Title: What is the Dark Energy?
1What is the Dark Energy?
- David Spergel
- Princeton University
2One of the most challenging problems in Physics
- Several cosmological observations demonstrated
that the expansion of the universe is
accelerating - What is causing this acceleration?
- How can we learn more about this acceleration,
the Dark Energy it implies, and the questions it
raises?
3Outline
- A brief summary on the contents of the universe
- Evidence for the acceleration and the implied
Dark Energy - Supernovae type Ia observations (SNe Ia)
- Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMB)
- Large-scale structure (LSS) (clusters of
galaxies) - What is the Dark Energy?
- Future Measurements
4Contents of the universe (from current
observations)
Baryons (4) Dark matter (23) Dark energy 73
Massive neutrinos 0.1 Spatial curvature very
close to 0
5A note on cosmological parameters
- The properties of the standard cosmological model
are expressed in terms of various cosmological
parameters, for example - H0 is the Hubble expansion parameter today
- is the fraction of the
matter energy density in the critical
density(Gc1 units) - is the fraction of the
Dark Energy density (here a cosmological
constant) in the critical density
6Evidence for cosmic acceleration Supernovae type
Ia
7Evidence for cosmic acceleration Supernovae type
Ia
- Standard candles
- Their intrinsic luminosity is know
- Their apparent luminosity can be measured
- The ratio of the two can provide the
luminosity-distance (dL) of the supernova - The red shift z can be measured independently
from spectroscopy - Finally, one can obtain dL (z) or equivalently
the magnitude(z) and draw a Hubble diagram
8 Evidence for cosmic acceleration Supernovae type
Ia
9 10Evidence from Cosmic Microwave Background
Radiation (CMB)
- CMB is an almost isotropic relic radiation of
T2.7250.002 K - CMB is a strong pillar of the Big Bang cosmology
- It is a powerful tool to use in order to
constrain several cosmological parameters - The CMB power spectrum is sensitive to several
cosmological parameters
11This is how the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy
Probe (WMAP) sees the CMB
12ADIABATIC DENSITY FLUCTUATIONS
13ISOCURVATURE ENTROPY FLUCTUATIONS
14Determining Basic Parameters
Baryon Density Wbh2 0.015,0.017..0.031 also
measured through D/H
15Determining Basic Parameters
Matter Density Wmh2 0.16,..,0.33
16Determining Basic Parameters
Angular Diameter Distance w -1.8,..,-0.2 When
combined with measurement of matter density
constrains data to a line in Wm-w space
17Simple Model Fits CMB data
Readhead et al. astro/ph 0402359
18Evolution from Initial Conditions I
WMAP team assembled
WMAP completes 2 year of observations!
DA leave Princeton
WMAP at Cape
19Evidence from large-scale structure in the
universe (clusters of galaxies)
- Counting clusters of galaxies can infer the
matter energy density in the universe - The matter energy density found is usually around
0.3 the critical density - CMB best fit model has a total energy density of
1, so another 0.7 is required but with a
different EOS - The same 0.7 with a the same different EOS is
required from combining supernovae data and CMB
constraints
20Cosmic complementarity Supernovae, CMB, and
Clusters
21What is Dark Energy ?
Most embarrassing observation in physics
thats the only quick thing I can say about dark
energy thats also true. Edward Witten
22What is the Dark Energy?
- Cosmological Constant
- Failure of General Relativity
- Quintessence
- Novel Property of Matter
- Simon Dedeo astro-ph/0411283
23COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANT??
- Why is the total value measured from cosmology so
small compared to quantum field theory
calculations of vacuum energy? - From cosmology 0.7 critical density 10-48 GeV4
- From QFT estimation at the Electro-Weak (EW)
scales (100 GeV)4 - At EW scales 56 orders difference, at Planck
scales 120 orders - Is it a fantastic cancellation of a puzzling
smallness? - Why did it become dominant during the present
epoch of cosmic evolution? Any earlier, would
have prevented structures to form in the universe
(cosmic coincidence)
24Anthropic Solution?
- Not useful to discuss creation science in any of
its forms.
Dorothy we are not in Kansas anymore
25Quintessence
- Introduced mostly to address the why now?
problem - Potential determines dark energy properties (w,
sound speed) - Scaling models (Wetterich Peebles Ratra)
- V(f) exp(-f)
matter
r
Zlatev and Steinhardt (1999)
Most of the tracker models predicted w gt -0.7
26Current Constraints
Seljak et al. 2004
27Looking for Quintessence
- Deviations from w -1
- BUT HOW BIG?
- Clustering of dark energy
- Variations in coupling constants (e.g., a)
- lfFF/MPL
- Current limits constrain l lt 10-6
If dark energy properties are time dependent, so
are other basic physical parameters
28Big Bang Cosmology
Homogeneous, isotropic universe
(flat universe)
29Rulers and Standard Candles
Luminosity Distance
Angular Diameter Distance
30Flat M.D. Universe
D 1500 Mpc for z gt 0.5
31Volume
32Techniques
- Measure H(z)
- Luminosity Distance (Supernova)
- Angular diameter distance
- Growth rate of structure
.
Checks Einstein equations to first order in
perturbation theory
33What if GR is wrong?
- Friedman equation (measured through distance) and
Growth rate equation are probing different parts
of the theory - For any distance measurement, there exists a w(z)
that will fit it. However, the theory can not
fit growth rate of structure - Upcoming measurements can distinguish Dvali et
al. DGP from GR (Ishak, Spergel, Upadye 2005)
34Growth Rate of Structure
- Galaxy Surveys
- Need to measure bias
- Non-linear dynamics
- Gravitational Lensing
- Halo Models
- Bias is a function of galaxy properties, scale,
etc.
35A powerful cosmological probe of Dark Energy
Gravitational Lensing
Abell 2218 A Galaxy Cluster Lens, Andrew
Fruchter et al. (HST)
36The binding of light
37Gravitational Lensing by clusters of galaxies
From MPA lensing group
38Weak Gravitational Lensing
Distortion of background images by foreground
matter
Unlensed Lensed Credit SNAP WL group
39Gravitational Lensing
Refregier et al. 2002
- Advantage directly measures mass
- Disadvantages
- Technically more difficult
- Only measures projected mass-distribution
Tereno et al. 2004
40Baryon Oscillations
CMB
C(q)
Baryon oscillation scale
q
1o
Galaxy Survey
Limber Equation
C(q)
(weaker effect)
Selection function
q
photo-z slices
41Baryon Oscillations as a Standard Ruler
- In a redshift survey, we can measure correlations
along and across the line of sight. - Yields H(z) and DA(z)!
- Alcock-Paczynski Effect
42Large Galaxy Redshift Surveys
- By performing large spectroscopic surveys, we can
measure the acoustic oscillation standard ruler
at a range of redshifts. - Higher harmonics are at k0.2h Mpc-1 (l30 Mpc).
- Measuring 1 bandpowers in the peaks and troughs
requires about 1 Gpc3 of survey volume with
number density 10-3 galaxy Mpc-3. 1 million
galaxies! - SDSS Luminous Red Galaxy Survey has done this at
z0.3! - A number of studies of using this effect
- Blake Glazebrook (2003), Hu Haiman (2003),
Linder (2003), Amendola et al. (2004) - Seo Eisenstein (2003), ApJ 598, 720 source of
next few figures
43Conclusions
- Cosmology provides lots of evidence for physics
beyond the standard model. - Upcoming observations can test ideas about the
nature of the dark energy.