The Nutrition Care Process: Driving Effective Intervention and Outcomes PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Nutrition Care Process: Driving Effective Intervention and Outcomes


1
The Nutrition Care Process Driving Effective
Intervention and Outcomes
2
Nutrition Care Process
  • Process for identifying, planning for, and
    meeting nutritional needs
  • Malnutrition increases
  • morbidity
  • length of hospital stay more care
  • mortality
  • higher costs ()

3

ADA NUTRITION CARE PROCESS
AND MODEL





Screening
Referral



System


Ø

Identify risk factors

Ø

Use appropriate tools
and methods

Ø

Involve
interdisciplinary
collaboration


Nutrition Diagnosis





Ø

Identify and label problem


Nutrition Assessment



Ø

Determine cause/contributing risk




Ø

Obtain/collect timely and

factors




appropriate
data



Ø

Cluster signs and symptoms/



Ø

Analyze/interpret with
defining characteristics

evidence
-
based standards





Ø

Document


Document


Relationship

Between



Patient/Client/Group
Nutrition Intervention



Dietetics

Ø

Plan nutrition intervention




Professional


Formulate goals and

determine a plan of action
Ø

Implement the nutrition intervention




Care is delivered and actions
Nutrition Monitoring and

-
are carried out

Evaluation

Ø

Documen
t
Ø

Monitor progress


Ø

Measure outcome indicators

Ø

Evaluate outcomes

Ø

Document


Outcomes


Management Sys
tem
Ø

Monitor the success of the Nutrition Care
Process implementation

Ø

Evaluate the impact with aggregate data

Ø

Identify and analyze causes of less than
optimal performance and outcomes

Ø

Refine the use of the Nutrition Care

Process






4
Central Core of Nutrition Care Model
  • The relationship
  • between the client
  • the dietetics
  • professional(s)
  • collaborative
  • client-focused
  • individualized

5
Outer Rings of Nutrition Care Model
  • Strengths brought to process by dietetics
    professional
  • dietetics knowledge
  • skills of critical thinking, collaboration,
    communication
  • evidence-based practice
  • Factors of external environment
  • health care system, practice setting
  • social support, economics, education level

6
ADAs Nutrition Care Process Steps
  • Nutrition Assessment
  • Nutrition Diagnosis
  • Nutrition Intervention
  • Nutrition Monitoring and Evaluation

For more information, access the ADA member page
in the Quality Management section.
http//www.eatright.org/Member/83_12962.cfm
7
Nutrition Assessment Components
  • Gather data, considering
  • Dietary intake
  • Nutrition related consequences of health and
    disease condition
  • Psycho-social, functional, and behavioral factors
  • Knowledge, readiness, and potential for change
  • Compare to relevant standards
  • Identify possible problem areas

8
Example of Nutrition Assessment Content
  • Type of assessment
  • Content component
  • Nutritional adequacy
  • Fat and cholesterol intake
  • Trans fatty acid intake
  • Health status
  • Lipid profile
  • BMI
  • Waist circumference
  • What are the reliable
  • standards (ideal goals)?
  • how well, how much,
  • how long

Nutrition assessment what data are most
effective for identifying clients nutrition
related problem of interest
What type of assessment data?
9
How do we get from Assessment to
Intervention?Nutrition Diagnosis
A crucial element of providing quality nutrition
care
10
Nutrition Diagnosis
  • Purpose
  • Identify and label the nutrition problem
  • Nutrition diagnosis
  • NOT medical diagnosis
  • EXPLICIT statement of nutrition diagnosis
  • Note Documentation is an on-going process that
    supports all the steps in the Nutrition Care
    Process

11
Nutrition Intervention
  • Purpose
  • Plan and implement purposeful actions to address
    the identified nutrition problem
  • bring about change
  • set goals and expected outcomes
  • client-driven
  • based on scientific principles and best available
    evidence

Note Documentation is an on-going process that
supports all the steps in the Nutrition Care
Process
12
Nutrition Monitoring Evaluation
  • Purpose
  • Determine the progress that is being made toward
    the clients goals or desired outcomes
  • Monitoring review and measurement of status
  • at scheduled times
  • Evaluation systematic comparison with previous
    status, intervention goals, reference standard
  • Note Documentation is an on-going process that
  • supports all the steps in the Nutrition Care
    Process

