Title: Molecular Biological and Genetic Techniques for Studying Learning and Memory
1Molecular Biological and Genetic Techniques for
Studying Learning and Memory Thomas Gould,
Ph.D. Department of Psychology Temple University
2Transgenic Techniques
- Inserts a novel gene into genome
- Developed in the early 1980s by John Gordon and
by Ralph Brinster and Richard Palmiter and their
co-workers. - Although all of the cells in the body contain an
identical set of genes, some genes are active in
only one or a few tissues. - The two main parts of a gene are the regulatory
region and the protein-coding region. - When the right combination of proteins binds to
specific sites along the DNA in the regulatory
region, the gene is switched on, and the
protein-coding region becomes active.
3Transgenic Techniques
- Make your DNA
- Using recombinant DNA methods, build molecules of
DNA containing the promoter and structural gene
you desire - Insert into plasmid DNA to copy
- Cloning
- Transform ES cells in culture
- Expose the cultured cells to the DNA to allow
incorporation - Select for successfully transformed cells
- neor (a gene that encodes an enzyme that
inactivates the antibiotic neomycin and its
relatives, like the drug G418, which is lethal to
mammalian cells) is part of the vector - Expose embyronic stem cells to G418
- Inject surviving cells into the inner cell mass
(ICM) of mouse blastocysts.
4Transgenic Techniques
- Embryo transfer
- Prepare a pseudopregnant mouse (by mating a
female mouse with a vasectomized male - stimulus
of mating elicits the hormonal changes needed to
make her uterus receptive) - Transfer the embryos into her uterus.
- No more than one-third will implant successfully
- Test offspring
- Remove a small piece of tissue from the tail and
examine its DNA for the desired gene - No more than 10-20 will have it, and they will
be heterozygous for the gene - Establish a transgenic strain
- Mate two heterozygous mice and screen their
offspring for the 14 that will be homozygous for
the transgene - Or create dominant transgene
- Mating these will found the transgenic strain.
5(No Transcript)
6Knockout Mice
- DNA that has been mutated is injected into
embryonic stem cells in cell culture - Stem cells are injected into blastocysts that
will incorporate the cells - Cells need to be incorporated into the gametes to
be useful (low probability) - Mice born with this mutation are called chimeras
and have one copy of the mutated DNA - Chimeras are crossbred producing ΒΌ offspring with
two copies of mutated gene
7Cerebellar Circuit
8Eye-Blink Circuit
Parallel Fibers
Climbing Fibers
Cerebellar Cortex
Granule Cells
Inferior Olive
Cerebellar Interpositus Nucleus
Mossy Fibers
Red Nucleus
Trigeminal Nucleus (US)
Lateral Pontine Nucleus(CS)
Abducens Nucleus
Reticular Formation
Eye-Blink
9Genetic Analysis of Cerebellar Plasticity
- Current goals
- Use genetic manipulation to examine effects of
pre- and postsynaptic up and down regulation of
PKA and CREB at the granule cell Purkinje cell
synapse on classical conditioning of the
eye-blink reflex and on cerebellar LTP and LTD - Use the tetracycline system to temporally control
gene expression - Examine Developmental issues
- Study acquisition vs extinction
- Use Genetic Manipulation to examine age-related
changes in learning and memory
10Temporal Control of Transgene Expression
- Tetracycline Responsive Transciptional Activator
(tTA) is used to temporally control transgene
expression - tTA stimulates gene expression from its cognate
promoter - Doxycycline inhibits promoter activity
11Spatial and Temporal Control of Transgene
Expression
Double Transgenic Mice
tTA-Gene
Region Specific Promoter
tTA
_
Doxycycline
Effector Gene
tTA responsive Promoter
12Effector Genes
- R(AB) transgene is the dominant negative form of
the regulatory subunit of PKA - C(QR) transgene has a mutation in the catalytic
subunit which up regulates PKA - ICER (inducible cAMP early repressor) transgene
down regulates CREB via transcription factor
repression - CREBY/F transgene promotes CREB gene expression
via constitutive phosphorylation of a mutant
polypeptide at Ser 133.
13Region Specificity
- ?6 promoter from the type A gamma-aminobutyric
acid receptor alpha6-subunit gene is only
expressed in cerebellar granule cells - L7 promoter is from a Purkinje cell-specific
gene.
