Title: Whats New in the AMA Manual of Style, 10th Edition
1Whats New in the AMA Manual of Style, 10th
Edition?
- AMWA Presentation
- June 30, 2007
Stacy Christiansen, MA AMA Manual of Style
Committee and Director of Manuscript Editing, JAMA
2Companion Web Site
http//www.amamanualofstyle.com
3Full-text e-book the plan
- Links for all cross-references within the manual
and from index to text - Links from journal articles cited to the article
whenever possible (PubMed?) - In glossaries, links from terms in definitions to
those terms that are included in the glossary - All URLs live
- FAQs searchable and linked to the relevant
section in manual - Content fully searchable
- Updates provided to subscribers, at least once
annually -
4More ideas for e-book
- Units of measure table chapter 18 linked to
calculator function, to perform calculations
using conversion factors shown - Icons used for items on which policy has changed,
with link to new policy description - Tip of the month feature for subscribers
- Ability to compose and save annotations and mark
frequently used sections - Bookmarking
- Retention of search history
- We welcome other suggestions
5New and improved
- The manual has grown from 660 to 1032 pages
- The index is far more comprehensive (and online)
- More useful running heads with actual section
terms - New chapter on medical indexes
- 4 new subsections in Nomenclature (psychiatry,
molecular medicine, ophthalmology, radiology) - Manuscript Preparation chapter broken into 3
chapters (chapters 2-4), with more content on
each chapter Manuscript Preparation, References,
Visual Display (figures, tables, boxes)
6Why is the book so beefy?
- Nomenclature chapter 130 pages in the 9th
edition and 247 pages in the 10th - Legal/Ethical Considerations 85 pages in the 9th
edition and 175 pages in the 10th edition (eg,
patient confidentiality, scientific misconduct,
editorial freedom, author/editor responsibility,
registration of clinical trials, open access) - Information about the online world (eg,
electronic references, submission of digital
images) has been added throughout the book
7 Editorial freedom JAMA
- In early 1999, JAMA editor fired by the AMA, who
accused him of interjecting the journal into a
major political debate by timing the publication
of a related article. - As a result, staff considered quitting, authors
threatened not to submit, reviewers threatened
not to review, and some people cancelled
subscriptions. - JAMA worked with publisher AMA to create a
Journal Oversight Committee to establish the
journals editorial independence, future editors
reporting relationships, and how that person
could be hired, fired, and evaluated. The JOC is
a 7-member committee of 1 member of AMA senior
management, 1 member from outside the AMA with
publishing business experience, and 5 members
representing the scientific, editorial,
peer-reviewer, contributor, and medical
communities.
8 Editorial freedom NEJM
- Later in 1999, NEJM editor fired by MMS for
objecting to the societys plans for reuse of the
journals content and co-branding of the journal
name with other information providers over which
he had no control or authority. - Same fallout as for JAMA
- Editors negotiated with MMS a set of principles
to maintain the journals editorial independence
and the editors authority and responsibility for
all content, editorial policies, and use of the
journals content, name, and logo.
9 Editorial freedom CMAJ
- Early 2006 CMAJ editor-in-chief and another sr
editor fired by CMA, presumably for series of
run-ins and conflicts over editorial independence
(story on lack of access to plan B, story
criticizing Canadian public health official). - Journal and association also agreed to governance
plan like JAMAs that addresses editorial freedom
and reporting structure of editors
10Clinical trial registration
- Trial Registration As a member of the
International Committee of Medical Journal
Editors (ICMJE), JAMA requires, as a condition of
consideration for publication, registration of
all trials in a public trials registry that is
acceptable to the ICMJE and that requires the
minimum registration data set as described by the
ICMJE. Acceptable trial registries include the
following - http//www.actr.org.au
- http//www.clinicaltrials.gov
- http//www.isrctn.org
- http//www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/index.asp
- http//www.umin.ac.jp/ctr
- References
- DeAngelis CD, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA, et al.
Clinical trial registration a statement from the
International Committee of Medical Journal
Editors. JAMA. 20042921363-1364. - DeAngelis CD, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA, et al. Is
this clinical trial fully registered? a statement
from the International Committee of Medical
Journal Editors. JAMA. 20052932927-2929.
