Title: A History of Eucharist Real Presence
1A History of EucharistReal Presence
- A transcendent reality, of someone or something
beyond the natural world, is not unique to
Christianity. - It is found in every religion both ancient and
modern though quality and intensity vary - A feeling of another presence that seems more
than natural - Localizable in space and time
- During certain times of the year
- During prayer
- Sacred places
- In particular objects
- All are sacraments in the broad sense
2A History of EucharistReal Presence
- Often sacred times, places, and objects become
permanent sacraments to those who believe - Primitive religions - the sky, the sun, the moon
are perennial symbols of the divine - They have no known beginnings
- Christianity - the cross, the Bible
- Others must be consecrated, made sacred.
- Through ceremony and ritual of initiation and
blessing, they are transformed into sacred
realities. - Monuments are dedicated, animals, altars,
vestments, ornaments, books, and beads.
3A History of Eucharist - Sacrifices
- Sacrifices ritually dramatize the meaning of
human life in relation to transcendent realities. - The sacrifice characterizes our dependence and
expresses that life is fragile and insecure and
contingent on forces beyond our control. - Sacrifices can sometimes be attempts
- to control the gods
- to influence the gods
- to maintain or restore a proper relationship
- to acknowledge the proper order
- to conform to the will of the gods
- They can be formalistic and mechanical or
- They can be entered into more deeply
- by those who seek sacred experience
4A History of Eucharist -Sacrifices
- Common sacrifices in ancient times were
- Gift offerings
- People acknowledged their dependence on
transcendent reality for the things they possess
and enjoy. - The offering was sacrificed completely by being
burned, buried or surrendered - It was performed either as an act of gratitude or
a gesture of prayer
5A History of Eucharist - Sacrifices
- Common sacrifices in ancient times were
- Shared offerings
- People acknowledge their need for union with a
transcendent reality in order to live or to live
rightly - It was a food offering
- It affirmed a communal bond between the god and
those sharing the meal - It could be to assimilate the symbolic qualities
of the food eaten. - By eating animals that symbolized courage,
wisdom, swiftness or strength you could take on
their attributes
6A History of Eucharist -Sacrifices
- Common sacrifices in ancient times were
- Sin offerings
- People acknowledge their past disregard of the
transcendent reality and their disobedience of
the transcendent order - The sacrifice was offered for deliberate
disobedience or inadvertent transgression of the
moral law - Sometimes sin or guilt of the participants was
symbolically transferred to an animal whose
ritual death represented the destruction of their
sins and guilt - It could be looked on as paying a debt or
soothing the anger of a god or as a desire to
live rightly in the future
7A History of Eucharist- Sacrifices
- All three types of sacrifice were practiced in
ancient Israel - The Mosaic law commanded farmers to sacrifice the
first part of each years crops as a gift to God
in gratitude for the harvest and for the land (Dt
26) - For shared offerings the Israelites were
instructed to burn the fat and vital organs of
animal sacrifices before the rest was eaten (Lv
3) - When offering sacrifice for the forgiveness of
sins the priest was to transfer the peoples
guilt to the animal by laying his hands on it
before it was killed. On the Day of Atonement
each year Israelites were to offer a sacrifice
which would remit the guilt for their
transgressions of the law. (Lv 3, 16) - The covenant between Yahweh and his people is
represented in the Jewish scriptures as being
solemnized by burnt offering and blood. (Ex 24)
8A History of Eucharist - Meals
- Ritual meals in the ancient world were connected
with food which had been sacrificed or - consecrated in some other way
- As a sacramental event the sacred meal engaged
the whole person - It affected all the senses
- It involved memory and imagination
- Internal sensations of hunger and satisfaction
- Social interaction among the participants
- The function of the meal
- was to affirm and intensify a bond of unity among
the participants, those who were not present, - and the god who created them
9A History of Eucharist -Meals
- Passover - The passing over of Yahweh, who slew
the first born of the Egyptians. And, the
crossing over of the Hebrews from slavery to
freedom through the Red Sea. - Yahweh ordered the Hebrews to sacrifice a lamb,
to sprinkle its blood on their door-posts to
protect them against death, to eat their last
meal in Egypt with unleavened bread because they
would not have time to see the dough rise (Ex 12) - The meal was commemorated each spring
- It began with a prayer of thanksgiving
- The sharing of bitter relish which symbolized
Hebrew slavery - The reading of the story of the first Passover
- Roasted lamb was eaten with wine and unleavened
bread - Further prayers of blessing and thanks were
offered - The meal ended with a psalm of praise and a final
thanksgiving over the last unconsumed cup of wine
10A History of Eucharist -Meals
- The Passover supper was a sacramental
- A reenactment of a sacred event in which those
events became real and present to the people who
shared it - It enabled the Hebrews to reenter past events and
to experience vividly the meaning of their
salvation - It made the God of Israel present to them and
they to him in a fuller and richer way than in
the ordinary sense - The meal was a complex symbol into which Jews
could enter and encounter the God of their
fathers - It was a door to the sacred
- through which they could pass
- into the sacred space and time of exodus.
