Presentation 3: Implementation of Fisheries Management: Requirements, Options and Obstacles PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 26
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Presentation 3: Implementation of Fisheries Management: Requirements, Options and Obstacles


1
Presentation 3 Implementation of Fisheries
Management Requirements, Options and Obstacles
  • Kevern Cochrane
  • Director Fisheries and Aquaculture Resources Use
    and Conservation Division

2
Structure of the Presentation
  • Introduction
  • What is fisheries management?
  • The elements of fisheries management in practice
  • Steps in the process
  • Management measures
  • Impacts of capacity and scales on management
  • Small and large scale fisheries and implications
    of the precautionary approach
  • Management at different spatial scales
  • Evaluating the effectiveness of management
  • Criteria for evaluating adequacy of management
  • Progress in fisheries management around the world
  • Indicators of progress in fisheries management
    around the world
  • Technical assistance

3
What is Fisheries Management
  • The integrated process of information gathering,
    analysis, planning, consultation, decision-
    making, allocation of resources and formulation
    and implementation, with enforcement as
    necessary, of regulations or rules which govern
    fisheries activities in order to ensure the
    continued productivity of the resources and the
    accomplishment of other fisheries objectives.
  • (FAO Guidelines on Fisheries Management, 1997)

4
The Elements of Fisheries Management
FAO Guidelines on EAF. 2003
5
The Primary Management Measures
6
The Impact of Capacity onManagement Ability
7
Scientific Advice and Input(Cochrane, Andrew and
Parma, 2010)
8
The Precautionary Approach and the Value of
Knowledge
9
Taking Scale into Account
10
Scaling-up from local to Stock and Ecosystem
(Fanning, Mahon and McConney. Coastal Management,
2009)
The Caribbean Large Marine Ecosystem includes 26
countries and 19 territories
11
Caribbean Spiny Lobster local or regional? (from
Cochrane and Chakalall, 2001)
12
Managing at Multiple Scales for Shared and
Straddling Stocks(Fanning et al. Coastal
Management, 2009)
13
Sustainability Criteria Lessons from the
Eco-labelling Guidelines
14
  • MINIMUM SUBSTANTIVE REQUIREMENTS AND CRITERIA FOR
    ECOLABELS
  • 26. The requirements and criteria are to be based
    on and interpreted in accordance with the current
    suite of agreed international instruments, in
    particular the 1982 UNCLOS, the 1995 UN Fish
    Stocks Agreement and the 1995 Code of Conduct for
    Responsible Fisheries, as well as related
    documentation including the 2001 Reykjavik
    Declaration on Responsible Fisheries in the
    Marine Ecosystem.
  • 27. Requirements are specified for three areas
    the management systems, the fishery and
    associated stock under consideration for which
    certification is being sought, and serious
    impacts of the fishery on the ecosystem.

15
Requirement 28. The fishery is conducted under a
management system ..
  • ...which is based upon good practice and meets
    the requirements and criteria described in
    Paragraph 29.
  • operates in compliance with the requirements of
    local, national and international law and
    regulations
  • 28.1 For the stock under consideration there
    are documented management approaches with a well
    based expectation that management will be
    successful taking into account uncertainty and
    imprecision.
  • 28.2 There are objectives, and as necessary,
    management measures to address pertinent aspects
    of the ecosystem effects of fishing as per
    paragraph 31.

16
Criteria for Management Systems(para 29)
  • The following criteria will apply to management
    systems for any fisheries, but it must be
    recognized that special consideration needs to be
    given to small-scale fisheries with respect to
    the availability of data and... that management
    systems can differ substantially for different
    types and scales of fisheries.
  • adequate data and/or information are collected,
    maintained and assessed
  • the best scientific evidence available is taken
    into account as well as consideration of relevant
    (and validated) traditional fisher or community
    knowledge
  • Management targets are consistent with achieving
    maximum sustainable yield (MSY) (or a suitable
    proxy) on average, or a lesser fishing mortality
    if that is optimal
  • appropriate measures for conservation and
    sustainable use implemented
  • an effective legal and administrative framework
    and compliance is ensured
  • the precautionary approach is being implemented