13
Nutrition Screening
  • Purpose To quickly identify individuals who are
    malnourished or at nutritional risk and to
    determine if a more detailed assessment is
    warranted
  • Usually completed by DTR, nurse, physician, or
    other qualified health care professional
  • At-risk patients referred to RD

14
Characteristics of Nutrition Screening
  • Simple and easy to complete
  • Routine data
  • Cost effective
  • Effective in identifying nutritional problems
  • Reliable and valid

15
Nutrition Questionnaire
16
Nutrition Screening Tools
  • Acute-care hospital or residential setting
  • Perinatal service
  • Pediatric practice
  • Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST)
  • Nutrition Screening Initiative (NSI)

17
Food and Nutrient Intake Risk Factors
  • Calorie or protein, vitamin and mineral intake
    greater or less than required
  • Swallowing difficulties
  • Gastrointestinal disturbances, bowel irregularity
  • Impaired cognitive function or depression
  • Unusual food habits (pica)
  • Misuse of supplements
  • Restricted diet
  • Inability or unwillingness to consume food
  • Increase or decrease in activities of daily
    living

Hammond KA. Assessment Dietary and Clinical
Data. In Krause, 12th edition, p. 386
18
Psychological/Social Risk Factors
  • Language barriers
  • Low literacy
  • Cultural or religious factors
  • Emotional disturbances associated with feeding
    difficulties (e.g., depression)
  • Limited resources for food preparation or
    obtaining food or supplies
  • Alcohol or drug addiction
  • Limited or low income
  • Lack of ability to communicate needs
  • Limited use or understanding of community
    resources

Hammond KA. Assessment Dietary and Clinical
Data. In Krause, 12th edition, p. 386
19
Physical Risk Factors
  • Extreme age (adults gt80 years, premature infants,
    very young children)
  • Pregnancy adolescent, closely spaced, or three
    or more pregnancies
  • Alterations in anthropometric measurements,
    marked overweight/ underweight for age, height,
    both depressed somatic fat and muscle stores
  • NOTE recent unintentional weight loss is more
    predictive of morbidity/mortality than wt/ht
    status

Hammond KA. Assessment Dietary and Clinical
Data. In Krause, 12th edition, p. 386
20
Physical Risk Factors (cont)
  • Chronic renal/cardiac disease, diabetes, pressure
    ulcers, cancer, AIDS, GI complications,
    hypermetabolic stress, immobility, osteoporosis,
    neurological impairments, visual impairments

Hammond KA. Assessment Dietary and Clinical
Data. In Krause, 12th edition, p. 386
21
Abnormal Laboratory Values
  • Visceral proteins (albumin, prealbumin,
    transferrin)
  • Lipid profile (cholesterol, HDL, LDL,
    triglycerides)
  • Hemoglobin, hematocrit, other blood tests
  • BUN, creatinine, electrolytes
  • Fasting and PP blood glucose levels, A1C

Hammond KA. Assessment Dietary and Clinical
Data. In Krause, 12th edition, p. 386
22
Medications
  • Chronic use
  • Multiple and concurrent use (polypharmacy)
  • Drug-nutrient interactions

23
Joint Commission Standards Drive Nutrition
Screening in Health Care Organizations
24
Nutrition Care Process Screening
  • The Joint Commission (TJC) requires that
    nutritional risk be identified within 24 hrs in
    all hospitalized pts
  • TJC also requires nutrition screening in
    accredited ambulatory facilities
  • Standards of Care protocols determines process
    evidence-based guidelines
  • Use simple techniques, available info
  • May be done by other than RD
  • Usually simple form with targeted info

25
Standard PC.2.20The hospital defines in writing
the data and information gathered during
assessment and reassessment
  • Elements of Performance
  • The information...to be gathered during the
    initial assessment includes the following, as
    relevant...
  • Each patient's nutrition and hydration status, as
    appropriate
  • The hospital has defined criteria for when
    nutritional plans must be developed

26
Standard PC.2.120 The hospital defines in
writing the time frame(s) for conducting the
initial assessment(s).
  • Elements of Performance
  • A nutritional screening, when warranted by the
    patient's needs or condition, is completed within
    no more than 24 hours of inpatient admission
  • CAMH online version, 2006

27
Standards Relating to Nutrition Assessment
  • Standard PC.2.130
  • Initial assessments are performed as defined by
    the hospital.
  • Standard PC.2.150
  • Patients are reassessed5 as needed. CAMH online
    version, 2006

