Welcome to Econ 420 Applied Regression Analysis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Welcome to Econ 420 Applied Regression Analysis

Description:

Theory 2: Men' earnings grow at a higher rate than women's earnings ... State's unemployment rate. Percentage of population who lives in urban areas. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:82
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: khora
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Welcome to Econ 420 Applied Regression Analysis


1
Welcome to Econ 420 Applied Regression Analysis
  • Study Guide
  • Week Seven

2
Answer Key to Assignment 5 Question 1- Part One
  • Step 1
  • H0 B1 B2 B3 0
  • HA At least one of these Bs is not zero
  • Step 2
  • Level of significance 1
  • Degrees of Freedom in Numerator k 3
  • Degrees of Freedom in Denominator n k 1
    30 3 1 26
  • Critical F, Fc, 4.64 (pg 319)

3
  • Step 3
  • Run regression and find F-statistic 40.82042
  • Step 4
  • Because our F-statistic, 40.82 gt 4.64, the null
    hypothesis is rejected at the 1 significance
    level it is 99 likely that at least one of
    these Bs is not zero.

4
Question 1- Part Two
  • The estimated slope coefficient for income, is
    0.022756.
  • SE 0.005516
  • Degrees of Freedom n k 1 30 3 1 26
  • tc 2.056 (pg. 313)

5
  • The 95 confidence interval for the coefficient
    on income is B1 tc SE (B1) lt B1 lt B1 tc
    SE (B1),
  • The 95 confidence interval is 0.0114 lt B1 lt
    0.0340.
  • There is 95 chance that the true value of B1 is
    in the above range.

6
2. 17, Page 63
  • a. Adjusted R2 1 (1 0.7) (9/5) 0.46
  • b. Adjusted R2 1 (1 0.7) (19/15) 0.62
  • c. Adjusted R2 1 (1 0.7) (99/95) 0.69
  • d. With the same R2, when the sample number goes
    up, adjusted R2 will increase. The implication
    here is that when you add more observations to
    your sample, the degrees of freedom goes up, and
    therefore the goodness of fit will increase.
  • e. When the sample size is increased, R2 may
    increase, decrease or even stay the same. It
    depends on how well the new observations fit the
    regression line.

7
3. 4, PP 81-82
  • a and b. Use the following formula to calculate
    the real values.

8
Percentage change
  • Is equal to (new value- old value) divided by the
    old value.

9
(No Transcript)
10
  • The percent change in real tax collections tends
    to be much smaller than that of the nominal tax
    collections. This shows the importance of
    adjusting for inflation (see part c).
  • c. If you didnt adjust for inflation, the
    regression process would think tax collections
    increased a lot more than they did. Any
    regression results from a model that includes the
    nominal (unadjusted) tax collections are likely
    to be misleading.

11
4. 5, Page 82
  • The model is a tautology, or it is very close to
    being a tautology. The right hand side simply
    adds up all the people who have left the nursing
    home for various reasons. The true value for
    each of the slope coefficients will always be 1.
    For example, if one more person leaves the
    nursing home to live with relatives, EXIT will
    always increase by 1, so the true value of B3 is
    1. This is true for all the slope coefficients.

12
5. 6, Page 83
  • a. HOUSE_EXP 7 0.00017 INCOME
  • b. HOUSE_EXP 7,000 170 INCOME
  • c. HOUSE_EXP 7 0.17 INCOME
  • d. HOUSE_EXP 0.7 0.17 INCOME
  • e. b is the easiest to interpret. You can say
    that if someone has an additional 1,000 in
    income, on average, they will spend 170 more on
    housing that year.
  • f. A measure of the price of housing, and the
    number of people in the household are two
    possible answers.

