record cash and remove Orig Cost
- PLUG figure for A/Depr
- Never any GAIN or LOSS
10Partial Period Depreciation
- SL Fraction of yr X annual amount
- Activity Method
- Less activity automatic
- SYD -- bought 3/4 into the year
- 1st do table of whole yrs depre
- 2nd year 3/4 of first table line, 1/4 of second
etc. SEE PAGE 534 - DDB -- can do as above or shortcut in Footnote p.
534
11Ex11-3 Bought Oct 1 - SLine
- Cost115,000 Salv 5,000
- 10yrs useful life 220,000 units.
- (115,000 5,000) 110,000/10 11,000 /yr.
- 1st year 11,000 3/12 2750
- 2nd yr 11,000
12Ex11-3 Bought Oct 1 - SYD
- Cost115,000 Salv 5,000
- 10yrs useful life 220,000 units.
- (10 11) /2 55
- IF FULL YRS
- 1st yr 10/55 X 110,000 20,000
- 2nd yr 9/55 X 110,000 18,000
- PARTIAL
- 1st ¼ X 20,000 5,000
- 2nd ¾ X 20,000 (1/4 18,000)
- 15,000 4,500 19,500
13Ex11-3 Bought Oct 1 - DDB
- Cost115,000 Salv 5,000
- 10yrs useful life 220,000 units.
- 1/10 times 2 20
-
REM BV - 1st yr 20 X 115,000 X ¼ 5750 109,250
- 2nd yr 20 X 109,250 21850
14Ex11-3 Bought Oct 1 - 150DB
- Cost115,000 Salv 5,000
- 10yrs useful life 220,000 units.
- 1/10 times 1.5 15
-
REM BV - 03 15 X 115,000 X ¼ 4312.50 110,687.50
- 04 15 X 110,687.50 16603
-
(rounded) - This is short cut approach.
15Ex11-3 Bought Oct 1 - Activity
- Cost115,000 Salv 5,000
- 10yrs useful life 220,000 units.
- 110,000/ 220,000 units .50/unit
- Yr 1 10,000 x .50 5000
- Yr 2 25,000 x .50 12500
16Ex11-9 Coal Mine Depl.
- Cost of Mine 3,600,000
- Max tons 900,000 tons over 4 yrs
- Extracted this yr 220,000 tons
- 3,600,000/ 900,000 tons 4/ton
- 220,000 X 4/ton 880,000
- OR 3,600,000 X 220/900
- 3,600,000 X .24444 880,000
- Depletion Exp. 880,000
- Accum. Depletion 880,000
17Revising depreciation
- What if life, salvage or both later appear to be
unreasonable based on new evidence - To revise
- Take remaining BV over remaining future life.
- Do NOT revise prior years depreciation.
18Revising depreciation (2)
- Orig Cost of 220,000 Salvage 20,000
- Life est 10 yrs
- Do depreciation for 3 yrs SLine
- 200,000/ 10 20,000 per year for 3 yrs
- What is CV?
- Orig cost of 220 60 160,000
- Now think total life only 5 yrs, 10,000 Salv.
- (160,000-10,000)/2 75,000
- If knew 5 yrs all along -gt 210,000/5 42000/yr
- PROSPECTIVE NO RETROACTIVE FIX
19PPE Impairments
- PPE at H/Cost less Accum. Depre
- Write down the asset ONLY when Materially
Impaired, not temporary - SCREENING Do write down until BV gt than all
future cash flows, undiscounted. - No way, Jose test .. Will never recover cost
- Not recoverable? -- write down to MV.
- Impairment Loss is NOT extraordinary.
- Dr. Impairment loss Cr. A/Depr.
20Vs. Intangible Impairments p. 544
- Tangibles When obviously piece of junk
- Intangibles other than goodwill MV only test
every year - Goodwill .. Annually look at PV discounted cash
flows, new MV - Items to be sold .. Write down, stop
depreciating, move to Current Assets or Other
assets
21Subsequent expenditures
- Ordinary repair keeps in good repair, doesnt
really add to overall value - Dr. Repairs Expense
- Betterments/additions/improvements
- Dr. Asset directly
- Replacement / Extraordinary repair extends life
beyond typical - Choice 1 Remove old BV .. Dr. new to Asset
- Choice 1 Move common Dr. Accum Depr
- Rearrangement? Expense vs. Asset??
22Accounting Changes
- Change in estimate
- Prospectively
- Change in Acct Prin
- Old Cum. Effect Retroactive in future
- Error
- Retroactive Restatement .. Adj R/E bal
- Change from XXX to FIFO?
- Change from ridiculous to accurate est?