11A History of Eucharist -Meals
- Religious groups within Judaism were accustomed
to sharing meals of fellowship on the vigils of
religious feasts - There was a ritual washing of hands
- A formal blessing in which the leader offered
thanks to God - A breaking and distribution of bread
- The meal was served
- After supper there was another washing
- The leader again offered a prayer of Thanksgiving
over a cup of wine which was then passed around
to all those present - Before returning home the group sang a psalm
together - These groups would meet together regularly for
religious devotion or works of charity in
addition to the regular synagogue services - Jesus and his disciples
- formed one of many such groups in ancient
Palestine
12A History of EucharistFrom the Last Supper to
the Liturgy
- The evening before he died
- The day before the feast of Passover
- Jesus shared his last fellowship meal with his
disciples - Jesus departs from the usual ritual
- He takes the basin intended for hand washing and
washes the feet of the disciples as a sign that
they should serve one another - He breaks the bread indicating that it is his
body - When he says the blessing over the cup he says it
is the new covenant of his blood - They forever remember the changes
13A History of EucharistFrom the Last Supper to
the Liturgy
- Jesus continued to appear to his disciples after
death but even after he was gone they continued
to sense his presence in their weekly fellowship
meal - They continued the meal in memory of Him
- More than a simple memorial it becomes a
sacramental meal which brings into real presence
the risen messiah - As the breach between follower of Jesus and
Orthodox Jew becomes wider this meal becomes the
center of their religious life - Pauls letter to the Corinthians is the earliest
record of the Last Supper 57CE - Gentiles lacking Jewish upbringing begin taking
liberties with the supper getting drunk with the
wine and not sharing food - Paul moves quickly to correct the situation
14A History of EucharistFrom the Last Supper to
the Liturgy
- I Corinthians 10-11
- The cup they shared was a communion with the
blood of Christ and the bread that they broke was
a communion with the body of Christ - At their meal they were to be united in a single
body, not divided into selfish little groups - When they ate and drank together they were
supposed to do it for the glory of God, so if
they were doing it just to have a good time it
was no longer the Lords supper - The Lords supper was a memorial of the last
supper and so it was not only a celebration of
his resurrection but a commemoration of his death
as well - Those who came to the meal should reflect on what
they were doing so that in their sharing of the
bread and cup they could recognize the body into
which they were united
15A History of EucharistFrom the Last Supper to
the Liturgy
- The Debates of the Present Are Born in the Past
- In Pauls Use of the Word Body
- Sometimes he refers to the Bread
- Other times he refers to the community
- This ambiguity led to disagreement among scholars
as to whether Paul believed in Christs presence
in the bread in the same way he saw his presence
in the community - The meal, the bread, the cup were undoubtedly
sacramental in that through sharing them a
presence of the risen Christ was felt - But some argued that his presence may not have
been seen as in the food itself.
