Title: Product Manufacturing
1 Product Manufacturing
CHEN 4470 Process Design Practice Dr. Mario
Richard EdenDepartment of Chemical
EngineeringAuburn University Lecture No. 11
Introduction to Six Sigma in Product
Manufacturing March 6, 2007 Contains Material
Developed by Dr. Daniel R. Lewin, Technion, Israel
2Instructional Objectives
- Be able to define the Sigma Level of a
manufacturing process - Know the steps followed in product design and
manufacture (DMAIC) - Be able to qualitatively analyze a process for
the manufacture of a product and know how to
identify the CTQ step using DMAIC
3Product Development
- Example The Electronics Food Chain
Source Dataquest 1999 data
4Product Development
- IC Production Capability
- Moores Law
5Product Development
Chip Area Device Year Transistors
per Chip
(cm2) 8086 1978 30K
0.34 80286 1981 120K 0.77 80386 1985 400K 1.0 486
1990 2M 1.8 Pentium 1993 3.5M 2.9 Pentium
Pro 1995 5.5M 2.9
6Product Development
Physical Limit
The budget always runs out before the physical
limits are reached.
Cost
Economic Limit
Capability
7Product Development
- Technology vs. Economics (Continued)
New Physical Limit
Physical Limit
Cost
Economic Limit
Innovation!!
Capability
8Product Development
- Implications of Blind Faith in Moores Law
- Fear is that exponential growth is only the first
half of an S shaped curve
9Product Development
- Industry Drivers (Push vs. Pull)
- Market requires (push)
- Smaller feature sizes desired
- Larger chip area desired
- Improved IC designs lead to innovations
- IC industry delivers (pull)
- Lower cost per function (higher performance per
cost) - New applications are enabled to use chips with
new capabilities - Higher volumes produced
10Six Sigma 115
- Definition
- 6? Six Sigma
- SSL Chapter 19
- Description
- Structured methodology for eliminating defects,
and hence, improving product quality in
manufacturing and services. - Aims at identifying and reducing the variance in
product quality, and involves a combination of
statistical quality control, data analysis
methods, and the training of personnel.
11Six Sigma 215
- Statistical Background
- ? is the standard deviation (SD) of the value of
a quality variable, x, a measure of its variance,
assumed to be normally distributed - Assume Lower Control Limit LCL ? - 3?, and
Upper Control Limit UCL ? 3?
Average
Standard Deviation
12Six Sigma 315
- Statistical Background (Continued)
- At SD ?, the number of Defects Per Million
Opportunities (DPMO) below the LCL in a normal
sample is
In a normal sample, the DPMO will be the same
above the UCL. The plot shows f(x) for ? 2.
13Six Sigma 415
- Methodology
- In accepted six-sigma methodology, a worst-case
shift of 1.5? in the distribution of quality is
assumed, to a new average value of ? 1.5?
In this case, the DPMO above the UCL 66,807,
with only DPMO 3 below the LCL (? 2).
14Six Sigma 515
- Methodology (Continued)
- However, if ? is reduced by ½ (? 1), so that
the new LCL ? - 6?, and UCL ? 6?, the DPMO
for normal and abnormal operation are now much
lower
15Six Sigma 615
16Six Sigma 715
- Simple Example Computing the Sigma Level
- On average, the primary product from a specific
distillation column fails to meet its
specifications during five hours per month of
production. Compute its sigma level. - Solution
- The chart on slide 15 gives the Sigma level as
3.8?
17Six Sigma 815
- Computing Throughput Yield
- For n steps, where the number of expected defects
in step i is DPMOi, the defect-free throughput
yield (TY) is - If the number of expected defects in each step is
identical, then TY is
18Six Sigma 915
- Simple Example Computing Throughput Yield
- In the manufacture of a device involving 40
steps, each step is operating at 4? (DPMO6,210) - This means that 22 of production is lost to
defects! - Corresponding to approximately 220,000 units per
million produced (DPMO ? 220,000) - The chart on slide 15 gives the Overall Sigma
level as 2.3?
