Title: C. Erlichman M.D. OUTLINE Preclinical Development
1DEVELOPMENT OF NEW TREATMENTS IN CANCER
2OUTLINE
- Preclinical Development
- Trials Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3
- Biomarkers in Cancer Treatment Trials
- Informed Consent and Regulations
3PRECLINICAL STUDIES
4LET ME SEE, WHICH DRUG SHOULD I TEST?
5NCI Drug Development Stages
6NCI Drug Development Stages
7SCREENING FOR NEW DRUGS
- Testing in tissue culture (in vitro)
- 60 human cancer cell lines
- patterns identified that suggest a new way of
killing cancer cells - interesting agents tested in animal models
8(No Transcript)
9Advantages and Disadvantages of Cancer Cell Line
Drug Screens
- Advantages
- Tumor cell lines have identified active agents in
clinical use - Identifies agents with antitumor activity in a
cell type - May provide useful clue for clinical testing
- Disadvantages
- Mechanism of action not elucidated
- Does not distinguish between nonspecific cell
toxins and potentially useful agents
10Preclinical Pharmacology
- Development of Drug Plasma Method
- Determine the extent of protein binding
- Plasma elimination kinetics of i.v.
administration - Other routes of administration such as oral, may
be evaluated as well - The in vitro and in vivo metabolism is
characterized using liver extracts
11Preclinical Pharmacology
- Preliminary (Range-Finding) Toxicity
- For each drug, it is necessary to establish a
maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting
toxicities (DLT) in both rodent and non-rodent
species. - Testing in human tumor models growing in mice to
determine whether the drug has activity - For each drug, the effect of treating animals
with different tumors is evaluated looking at
stopping tumors from growing and prolonging of
the animals life - tumor types tested depends in part of the
mechanism of action and where there is activity
in tissue culture
12IND Toxicology
- Single or multiple daily dose schedules such as
Dx1, q3hr x 3, q8hr x 15, q4D x 3, etc. - Up to twenty-eight days or more of repeated
administration of drug to rodents and
non-rodents.
13IND Toxicology
- Multiple cycle studies may be required if delayed
or cumulative toxicity is anticipated. - Special studies such as cardiotoxicity,
neurotoxicity evaluations, and immunotoxicity
studies may be required as part of an existing
study or in a separate study.
14CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS
15ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
- Primarily to ensure safety
- To ensure some level of uniformity of the study
population - To select a population of interest
16COMMON ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
- Evidence of cancer
- Age
- Performance status
- Adequate blood counts
- Adequate liver function blood tests
- Adequate kidney function
- Reasonable life expectancy ? 3 months
- Capable of giving informed consent
17COMMON INELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
- Has had therapy (XRT, Chemo) within 4 weeks
- Pregnancy
- Breast feeding
- Prior treatments that may be similar
- Recovery from surgery
- Infections
- Brain metastases
- Cannot take oral medications
18Phase I Trial Goals
- 1. To determine MTD and phase II recommended dose
- 2. To describe all toxicities
- 3. To determine the clinical pharmacokinetics
(PK) - 4. To report any responses
- 5. To relate PK to toxicities and/or biologic
effect - 6. To evaluate potential markers of biologic
endpoints (pharmacodynamics) - 7. To relate PK to genetic polymorphisms
19Pharmacokinetics Pharmacodynamics Pharmacogenetics
- Pharmacokinetics
- What the body does to the drug
- AUC, clearance, t1/2, volume of distribution,
Cmax, CSS, Tmax, renal clearance
20Pharmacokinetics Pharmacodynamics Pharmacogenetics
- Pharmacodynamics
- What the drug does to the body
- Toxicity Grade
- Effect on ANC, platelets
- Tumor response
- Normal Tissue Surrogates
- Effect on Imaging characteristics