28
Screening for Malnutrition in Acute Care Settings
  • The consensus of the committee is that while
    screening for nutrition risk in the acute care
    setting is crucial, the JCAHO requirement that
    nutrition screening be completed within 24 hours
    of admission is not evidence-based and may
    produce inaccurate and misleading results.
  • Institute of Medicine, 1999

29
Commonly Used Criteria for Nutrition Risk
Screening-Acute Care
  • Diagnosis
  • Weight
  • Weight change
  • Need for diet modification or education
  • Laboratory values (s. albumin, cholesterol,
    hemoglobin, TLC
  • Problems with chewing or swallowing
  • Diarrhea
  • Constipation
  • Food dislikes or intolerance

Institute of Medicine, 1999
30
Nutrition Screening and Assessment Tool
Courtesy Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte,
N.C.
31
Prevalence of Nutrition Risk in Acute Care
  • The prevalence of nutrition risk will vary
    depending on the population screened and the
    criteria used for screening
  • In published studies, prevalence of malnutrition
    in hospitalized patients has ranged from 12 to
    more than 50
  • There is little published data regarding
    nutrition screening for other purposes

32
Malnutrition in Hospitalized Pts
33
CNM Nutrition Screening SurveyChima and Seher,
2007
  • Blast email sent to 1668 members of the Clinical
    Nutrition Management dietetic practice group in
    May, 2007
  • 522 usable surveys were returned, for a response
    rate of 31

34
Does Your Health Care Organization Screen
Patients for Nutrition Risk?
(with accredited ambulatory clinics)
35
Screening in Acute Care
36
Who Has Primary Responsibility for Nutrition
Screening (Inpatient)?
of Respondents
In the 1987 survey, only 60 of 77 respondents
reported admission nutrition screening
37
Criteria Used by Nursing in Nutrition Screening
(n442)
Criterion N
History of weight loss 418 95
Poor intake pta 360 81
Patient is on nutrition support 349 79
Chewing/swallowing issues 333 75
Skin breakdown 319 72
Pregnant/lactating mother off OB 197 45
Diagnosis 167 38
Need for education 160 36
Geriatric surgical patient 148 33
38
Criteria Used by Nursing in Nutrition Screening
(n442)
Criterion N
Specific diet orders 105 24
Food allergy 103 23
NPO/Clear liquid in-house 84 19
Weight for height criterion 75 17
Age (premature or geriatric) 71 16
Visceral proteins (albumin, PAB) 51 12
Infant on concentrated formula 43 10
Body mass index 38 9
Other 111 25
39
How Were Nursing Screening Criteria Chosen?
40
Where Are Nursing Screening Results Documented in
the MR?
41
How Are Nursing Screens Communicated to
Nutrition Staff?
42
If Nursing Screens, Do Nutrition Staff Do a
Secondary Screen?
43
Why Do Nutrition Staff (NS) Do Secondary
Screening?
n
NS screens identify patients missed by NU screens 62 158
Criteria used by NS may not identify pts at nutrition risk 46 117
NU screens may not be completed 50 129
NU screens may be unreliable 34 86
NS staff may not be notified of NU screens 46 118
Other 24 61
44
Characteristics of Secondary Nutrition Screening
n
Nutrition staff (NS) screens use different data than NU 61 156
Nutrition staff (NS) collect the same data as NU 12 30
NS utilize criteria that require nutrition expertise 55 139
Other 6 14
45
Who Is Responsible for Secondary Nutrition
Screening?
46
Criteria Used by Nutrition Staff in Secondary
Screening (n258)
Criterion N
Diagnosis 223 86
NPO/Clear in-house 192 74
Patient on nutrition support 190 74
Specific diet orders 161 62
Visceral proteins (albumin, PAB) 158 61
Chewing/swallowing issues 139 54
Skin breakdown 137 53
History of weight loss 136 53
Weight for height criterion 119 46
47
Criteria Used by Nutrition Staff in Secondary
Screening (n258)
Criterion N
Poor intake prior to admission 110 43
Need for education 95 37
BMI 93 36
Food allergy 89 35
Geriatric surgical patient 83 33
Pregnant/lactating outside OB 79 31
Age (premature or geriatric) 78 30
Infant on concentrated formula 44 17
Other 40 15
48
Where Is Secondary Screening Documented in the
Medical Record?
49
Criteria Used by Nursing/Nutrition to Identify
Patients at Nutrition Risk (Inpatient)
50
Criteria Used By Nursing/Nutrition to Identify
Patients at Nutrition Risk (Inpatient)
51
Criteria Used By Nursing/Nutrition to Identify
Patients at Nutrition Risk (Inpatient)
52
How Many Levels of Risk Does Your Screening
System Include?
53
Has Your Inpt Screening System Been Validated for
Sensitivity/Specificity?
of respondents
54
How Well Do Inpt Screening Criteria Effectively
Identify Nutrition Risk?
55
Validation of Nutrition Screening Tools in Acute
Care
56
Validation of Nutrition Screening Tools in Acute
Care
57
Adult-Geriatric Inpatient Screening Criteria at
MHS
  • 1. Pregnant or Lactating mother admitted to unit
    other than antepartum or mother-baby 
  • 2. Significant unintentional weight loss gt10 lb.
    in past 1-2 months  
  • 3 Patient DESIRES EDUCATION on a therapeutic
    diet 
  • 4. Patient unable to take oral or other
    feedings gt5 days prior to admission
  • 5. Patient on enteral or parenteral feedings 
  • 6. Geriatric patient (80 years plus) admitted
    for surgical procedure 
  • 7. Patient with skin breakdown (decubitus
    ulcer) 

