Models of Injury Current Research Injured people experience - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Models of Injury Current Research Injured people experience

Description:

Models of Injury Current Research Injured people experience more tension, anger, depression, confusion, anxiety, fatigue, & self esteem than non-injured Profile of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: lhupEduyi5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Models of Injury Current Research Injured people experience


1
Models of Injury
2
Current Research
  • Injured people experience more tension, anger,
    depression, confusion, anxiety, fatigue, self
    esteem than non-injured
  • Profile of Mood States (POMS) as the instrument
  • Not developed for injured people only

3
Pxs with Current Research
  • Frequency of testing a px
  • Group similarities/differences
  • Time of 1st data collection

4
Predictive Model
  • Williams Andersen 1998
  • Believe they are able to predict injury using
    psychological variables such as cognitive
    thinking, physiological variables, behavioral,
    intrapersonal, social, and stress hx.
  • Most important is

5
Stress and Injury Model
History of Stressors
Personality
Coping Resources
Stress Response Cognitive
Physiological/ Appraisals Attentional
Changes
Potentially stressful situation
Injury
Interventions
6
  • Individuals who are able to manage stressful
    situations or interpret certain environment
    stimuli as being non-stressful may avoid exercise
    related injury.

7
Conceptual Basis of Grief
  • Studies asso with bereavement, job loss, marital
    separation, loss of a pet, loss of a limb
  • Definition an intense emotional suffering set
    off by a loss.
  • Significance of the loss is determined by
    individuals value system
  • active process that changes over time

8
Concepts of Grief cont
  • Most research focuses on the stages
  • b/t 3-6 stages depending on the researcher
  • Each person grieves in their own manner
  • Not at the same pace

9
Denial as coping strategy
  • Shock, numb, disbelief
  • Normally 1st
  • This cannot be happening to me
  • This stage depends on how well the patient is
    prepared for outcome

10
When denial no longer works Anger
  • Fear, rage, envy, resentment, hostility,
    aggression
  • Friends loved ones common targets
  • Why me? Why not someone else?
  • Unpredictable mood swings
  • Maybe even self abuse

11
  • Length of denial anger stages vary from person
    to person
  • Problematic individuals may stay in these phases
    longer

12
Grief bargaining
  • Series of feelings related to the loss or
    separation
  • Dynamic state
  • Long for what they use to be
  • Live in the past, talk about memories

13
Grief cont
  • This phase is influenced by
  • Nature of loss
  • Social system of support
  • Personality
  • Coping behaviors
  • Intelligence
  • Social, cultural ethnic and religious backgrounds

14
  • Initial stage of recovery
  • Bargaining begins
  • Begins talking to a supreme being
  • Attempts to make a deal
  • Desperate effort final attempt
  • Once they realize there are no miracles coming
    then they enter the acceptance stage

15
Depression
  • This stage is present in some
  • A sense of great loss
  • Withdraw from activities social support
  • Verbalized helplessness
  • Lacks sense of purpose

16
Re-integration
  • Difficult to define
  • A return to normal

17
Grief Models versus Cognitive Appraisal Models
  • Cognitive models account for individual
    differences in response to injury
  • Emphasis is placed on cognition

18
Stress Based Cognitive Appraisal
  • Ones interpretation of an injury will determine
    the psychological response
  • Relationship has been developed b/t emotional
    response to injury and injury severity, duration
    of injury, injury history, social support for
    rehabilitation, physician rated current injury
    status, impairment of performance

19
Cognitive Appraisal Concepts
  • Trying to understand the process athletes may
    experience in response to injury
  • Deals with coping (persons ever changing efforts
    to manage circumstances varies person to person,
    situation to situation)
  • Primary Appraisal (assessment of what is at
    stake)
  • Secondary Appraisal (assessment of coping options)

20
  • Deal more with stress (relationship b/t person
    environment)
  • Deals with emotional response trying to
    determine why people may experience certain
    emotions

21
General Adaptation Syndrome (GAS)
  • Selye (1974) a reactive model to stress
  • When 1st exposed to a stressor, initial response
    is alarm

Then one of two things happens
  • Adaptation phase
  • Individual is able to handle the stressor
  • Individual becomes stronger

Resistance to other stressors is compromised. If
stressor continues, exhaustion may occur causing
one to give in to stressor
OR
Similar to Erikson we learn through resolving
developmental crises
22
  • Injury usually results in
  • Loss of fine or gross motor movement
  • Stress anxiety
  • Causes inability to obtain goals

23
  • See Integrated Model of Psychological responses
    to injury rehabilitation.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com