Analytic%20Philosophy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Analytic%20Philosophy

Description:

Zombies, Qualia and the Mind-Body Problem. Zombies: physical duplicates of ' ... A zombie's brain states are perfect duplicates of the brain states of normal ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1572
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: heba3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Analytic%20Philosophy


1
Analytic Philosophy
  • Introduction and a Brief History

2
Introduction
  • About this course
  • Analytic philosophy in the history of philosophy
    and the history of analytic philosophy
  • Areas of philosophy and central philosophical
    issues

3
About this course
  • Mechanics, requiements and expectations

4
Syllabus
  • Office Founders 165c
  • Telephone (619) 260-2749 USD (619) 805-6838
    mobile
  • Email baber_at_sandiego.edu
  • Class Website http//home.sandiego.edu/baber/ana
    lytic/
  • Message Board http//analyticphilosophy.blogspot.
    com/
  • Turnitin.com Info Turnitin.com class ID 4739566
    enrollment password analytic
  • Office Hours Thu Thu 1215 215 pm Wed 115
    215 and by appointment.
  • Class Meetings Tue Thu 230 350 Serra 312

5
Syllabus
  • Readings There are no hard-copy textbooks for
    this class! All readings, handouts and
    powerpoints are linked to the class website.
  • Grade Your grade for the semester will be based
    upon two tests and a term paper. In addition, you
    must submit a written proposal for your term
    paper to be discussed in class and approved by
    your instructor.
  • Test I Thu Mar 15 30 of final grade
  • Test II Thu May 3 30 of final grade
  • Proposal due Tue Apr 26 must be approved
  • Presentations May 8, May 10 required
  • Term Paper due Tue May 20 40 of final grade

6
Term Papers Turnitin
  • Legal Notification of Policy
  • USD subscribes to Turnitin.com, a web-based
    application that compares the content of
    submitted papers to the Turnitin.com database and
    checks for textual similarities. All required
    papers for this course will be subject to
    submission to Turnitin.com for textual similarity
    review and to verify originality. All submitted
    papers will be included as source documents in
    the Turnitin.com reference database solely for
    the purpose of detecting textual similarities and
    verifying originality. Each student is
    responsible for submitting his or her papers in
    such a way that no identifying information about
    the student is included. A student may not have
    anyone else submit papers on the students behalf
    to Turnitin.com. A student may request in writing
    that his or her papers not be submitted to
    Turnitin.com. However, if a student chooses this
    option, the student may be required to provide
    documentation in a form required by the faculty
    member to substantiate that the papers are the
    students original work.

7
Schedule Topics Readings
  • A schedule of topics and readings, subject to
    revision, is available at the class website at
  • http//home.sandiego.edu/baber/analytic/schedule
    .htm
  • Class Website http//home.sandiego.edu/baber/an
    alytic

8
Analytic Philosophy
  • Analytic philosophy is a generic term for a style
    of philosophy that came to dominate
    English-speaking countries in the 20th century.
    In the United States the overwhelming majority of
    university philosophy departments self-identify
    as "analytic" departments. This situation is
    mirrored in the United Kingdom, Canada, and
    Australia. Wikipediabut if you dont trust
    Wikipedia
  • Brian Leiter, the philosophical gourmet, notes
    "All the Ivy League universities, all the leading
    state research universities, all the University
    of California campuses, most of the top liberal
    arts colleges, most of the flagship campuses of
    the second-tier state research universities boast
    philosophy departments that overwhelmingly
    self-identify as "analytic" it is hard to
    imagine a "movement" that is more academically
    and professionally entrenched than analytic
    philosophy.
  • See also John Searle's judgment (in Bunnin
    Tsui-James (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to
    Philosophy (Blackwell, 2003), p. 1) "Without
    exception, the best philosophy departments in the
    United States are dominated by analytic
    philosophy, and among the leading philosophers in
    the United States, all but a tiny handful would
    be classified as analytic philosophers."

9
A History of Philosophy
  • The Analytic Philosophers Version

10
Western Philosophy Timeline
Continental Philosophy
Hellenistic/ Medieval
Rationalists
Empiricists
Kant
Ancient
Plotinus Augustine Anselm Abelard Aquinas Ockham
Descartes Leibniz Spinoza
Locke Berkeley Hume
Kant
Plato Aristotle
Analytic Philosophy
Our Esteemed Ancestors
Our esteemed ancestors
11
Anglo-American Philosophy
Continental Philosophy
British Idealists
Empiricists
Locke Berkeley Hume
Analytic Philosophy
Early 20th Century Rejection of Idealism (Defense
of Commonsense) Logical Atomism
Logical Positivism
Ordinary Language Philosophy
Contemporary Analytic Philosophy
12
Subfields of Philosophy
  • Traditional Subfields
  • Logic
  • Ethics
  • Metaphysics
  • Epistemology
  • History of Philosophy
  • Additional Special Fields
  • Philosophy of Mind
  • Philosophy of Religion
  • Philosophy of Science
  • Applied Ethics specialties
  • Aesthetics
  • Philosophy of Language