16A History of EucharistFrom the Last Supper to
the Liturgy
- The Synoptic Gospels
- Luke like Paul relates Jesus words over the wine
as This cup is the new covenant in my blood and
does not definitively relate the wine to his own
blood - Matthew and Mark definitively make the connection
for both the bread and wine This is my body,
This is my blood - Protestants argue
- That in Jesus language, Aramaic there is no
equivalent of the verb is - Greek-speaking Christians may have related the
blood to the wine but for Jews this would have
been repulsive and forbidden by Mosaic law - Jews were already familiar with the practice of
eating symbolic foods it is more likely Jesus was
just giving the bread and wine a new symbolic
meaning
17A History of EucharistFrom the Last Supper to
the Liturgy
- John 6 - By 90CE Christians definitively
identified the bread and wine with the body and
blood of Christ. - Johns Gospel was written to refute the Gnostic
philosophy that matter was evil and God would
never contaminate himself with human flesh or
created matter. - Jesus was really God just appearing to be human.
- The Eucharist was not a sharing in Christs body
and blood - John places emphasis on the literal humanity and
divinity of Jesus - My flesh is real food and my blood is real
drink. He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood
lives in me and I in him (655-56). - Interesting enough protestants prefer to take
these Gospel passages figuratively rather than
literally
18A History of EucharistFrom the Last Supper to
the Liturgy
- His crucifixion was understood as a sacrificial
death, - an offering of himself to God,
- as a commemoration of his death and triumph over
death - the Lords supper is seen as a sacrificial meal.
- Three Gospel accounts refer to the blood of
Christ being poured out for others - Matthew speaks of Christs blood be shed for the
forgiveness of sins - Paul refers to a new covenant sealed in blood,
a covenant sacrifice - The sharing of food connected the supper to the
Jewish shared offering - The proximity to the Passover suggested the
similarities between Jesus and the paschal lamb - Hebrews 412-1018 Christ is both everlasting
Priest and victim - The view of the Lords supper as sacrifice is
uncontested
19A History of EucharistFrom the Last Supper to
the Liturgy
- Early Developments
- Because of abuses and the size of the assembly
the sharing of a fellowship meal gradually
disappeared from Christian communal worship
(Rarely mentioned after 200CE) - By 100CE the symbolic meal that remained was
referred to regularly as Eucharist (prayer of
praise and thanks) - Around 112 Pliny the Younger, Roman proconsul of
Bythinia in Asia Minor sent a letter to emperor
Trajan concerning some people accused of being
Christian - They met before dawn on a fixed day each week
- Sang a hymn to Christ their God
- Bound themselves by an oath to do no wrong
- Then met later in the day for a religious meal
20A History of EucharistFrom the Last Supper to
the Liturgy
- Its format resembled the Jewish communitys
Sabbath morning prayer service - The Lord be with you,..And with your spirit are
Hebrew forms of address and were used as the
opening greeting - The congregation brought forward offerings of
bread and wine - Prayers of praise and thanks to God were said
over the gifts. Usually these prayers included
reference to Christs words at the last supper - The leader broke the bread and shared it and the
wine - A dismissal prayer was said
- Since the entire action was done in memory of him
some early forms of worship did not include what
came to be known as the words of institution. - The Teaching of the Twelve Apostles (Didache 150
Syria)
21A History of EucharistFrom the Last Supper to
the Liturgy
- Ignatius, Second Bishop of Antioch around 113
wrote letters to other churches in which he
mentioned - Sunday had been chosen to take the place of the
Sabbath - Only the bishop should preside over the
eucharistic worship - Justin, Palestinian philosopher and convert wrote
around 150 a defense of Christian practices. - He describes two kinds of eucharistic services in
Rome - The yearly initiation included an offering of
bread and a cup of wine with water, prayers of
praise and thanksgiving to which the people
responded Amen and a sharing of the bread and
wine - The weekly gathering on the day of the Sun
included the same but also readings of the
prophets and apostles along with an explanation
and exhortation by the leader
22A History of EucharistFrom the Last Supper to
the Liturgy
- Hippolytus of Rome around the year 215 wrote a
liturgical book, The Apostolic Tradition. - He outlines the order of service for the
consecration of a bishop and for initiation of
catechumens - Each of these is followed by a eucharistic
service whose pattern is basically the same as
Justins - Hippolytus include prayers that could be said but
emphasized the bishop should pray according to
their own ability - In the third part of his book is a format for a
fellowship meal not considered to be a form of
eucharistic worship - Tertullian, a north African
- staying in Rome around this time,
- Mentions in his writings that those who wished
could take the eucharist home to be eaten before
their own meals
23A History of EucharistFrom the Last Supper to
the Liturgy
- Ignatius - The eucharist is the flesh and blood
of our savior, the flesh which suffered for our
sins and which the Father raised from the dead. - Justin - The food which has been made eucharist
through the prayer formed out of the words of
Christ and which nourishes and becomes our flesh
and blood, is the flesh and blood of the same
Jesus who was made incarnate. - Irenaeus - When the bread from the earth
receives the invocation of God it is no longer
common bread but eucharist, having both an
earthly and a heavenly reality.
