Developing Teacher Leaders - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Developing Teacher Leaders

Description:

Developing Teacher Leaders By Manley Midgett North Carolina Teacher Academy 909 Aviation Parkway, Suite 700 Morrisville, NC 27560 manley.midgett_at_teacheracademy.org – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:109
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: ncteachera
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Developing Teacher Leaders


1
Developing Teacher Leaders
  • By
  • Manley Midgett
  • North Carolina Teacher Academy
  • 909 Aviation Parkway, Suite 700
  • Morrisville, NC 27560
  • manley.midgett_at_teacheracademy.org

2
Developing Teacher Leaders
  • Cover

3
(No Transcript)
4
North Carolina Teacher Academy
  • Started in 1994
  • Funded by the General Assembly
  • Connected to Department of Education
  • Offer 35 different modules
  • Served 78 of schools (1,783)
  • Served over 45,000 teachers in extensive
    professional development experiences
  • Provided 300 literacy coaches

5
The North Carolina Teacher Academy Professional
Development Standards are aligned with the
National Staff Development Councils Standards
for Staff Development and are designed to assist
schools in outlining school improvement goals.
All professional Development is results-driven,
standards-based, and job-embedded.
6
Why Develop Teacher Leaders?
  • Doing what weve always done,

7
Why Develop Teacher Leaders?
  • Still gets us what weve always gotten!

8
Why Develop Teacher Leaders?
  • We dont like what weve always gotten!

9
Why Develop Teacher Leaders?
  • We can try to change everybody at once

10
Why Develop Teacher Leaders?
  • or, we can start with some key leaders!

11
Why Develop Teacher Leaders?
  • We are not trying to get teachers to leave the
    classroom.

12
Change on three fronts
Objectives
THE SCIENCE CURRICU
LUM Evaluation Instruction



13
Change on three fronts
  • The written curriculum (Standards)
  • The taught curriculum
  • The tested curriculum

14
1. The Written Curriculum
  • Converting standards
  • to
  • classroom objectives

15
2. The Taught Curriculum
  • What we do day-to-day in the classroom

16
3. The Tested Curriculum
  • Are they getting it?

17
1. Standards
  • It is worth it to spend time converting state
    standards into objectives that include student
    behaviors and science process skills matched with
    content.
  • (Typically, there is a tendency to jump directly
    on the content.)

18
2. Old Instructional Model
  • The 2E Model
  • Explain-Evaluate

19
One Major Change
  • Implement the 5E Model
  • Even our best teachers still wanted to explain
    before exploring.
  • We matched activities to the classroom
    objectives and used the expected skills and
    content.

20
(No Transcript)
21
3. Evaluation
  • Typically, we expect the students to tell us back
    that which we have been saying.
  • They like this deal!
  • They dont need to think, just repeat after us.

22
3. Evaluation
  • What do we get?
  • A false sense
  • of security

23
Question?
  • Are we really evaluating for understand?

24
Solution
  • So, we matched the evaluation to the classroom
    objectives, which were also matched by the 5E
    activities.

25
Developing Teacher Leaders
26
Getting Started
  • Selected
  • a focus
  • a level

27
Getting Started
  • Sent out applications
  • Got over 300 back
  • Selected 35-40 teachers
  • Who did we select?

28
Provide three things
  • 1. Deeper understanding of science
  • 2. Learn how to improve objectives, lesson
    cycles, and evaluation for understanding
  • 3. How to become a provider of
  • professional development
  • Bonus Camaraderie

29
1. Deeper understanding of science
  • 6 days of in-depth training with a national
    expert in the field

30
2. The Science Curriculum(Written-Taught-Tested)
  • Tasks to try in classroom, share with each other,
    discuss, revise and receive feedback (met for
    extend times)
  • Wrote objectives
  • Wrote tried 5E cycles
  • Wrote evaluations discussed them

31
Communications
  • Tried activities over time
  • Got feedback from me and
  • Got feedback from team leaders
  • Emailed and phoned feedback
  • Worked as Grade Level Teams
  • Met regularly to share

32
3. Professional Developers
  • Modeled professional development
  • Chances to practice
  • Coaching
  • 2 days of planning for a summer academy
  • Worked in grade-level teams

33
3. Professional Developers
  • Week-long academy by grade level
  • Worked in pairs
  • Got daily and end-of-week feedback by peers and
    me
  • Got feedback from participants

34
3. Professional Developers
  • 2-day follow-up provided help with all things
    related to their professional development
  • On-line follow-up with participants provided
    feedback for PD as well as the lesson cycles

35
Its Not Over!
  • Seems like a lot to do for a one-week academy?
  • They can now provide PD for their school and
    district and we support PD by them for other LEAs
    and future summers.
  • Some are in their 15th year of doing this.

36
(No Transcript)
37
  • Elementary Earth Science

38
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com