Legal Issues Related to Carbon Sequestration Continued - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Legal Issues Related to Carbon Sequestration Continued

Description:

Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) Resource Conservation and ... Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund) ... Safe Drinking ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: hea73
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Legal Issues Related to Carbon Sequestration Continued


1
Legal Issues Related to Carbon Sequestration
(Continued)
  • Michael P. Healy
  • College of Law
  • University of Kentucky

2
PUBLIC NUISANCE CLAIM
  • California v. General Motors Corp., __ F. Supp.
    2d __, 2007 WL 2726871 (N.D. Cal. 2007).
  • Connecticut v. American Electric Power Co., 406
    F.Supp.2d 265 (S.D.N.Y. 2005).

3
NEGLIGENCE CLAIM
  • In a toxic tort type case, a plaintiff must show
    substance, source and exposure causation. P must
    show that the substance for which D is
    responsible can cause P's injury or disease that
    D is the source of the substance and that P was
    exposed in a way that caused the disease or
    injury.

4
NEGLIGENCE CLAIM(Continued)
  • Possible analogy to toxic tort injuries
  • Risk of Cancer
  • Fear of Cancer
  • Medical Monitoring

5
STRICT LIABILITY CLAIM
  • Restatement (Second) 520 Factors
  • 1 2. The risk of harm is great. AND The harm
    that would ensue if the risk materialized is
    great.
  • 3. Risks cannot be eliminated by the exercise of
    due care.
  • 4. The activity is not a matter of common usage.
  • 5. The activity is inappropriate to the place
    where it takes place (i.e., risk would be reduced
    by shifting location).
  • 6. The value to the community of the defendant's
    activity.

6
STATUTORY LIABILITY
  • Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
  • Comprehensive Environmental Response,
    Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or
    Superfund)
  • Clean Air Act (CAA)
  • Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)

7
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
  • Any person may bring (42 U.S.C. 6972(a)(1)(B)) or
    the EPA may bring (42 U.S.C. 6973(a)) a court
    action against any person engaged in the disposal
    of a solid waste if the activity is causing an
    imminent and substantial endangerment.
  • RCRA defines solid waste to includee solid,
    liquid, semisold, or contained gaseous material
    resulting from industrial, commercial, mining,
    and agricultural operations . . . .
  • Solid waste includes any other discarded
    material and is accordingly distinguished from a
    product.

8
Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or
Superfund)
  • Section 104 identifies a variety of parties that
    are authorized to pursue response actions when
    there has been a release or a significant threat
    of a release of hazardous substances into the
    environment.
  • Section 107 imposes strict, joint and several
    liability on parties, including generators
    responsible for the release of hazardous
    substances into the environment.

9
Clean Air Act (CAA)
  • 42 U.S.C. 7603 authorizes EPA to bring an action
    in federal district court to seek abatement of
    air pollution that is causing an imminent and
    substantial endangerment. EPA may also issue an
    administrative abatement order when the subject
    of the order is responsible for emissions that
    are causing the imminent and substantial
    endangerment.
  • In Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection
    Agency, 127 S. Ct 1438 (2007), the Supreme Court
    held that Congress had not precluded the
    regulation of carbon dioxide under the mobile
    sources provision of the CAA.

10
Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
  • The SDWA includes a provision that authorizes the
    EPA to issue an abatement order or to bring an
    abatement action in federal district court if a
    defendants activities are causing an imminent
    and substantial endangerment to health because of
    the entry or threatened entry of materials into
    an underground source of drinking water. See 42
    U.S.C. 300i(a).

11
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
  • Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
  • Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
  • Cap and Trade Enforcement

12
Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
  • EPA administers an Underground Injection Control
    (UIC) Program that requires that an operator of
    an underground carbon dioxide storage facility
    receive a permit authorizing the facility. See
    40 C.F.R. Parts 144-48.
  • Carbon sequestration may now be permitted as a
    Class V experimental technology well. At the end
    of July 2008, EPA proposed a new class of
    injection wells -- Class VI that would apply to
    geologic sequestration of carbon dioxide.
    Comments on the proposed regulations are due on
    or before November 24, 2008.

13
Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
  • There are two important restrictions on the scope
    of the UIC program. First, the program applies
    only to injection wells, but does not apply to
    production wells, that is, wells utilizing the
    injected fluids to enhance mineral recovery. See
    42 U.S.C. 300h(d)(1).
  • Also, the UIC permitting requirements do not
    apply if the materials being injected under
    ground are hazardous. They would then be
    regulated under RCRA, provided that they are
    solid wastes.

14
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
  • Regulatory requirements are triggered by disposal
    of hazardous waste. A hazardous waste is a solid
    waste that either (a) is listed by EPA (listed
    wastes are typically the most hazardous wastes)
    or (b) possesses one or more of four
    characteristics ignitability, corrosivity,
    reactivity, or toxicity.
  • The generator of the waste is responsible for
    determining whether the waste is hazardous.

15
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
  • The EPAs discussion of carbon dioxide
    sequestration indicates that the material is not
    hazardous in its pure form. See 73 Fed. Reg.
    43,503. EPA indicates, however, that carbon
    dioxide intended for sequestration may be
    hazardous as a consequence of hazardous
    contaminants. See id. To the extent that such
    contaminants can be removed as the carbon dioxide
    for sequestration is produced, RCRA regulation
    will be avoided.

16
Cap and Trade Enforcement
  • To the extent sequestration is used to meet cap
    and trade limits, sequestration will need to be
    guaranteed for a lengthy time period. For
    example, Vermonts regulation promulgated to
    implement the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative
    provides that credits are available only when the
    greenhouse gas has been permanently and
    irrevocably retired.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com