24A History of EucharistFrom the Last Supper to
the Liturgy
- 313 Constantine lifts the ban on Christian
worship - Eucharistic worship evolved from a comparatively
brief and simple ritual meal into a richly
elaborate ceremonial ritual - Christianity was seen as a means of religiously
unifying and increasingly disunited empire - 380 Theodocius proclaims Christianity the
official religion of the Roman state - Eucharistic worship became a state function as
well as a religious ritual - Liturgy was performed in the common language of
the people the most common of which was Greek. - Knowledge of Greek declined after the fourth
century when the liturgy was translated into
several other languages including Latin in the
west
25A History of EucharistFrom the Last Supper to
the Liturgy
- Arianism
- Arius teaches that Jesus is not really God but a
superior being, the incarnation of Gods Word. He
was more than an ordinary man but not equal to
God. - Constantine called the council at Nicaea in 325
because the theological debate was splitting the
empire - Jesus was declared one in being with the Father
- A later council declared the same of the Holy
Spirit - To counteract Arianisms continuing spread the
church fathers stressed the divinity of Christ in
their sermons and theological writings - Eucharistic worship began to reflect this change.
Instead of sharing in Christs prayer of
thanksgiving to the Father, Christians began
praying directly to Christ Himself as a member of
the divine Trinity.
26A History of EucharistFrom the Last Supper to
the Liturgy
- A change in vocabulary
- Eucharist came to refer specifically to the
sacred elements of bread and wine which were
offered to God - Liturgy (a work done for the good of the people)
came to refer to the religious service that
surrounded the Eucharistic celebration presided
over by the Bishop. - Bishops still determined there own style of
service but the population centers of the empire
gradually began to set the predominant style of
worship for their region - In the east Jerusalem, Constantinople, Antioch
- In the west Roman and Gallic
- Still the basic format sketched by Justin
remained the same. - Adult catechumens began to be dismissed after the
readings
27A History of EucharistFrom the Last Supper to
the Liturgy
- Constantine set a precedent by financing a large
meeting hall for the faithful in Rome - Built in the style of a basilica, a rectangular
building with a raised floor on one end used for
ceremonies of state. - Increasing wealth led to ornate wall decorations
to accommodate the new official public ritual - In 321 Constantine set Sunday aside as a day of
rest - New festival days were added to the calendar and
celebrated with liturgies - West- Christmas replaced the birthday of the sun
December 25th - East- Christs appearance on earth replace the
Egyptian epiphany of the sun god Osiris on
January 6th
28A History of EucharistFrom the Last Supper to
the Liturgy
- Because Bishops were usually educated men
Constantine gave them authority as judges. - They were given special signs of their rank a
cape, headgear, footwear and a ring. - Judges were allowed to sit on a throne
- They were regularly accompanied by incense, torch
bearers in procession. - Judges were also greeted with a genuflection as a
sign of subordination and respect. - Liturgy as official public worship gradually
incorporated these elements.
29A History of EucharistFrom the Last Supper to
the Liturgy
- By the end of the fourth century many basilicas
offered liturgies on almost every day of the
week. - In most cases additions and changes of prayers to
the liturgy simply extended older practices (387) - Prayers of petition for Gods blessing and
protection covered the emperor, government, the
local congregation and the universal church - The bringing of bread and wine became a
procession in which people brought food,
clothing, wax for liturgical candles etc. - By the end of the fourth century recitation of
the Lords prayer prior to communion became
customary
30A History of EucharistFrom the Last Supper to
the Liturgy
- Others were Theological additions
- Especially due to Arianism
- Prayers once addressed to God the Father began
being addressed directly Jesus or to the Trinity - In doxologies Father, Son and Holy Sprit all were
put on the same level - Lord have mercy, Christ have mercy was added to
penitential rite - The bread and wine began being identified as
Christ
31A History of EucharistFrom the Last Supper to
the Liturgy
- In the western church a popular designation for
the liturgy was missarum solemnia. - The ceremony of dismissal due to the
catechumens being dismissed after the readings
and the entire congregation being dismissed after
communion. - This was later shortened to missa.
