Jean Brown

1
Leadershipin the Use and Analysisof Student
Data 2007-2008

• Jean Brown
• Superintendent, Local District 1
• September 2007

2
Theory of Action

• Curriculum and Instruction
• Professional Development
• Coaching
• Use of Periodic Assessment Data
• Teacher Collaboration
• Administrative Leadership
• Personalization

3
2005 2006Understanding Systems for Continuous
Improvement

4
2006 - 2007Leadership in the Development and
Delivery of High-Quality Professional Development
5
2007 2008Leadership in the Use and Analysis
of Student Data
6
Attendance Data
7
Local District 1Attendance Data
8
Reclassification Data
Reclassification Data
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
Percentage of English Learners Reclassified to
English Proficient
12
AYP and API

• AYP measures students moving from basic, below
  basic, and far below basic to proficient and
  advanced performance levels.
• API measures student movement between all
  performance levels. The greatest growth occurs as
  students move from far below basic to below
  basic and from below basic to basic.

13
API Data
14
(No Transcript)
15
Elementary School API
16
(No Transcript)
17
Middle School API
18
(No Transcript)
19
High School API
20
Elementary Schools With theGreatest API Gains in
2007

• Napa 70 Canoga Park 30
• Plummer 64 Lassen 30
• Newcastle 48 Rosa Parks 29
• Sunny Brae 39 Ranchito 27
• Noble 37 Blythe 25
• Chatsworth Park 36 Beckford 24
• Van Gogh 33 Granada 22
• Bertrand 32 Haynes 22
• Langdon 31 Gledhill 21
• Dearborn 30

21
Secondary Schools With theGreatest API Gains in
2007

• Reseda HS 35
• Vista MS 21
• Chatsworth HS 17
• Kennedy HS 17
• Sherman Oaks CES 16
• El Camino HS 11
• Taft HS 9
• Lawrence MS 8
• Cleveland HS 7

22
Small Schools With Great API Gains in 2007

• Addams 114
• Kirk Douglas 108
• Cal Burke 45
• Zane Grey 36

Lull Sp Ed Center 182 Leichman HS
150 Miller HS 143 West Valley Sp Ed
Center 89
23
Elementary Schools With an API of 800-899

• Pomelo 896
• Nestle 878
• El Oro 876
• Serrania 874
• Superior 871
• Vintage 862
• Topeka 861
• Hamlin 860
• Calabash 855

Justice 853 Woodlake 851 Haynes 849 Lockhurst
848 Darby 846 Knollwood 842 Encino 842 Andasol
839 Stagg 839
24
Elementary Schools With an API of 800-899

• Dearborn 837
• Lemay 836
• Calahan 832
• Lorne 830
• Emelita 828
• Danube 827
• Germain 827

Tarzana 819 Tulsa 818 San Jose 815 Mayall 806
Haskell 804 Granada 800
25
Secondary Schools with an API Score of 800-899

• Sherman Oaks CES 845
• Noble Middle 837
• High Tech High 819

26
Elementary Schools With an API Over 900

• Balboa Magnet 982
• Woodland Hills 958
• Welby Way 921
• Lanai Road 920
• Castlebay Lane 917
• Beckford 911
• Wilbur 911
• Van Gogh 900

27
AYP
28
The following schools made AYP and are on HOLD

• Bertrand Elementary
• Napa Elementary
• Noble Elementary
• Plummer Elementary
• Primary Academy for Success
• Winnetka Elementary

29
The Following Schools Made AYP and Have EXITED
Program Improvement Status

• Anatola Elementary
• Birmingham HS
• Taft HS
• West Valley Sp. Ed. Center

30
CST Data
31
Local District 1 CST Percentage of Students
Scoring Proficient/AdvancedELEMENTARY ENGLISH
LANGUAGE ARTS, 2003-2007
32
Local District 1 CST Percentage of Students
Scoring Proficient/Advanced, MIDDLE SCHOOL
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, 2003-2007
33
Local District 1 CST Percentage of Students
Scoring Proficient/Advanced, HIGH SCHOOL ENGLISH
LANGUAGE ARTS, 2003-2007
34
Local District 1 California Standards
Test Percentage of Students Scoring
Proficient/Advanced, 2003-2007
35
Local District 1 CST Percentage of Students
Scoring Proficient/Advanced, ELEMENTARY MATH,
2003-2007
36
Local District 1 CST Percentage of Students
Scoring Proficient/Advanced, MIDDLE SCHOOL MATH,
2003-2007
37
Local District 1 CST Percentage of Students
Scoring Proficient/Advanced, HIGH SCHOOL MATH,
2003-2007
38
Local District 1 California Standards
Test Percentage of Students Scoring
Proficient/Advanced, 2003-2007
39
Local District 1 California Standards
Test Percentage of Students Scoring
Proficient/Advanced, 2003-2007
40
Local District 1 California Standards
Test Percentage of Students Scoring
Proficient/Advanced, 2003-2007
41
Assessment
42
TWO TYPES OF ASSESSMENT Assessment OF
LearningAssessment FOR Learning
43
Assessment OF LearningSummative
AssessmentCalifornia Standards TestCAHSEECAT
6Course Final Exam

• Provides information for program evaluation
• Provides judgmental feedback
• Provides feedback for audits and reviews
• Provides accountability information, e.g., NCLB

44
Assessment FOR LearningFormative
AssessmentLAUSD Periodic AssessmentsWell-crafte
d, teacher-made assessments

• Promotes student reflective learning
• Measures short-term student progress
• Informs teacher practice and professional
  development
• Serves as a tool for supervision of instruction
  by providing measures of student progress

45

• Using Periodic Assessments to Help
• Sustain School Improvement
• Bill Saunders
• Pearson Achievement Solutions