Directed Mutagenesis and Protein Engineering PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 61
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Directed Mutagenesis and Protein Engineering


1
Directed Mutagenesis and Protein Engineering
2
Mutagenesis
  • Mutagenesis -gt change in DNA sequence
  • -gt Point mutations or large modifications
  • Point mutations (directed mutagenesis)
  • Substitution change of one nucleotide (i.e. A-gt
    C)
  • Insertion gaining one additional nucleotide
  • Deletion loss of one nucleotide

3
Consequences of point mutations within a coding
sequence (gene) for the protein
Silent mutations -gt change in nucleotide
sequence with no consequences for protein
sequence
-gt Change of amino acid
-gt truncation of protein
-gt change of c-terminal part of protein
-gt change of c-terminal part of protein
4
Mutagenesis Comparison of cellular and invitro
mutagenesis
5
Applications of directed mutagenesis
6
General strategy for directed mutagenesis
  • Requirements
  • DNA of interest (gene or promoter) must be
    cloned
  • Expression system must be available -gt for
    testing phenotypic change

7
Approaches for directed mutagenesis
  • -gt site-directed mutagenesis
  • -gt point mutations in particular known
    area
  • result -gt library of wild-type and
    mutated DNA (site-specific)
  • not really a
    library -gt just 2 species
  • -gt random mutagenesis
  • -gt point mutations in all areas
    within DNA of interest
  • result -gt library of wild-type and
    mutated DNA (random)
  • a real library -gt
    many variants -gt screening !!!
  • if methods efficient -gt mostly
    mutated DNA

8
Protein Engineering
  • -gt Mutagenesis used for modifying proteins
  • Replacements on protein level -gt mutations on DNA
    level
  • Assumption Natural sequence can be
    modified to
  • improve a certain
    function of protein
  • This implies
  • Protein is NOT at an optimum for that function
  • Sequence changes without disruption of the
    structure
  • (otherwise it would not fold)
  • New sequence is not TOO different from the native
    sequence (otherwise loss in function of protein)
  • consequence -gt introduce point mutations

9
Protein Engineering Obtain a protein with
improved or new properties
10
Rational Protein Design
? Site directed mutagenesis !!!
Requirements -gt Knowledge of sequence and
preferable Structure (active site,.) -gt
Understanding of mechanism (knowledge about
structure function relationship) -gt
Identification of cofactors..
11
Site-directed mutagenesis methods
Old method -gt used before oligonucleotide
directed mutagenesis Limitations -gt just C-gt
T mutations -gt randomly mutated
12
Site-directed mutagenesis methods
13
Site-directed mutagenesis methods
Oligonucleotide - directed method
14
Site-directed mutagenesis methods PCR based
15
Directed Evolution Random mutagenesis
-gt based on the process of natural evolution -
NO structural information required - NO
understanding of the mechanism required General
Procedure Generation of genetic diversity ?
Random mutagenesis Identification of successful
variants ? Screening and seletion
16
(No Transcript)
17
General Directed Evolution Procedure
Random mutagenesis methods
18
Directed Evolution Library
Even a large library -gt (108 independent clones)
will not exhaustively encode all possible single
point mutations. Requirements would be 20N
independend clones -gt to have all possible
variations in a library ( silent
mutations) N.. number of amino acids in the
protein For a small protein -gt Hen
egg-white Lysozyme (129 aa 14.6 kDa)
-gt library with 20129 (7x
10168) independent clones Consequence -gt not all
modifications possible -gt
modifications just along an evolutionary path
!!!!
19
Limitation of Directed Evolution
  • Evolutionary path must exist - gt to be successful
  • Screening method must be available
  • -gt You get (exactly) what you ask for!!!
  • -gt need to be done in -gt High throughput
    !!!

20
Typical Directed Evolution Experiment
  • Successful experiments involve generally
  • less than 6 steps (cycles)!!!
  • Why?
  • Sequences with improved properties are rather
    close to the parental sequence -gt along a
    evolutionary path
  • 2. Capacity of our present methods to generate
    novel functional sequences is rather limited -gt
    requires huge libraries
  • ? Point Mutations !!!