19Six Sigma 1015
- Monitoring and Reducing Variance
- A five-step procedure is followed - Define,
Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control - DMAIC - Define
- A clear statement is made defining the intended
improvement. - Next, the project team is selected, and the
responsibilities of each team member assigned. - To assist in project management, a map is
prepared showing the Suppliers, Inputs, Process,
Outputs and Customers (referred to by the
acronym, SIPOC).
20Six Sigma 1115
- Define (Continued)
- Example A company producing PVC tubing by
extrusion needs to improve quality. A SIPOC
describing its activities might look like this
21Six Sigma 1215
- Measure
- The Critical To Quality (CTQ) variables are
monitored to check their compliance with the UCLs
and LCLs. - Most commonly, univariate statistical process
control (SPC) techniques, such as the Shewart
chart, are utilized. - The data for the critical quality variables are
analyzed and used to compute the DPMO and the
sigma level. - Example Continuing the PVC extrusion example,
suppose this analysis indicates operation at 3?,
with a target to attain 5? performance.
22Six Sigma 1315
- Analyze
- To increase the sigma level, the most significant
causes of variability are identified, assisted by
a systematic analysis of the sequence of
manufacturing steps. - This identifies the common root cause of the
variance. - Example In the PVC extrusion example, a list of
possible causes for product variance includes - Variance in quality of PVC pellets
- Variance in volatiles in pellets
- Variance in steam heater operating temperature
23Six Sigma 1415
- Improve
- Having identified the common root cause of
variance, it is eliminated or attenuated by
redesign of the manufacturing process or by
employing process control. - Example Continuing the PVC tubing example,
suggestions to how the variance in product
quality can be reduced include - Redesign the steam heater.
- Install a feedback controller to manipulate the
steam valve to enable tighter control of the
operating temperature. - Combination of the above.
24Six Sigma 1515
- Control
- After implementing steps to reduce the variance
in the CTQ variable, this is evaluated and
maintained. - Thus, steps M, A, I and C in the DMAIC procedure
are repeated to continuously improve process
quality. - Note that achieving 6? performance is rarely the
goal, and seldom achieved.
25Six Sigma for Design 13
- Methodology
- The DMAIC procedure is combined with ideas
specific to product design to create a
methodology that assists in applying the
six-sigma approach to product design. - A five-step procedure is recommended
- Define project
- Identify requirements
- Select concept
- Develop design
- Implement design
-
26Six Sigma for Design 23
- Step 1 Define Project
- The market opportunities are identified.
- A design team is assigned and resources are
allocated. - Often, project timeline is summarized in a Gantt
chart. - Step 2 Identify Requirements
- As in DMAIC, the requirements of the product are
defined in terms of the needs of customers. - Step 3 Select Concept
- Innovative concepts for the new design are
generated, first by brainstorming. - The best are selected for further development.
27Six Sigma for Design 33
- Step 4 Develop Design
- Often several teams work in parallel to develop
and test competing designs, making modifications
as necessary. - The goal is to prepare a detailed design,
together with a plan for its management,
manufacture, and quality assurance. - Step 5 Implement Design
- The detailed designs in Step 4 are critically
tested. - The most promising design is pilot-tested and if
successful, proceeds to full-scale
implementation.
28Summary Six Sigma
On completion of this part, you should
- Define the Sigma Level of a manufacturing process
(Increased losses DPMO means decreased sigma
level). - Apply DMAIC in product design and manufacture.
- Qualitatively analyze a process for the
manufacture of a product and know how to identify
the CTQ step using DMAIC.
29Other Business
- Guest Lecture March 8
- Latest Acrolein research results
- Individual Team Assignments
- Will be assigned over next two week period
- Progress Report No. 2
- Can be turned in Friday March 16 before 500 PM
- External Evaluators Confirmed
- Lee Daniel, Lead Product Developer, Civil Systems
Inc. - Robert DAlessandro, Director of Process Eng.,
Degussa - Resumes will be posted on website soon
30Other Business
- Field Trip to Degussa March 13
- More details will be provided at lecture on
Thursday - Suggested driver and passenger assignment