- This became the most commonly used name in the
west by the fifth century even though the
catechumenate all but disappeared due to infant
Baptism - By the fifth century prayers and directions for
performing the missa were written down - Spontaneity all but disappeared
- Gregorian Sacramentary (600)
32A History of EucharistFrom the Last Supper to
the Liturgy
- Theodore of Mopsuestia first began explanation of
the liturgy allegorically - the bringing out of the bread and wine
represented Christ being led to his passion - the gifts being offered to God symbolized Christ
being offered on the cross to his Father - The gifts resting on the altar was like Christs
body resting in the tomb - The invoking of the Holy Spirit corresponded to
the transformation of his body into its
incorruptible glorious form - His being given in communion paralleled his
coming to the disciples after resurrection - He saw the liturgy as a sacramental
representation of Christs passion and
resurrection
33A History of EucharistFrom the Last Supper to
the Liturgy
- By the fifth century the pressing question was
when exactly in the liturgy Christ became
present? - The early Fathers were unspecific saying Christ
was felt during the entire celebration - In the west emphasis was placed on the words of
consecration - Ambrose of Milan - This bread was in fact bread
before the sacramental words were spoken but at
the moment of consecration it becomes the flesh
of Christ - Augustine of Hippo - Once the bread you see on
the altar is sanctified by the word of God, it is
the body of Christ. And once the chalice is
sanctified by the word of God, what the chalice
contains is the blood of Christ.
34A History of EucharistFrom the Last Supper to
the Liturgy
- By the fifth century the pressing question was
when exactly in the liturgy Christ became
present? - In the east emphasis was placed on the invoking
of the Holy Spirit as the point which made Jesus
words effective - Cyril of Jerusalem - We pray that God in his
mercy will send his Holy Spirit down upon the
gifts lying before him so that the Spirit might
make the bread the body of Christ and the wine
the blood of Christ, because if the Holy Spirit
touches anything it is certainly sanctified and
changed - John of Damascene - After an extensive study of
the liturgical texts concluded that The words of
Jesus become effective only when the Holy Spirit
is called down upon the bread and wine.
35A History of EucharistFrom the Last Supper to
the Liturgy
- The liturgy gradually lost its concept of a
shared offering and became an offering of
atonement for sin - Many people because of the mass conversions and
lack of education attended the liturgy out of
custom rather than conviction - Though responses were still called for the
liturgy became something to be observed rather
than participated in. - For the fathers the liturgy was an internal
experience but for the people it was an external
experience, a public religious function
36A History of EucharistFrom the Last Supper to
the Liturgy
- Reception of Eucharist began to decline
- People felt unworthy to receive
- Or unwilling to risk direct contact with the
creator and judge of the universe. - This became a major concern
- John Chrysostom - We stand before the altar in
vain no one comes to partake. - Augustine - If you are the body of Christ and
his members , it is your mystery which has been
placed on the altar of the lord you receiive
your own mystery. - Cyril of Alexandria - Let us share in the body
and blood of Christ so that by sharing in the
body and blood of Christ you may become one body
and blood with Christ.
37A History of EucharistThe Middle Ages
- The eastern church
- The culture of the Byzantine Roman empire
remained more or less stable through the ninth
century. - The liturgies of the great fathers continued to
be used and in fact are still in use today - The western church
- Liturgy continued to evolve through the sixth
century - Rome imposed liturgical uniformity on the
Catholic church - Reformers developed non-traditional forms of
worship within Protestant churches
38A History of EucharistThe Middle Ages
- Monasteries and mission territories
- Bishops could not keep up with the number of
masses required or the mission territories - Bishops ordained monks as missionaries and
extended the power of consecration - Monasteries filled with monks could not have them
all stand around a single altar to exercise this
new privilege - Single priests with no congregation began saying
private masses referred to as low-mass - Low mass became the norm for Europe.