11Open access
- Unrestricted use of publication content
(BioMedCentral peer review but no edit Public
Library of Science (PLoS) both) - Advantages unlimited online access globally,
improved visibility, potentially more citations - Disadvantages can cost authors, institutions, or
other funders anywhere from 615 to 1775 for
BioMedCentral and 2500 for PLoS - More than 200 open-access medical journals
12Open access at JAMA
- Delayed open access model
- After 6 months at JAMA all content is free
- Immediately upon publication at least 1 article
per issue is free, as well as Express papers
13New style policies
- Updates in policies on group authorship, listing
of contributions of all authors - More detailed and stringent guidelines on
financial disclosure, role of the sponsor,
funding/support - Table footnotes now lowercase superscript
letters, not symbols (eg, asterisk, dagger) - Line art now sentence-style capitalization, not
title-style capitalization, except on the axes - State names spelled out except in full street
addresses and in references (for location of
publisher), where 2-letter abbreviations will be
used and for space in tables figures
14Group authorship
15Author contributions
- Each author is asked to identify how she/he has
contributed to the work - Two methods of identifying contributions
- Ask authors to self-identify contributions
(Lancet, BMJ) - Provide a checklist of various contributions
(Annals of Internal Medicine, JAMA, Archives
Journals, Radiology) - Helps enforce integrity of author role
- Anyone else should be listed in acknowledgment
16Contribution Checklist
- I have made substantial contributions to the
intellectual content of the paper as described
below - 1. (check at least 1 of the 3 below)
- conception and design
- acquisition of data
- analysis and interpretation of data
- 2. (check at least 1 of 2 below)
- drafting of the manuscript
- critical revision of the manuscript for
important - intellectual content
- 3. (check at least 1 below)
- statistical analysis
- obtaining funding
- administrative, technical, or material
support - supervision
- no additional contributions
- other contributions (specify)________________
_______________________
17Financial disclosures
- From the JAMA authorship form
- I certify that all my affiliations with or
financial involvement, within the past 5 years
and foreseeable future (eg, employment,
consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or
options, expert testimony, grants or patents
received or pending, royalties) with any
organization or entity with a financial interest
in or financial conflict with the subject matter
or materials discussed in the manuscript are
completely disclosed in the Acknowledgment
section of the manuscript. - As published
- Financial Disclosures None reported.
- Financial Disclosures Dr Jones has served as a
paid consultant to Wyler Laboratories. Dr Jacques
owns stock in Wyler Laboratories. Drs Smith and
Brown reported no financial interests.
18Funding/support and role of the sponsor
- Funding/support can include, among other things,
grant support and funding, provision of equipment
and supplies, and other paid contributions. - Funding/Support The Women's Health Initiative
program is funded by the National Heart, Lung,
and Blood Institute, National Institutes of
Health, Department of Health and Human Services.
The study drugs were supplied by Wyeth Research
(St Davids, Pa).
- Funding/Support This work was supported by NIH
grants to General Clinical Research Center
(M01-RR00125) and Dr Caprio (R01-HD28016 and
R01-HD40787), Yale University School of Medicine,
and an unrestricted gift from the McPhee
Foundation, Bristol, Connecticut. - Role of the Sponsor The National Institutes of
Health and the McPhee Foundation played no role
in the concept or design of the study in the
acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of the
data in the drafting or revision of the
manuscript or technical support or supervision
of the study.
19Table footnotesFormerly used symbols ?
but was limited to a maximum of 9
20New table footnotesAlphabetical superscripts
mean 26 footnotes possible without duplication,
order easy to remember
21Capitalization in line art then
22Capitalization in line art now
23State abbreviations
- 9th edition
- US State, Abbreviation Postal Code
- Territory,
- or Possession
- Alabama Ala AL
- Alaska Alaska AK
- Arizona Ariz AZ
- Arkansas Ark AR
- California Calif CA
- Colorado Colo CO
- Connecticut Conn CT
- Delaware Del DE
- District of
- Columbia DC DC
- Florida Fla FL
-
- 10th edition
- US State, Postal Code
- Territory,
- or Possession
-
- Alabama AL
- Alaska AK
- Arizona AZ
- Arkansas AR
- California CA
- Colorado CO
- Connecticut CT
- Delaware DE
- District of Columbia DC
- Florida FL
-
24- In full street addresses for Canada, the province
name will be a 2-letter abbreviation - Jr and Sr will no longer be set off by commas (to
match III and IV) - Journal references will include the issue number
(consonant with PubMed) - Journal names will be abbreviated in accordance
with the abbreviation used at the time the
article was published (eg, Br Med J) - Units of measure policy has been modified (no
longer a preference for SI units or dual
reporting)
25Electronic references early release
- Article published online ahead of print
- Jackson N, Krol E, Author S, et al. Restrictions
on chocolate intake associated with mood
published online ahead of print June 29, 2007.
J Choc Stud. 20071(6)150-154.
doi10.1010.choc0629. - If its in the time frame between online and
print (ie, not paginated into an issue yet),
everything is the same except there is no
citation - Jackson N, Krol E, Author S, et al. Restrictions
on chocolate intake associated with mood
published online ahead of print June 29, 2007.
J Choc Stud. doi10.1010.choc0629.
26Electronic references online only
- Some journals publish content that only appears
online - Locke J, Shepard J, Jarrah S, et al. Effect of
social isolation on survivors. J Soc Exp.