58
Infant-Child-Adolescent Inpatient Screening
Criteria at MHS
  • 1. Recent weight loss
  • 2. On special diet and NEEDS EDUCATION
  • 3. Has feeding tube or on parenteral feedings
  • 4. Diabetic
  • 5. Receives high calorie feeds/concentrated
    formula
  • 6. Food allergy
  • 7. Failure to thrive
  • 8. Feeding problems/intolerance
  • 9. Teen who is pregnant or lactating
  • 10. Child being breast fed

59
MHS Adult Ambulatory Screen
60
MHS Peds Ambulatory Screen
61
MetroHealth Screening Prompt Criteria in Peds
Ambulatory Clinics
  • Children lt2 Years
  • lt10 ile weight/length
  • gt90 ile weight/length
  • Children 2-18 Years
  • lt 10 ile BMI/age
  • gt85 ile BMI/age

62
(No Transcript)
63
(No Transcript)
64
Nursing Admission Screens Most Common Criteria
MHMC (Feb 17-Mar 2, 2003)
65
of Positive Nutrition Screens Classified as
High Risk after Review (by Criterion)
66
Nutrition Screening at MetroHealth
  • Consistent with national practice in terms of
    criteria, procedures, and time frames
  • With the exception of TJC-mandated criteria,
    specificity ranges from 50-100
  • TJC-mandated criteria are poor predictors of
    nutrition risk
  • No data on sensitivity (e.g. what percentage of
    at risk pts are we discovering?)

67
Issues in Nutrition Screening
  • Most nutrition screening in acute and ambulatory
    settings is done by staff other than nutrition
    professionals
  • Based on a national survey, identified at-risk
    patients are referred to nutrition professionals
    less than half the time

68
Issues in Nutrition Screening
  • Much of the research that exists validates more
    comprehensive nutrition screening tools, e.g. MNA
    in the elderly
  • Little research has been done to validate or
    evaluate nutrition screening as it currently
    exists in most acute care institutions a process
    using limited data obtained on admission by
    nursing staff.
  • There is no gold standard of nutrition status
    that can be used as a benchmark

69
ADA Screening Evidence Analysis Work Group
  • Convened fall, 2007
  • Will develop definitions and formulate questions
    for evidence analysis regarding nutrition
    screening

70
Members of Screening EAL Work Group
  • Chair Pam Charney, PhD, RD, CNSD, consultant
  • Vicki Castellanos, PhD, RD, Florida International
    University, educator
  • Cinda Chima, MS, RD, University of Akron,
    educator
  • Maree Ferguson, MBA, PhD, RD, Queensland,
    Australia, clinical manager
  • Nancy Nevin-Folino, MEd, RD, CSP, LD, FADA,
    Childrens Hospital, Dayton, Oh, practitioner
  • Judy Porcari, MBA, MS, RD, Clinical Manager
  • Annalynn Skipper, PhD, RD, FADA, Consultant
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com