21
Evolutionary Methods
  • Non-recombinative methods
  • -gt Oligonucleotide Directed Mutagenesis
    (saturation mutagenesis)
  • -gt Chemical Mutagenesis, Bacterial Mutator
    Strains
  • -gt Error-prone PCR
  • Recombinative methods -gt Mimic natures
    recombination strategy
  • Used for Elimination of neutral and
    deleterious mutations
  • -gt DNA shuffling
  • -gt Invivo Recombination (Yeast)
  • -gt Random priming recombination, Staggered
    extention precess (StEP)
  • -gt ITCHY

22
Evolutionary MethodsType of mutation Fitness
of mutants
  • Type of mutations
  • Beneficial mutations (good)
  • Neutral mutations
  • Deleterious mutations (bad)
  • Beneficial mutations are diluted with neutral and
    deleterious ones
  • !!! Keep the number of mutations low per cycle
  • -gt improve fitness of mutants!!!

23
Random Mutagenesis (PCR based) with degenerated
primers (saturation mutagenesis)
24
Random Mutagenesis (PCR based) with degenerated
primers (saturation mutagenesis)
25
Random Mutagenesis (PCR based) Error prone PCR
-gt PCR with low fidelity !!! Achieved by -
Increased Mg2 concentration - Addition of Mn2 -
Not equal concentration of the four dNTPs - Use
of dITP - Increasing amount of Taq polymerase
(Polymerase with NO proof reading function)
26
Random Mutagenesis (PCR based) DNA Shuffling
DNase I treatment (Fragmentation, 10-50 bp, Mn2)
Reassembly (PCR without primers, Extension and
Recombination)
PCR amplification
27
Random Mutagenesis (PCR based) Family Shuffling
Genes coming from the same gene family -gt highly
homologous -gt Family shuffling
28
Random Mutagenesis (PCR based)
29
Directed EvolutionDifference between
non-recombinative and recombinative methods
Non-recombinative methods
recombinative methods -gt hybrids (chimeric
proteins)
30
Screening Basis for all screening selection
methods
  • Expression Libraries
  • -gtlink gene with encoded product which is
    responsible for enzymatic activity

Kilde Reymond, Chapter 6 (HTS screening and
selection of Enzyme-encoded genes)
31
Low-medium throughput screens
  • -gt Detection of enzymatic activity of colonies on
    agar plates or crude cell lysates -gt production
    of fluorophor or chromophor or halos
  • -gt Screen up to 104 colonies
  • -gt effective for isolation of enzymes with
    improved properties
  • -gt not so effective for isolation of variants
    with dramatic changes of phenotype

Lipase variants on Olive oil plates With pH
indicator (brilliant green)
Kilde Reymond, Chapter 6 (HTS screening and
selection of Enzyme-encoded genes)
32
Directed Evolution on Fusarium solani pisi
cutinase Screening of a random mutagenesis
library of cutinase for variants with preference
towards long chain fatty acid esters (Tributyrin
? Olive oil) 20.000 colonies were screened ? 50
positive colonies
33
HTS of enzymes with Phage Display
Filamentous Pages (M13) -gt Bacterial cell
infected by this type of bacteriophage is
constantly releasing progeny phage particles.
This usually leads to a growth inhibition and a
massive, continous phage production but no lysis
of cells.
Kilde Reymond, Chapter 6 (HTS screening and
selection of Enzyme-encoded genes)
34
HTS of enzymes with Phage Display
Kilde Reymond, Chapter 6 (HTS screening and
selection of Enzyme-encoded genes)
35
HTS of enzymes with Phage Display
  • -gt Advantages
  • Phages give a direct link between gene and
    protein
  • Display on the surface allows direct and easy
    access for the substrate to perform enzymatic
    reaction
  • -gt Challenges
  • - to link enzyme with product

36
HTS of enzymes with Phage Display
  • Selection for catalytic antibodies with
    peroxidase activity.
  • Tyramine will be oxidized of hydrogenperoxid
    (peroxidase antibodies) -gt produced by the phage.
  • Biotin-tyramine bindes irreversible with
    phenol-sidechanin on peroxidase antibody.
  • Selection via biotin-streptavidin interaction

Kilde Reymond, Chapter 6 (HTS screening and
selection of Enzyme-encoded genes)
37
HTS of enzymes with Phage Display
Kilde Reymond, Chapter 6 (HTS screening and
selection of Enzyme-encoded genes)
38
HTS of enzymes with Phage Display
  • Catalytic elution
  • For enzymes that are dependent on co-factors
  • After protein expression on the surface of the
    phage -gt all co-factors are removed and the
    catalytic inactive phage/enzyme is bound to an
    immobilized substrate. Co-factor are added -gt
    phage with active enzyme is eluated because
    substrate is converted into product.

