Criminal Evidence - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Criminal Evidence

Description:

Mincey v Arizona- States there is no murder scene exception ... Human hair, fibers, forged check, etc.. 7/5/09. 12. Failing to show a sufficient chain of custody ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1442
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: STEL2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Criminal Evidence


1
Criminal Evidence
  • The crime scene, the chain of custody
    requirement, and fingerprints as evidence
  • Chapter 16

2
Obtaining evidence from a crime scene
  • When a crime occurs in a public place such as on
    a street or sidewalk, law officers would not have
    to show authority such as consent, a search
    warrant, or an exigency to justify their entry

3
Obtaining evidence from a crime scene cont..
  • Private premises such as a home, apartment or
    office, police can only enter with consent or
    with a warrant
  • Exigency-where a persons life or safety is
    endangered
  • Officers can only stay in a place to search for a
    reasonable period of time

4
Obtaining evidence from a crime scene cont.
  • Mincey v Arizona- States there is no murder scene
    exception
  • A police officer was shot in the head and killed
    during a drug raid on suspects apartment
  • The apartment was seized and searched for 4 days
    and over 300 objects were taken for evidence
  • US Supreme Ct overturned Arizona Supreme Ct
    Murder Scene Exception and stated a warrantless
    search of the apartment was not legal because a
    murder had occurred there

5
What can police search for in premises where a
serious crime has recently occurred?
  • Law officers may make a prompt warrantless search
    of the area to see if there are other victims or
    if a killer is still on the premises
  • The police may seize any evidence that is in
    plain view during the course of their legitimate
    emergency activities

6
Obtaining evidence
  • Obtaining evidence after a hot pursuit entry into
    private premises
  • Court holds that officers are under no obligation
    to delay a search if the failure to immediate
    search would gravely endanger them when looking
    for weapons
  • Obtaining evidence in now or never exigency
    situations
  • 1966 Schmerber v Calf created the implied
    consent laws of today Suspect was involved in a
    car accident where he and others were injured and
    he was suspects of intoxication

7
Obtaining evidence in emergency aid situations
  • Evidence found when police are responding to an
    emergency may be used in criminal trials
  • Police may aid physicians who are treating
    persons who have overdosed
  • Anytime police receive a report of an emergency
    they are duty bound to search
  • If police observe someone injured and unconscious
    in a home
  • Police can stop and search cars where shots have
    been fired

8
Defendants must have standing to challenge the
use of evidence obtained from crime scenes
  • To have standing and challenge the manner in
    which police obtained evidence from a crime
    scene, a defendant must show that he had a
    legitimate expectation of privacy in the crime
    scene

9
Protecting and searching a crime scene
  • To prove that evidence is genuine and authentic
  • Testify about where and how the object was
    obtained
  • Identify the object by serial number if a serial
    number is on the object
  • Identify the object based upon personal knowledge
    and observations
  • If the evidence is not readily identifiable or is
    susceptible to alteration by tampering,
    substitution, or contamination, the party must
    establish a chain of custody

10
The chain of custody requirement
  • Chain of custody-all persons who had possession
    of the evidence must appear as witnesses to
    testify that evidence such as fingerprints or
    illegal drugs had not been tampered with,
    substituted, or contaminated while the witness
    had custody and control of the evidence

11
Chain of Custody Documentation
  • Chain of custody is usually required for the
    following types of evidence
  • Videotapes
  • A crack pipe
  • Suitcase full of marijuana
  • Forensic evidence
  • Shell casing
  • Blood Samples
  • Note found near victims body
  • Human hair, fibers, forged check, etc..

12
Failing to show a sufficient chain of custody
  • To use evidence that could be subject to
    tampering, etc. the state must by the use of
    witnesses, establish a chain of custody to show
    reasonable probability that the evidence was not
    tampered with

13
Situations not requiring a chain of custody
  • A chain of custody is not required if the object
    to be used as evidence is not subject to
    alteration by tampering, substitution, or
    contamination
  • Such as
  • Most shoplifting and theft cases

14
Fingerprints as evidence
  • Latent fingerprints-fingerprints left by a person
    on a surface other than one designed for
    recording fingerprints
  • The FBI has millions of fingerprints on file
  • They receive more than 20,000 fingerprints a day
    from law enforcement agencies throughout the
    country
  • Fingerprints are the most valuable common forms
    of evidence

15
Obtaining fingerprints
  • Persons in lawful police custody
  • Los Angeles has 40 thousand arrests each month
  • Person who served in the military
  • Many government employees
  • People who receive licenses for such occupations
    as bartending, driving a taxicab, working in
    private security, or obtaining a government
    security clearance

16
Proving that fingerprints were impressed at the
time of the crime
  • It is impossible to determine the age of a latent
    print
  • The government must show that the fingerprints
    could only have been impressed at the time when
    the crime was committed

17
Automated fingerprint identification systems
  • 1985 AFIS was activated
  • Largest database in the US is the FBI
  • 41 million fingerprint files
  • 24 million crime history records

18
Other types of evidence
  • Palm prints and lip prints
  • Footprints and shoe prints
  • Bite marks
  • To use bite marks an expert witness must be used
    such as a dentist or forensic odontologist
  • Tire tracks- In State v Tillman the manager of a
    Goodyear tire store was held to have enough
    experience to testify as an expert in recognizing
    tread patterns on tire tracks

19
The End
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com