- Only on Sundays was mass celebrated communally
39A History of EucharistThe Middle Ages
- Private masses eliminated the need for
translation of the mass into the common language - Wherever the missionaries or monks celebrated
mass it was done in Latin - Only the clergy new latin so the mass became
something to be watched and listened to not
something participated in. It became a religious
performance. - As the Germanic invasions effected even the
vernacular Italian the liturgy frozen in the
written word did not change - Priests instead of leading the mass said it for
the people - People only new about the mass what they were
told - It was a sacrifice in which the flesh and blood
of Gods Son became present on the altar, was
offered for their sins, and was eaten and drunk.
40A History of EucharistThe Middle Ages
- Charlemagne - Uniformity of liturgy (784)
- Alcuin of York monk and chief scholar of his
court translates Gregorys sacramentary with a
few subtle changes - Roman style mass becomes the obligatory form in
the Frankish empire and supplants the Celtic
style in England - Eventually this new liturgy made its way back to
Rome
41A History of EucharistThe Middle Ages
- By the thirteenth century what was once a
communal prayer was now a clerical ritual
separated by language and architecture - A ritual confession of sins was added to the
introductory rite - A recitation of the creed of Nicaea was added
after the Gospel to affirm the divinity of Christ
and his unity with the Father - Prayers formerly shared by all were now said
solely by the priest with hands folded rather
than outstretched - Parts of the liturgy formerly done by other
ministers were taken on by the priest since he
was most often alone - Altars with reliquaries forced the priests back
to the people - The sermon was seen as superfluous and even when
used they did not coincide with the readings - The readings were done in latin so that few
understood. Rather than processing the book the
priest simply moved the book from the epistle to
the gospel side
42A History of EucharistThe Middle Ages
- The role of the laity changed from active
participation to passive inspiration and
adoration - Because it was a private mass there was no
procession of gifts - The priest now made numerous signs of the cross
over the bread and wine and genuflected before
them in adoration - Prayers of the eucharistic rite were regulated
and canonized - Lay people were discouraged from taking communion
lest it bring damnation rather than salvation
upon their sinful souls - Those who dared to receive could not touch the
sacred species with their hands rather they were
communicated to by a priest while kneeling which
propagated communion rails - Since few shared in the eucharist, a small
unleavened wafer took the place of the loaf of
bread. This followed the belief that Christs
meal was a Passover meal. The wafer became
referred to as host which is the latin word for
sacrificial victim
43A History of EucharistThe Middle Ages -
Physicalism
- Amalar of Metz, proposed the meaning of the mass
was the life of Christ. He took every minute
detail of the mass and attempted to relate it to
a particular instance in Christs life. This
theory was rejected. - Paschase Radbert, abbot of the monastery of
Corbie 831 concluded that the real flesh and
blood of Christ must be physically present on the
altar during the mass. - Berengar of Tours 200 years later concluded that
if the eucharistic bread and wine were a
sacrament they had to be a sign of Christs body
and blood not identical with it. Christ then did
not have to be physically present in the
eucharist - A local council of bishops in 1059 cited Berengar
for heresy to them a reality was one thing, a
symbol was another, and so to call the eucharist
or the mass symbolic was to deny their reality.
44A History of EucharistThe Middle Ages
- This 200 year long debate
- resulted in two key teachings of the Church
- The concept of sacramentum et res, the
sacramental reality, which allowed the
eucharistic bread and wine to be referred to as
both a sign (sacred symbol) and a reality. - The churches doctrine that when the host is
broken Christ is not divided but the whole Christ
is present in every piece of bread and in every
drop of wine.