200710. http//www.lost.com/isolation/2007.
Accessed June 1, 2007. - Note just year and volume given, then URL and
access date. If possible, also give date posted.
27Electronic references Web sites
- Prefer only sites that wont disappear, leading
to broken links in online articles - Some journals require printout of online
citations so all content is captured - All links checked through editing, production, up
until posted online. JAMA does not have resources
to continually go back and check reference links. - E-mail is a personal communication and must be
listed in the text, not cited as formal
reference. Permission must be obtained from
e-mail writer.
28Units of measure
- For laboratory values reported in JAMA and in the
Archives Journals, factors for converting
conventional units to SI units should be provided
in the article. In text, the conversion factor
should be given once, at first mention of the
laboratory value, in parentheses following the
conventional unit. - The blood glucose concentration of 126 mg/dL (to
convert to millimoles per liter, multiply by
0.055) was used as a criterion for diagnosing
diabetes.
29Units of measure tables figures
Table footnote
Figure legend
30New Terms in Correct and Preferred Usage
- analog/analogue
- association/relationship
- attenuate/attenuation
- cadaver/donor
- chief complaint/chief concern
- contrast/contrast agent/contrast
material/contrast medium - erectile dysfunction/impotence
- fasted/fasting
- global/international
- glycated hemoglobin/glycosylated hemoglobin
- hyperintense/hypointense
- impaired/intoxicated
- operation/surgical procedure/surgeries/surgery
- prostitute/sex worker
- survivor/victim
31Medical indexing
- Chapter provides guidance on alphabetical listing
and sorting, especially in tricky terms like
those that start with Greek letters and various
prefixes - Recommends lowercase main entries (and stylebook
index follows this) and saves caps for proper
nouns, abbrevs - Provides examples of formatting style (eg,
indented vs run-in subcategories) and
cross-references
32Nomenclature additions
- Ophthalmology
- OS, OD, OU
- Glossary of common ophth terms, including disc,
lasers, visual acuity, and visual field - Psychiatry
- DSM expansions and nomenclature
- Axis diagnostic categories
- Radiology
- Terms from MRI, ECG resource list
33Spacing in equations
- Thin spaces should be used before and after the
following mathematical symbols , , lt, gt, , ,
, , , , , , , n, ?, ?, ?, and . - Exception is if its not really an equation, then
set close to the value - Temperature of 10C
- Patients were grouped by age as lt35 years, 35-65
years, and 66 years.
34P values pp 888-889
- P values should be expressed to 2 digits for
Pgt.01, whether or not P is significant. When
rounding a P value expressed to 3 digits would
make the P value nonsignificant, such as P.049
rounded to .05, the P value can be left as 3
digits. If Plt.01, it should be expressed to 3
digits. - The actual P value should be expressed (P.04),
rather than expressing a statement of inequality
(Plt.05), unless Plt.001. Expressing P to more than
3 significant digits does not add useful
information to Plt.001, since precise P values
with extreme results are sensitive to biases or
departures from the statistical model. - (Exception genetics papers)
35More P values
- P values should not be listed simply as not
significant or NS, since for meta-analysis the
actual values are important and not providing
exact P values is a form of incomplete reporting.
Because the P value represents the result of a
statistical test and not the strength of the
association or the clinical importance of the
result, P values should be referred to simply as
statistically significant or not significant
terms such as highly significant or very highly
significant should be avoided.
36And still more P values
- JAMA and the Archives Journals do not use a zero
to the left of the decimal point, since
statistically it is not possible to prove or
disprove the null hypothesis completely when only
a sample of the population is tested (P cannot
equal 0 or 1, except by rounding). If Plt.00001, P
should be expressed as Plt.001 as discussed. If
Pgt.999, P should be expressed as Pgt.99.
37Eponyms still no s
- Continued policy of nonpossessive form
- Stedmans, CSE manual support
- Dorlands internally inconsistent but moving to
nonpossessive - Exceptions given, such as St Johns wort and
organization names (Alzheimers Association) - If possible, best to use noneponymous terms
(polycystic ovary syndrome vs Stein-Leventhal
syndrome), but depends on reader familiarity.
Good to present both terms at first mention.
38Glossary of publishing terms
- New additions, particularly techie
- bandwidth
- blog
- doi
- DTD
- e-mail
- FAQ
- spam
- Web browser
- XML
39Typography
- Discussions of design, layout, formatting, fonts,
sizes, spacing, and typefaces - Examples of use of
- bold (headings, citations, in tables)
- italics (titles of books or journals, genus and
species, genes, some statistical terms) - small caps (am and pm, some chemical prefixes)
40How Can I Contribute?
- We value your input on
- the 10th edition
- any errors you find (in second printing now with
errata incorporated) - ideas for an e-book (workbook/exercises?)
- Contact stylemanual_at_jama-archives.org