23Ex11-13 Change in Estimate
- Bought Patent for 18M beg. of 1999
- Now end 2003. Orig used 9 yr life.
- 18M/ 9 2M /yr times ?? Years
- 4 past yrs .. Dont count 03 depr entry not
done yet New total 6. 2 more - Cost 18 M less 8M Rem. BV of 10M
- RULE Remaining DBase over Remain. yrs
- 10 M / 2 yrs 5M
- Patent Amortization 5M
- Patent
5M
24Ex11-14 (1) 1/1/01 Computer
- Cost 40,000 SL, 5 yr life, 4000 Salvage
- 1/1/03 life changed to total of 10 yrs
- Prior Depr (40,000 4000)/ 5 7200/yr
- 7200 X 2 yrs 14,400
- Current BV 40,000 -14,400 25,600
- New (25,600 900)/ 8 yrs 3087.50
- Entry Depr Exp 3087.50
- A/Depr 3087.50
25Ex11-14 (2) SYD Revision
- Cost 40,000 SYD, 5 yr , 4000 Salvage
- 1/1/03 life changed to total of 10 yrs
- 5/15 X 36,000 12,000
- 4/15 X 36,000 9,600 21,600
- Bvalue 40,000 21,600 18,400
- Depr base 18,400 900 17,500--gt8yrs
- N(N1)/2 8(9)/2 36
- 8/36 X 17,500 3889
- Dr. Depr Ex 3889 cr. A/Depr 3889
26Ex11-15 Machine purc 2000
- Cost 1,200,000 Salvage 200,000
- Used SYD over 10 yrs
- (10)(11)/2 55 Depr Base 1M
- 01 10/55 X 1,000,000 181,818
- 02 9/55 X 1,000,000 163,636
- 03 8/55 X 1,000,000 145,455
- 27/55 X 1,000,000 490,909 vs SL
300,000 - Past Depreciation Overstated .. NI Under
- A/Depr 190,909
- Cumulative Effect of Change 190,909 ????
- cr. R/Earnings Retro new approach
27Ex11-15 Machine purc 2000
- Answer 490,909 vs SL 300,000
- A/Depr 190,909
- REarnings 190,909
- And,
- Depr Expense 100,000
- A/Depr 100,000
- 1m/ 10 yrs
28Goodwill
- Common Sense Customers really like you
- Never on books unless bought another Co.
- Definition Excess of Purchase Price over FV of
Net Identifiable Assets - Paid 10M BV Assets 9M Liab 1M MV of
Assets 8M - GOODWILL
- Paid 10M
- Net FV 7M Goodwill 3M
- True Asset or Overpmt?
29Goodwill Amortization
- Used to amortize over 40 yrs
- New rules say life is indefinite (like land)
- Write down only if IMPAIRED
- New FV vs. BValue
- Lumpy writeoffs vs. smooth SLine amortization
under old system
30Tax Issues
- Depreciation method (MACRS) used for tax purposes
is not the same method used for financial
reporting purposes. - Tax allows depletion based on times the value
of the resource instead of the cost--- - May have more depletion over time than the
original cost - NOT allowed for book purposes.
31E11-18(1) Impairment of Tangible PPE
- 3 restaurants with declining profit
- BV 6.2M
- Estimated Undiscounted future cash 4M
- Fair Value 3.5M
- Step one Recoverability test
- IS IMPAIRED 4M will not return full cost
- Step two IF impaired write down to FV
- 6.2 less 3.5M 2.7M impairment loss
32E11-18(2) Impairment of Tangible PPE
- BV 6.2M
- Est. Undiscounted future cash 6.5M
- Fair Value 5M
- Step one Recoverability test
- IS NOT IMPAIRED 6.5 will return full cost
- Step two No write-down if not impaired
- Doesnt matter that BV of 6.2M is greater than
FV of 5M by 1.2M do not record this as 1.2M
loss
33E11-19(1) Impairment of Goodwill
- Alliant bought Centerpoint for 300M of which
50M was allocated to G/Will - Tests for impairment end of each yr
- FV of Centerpoint 220M
- FV of n/assets excluding G/will 200M
- BV of Centerpoint including G/will 250M
- Implied value of Gwill 220-200 20M
- BV of Gwill 50M
- Write down by 30M
34E11-19(2) Impairment of Goodwill
- Alliant bought Centerpoint for 300M of which
50M was allocated to G/Will - Tests for impairment end of each yr
- FV of Centerpoint 270M
- FV of n/assets excluding G/will 200M
- BV of Centerpoint including G/will 250M
- Implied value of Gwill 270-200 70M
- BV of Gwill 50M
- Gwill is not Impaired no write down
35Costs after acquisition Revenue vs. Capital
Expenditure
- ORDINARY REPAIRS
- Revenue Expenditures -- dr. to EXPENSE
- EXTRAORDINARY REPAIRS
- Extends life beyond normal -- dr. A/Depr.