45A History of EucharistThe Middle Ages
- Practically it led to a sense of realism about
the eucharistic elements - Consecrated bread had usually been kept in a
cupboard near the altar as viaticum - (food for the journey to the next world)
- It was customary for bishops to bow toward this
cupboard the this tradition gave way to a more
reverent genuflection - To give it more prominence the sacrament was now
placed in a tabernacle on the altar, a lamp was
lit to remind visitors that Christ was present - Priests were required to genuflect each time they
touched the host and to keep their fingers joined
lest a crumb drop - Priests stopped passing the chalice in fear of a
spill - During the elevation a bell was wrung to allow
adoration by those who were privately praying
46A History of EucharistThe Middle Ages
- Scholastic theologians came to regard the
extremely physical view as unnecessary and
regained the metaphysical concept of reality - The focus of scholastics was the sacrament of
eucharist not the liturgy of the mass - They wanted to know exactly when and how the
bread and wine were changed - They never came to any concise agreement on the
when - But for the how they developed the necessary
vocabulary to come to agreement
47A History of EucharistThe Middle Ages
- Transubstantiation
- A change in substance or reality
- Hildebert of Tours - first used the term in the
early 13th century at the University of Paris - The reality or substance of the elements changed
while their appearances remained those of bread
and wine. - A substance was anything that could exist on its
own it was a reality in and of itself - Properties of a substance (color, shape, size,
etc.) were considered accidents - Fourth Lateran Council used the same terminology
48A History of EucharistThe Middle Ages
- Aquinas developed it into a work of art
- He placed the Eucharist at the center of his
sacramental system - He saw the Eucharist as sacred object rather than
sacred action - The mass was a sacred action during which this
sacred object was produced for the spiritual
benefit of the Church - The matter was the bread and wine. The form was
Christs words of consecration. - The physical appearance of the bread and wine was
only a sacrament, a sacred sign of a spiritual
reality
49A History of EucharistThe Middle Ages
- And set the focus on reception of the sacrament
- Eucahrist was only a reality in the consumation
- Gods purpose in giving the eucharist was not to
make bread and wine an object of worship but to
give Christians a means of spiritual nourishment. - The reality of the sacrament was a grace that
could only be experienced in the reception of
communion - The experience depended on the inner disposition
and openness to Gods grace of the individual
recipient - The only thing automatic in the eucharist was the
effect of the act of consecration on the elements
50A History of EucharistThe Middle Ages
- Consubstantiation became the debate (14th
century) - The substance of the bread and wine exists after
the consecration side by side with the substance
of Christs body and blood but is not changed
into it - William of Ockham, father of legalism and
nominalism, agreed but felt the Fourth Lateran
Council had already made transubstantiation a
dogma by ecclesiastically endorsing the
philosophical view - The Council of Constance in 1415 declared John
Wycliffe a heretic for teaching that the bread
and wine remained in the sacrament of the altar - Popular piety turned completely to adoration of
the host
51A History of EucharistThe Middle Ages
- The mass was transformed from an act of public
worship to a form of clerical prayer - It was offered many times a day in private
- It was no longer concelebrated by a bishop but
said simultaneously by many priests - It no longer contained scriptural readings or a
communion service. It was a symbolic sacrifice. - Sunday masses were still said but were paid for
through mandatory stipends by the people - The mass had become a good work performed by the
priest for the spiritual benefit of the church - This is the mass the reformers rejected
52A History of EucharistThe Lords Supper and the
Modern Mass
- The Protestant Dilemma
- The private low mass was obviously nothing like
the Last Supper but nothing was known about
eucharistic worship in the first few centuries - Luther left the mass the same other than
translating the Latin into German and offering
communion to the laity - Accepted the concept of consubstantiation
- Calvin and Zwingli split the mass into a liturgy
of the word and a liturgy of communion - Interpreted Christs words figuratively rather
than literally - Anglicans initially changed nothing.
- Other than the Pope they still considered
themselves catholic - Excommunication left them free to reform the mass
but no vision existed for how to reform it
53A History of EucharistThe Lords Supper and the
Modern Mass
- Protestants did not reject the eucharist.