14Spatial and Temporal Control of PKA Expression in
Cerebellar Granule Cells
Double Transgenic Mice
tTA-Gene
?6 Promoter
tTA
Doxycycline
_
R(AB) Transgene
tTA responsive Promoter
15Spatial and Temporal Control of PKA Expression in
Cerebellar Purkinje Cells
Double Transgenic Mice
tTA-Gene
L7 Promoter
tTA
Doxycycline
_
R(AB) Transgene
tTA responsive Promoter
16Microarrays
- Method of examining changes in gene expression
associated with event, drug, or disease
17Probing Microarrays
18Delay Contextual Fear Conditioning
Training Day
Testing Day
Context - Shock US Association Hippocampal
Dependent
Test Freezing to Context
Clicker CS - Shock US Association Hippocampal
Independent
Test Freezing to CS in Altered Context
CS 30 sec white noise, US 0.5 mA 2 sec shock,
ITI 2 minutes, 2 trials
19Duration of Enhancement
- Nicotine must be administered on training and
testing days for enhancement. Will enhancement
be seen in the absence of nicotine at a second
test? - Groups
- Nicotine pre-training and prior to testing at 24
hours retest one week later with no nicotine - Saline pre-training and prior to testing at 24
hours retest one week later with no nicotine
20(No Transcript)
21Nicotine Alters Gene Expression
- Long-term memory for contextual fear conditioning
remained enhanced at later retests in the absence
of nicotine (Gould and Higgins, 2003) - Long-term memory is thought to be stored in
neurons as a result of changes in gene expression
induced by the activation of intracellular
signaling pathways (reviewed in Abel and Lattal,
2001) - Nicotine can activate cellular and molecular
processes involved in the chain of events linking
synaptic activity to gene expression (Berg and
Conroy, 2002 Dajas-Bailador et al., 2002) - Use microarray analysis to determine if
hippocampus-dependent learning in the presence of
nicotine results in a different pattern of gene
expression than learning in the absence of
nicotine
22Affymetrix Microarrays
6000 mouse genes per chip Arrayed as
oligonucleotides 20 per gene Mismatch
oligonucleotides used as controls Does nicotine
alter gene expression in the hippocampus during
fear conditioning?
23Microarray Experimental Design
Train and test mice nic/nic sal/sal Prepare
mRNA from hippocampus, amygdala, prefrontal
label cRNA prepared from mRNA hybridize to mouse
Affymetrix microarray MGU74Av2 Compare gene
expression levels compare to normal variance
in these brain regions compare to mice treated
with nicotine or saline and not
conditioned Confirm using real-time PCR
24Nicotine and Saline Mean Hippocampi Log Base 2
Expression Values
- Each dot represents the expression level of a
single probe set (Gene) on both chips. - Dots outside the line of (yx) are outliers
potentially represent genes that affected by the
nicotine manipulation. - Manipulation does not affect most of the genome.
The are about 20 genes that appear affected
between the expression levels of
5-11--representing about 1.5 fold changes.
25Changes In Gene Expression
- Differences between nicotine and saline arrays
were specific because there were no global
changes in average expression between the groups - 20 Genes with Significantly Higher Expression in
Nicotine Group - 3 Genes with Significantly Higher Expression in
Saline Group
26Potential Genes of Interest
- Potassium voltage-gated channel, shaker-related
subfamily, beta member 1 - Accessory potassium channel protein which
modulates the activity of the pore-forming alpha
subunit alters the functional properties of
kv1.1 and kv1.4 - Centrin 2
- Coding for calmodulin
- Annexin A3
- Inhibitor of phospholipase a2
- Nucleosome assembly protein 1-like 1
- May be involved in modulating chromatin formation
and contribute to regulation of cell
proliferation - Mitogen activated protein kinase 8
- phosphorylating a number of transcription factors
- Mitogen activated protein kinase 10
- phosphorylating a number of transcription factors
27(No Transcript)
28Conclusions
- Nicotine enhances hippocampus-dependent versions
of fear conditioning - Nicotine enhancement of fear conditioning is
long-lasting and this long-lasting memory is
expressed in the absence of nicotine - Nicotine administration during training and
initial testing is associated with an
up-regulation of genes that may have a role in
synaptic plasticity
29Acknowledgements
- Transdisciplinary Tobacco Use Research Center
UPENN - American Federation of Aging Research
- The PA Department of Health (TG)
30Thanks
Gould Lab Jennifer Davis Mike Lewis Olivia
Rossebo Dan Moore Steve Higgins Joel Lommock Alla
Kryss Collaborators and Colleagues Ted Abel,
Ph.D. UPENN Sheree Logue, Ph.D. Aventis
Pharmaceutical Jeanne Wehner, Ph.D. Univ
Colorado Diana Woodruff-Pak, Ph.D. Temple Univ