Kilder Reymond, Chapter 6 (HTS screening and
selection of Enzyme-encoded genes), H. Pedersen
et al., A method for directed evolution and
functional cloning of enzymes, Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA, Vol. 95, pp. 1052310528, September 1998
39
HTS of enzymes with Cell Display
  • Similar to phage display
  • Uses FRET substrate
  • FRET-based enzyme screening. (a) The structure of
    the FRET substrate Fl, BODIPY Q,
    tetramethylrhodamine. (b) Binding of FRET
    substrate to the cell surface of E. coli cells
    displaying the outer membrane protein OmpT. The
    positively charged FRET substrate is attached to
    the negatively charged polysaccharides of the
    cell surface. (c) Upon enzymatic cleavage of the
    scissile bond, the FRET substrate displays Fl
    fluorescence, which is otherwise quenched by Q.

Kilder Reymond, Chapter 6 (HTS screening and
selection of Enzyme-encoded genes), S. Becker et
al., Ultra-high-throughput screening based on
cell-surface display and fluorescence-activated
cell sorting for the identification of novel
biocatalysts, Current Oppinion in Biotechnology
2004, 15323-329
40
HTS of enzymes with Cell Display
  • Yeast display of antibody scFv fragments
  • -gt Expression of scFv on yeast cells is
    monitored using either the HA or c-myc epitope
    tags.
  • -gt Binding of the target antigen, HIV-1
    gp120, is visualized using a biotinylated mAb to
    a noncompetitive epitope on gp120 and fluorescent
    streptavidin. Gp120-binding scFvs are selected by
    fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) of the
    yeast cells.

Kilder Reymond, Chapter 6 (HTS screening and
selection of Enzyme-encoded genes), S. Becker et
al., Ultra-high-throughput screening based on
cell-surface display and fluorescence-activated
cell sorting for the identification of novel
biocatalysts, Current Oppinion in Biotechnology
2004, 15323-329
41
In vitro compartmentalization (IVC)
  • Water-in-oil emulsion -gt make microscopic
    compartments (droplet volume 5 fL) -gt no
    diffusion between compartments.
  • Each compartment contains in general one single
    gene and acts as an artificial cell (invitro
    transcription and translation)
  • -gt Gene is linked to substrate
  • -gt if protein is active substrate will be
    converted into product -gt signal -gt fishing out
  • -gt direct access to gene

Kilder Reymond, Chapter 6 (HTS screening and
selection of Enzyme-encoded genes), O.J. Miller,
Directed evolution by in vitro
compartmentalization, Nature Methods, vol.3, no.
7, 561-570, 2006
42
IVC selections
  • Microbeads i w/o emulsion
  • Gene coding for a phosphotriesterase is
    immobilized on a microbead.
  • Enzyme produced with a tag (T) -gt on the bead på
    anti-tag antibodies -gt enzyme interacts with
    antibody -gt immobilized on bead.
  • after translation, bead transferred to different
    emulsion that contains a substrate with
    caged-biotin
  • Active enzyme cleaves ester-substrate -gt biotin
    uncaged during exposure of light -gt substrate
    and product bind to bead (biotin-streptavidin)
  • Emulsions distroyed -gt beads incubated with
    monoclonale antibodies (against product)
  • Incubation with secondary antibody
    (fluorescein-labelled) gt analysed with FACS

Kilder Reymond, Chapter 6 (HTS screening and
selection of Enzyme-encoded genes), S. Becker et
al., Ultra-high-throughput screening based on
cell-surface display and fluorescence-activated
cell sorting for the identification of novel
biocatalysts, Current Oppinion in Biotechnology
2004, 15323-329
43
In vitro compartmentalization (IVC)
  • Advantages
  • In vitro system -gt allows any kind of substrate,
    product and chemical reaction that could be
    incompatible with the invivo system
  • Different emulsions steps -gt production of
    enzyme is decoupled from catalytic reaction
  • single emulsion step -gt possible to change
    content of compartments after translationen
    without distroying emulsionen