13
Our Philosophical Issues
  • Skepticism and the External World
  • Meaning and Reference
  • The Logical Positivist Program
  • The Mind-Body Problem
  • The Problem of Universals
  • Externalism and the mental
  • Identity (including personal identity)
  • Time and time-travel

14
The External World
  • Epistemological, metaphysical questions and
    philosophy of language issues.
  • Do we know theres an external world? If so, how?
  • What are the constituents of this external world?
  • How should we analyze talk about these things?

15
The Epistemological Question
  • External world mind-independent objects
  • Immediate experience and inference (I hear a
    screeching when I step on the brakes and infer
    that the pads are worn and metal is grinding on
    metal. Sight is no different.
  • Veridical and non-veridical experience
  • Do we have any good reason to believe that any of
    our experiences are veridical? How could we know?

16
Representative Theory of Perception
17
The Veil of Perception
18
Thought Experiments
  • We want to know what is logically (or
    metaphysically) possible
  • E.g. Is it possible for persons to exchange
    bodies? Survive bodily death? Reappear in
    resurrection worlds? Be reincarnated?
  • Conceivability is (roughly) a criterion for
    logical possibility so
  • We produce and consider thought experiments to
    ascertain what is conceivable.
  • These thought experimentsstories about zombies,
    transport via Startrek Machine, Brains in Vats
    and life in the Matrix, apparent cases of
    body-exchange, etc. are fictions intended to pump
    our intuitions.

19
The Mind-Body Problem
  • Zombies physical duplicates of normal humans
    who do not have qualia.
  • Qualia contents of immediate experience, raw
    feels or sense-data
  • The Mind-Body Problem (crude version) is the
    mind the brain? (or, are mental states just brain
    states?)
  • Conceivability as a criterion for (logical)
    possibility

20
Zombies Argument for Mind-Body Dualism
  • Zombies are logically possible (we can conceive
    of them, right?)
  • A zombies brain states are perfect duplicates of
    the brain states of normal individuals
    experiencing qualia
  • There must be something more then that brain
    state when an individual has qualia
  • The mind is not just the brain (mental states are
    not just brain states)

21
More Mind-Body Problem
  • The Knowledge Argument, Reversed Spectrum, etc.
  • Can machines think? The Turing Test and Searles
    Chinese Room
  • Are meanings in the head? Hilary Putnam and the
    Twin Earth problem

22
The Problem of Universals
  • Statements of the form x is P can be true or
    false.
  • Intuitively, what makes them true or false is an
    objects having a property
  • Intuitively, when objects are similar it is
    because they share properties
  • But are there properties and, if so, what are
    they? And how can they be shared?

23
All standard solutions are unintuitive!
  • Nominalism makes it difficult to account for the
    fact that some ways of grouping are correct while
    others incorrect.
  • Conceptualism begs the question What is it in
    the object that corresponds to my idea and what
    is that correspondance? What makes my idea of red
    the same as your idea?
  • Realism posits crazy, immaterial objects

24
Reference
  • Platos question how can I think the thing that
    is not?
  • Fictional entities What makes it true that
    Pegasus is a flying horse--and not a unicorn or
    magic mushroom? What makes it true that Pegasus
    doesnt exist?
  • Again, construing Pegasus, et. al. as ideas
    doesnt help so we seem stuck with the existence
    of crazy, non-existant objects.
  • Russells theory of descriptions the
    Russell-Strawson debate.

25
Logical Positivism
  • Metaphilosophical issues Humes Fork and the
    rejection of metaphysics
  • Humes Fork and the Analytic/Synthetic
    distinction
  • Phenomenalism objects as permanent
    possibilities of sensation
  • Quines Two Dogmas of Empiricism

26
Identity
  • An equivalence relation
  • Reflexivity x x
  • Symmetry if x y then y x
  • Transitivity if x y and y z then x z
  • An indiscernibility relation if x y then they
    have all the same properties
  • Is the converse true also, i.e. if x and y have
    all the same properties does x y?

27
Identity Puzzles
  • Indiscernibility of Identicals and Freges puzzle
  • Identity of Indiscernibles, symmetrical worlds
    (Blacks Balls) and Eternal Return
  • Branching Cases the Ship of Theseus, etc.
  • Personal identity Lockes identity problem,
    survival, fission, etc.

28
And now for some solutions
  • none of which are conclusive!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com