ICTSD-UNCTAD Regional Dialogue on IPR, Innovation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

ICTSD-UNCTAD Regional Dialogue on IPR, Innovation

Description:

University of Cape Town. 021-650-2425/083-784-3648. Rosemary.Wolson_at_UCT-Innovation.co.za ... 30 June 2004, Cape Town, South Africa. Promoting Excellence with Equity ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: rosemarya
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ICTSD-UNCTAD Regional Dialogue on IPR, Innovation


1
IP Tools, Innovation Commercialisation of IP
  • Options to assist developing countries in
    positioning themselves to reap the benefits of a
    stronger IP regime, with special reference to the
    role of IP management in research organisations
  • Rosemary Wolson
  • Intellectual Property Manager UCT Innovation
  • University of Cape Town
  • 021-650-2425/083-784-3648
  • Rosemary.Wolson_at_UCT-Innovation.co.za

2
Context
  • TRIPS here to stay
  • Reduced flexibility in implementing IPRs
  • Need to acquire, absorb diffuse technology
  • IPRs as enabler or obstacle?
  • Role of research organisations in promoting
    development
  • Especially indigenous innovation
  • Situated within broader policy framework
  • Tailored to needs environment
  • Not proposing a solution
  • But a step towards one?

3
University Knowledge Technology Transfer
Basic applied research
Know-how IP
Knowledge technology transfer
Revenue
Commercial- isation economic benefit
Publication academic benefit
To community social benefit
4
Institutional Technology Transfer
  • Relationship between academic/public sector
    research private sector
  • TTO as facilitator
  • Research contracts (incl collaboration
    agreements)
  • Publication
  • Freedom-to-operate
  • IP
  • Licensing
  • Policy/regulatory affairs
  • Research innovation value chain

5
Research Innovation Value Chain
Research
Invention disclosure
Intellectual Property
Licencing
Spin-out company
6
US Bayh-Dole Act (1980)
  • To remedy situation in which federal govt owned
    IP arising from federally-funded research, but
    failed to exploit it
  • Recipients of federal grants given right to own
    IP, in exchange for undertaking to exploit it
  • Report
  • Seek patent protection
  • Take active steps to commercialise
  • Share income with inventors
  • Use balance for research or educational purposes

7
Bayh-Dole Licence Conditions
  • Exclusive or non-exclusive
  • US govt entitled to non-exclusive, worldwide,
    royalty-free licence
  • March-in rights of US govt
  • If in the public interest
  • Manufacture substantially in US
  • Preference to small business

8
Benefits of Bayh-Dole
  • New products on the market
  • Job creation
  • New businesses established
  • Typically close to licensing university
  • Tax revenue
  • Regional economic development
  • Or would these benefits have been generated
    notwithstanding?

9
Other Experiences
  • Similar TTO model adopted
  • But usually without Bayh-Dole-type legislation
  • Very mixed data on ROI
  • Substantial investment needed
  • Time lag to realise returns 10 years
  • Lack of skilled staff
  • Patent marketing costs
  • US average around 3 of research budget
  • UK average closer to 1 of research budget
  • Europe even lower?

10
Options for Developing Country Institutions
  • Bearing in mind severe pressure on resources
  • Distinguish appropriate roles
  • Pre-licensing TTO
  • Licensing TTO
  • Broad definition of TTO
  • Minimal functions eg reduce risks
  • Active facilitation of collaboration
  • Regulatory affairs compliance
  • Licensing
  • Tailor according to needs

11
Options for Licensing Practices (I)
  • Strategic patenting
  • Licensing prefered over assignment
  • Non-exclusive v exclusive licensing
  • Exclusivity where licensee can practice
  • Appropriate fields of use, territories, duration
  • Minimum performance/diligence provisions
  • Open source as a model

12
Options for Licensing Practices (II)
  • Market segmentation
  • Incl differential pricing
  • Developing v developed country markets
  • Public v private sector
  • Requirement to deliver in developing countries
  • Compulsory sub-licensing incl know-how
  • Humanitarian use clauses
  • Preference for local firms
  • Donation of technologies unlikely to yield
    profits or serving public interest

13
Points to Consider
  • Not an exhaustive list
  • A licence a contract subject to negotiation
  • Influenced by parties respective bargaining
    power
  • How to ensure that technology is made easily
    accessible to those who can benefit from it
  • Must be determined case-by-case - on the whole

14
Supportive Policies (I)
  • Motivation for govt intervention
  • Main benefits captured outside institution in
    broader economy
  • Bayh-Dole?
  • UK Lambert Report
  • SA low proportion of unencumbered research

15
Supportive Policies (II)
  • Training capacity-building
  • Learning by doing, context-specific
  • Funding for patent filing, prosecution
    marketing
  • Centralised TTO
  • National or regional
  • Limitations
  • Potential benefits

16
Complementary Policies
  • Rooted in a well-functioning national system of
    innovation
  • Co-ordination of efforts of different government
    depts, agencies stakeholders
  • Avoid duplication
  • Avoid conflicts
  • Seek synergies

17
RD Support
  • Increased public spending on RD
  • Incentives for promoting private RD investment
  • Tax relief
  • Matched funding
  • PPPs
  • Environment conducive to attracting
  • FDI
  • Tech transfer (international)
  • Meaningful research collaboration
  • Support for local firms and research institutions
    to exploit their IP

18
IP-Related Mechanismsto Explore
  • Taking advantage of TRIPS flexibilities where
    available
  • Must be appropriate to national context
  • Sui generis rights for protection exploitation
    of IKS
  • Utility models/petty patents
  • Geographical indications
  • ABS for protection of biodiversity
  • Competition law

19
Bilateral
  • Balancing undertakings for stronger IP protection
    with measures to ensure that users of system can
    ultimately benefit
  • Medium- to long-term objective
  • Capacity-building
  • Tech transfer (including know-how)
  • Provision of research infrastructure
  • Genuine collaborations

20
Multilateral
  • Alignment of countries with similar interests to
    lobby
  • Co-ordinating role of multilateral institutions
  • Clearing-house facilities
  • Administration of multilateral funds
  • Facilitation of tech transfer of technologies of
    particular public interest
  • Multilateral agreement on access to basic science
    and technology?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com