Kilde Reymond, Chapter 6 (HTS screening and
selection of Enzyme-encoded genes)
44
-gt w/o/w -gt water in oil in water emulsion
(Vesicle)
In vitro compartmentalization (IVC)
  • Avantage
  • No direct link between product and gene necessary
    -gt keep the compartment
  • Can be directly analysed with FACS

Kilde Reymond, Chapter 6 (HTS screening and
selection of Enzyme-encoded genes)
45
FACS (Fluorescens-activated cell sorter)
Capacity gt 107 per hour
  • The cell suspension is entrained in the center of
    a narrow, rapidly flowing stream of liquid.
  • A vibrating mechanism causes the stream of cells
    to break into individual droplets.
  • Just before the stream breaks into droplets, the
    flow passes through a fluorescence measuring
    station where the fluorescent character of
    interest of each cell is measured.
  • An electrical charging ring is placed just at
    the point where the stream breaks into droplets.
    A charge is placed on the ring based on the
    immediately-prior fluorescence intensity
    measurement, and the opposite charge is trapped
    on the droplet as it breaks from the stream. The
    charged droplets then fall through an
    electrostatic deflection system that diverts
    droplets into containers based upon their charge.

http//www.bio.davidson.edu/COURSES/GENOMICS/metho
d/FACS.html
46
Protein Engineering
What can be engineered in Proteins ? -gt Folding
(Structure) 1. Thermodynamic Stability
(Equilibrium between Native ? Unfolded
state) 2. Thermal and Environmental Stability
(Temperature, pH, Solvent, Detergents, Salt
..)
47
Protein Engineering
  • What can be engineered in Proteins ?
  • -gt Function
  • 1. Binding (Interaction of a protein with its
    surroundings)
  • How many points are required to bind a molecule
    with high affinity?
  • Catalysis (a different form of binding binding
    the transition state of a chemical reaction)
  • Increased binding to the transition state ?
    increased catalytic rates !!!
  • Requires Knowledge of the Catalytic Mechanism
    !!!
  • -gt engineer Kcat and Km

48
Protein Engineering
  • Factors which contribute to stability
  • Hydrophobicity (hydrophobic core)
  • Electrostatic Interactions

  • -gt Salt Bridges

  • -gt Hydrogen Bonds

  • -gt Dipole Interactions
  • Disulfide Bridges
  • Metal Binding (Metal chelating site)
  • Reduction of the unfolded state entropy with
  • X ? Pro mutations

49
Protein Engineering
  • Design of Thermal and Environmental stability
  • Stabilization of ?-Helix Macrodipoles
  • Engineer Structural Motifes (like Helix N-Caps)
  • Introduction of salt bridges
  • Introduction of residues with higher intrinsic
    properties for their conformational state (e.g.
    Ala replacement within a ?-Helix)
  • Introduction of disulfide bridges
  • Reduction of the unfolded state entropy with
  • X ? Pro mutations

50
Protein Engineering - Applications
Engineering Stability of Enzymes T4 lysozyme
-gt S-S bonds introduction
51
Protein Engineering - Applications
Engineering Stability of Enzymes
triosephosphate isomerase from yeast
-gt replace Asn (deaminated at high temperature)
52
Protein Engineering - Applications
Engineering Activity of Enzymes tyrosyl-tRNA
synthetase from B. stearothermophilus
-gt replace Thr 51 (improve affinity for ATP) -gt
Design
53
Protein Engineering - Applications
Engineering Ca-independency of subtilisin
Saturation mutagenesis -gt 7 out of 10 regions
were found to give increase of stability Mutant
10x more stable than native enzyme in absence of
Ca 50 more stable than native in presence of Ca
54
Protein Engineering - Applications
Site-directed mutagenesis -gt used to alter a
single property Problem changing one property
-gt disrupts another characteristics Directed
Evolution (Molecular breeding) -gt alteration of
multiple properties
55
Protein Engineering ApplicationsDirected
Evolution
56
Protein Engineering ApplicationsDirected
Evolution
57
Protein Engineering ApplicationsDirected
Evolution
58
Protein Engineering ApplicationsDirected
Evolution
59
Protein Engineering Directed Evolution
60
Protein Engineering - Applications
61
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com