- BETTERMENTS or ADDITIONS
- -- dr. Asset account
- REARRANGEMENTS
- Expense Or Dr. Intangible Asset if Probable
Future Benefits???
36E11-20Subsequent Expenditures
- Heating system replaced for 300,000
- Extraordinary repair
- A/Depr 300,000
- Cash 300,000
- Replaces benefits, doesnt increase overall
value - New wing added for 750,000 Betterment or
addition - Building 750,000
- Cash 750,000
- Increases value of overall asset
37E11-20 Continued
- Annual Building maintenance
- Basic repairs
- Repairs Expense 12,000
- Cash 12,000
- Maintains but does not increase future service
potential - Rearrangement of machinery increases productive
capacity - Rearrangement (Intangible Asset) 50,000
- Cash 50,000
38Asset Retire. Oblig. P. 467-8
- Common ex Environmental Cleanup
- Put liab on now and dr. Asset ?? too
- Recent FASB concept of Expected Cash flow .. P.
468 more than one guess - Probability weighted liab. then take PValue using
credit adj risk free rate. (DISCUSS) - Dr. to Asset is then depr/amortized over asset
life .. - Impairment write-off??
39Retirement Replacement Depr. In Appendix
- No longer allowed unless immaterial
- Utilities .. Phone lines
- No systematic depreciation when poles replaced
either original cost to depreciation (retirement
approach) OR - Net Cost of New pole to depreciation (rep.)
- Similar to same effect as SLine IF replace equal
each yr otherwise could manipulate NI
40Questions?
41Ex11-22(1)
- 500,000 100,000/ 8 yrs 50,000 X 2
- Cost 500,000
- A/Depr 100,000 BV 400,000
- Write down to 175,000 January 2003
- 175,000 25,000/ 2 75,000
- D. 175,000 BV less another 75,000 A/dep
100,000 BV
42Ex11-22(2)
- 100,000 10,000/10 9000/yr
- 9000 X 4 yrs 36,000
- Book Value
- Cost 100,000
- A/Depr (36,000) 64,000
- Remaining BV 64,000 4000 / 4 15000 depre
- B. NEW BV 64,000 15000 49,000
43Ex11-22(3)
- 714000/15 47,600 X 3 yrs 142,800
- Book value 714,000 142,800 571,200
- 571,200 divided by 7 REMAINING YRS
- 81,600
- B. 571,200 81,600 489,600
44Ex11-22(4)
- Machine and cost to install is capitalized
- So are all rearrangement costs if you really
believe they provide probable future benefits in
excess of cost. - A. Total of costs listed 147,000
45P10-6
- Southern Building FV 1.4M
- Cost of 2M A/depr of 1.2 .8 M BValue
- Exchanges for Eastern Building
- Eastern Cost of 1.6M 650,000 950,000 BV
- Eastern gives Southern 140,000 to complete
exchange. - IMPLIED Eastern FV must be
- 1,400,000 less 140,000 1,260,000
46P10-6 Southern Entries
- Cash 140,000
- New Bldg 1,260,000
- A/depr 1,200,000
- Old Bldg 2,000,000
- GAIN??? 600,000
- What fraction of transaction is for cashgt
- 140,000/1,400,000 10
- Leave 60,000 gain on books
- New Bldg 1,260,000 540,000 720,000
47P10-6 Eastern Entries
- New Bldg 1,400,000
- A/depr 650,000
- Old Bldg 1,600,000
- Cash 140,000
- Gain 310,000
- Boot given similar trade dont recognize any
of the gain collapse into new asset - 1,400,000 310,000 1,090,000
48Costs after acquisition Revenue vs. Capital
Expenditure
- ORDINARY REPAIRS
- Revenue Expenditures -- dr. to EXPENSE
- EXTRAORDINARY REPAIRS
- Extends life beyond normal -- dr. A/Depr.
- BETTERMENTS or ADDITIONS
- -- dr. Asset account
- REARRANGEMENTS
- Expense Or Dr. Intangible Asset if Probable
Future Benefits???
49Asset Retire. Oblig. P. 468
- Common ex Environmental Cleanup
- Put liab on now and dr. Asset too
- Recent FASB concept of Expected Cash flow
- Probability weighted liab. then take PValue.
- Dr. to Asset is then depr/amortized over asset
life .. - Hopefully charge fees to accum. funds to pay for
this before closed.