13
Chapter 5
  • This week we will cover up to Page 94 Section
    5-2 Interaction variables

14
Some elementary rules of partial differentiation
  • Y 2X1 3 X1X2 5 X33
  • dY/dX1 measures change in Y as a result of one
    unit change in X1 assuming X2 and X3 are constant
  • dY/dX1 2 3X2
  • dY/dX2 3X1
  • dY/dX3 15X32

15
Intercept Dummies
  • Theory 1 Mens earnings is ,in general, higher
    than womens earnings

16
Graph of earnings versus experience
Earnings
Male
Female
Years of work
17
  • How would a dummy variable capture this?
  • Intercept dummy
  • Earnings B0 B1 (gender) B2 (years of work)
    error
  • Where gender is dummy variable that takes a value
    of 1 if the observation is a male and 0
    otherwise.

18
So you add one more variable to your data set.
Suppose you have 5 observations in your data set,
then it will look like this
19
Testing the theory
  • You estimate your model as usual and get
  • Earnings 1000 200 (gender) 500 (years of
    work)
  • Then you do a one sided t-test of significance on
    the coefficient of gender
  • Ho B1 0
  • Ha B1gt0
  • If you reject Ho, then you have found significant
    evidence that men, in general earn more than
    women

20
How much more?
  • If your observation is a male
  • Earnings 1000 200 (1) 500 (years of work)
  • Earnings 1200 500 (years of work)
  • If your observation is female
  • Earnings 1000 200 (0) 500 (years of work)
  • Earnings 1000 500 (years of work)

21
Graph of earnings versus experience
Earnings
Male
Female
1200
1000
Years of work
22
Slope Dummies
  • Theory 2 Men earnings grow at a higher rate
    than womens earnings

23
Graph of earnings versus experience
Earnings
Male
Female
Years of work
24
How would a dummy variable capture this?
  • Slope dummy
  • Earnings B0 B1 (years of work) B2 (years of
    work) ( gender) error
  • Where gender is dummy variable that takes a value
    of 1 if the observation is a male and 0
    otherwise.

25
Suppose you have 5 observations in your data set,
you will create a new variable (genwork). Genwork
is gender times years of work. your data set will
look like this
26
Testing the theory
  • You estimate your model as usual and get
  • Earnings 1000 500 (years of work)
    70(genwork)
  • Then you do a one sided t-test of significance on
    the coefficient of genwork
  • Ho B2 0
  • Ha B2gt0
  • If you reject Ho, then you have found significant
    evidence that mens earnings grow at a higher
    rate with years of experience.

27
How much more?
  • If your observation is a male
  • Earnings 1000 500 (years of work) 70 (years
    of work) (1)
  • Earnings 1200 570 (years of work)
  • If your observation is female
  • Earnings 1000 500 (years of work) 70 (years
    of work) (0)
  • Earnings 1000 500 (years of work)

28
Graph of earnings versus experience
Earnings
Male slope 570
Female slope 500
Years of work
29
What if
  • The theory suggested that not only, in general,
    mens salaries are higher than womens salaries
    but men also receive a higher rate of increases
    in their salaries compared to women over time.
  • Then you are better off to estimate the model
    twice once for male observations and once for
    female observations as the slope and the
    intercept must be allowed to vary across genders.

30
Assignment 6 (20 points)Due before 10 PM on
Friday, October 12)
  • Suppose the theory suggests that advertising for
    sun blocks is more effective in summer than any
    other time of the year
  • Formulate the model
  • What type of a data set will you use time series
    or cross sectional?
  • Set up a hypothesis to test the theory

31
  • 2. Suppose we estimate a regression equation that
    sets the crime rate as a function of a states
    per capita income and the number of police
    officers in each state per 10,000 population.
    The estimated coefficient of per capita income
    happens to be positive. We suspect that the
    estimated coefficient of per capita income is
    biased positively because we have an omitted
    variable. Which of the following omitted
    variables is more likely to have caused the bias
    in our estimated coefficient of income and why?
  • Number of college educated individuals per 1000
    population
  • Percentage of population living in poverty
  • States unemployment rate
  • Percentage of population who lives in urban areas.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com