Console Operator Selection - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Console Operator Selection

Description:

Jolene Kramer JPS Vice President Northwest Process Technology Alliance - Technical Trainer s Conference Bellingham, Washington September 16, 2004 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1206
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: nwptaOrgd
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Console Operator Selection


1
Console Operator Selection
Jolene Kramer JPS Vice President
Northwest Process Technology Alliance - Technical
Trainers Conference
Bellingham, Washington
September 16, 2004
2
A True Story Russias Nuclear MissileersThe
Rocketchiki
Inner sanctum The TOPOL command center
3
Assessment Testing for the Rocketchiki
  • TATIANA ANISIMOVA (Psychologist) The first test
    is to define personality traits. And the second
    is not so much a test, rather to work out
    bio-rhythms. In assessing personal traits, and
    everyone knows it these days, it's been proved,
    on the basis of a person's attitude to color one
    can determine not only their emotional state, but
    also their qualities. As for bio-rhythms, a human
    being is influenced by various rhythms the
    rhythm of the sun's movement, lunar movement and
    so on. And these bio-rhythms, date of birth, the
    lunar phase at that time, the impact of the sun
    on the earth in that year, on that basis the
    bio-rhythms are constructed.

4
Overview
  • Why the console operator job is unique
  • Benefits of good selection practices
  • What most companies are doing
  • The latest scientific findings
  • Recommended selection practices

5
Jobs Similar to the Console Operator
2004
  • Jobs Today
  • Air Traffic Controllers
  • Refinery Console Operators
  • Pipeline Controllers
  • Water Treatment Plant Controller
  • Nuclear Power Plant Operators
  • Utility Power Load Coordinators
  • Missile Launch Operator

6
Common Features to These Jobs
  • Dynamic Process
  • High Information Processing Demands
  • Visual Displays
  • Interface Separates Employee From the Process
  • Long Training Times
  • Grave Consequences of Error
  • Stressful

7
What Makes Jobs Complex
Future Console Operator?
Level of Ability
Todays Console Operator
Past Board Operator
Number of Abilities
8
Variation in Job PerformanceAs a Function of
Complexity
Over 100 Times
Best
12 Times
Best
3 Times
Best
Worst
Worst
Worst
Low
Medium
High
Complexity of Job
9
Abilities Needed by Console Operators
  • Selective Attention (vigilance)
  • Problem Sensitivity (identifies problems early)
  • Time Sharing (multitasking)
  • Reasoning
  • Oral Expression (communicates clearly)
  • Oral Comprehension
  • Resists making premature judgments
  • Visualization
  • 9. Speed of Closure (pattern recognition)

10
Benefits of Good Selection Practices
  • Decreased attrition
  • Better trainability of operators
  • Fewer incidents
  • More profitable operation

11
Relationship Between Selection Training
Infinite
Level of Training Required
No Training
High
Low
Aptitude
12
Levels of Console Operator Expertise
Level 2 System Users
40 - 50
13
Description of Selection Systems
  • Minimal System

Drug Screen
Application
Interview
  • Standard Approach

Cognitive Test
Interview
Reference Checks
Application
Drug Screen
Physical
  • Deluxe Model

(Standard plus role plays, group exercise,
simulations)
14
What We Believe Companies are Doing
  • Universal
  • Application blank
  • Interview
  • Drug Screen
  • Physical
  • Common
  • Test of gen. knowledge, reasoning, mech. ability
  • Reference checks
  • Less Frequent
  • Simulations, role plays, group exercises
  • Rare
  • Personality tests
  • Honesty tests
  • Graphology tests

15
Recommended Selection TechniquesTests of
Cognitive Ability
  • Should be part of any console operator selection
    system
  • Probably your single best predictor of
    performance
  • True correlation with performance is about r
    .56 (for all complex jobs)
  • Paper Pencil (RBH, Bennet Mech. Reasoning)
  • Simulation-based

16
Measurement of Key Cognitive Abilities
Traditional selection methods measure some of
Key abilities
17
Interviews
  • Should also be a component of any CO selection
    systems
  • Can assess a range of KSAOs, particularly
    interpersonal skills, personality traits, org fit
  • In general, the more you structure the interview
    process the better
  • Unstructured interviews, r .38
  • Structured r .51 (in combination with cog tests
    r .63) VERY STRONG CORRELATION.

18
Ways to Add Structure to Interviews
  • Develop questions linked to KSAOs identified in
    the job analysis
  • Ask same questions of each applicant
  • Develop what did you do and what would you
    do type questions as appropriate.
  • Patterned or behavioral interview
  • Situational interview
  • Develop a scoring system for responses
  • Train interviewers

19
Reference Checks
  • Obtain signed permission statement on application
    to check references
  • Limit access in your company to derogatory
    information
  • Inquire about state laws limiting liability for
    good faith disclosures by former employers
  • Correlation with performance about, r .26

20
Drug Screen
  • Typically assess about 8 10 illicit substances
    including marijuana and cocaine
  • Some studies find 10 or higher test positive
  • Laboratory link between drug use and impaired
    performance
  • Some empirical evidence linking drug use and
    negative work behaviors
  • Unclear what is the correlation with performance

21
Controversial Tests
  • Personality Tests
  • There are some new paper and pencil tests
  • Target a few broad personality domains
  • Conscientious is predictive of job performance
  • Faking may not be a big issue
  • r .31 (MODERATE CORRELATION)
  • Honesty (Integrity)Tests
  • Several paper and pencil tests on market
  • Can ask direct questions or indirect questions
  • Popular with retail establishments to reduce
    theft
  • Does show some validity with job performance
  • r.34

22
Tests to Avoid
  • Graphology Tests
  • Personality assessment based upon a sample of
    hand writing
  • Fairly common in use as a selection tool in
    France and Israel
  • Studies indicate it has virtually no predictive
    value
  • r .02 (NO CORRELATION)
  • Polygraph Tests
  • Legally allowed in just a few situations
  • Best validity obtained when asking specific,
    pointed, questions
  • False positives do occur and can brand people

23
Example of a Good Selection System
Subject Matter Expertise
24
SummaryFor Console Jobs
  • Big payoffs to good selection systems
  • A good system will assess cognitive,
    interpersonal, good citizenship, org fit
  • Cognitive tests and structured interviews are
    basic (OUGHT TO BE USING THEM)

25
Some Things to Ponder
  • What do you think is the value of the selection
    tests that are administered to Russias Nuclear
    Missileers ?
  • Think about your own facility.
  • What is the value of the assessment tests you are
    using to select console operators at your
    facility ?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com