- The laity were not used to frequent communion so
it was only offered anywhere from once a month to
once a year - The Sunday worship became a non-eucharistic
prayer service - They rejected what were seen as superstitious
beliefs and practices concerning the consecrated
host - They no longer reserved the sacrament in their
churches - They reinterpreted the words of institution
- Most rejected the Roman mass
- They brought back sermons
- Rejected the name mass and chose new names the
Lords supper and the Lords table - Rejected the notion of mass as sacrifice, seeing
it as a sign of Christians sins being forgiven
through Christs death on the cross
54A History of EucharistThe Lords Supper and the
Modern Mass
- Catholic solidification - The Council of Trent
- The council produced three documents on the
eucharist - The Blessed Sacrament (1551)
- The Reception of Communion (1562)
- The Mass as a Sacrifice (1562)
- All three taught using the scholastic approach to
theology which acted to set this approach as
definitive and final - The division of sacrament, communion, and mass
resulted in Catholics continuing to consider
these things separately
55A History of EucharistThe Lords Supper and the
Modern Mass
- Sacrament was the consecrated bread and wine
- The Blessed Sacrament (1551)
- Our Lord Jesus Christ, true God and man, is
truly, really, and substantially contained under
the appearance of bread and wine. By the
consecration of the bread and wine the whole
substance of the bread is changed into the
substance of the body of Christ our Lord, and the
whole substance of the wine is changed into the
substance of his blood.
56A History of EucharistThe Lords Supper and the
Modern Mass
- Communion was not looked upon as a sacramental
action in itself but as receiving the sacrament - The Reception of Communion (1562)
- Catholics did not have to receive both bread and
wine to receive Christ in communion because he
was fully present in either element - Children did not have to receive eucharist before
the age of reason
57A History of EucharistThe Lords Supper and the
Modern Mass
- Mass was seen as instituted by Christ but was
regarded as a sacrifice not a sacrament - The Mass as a Sacrifice (1562)
- The bishops explained that at the last supper
Christ had offered a sacrifice of his body and
blood to God the Father, and had commanded that
it be continued so that through it his sacrifice
on the cross could be present in the church
forever. - Christ offered himself in an unbloody manner
- Since it was Christ it was a clean oblation not
able to be defiled by unworthiness of the
minister and therefore effective even without the
peoples participation - Its spiritual benefits were available to the
church for the atonement of sins
58A History of EucharistThe Lords Supper and the
Modern Mass
- In 1570 a normative version of the Roman Missal
was issued under authority of Pius V and made
mandatory. - A ban was placed on translation of any texts from
the approved Latin - Books of private devotional prayers were
published - For those who could not read the rosary was
suggested - So that the sacrifice would not be disturbed Holy
Communion was distributed before or after mass to
fulfill the annual obligation - For the most part this norm stayed in effect
until 1960
59A History of EucharistThe Lords Supper and the
Modern Mass
- In the late 1800s a renewed interest in
historical investigation began - Ancient manuscripts were searched out.
Benedictine monks in France and Germany tried to
find out where the Tridentine mass had come from
hoping to increase their understanding of the
mass - What they discovered was that in the early days
people were actually expected to participate - They brought Gregorian chant back into their
masses. Interest in the rediscovered form of
prayer skyrocketed. - In order for people to understand they had to
translate the music. In 1880 missals used by lay
people were first published. Some had
translations - In 1897 the official ban on translating the Roman
missal was lifted for the first time in 1000
years all Catholics could follow the mass
60A History of EucharistThe Lords Supper and the
Modern Mass
- Pius X in 1903 gave papal approval for greater
participation in the mass through chant and more
frequent reception of communion. - 1910 He established the age for first communion
at seven. First communion began to rival
Confirmation in popularity. - First communion became a modern day unofficial
sacrament, an almost universally practiced
childhood ritual closely associated with the mass
and the official sacrament of eucharist.
61A History of EucharistThe Lords Supper and the
Modern Mass
- Historical research continued through both world
wars - 1946 Gregory Dix and Josef Jungmann published
lengthy historical studies of the mass - 1947 Pius XII issued a papal encyclical warning
priests against tampering with the liturgy but
approving attempts to make it more relevant to
the laity - The 1950s saw modest reforms in liturgies
- Permission to celebrate evening masses on Sunday
and Holy Days - Liturgies oof Holy Week were modified to more
closely match the patristic period - The hours of fasting were shortened from 12 to 3
to 1 - January 1959 John XXIII announced the Second
Vatican Council - Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy was approved
as the first conciliar document