Similarities and Differences in - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Similarities and Differences in

Description:

EC DG Joint Research Centre. Institute for Environment and Sustainability ... Dusseldorf. London. Aerosol optical depth at 555 nm in August 1997 measured from space ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: Fra5187
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Similarities and Differences in


1
TFIAM TFMM joint workshop on cost-effective
control of urban air pollution
Similarities and Differences in Particle
Characteristics across Europe Jean-Philippe
Putaud EC DG Joint Research Centre Institute
for Environment and Sustainability
2
from TNO FEL (NL), Robles-Gonzalez et al.,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 955-958, 2000.
Aerosol optical depth at 555 nm in August 1997
measured from space
3
http//air-climate.eionet.eu.int/databases/EuroAir
net/
4
(No Transcript)
5
Dockery et al., N. Engl. J. Med. 329, 1753 (1993)

6
City-specific estimates (95 CL) of relative risk
for mortality per 10 µg/m3 increase in PM10
levels.
Le Tertre et al., Risk Analysis, 25, 711-718, 2005
Relative Risk
May such differences be due to different PM
characteristics ?
7
  • In existing aerosol data bases
  • Very few datasets incl. more than just PM mass.
    e.g. EMEP
  • regard areas with high population density
  • Other short- or long-term datasets
  • cover various types of sites (from remote to
    kerbside)
  • cannot be easily reached by users
  • A European Aerosol phenomenology
  • Synthetising in a single document aerosol
    datasets from various sources including PM mass
    concentrations and particle size distributions or
    chemical compositions.

8
http//ccu.jrc.it/ downloaded 741 times
9
(No Transcript)
10
  • Synthesising physical and chemical aerosol
    characteristics which may be relevant to
  • Aerosols and Health
  • Are there differences in particle characteristics
    which may explain differences in health effects?
  • Aerosols and Climate
  • Particles (and ozone) are two radiative forcing
    agents
  • synergies and trade-offs between climate
    change mitigation and air pollution abatement
    policies
  • Aerosol Modelling
  • Models need testing and validation against
    fundamental data such as aerosol particle size
    distributions and chemical compositions.

E
11
34 sites
natural rural near-city urban
kerbside
12
  • PM mass concentration annual statistics

natural rural near-city
urban kerbside
13
PM2.5/PM10 ratios range from 0.57 to 0.85.
14
Median number size distribution in summer during
the morning, afternoon and night periods
15
lt


16
Any relationship between PM mass and particle
number concentrations ?
17
PM2.5 annual average chemical composition
natural rural near-city urban
kerbside
18
PMcoarse annual average chemical composition
natural rural near-city urban
kerbside
19
(No Transcript)
20
  • Some conclusions
  • At a given site PM10 and PM2.5 are well
    correlated
  • but PM2.5 / PM10 ranges from 0.55 to 0.85
  • NO useful correlation between PM mass and
    particle number concentrations
  • same PM2.5 ? particle number twice larger
  • same particle number ? PM2.5 three times larger
  • PM chemical composition quite similar across
    Europe
  • More differences between background and kerbside
    sites Secondary inorganics and POM vs. POM and
    dust (PM10)
  • POM and EC (PM2.5)

21
  • Some comments
  • Lots of relevant data sets are not included in
    this compilation
  • The lack of harmonisation in sampling and
    analytical techniques makes comparisons between
    sites difficult.

22
Perspective A European aerosol phenomenology
stage 2
  • Make use of the COST633 action structure to
  • more systematically compile the existing aerosol
    data
  • assess comparability of various analytical
    methods
  • Make the existing aerosol data available to a
    larger community through the WDCA

23
  • Among 18 2 parties
  • 1. metadata have been provided by
  • GR, SI, AT, FI, ES, PT and HU (7) comprehensive
  • UK, DE, CZ, IT, FR and IS (5) partial
    information
  • 2. data have been reported by
  • AU, HU, GR, UK, DK, ES, FI, NL, NO, SI, and JRC
    (91)

24
Final statements
  • Avoid wasting money for decreasing PM mass
    without effects on health impact
  • Integrated assessment exercises are generally
    limited by data availability
  • A consistent (temporal and spatial) monitoring
    effort is needed
  • There is already a huge amount of data available
    across Europe but a lack of reporting to
    accessible data banks
  • Attempts (COST Action 633 TFMM PM assessment
    report) going on

THANKS !
25
Supplementary material
26
Transboundary Particulate Matter in Europe
Status Report 2005
27
Variations in PM10 and PM10 components
(µg/m³) over 20 years at IT04 (Ispra)
28
(No Transcript)
29
natural and rural background
kerbside
near-city and urban background
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com