Title: Immunolabeling of Cells and Transmission Electron Microscopy
1Immunolabeling of Cells and Transmission Electron
Microscopy
- Ike Miguel
- June 30, 2006
- ABE Workshop 2006
2Purpose
- Using TEM to label specific sites in Arabidopsis
thaliana. - Goal
- Overview of Immunolabeling
- Preparation of samples and viewing
- Observations of results
- Thoughts
3Antibodies are used in immunolabeling of cells
- Immunoglobulins, or antibodies, detect foreign
bodies and attach at specific sites called
epitopes - Antibodies fused to myeloma cells where they are
cloned indefinitely and screened - in vitro and in vivo
- Indirect method used to our purposes
4Antibody Structure
- 4 polypeptide chains
- Two light, VL and CL
- 2 heavy chains determine fuctional activity in
vivo - IgG, IgA, IgM, IgE, IgD
5Use of Antibodies for Immunolabeling
- High level of specificity needed due to
non-covalent, weak bonding - Eliminate non-specific binding
- Optimal conditions include reagants, pH, heat.
- Controls are very important!
- Negative controls to discriminate non-specific
binding
6Tranmission Electron Microscopy
- Zeiss 10/A conventional TEM
- Easy operation
- Uses film for images
- LEO 912 Energy-Filtering TEM
- Little as 0.5um sections
- EELS, ESI
- Digital images
- Ultramicrotomy, 60-90nm sectioning in resin
7Immunolabeling with Gold by Indirect Method
- Gold small, round and dense
- Easily detectable
- 110 and 1100 colliodal gold-labeled conjugated
to primary antibody
8Preparation of Specimens by Embedding
- Preparation is limiting factor!
- Chemical fixation with aldehydes which
cross-links proteins - Paraformaldehyde for grids
- Dehydrate
- Infiltrate with resin
- Polymerize
- May stain prior to polymerization
- 7 10 days to fix. May need to repeat.
9Ultramicrotomy and transfer to grids
- Glass knife can cut ucron thick sections
- Diamond knife can cut as small as 2-3um
- Our samples 80nm 1um thick
- 60-80nm max thickness for transmission of light
- 2 sections embedded per grid
- Avg of 6 sections per grid (2 20)
10Post-Embedding and Labeling of Specimens
- Dilution series and controls!
- Sectioned on Formvar coated grids
- Pretreat and etch with Na-metaperiodate/
PBS-glycine - Wash with TBST (detergent, ampiphatic, nonionic)
- Block with milk (lipid, naturally sticky)
- 1o antibody
- Wash with TBST
- 2o antibody, colliodal-gold
- Wash with TBS and H20 to rinse any Ppt
11TEM LEO912 Energy-Filtering TEM
- Tungsten cathode used to produce electron
illumination source - Nitrogen for carbon residue
- Accelerated through column
- EMF used to bend and focus illumination
- Grid sample on objective lense
- Projector lense produces visible light
- Beam strikes CCD strip for histogram results
12GFP, DTT treated
- Grid 1 No pretreatment, 110 anti-GFP (1o-Ab),
110 gold (2o-Ab) - DTT dithiothritol used to denature GFP
- Expected labeling on ER, vacuole, or vesicles.
- What is this?
Fig. 1 Numerous binding to organelle. Group 1.
13GFP DTT non-specific binding
- Grid 2 Glycine, 110 anti-GFP (1o-Ab), 110 gold
(2o-Ab) labeling - Non-specific binding is expected result
- Thoughts?
- Vascular system or chloroplast
Fig. 2 Non-specific binding
14Group 2 GFP no DTT treatment
Grid 3. No pretreatment, 110 anti-GFP, 1100
gold. Possible labeling on vacuole.
Grid 4. Na-Periodate, 1100 anti-GFP, 1100 gold.
Random labeling
15PDI2
- Expected labeling on starch granules
- No pretreatment
- At high concentrations primary antibody may have
a large number of non-specific binding.
Grid 1. No pretreatment, 110 anti-PDI-2, 110
gold. Observing non-specific binding. Group 3
16Group 3 PDI2
Grid 1. A lot of non-specific binding but closer
observations may give insight.
17Group 4 PDI2
Grid 4. Na-Periodate, 110 anti-PDI2, 11000?
gold. Labeling of starch granules
18Group 4 Control
Grid 4. Control with no primary antibody.
19Group 4 CNGC
- Cyclic nucleotide gated channel
- Allows passage of K
- Expected labeling on plasma membrane
Grid 2. Glycine, 110 anti-CNGC, 110 gold
20Group 4 CNGC
Grid 2. Gycine, 110 anti-CNGC, 110 gold.
Possible communication.
21CNGC
Grid 3. No pretreatment, 110 anti-CNGC, 1100
gold. Group 4
22Errors and Conclusion
- Preparation is the limiting factor!
- Gold labeling antibody may have been prepared in
the wrong concentrations. - A set of new dilutions may be needed.