17
Stocks under Considerationpara 30
  • The stock under consideration is not overfished
    if it is above the associated limit reference
    point (or its proxy).
  • If fishing mortality (or its proxy) is above the
    associated limit reference point for F, actions
    should be taken to decrease it below that limit.
  • The structure and composition of the stock which
    contribute to its resilience are taken into
    account (e.g. size composition, spatial
    distribution).
  • In the absence of specific information on the
    stock generic evidence based on similar stocks
    can be used for fisheries taking into account
    the impact on quality of information to risk to
    the stock

18
Ecosystem Considerations(para 31)
  • Non target catches, including discards, of stocks
    other than the stock under consideration are
    monitored and should not be threatened with
    serious risk of extinction
  • The role of the stock under consideration in
    the foodweb is considered
  • There is knowledge of the essential habitats for
    the stock under consideration impacts on
    essential habitats and on habitats that are
    highly vulnerable to damage by the fishery are
    minimized or mitigated the full spatial range of
    the relevant habitat should be considered,
  • In the absence of specific information on the
    ecosystem impacts of fishing, generic evidence
    based on similar fishery situations can be used,
    taking into account the impact on quality of
    information to risk to the stock

19
Addressing the Methodological Diversity
  • There are many ways in which state and trends in
    stocks may be evaluated, that fall short of the
    highly quantitative and data-demanding approaches
    Use of less elaborate methods ..should not
    preclude fisheries from possible certification
    for ecolabelling.NBmore precautionary
    approaches to managing such resources will be
    required There is a variety of management
    measures commonly used in small scale or low
    value fisheries that nonetheless can achieve
    quite adequate levels of protection for stocks in
    the face of uncertainty about the state of the
    resource. (para 32)

20
Indicators of Effectiveness Status of Marine
Fisheries Stocks
21
Indicators of Effectiveness Sunken Billions1
  • Economic losses in marine fisheries add up to
    US50 billion per year
  • Resulting from poor management, inefficiencies,
    and overfishing
  • Arises from too many vessels, increasingly
    powerful fishing technologies, and increasing
    pollution and habitat loss have depleted fish
    stocks worldwide
  • 1. http//siteresources.worldbank.org

22
Problems being experienced by countries in
achieving sustainability
  • Biological and ecological uncertainty
  • Conflict between short-term economic and social
    objectives and the longer-term sustainability
    objectives
  • Poorly or loosely defined management objectives
    reactive management
  • Institutional weaknesses
  • the absence, or weak or inappropriate systems, of
    user rights and
  • predominance of top-down and centralised
    management approaches
  • Weak and frequently inadequate capacity in
    fisheries administrations
  • Inadequate monitoring, control and surveillance
    systems (MCS) leading to high levels of IUU
    fishing
  • from Cochrane and Doulman (2005)

Cochrane Doulman 2005
23
Examples of Institutional needs and problems
identified in the BCLME countries (Cochrane et
al., 2009)
  • Need to improve stakeholder consultation and
    involvement
  • Issues related to access rights still affecting
    management in all three countries
  • No formal, active management plans in place in
    Angola and Namibia
  • Problems being experienced with data capture and
    storage in three countries
  • Problems in attracting and retaining research
    staff, particularly in Namibia and South Africa
  • Problems in effective monitoring, control and
    surveillance being experienced in three countries

24
FAO Assistance to Sustainable Management
  • The Fisheries and Aquaculture Department has a
    staff of 147 individuals (83 professional staff)
    with an annual budget of approximately US70
    million (in both cases combining Regular
    Programme and project resources)
  • Assistance in implementation of the Code of
    Conduct, encompassing EAF (and EAA), is primary
    goal of FAO
  • Bulk of our personnel and financial resources
    (regular programme and extra-budgetary) is
    directed to this end and active throughout world,
    focused on developing countries
  • Requests and needs for assistance far outweigh
    our ability to meet them, notwithstanding
    complimentary action from a wide range of other
    organizations and agencies.

25
Conclusions
  • All countries are struggling to meet their
    commitments and needs for achieving sustainable
    use of fishery resources.
  • Developing countries and small-scale fisheries in
    particular face many constraints and will
    frequently find it more challenging to
    demonstrate that they are achieving
    sustainability.
  • Widespread technical support from FAO and others
    is available but there are enormous challenges,
    including in developed countries.

26
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com