21Pharmacokinetics Pharmacodynamics Pharmacogenetics
- Pharmacogenetics
- Genetic variation in enzymes that metabolize
drugs - Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)
- Functional SNPs
- Differences between ethnic groups
- Frequency could be common or relatively rare
- Not analyzed for cancer risk, screening, or
prevention
22Phase I Trial Design Considerations
- Starting dose
- 1/10 LD10 in mice provided the dose lt TLD (toxic
low dose) in dog - If toxic in dog, then start with1/3 TLD in dog
23Phase I Trial Design Considerations
- Standard cohort-escalation design
- 3 patients per dose level
- If 2 or 3 DLTs stop escalation
- If 1 DLT add 3 patients and if no further DLT
continue dose escalation, i.e. 1/6 DLT - MTD is 1 dose level lower
24ASSESSMENT OF DRUG TOXICITY (SIDE EFFECTS)
25TOXICITY GRADING ATTRIBUTION
- NCI common toxicity criteria (CTC v3.0)
- Not related
- Possible related
- Probably related
- Definitely related
26Example of CTC Toxicity Tables
27PHASE 2 AND 3 STUDY GOALS
- Response Rate What percent of patients have
significant tumor shrinkage - Time to Progression The time it takes for the
tumor to grow by a certain amount after starting
the study - Disease Free Survival The time it takes for the
tumor to come back after starting the study - Overall Survival The time patients live after
starting the study
28PHASE 2 CLINICAL TRIALS
- Initiated when a safe dose and schedule define in
phase I - Performed in specific tumor types
- Tumor types selected for testing depending on a
variety of criteria - Overall purpose is to determine whether there is
any clinically meaningful activity
29PHASE 2 CLINICAL TRIALS
- Criteria for tumor types to study
- hint of effect in phase I
- specific target is present in that cancer
- a clinical need is identified
- competitors in the market place
- potential market size
30PHASE 2 CLINICAL TRIALS GOALS
- To determine the response rate, time to
progression and survival - To determine the frequency and spectrum of all
toxicities - To relate potential markers of biologic endpoints
to clinical effect - To relate pharmacogenetics to toxicity and
efficacy
31Phase I vs PHASE 2 CLINICAL TRIALS
- Phase I trials include 20-25 patients with many
tumor types and patients are treated at different
doses - Phase 2 trials can include from 14 to 100
patients with one tumor type treated with one dose
32PHASE 2 CLINICAL TRIALS
- If a phase 2 trial meets its objective then phase
3 trials are needed - However, phase 2 trial results can be used for
accelerated approval by FDA - This needs to be established in consultation with
FDA before the plan for the trial is finalized
and will still require a phase III trial
33PHASE 3 CLINICAL TRIALS
- Definitive comparative trials
- Requires a randomization
- Rarely blinded in Cancer trials
- Primary endpoints can include response rate, time
to progression, overall survival and disease-free
survival
34PHASE 3 CLINICAL TRIALS
- As follow-up on patients may be long results can
take 5 and 10 years to be realized - Size of the study can vary from a few hundred
patients to thousands
35Molecularly Targeted Therapies
- A new paradigm for cancer treatment
- Cancer as a chronic disease like diabetes,
hypertension - Although cure is still the ultimate goal,
control can achieve valuable benefit for the
patient - Treatment are less toxic and chronic
36Natural History of Cancer
Cellular Dedifferentiation
Growth Dysregulation
Loss of Apoptosis
Invasion and Metastasis
Unlimited Cell Division
Angiogenesis
37Molecular Events in Cancer
Dysregulation of Growth Factors or Receptors
Aberrant Signal Transduction
Secretion of Autocrine Growth Factors
Secretion of Angiogenic Growth Factors
Secretion of Matrix Metalloproteinases
Expression of Oncogenes Loss of Tumor Suppressor
Genes
38Receptor Tyrosine Kinases Overexpressed in Breast
Cancer
Extracellular
region
Flt-1
Flk-1
a
ß
a
a
N-Flg
ß
ß
TRK-B
(TK-)
TRK family
FGF receptor
Tie
Insulin
Ltk
EPH/ECK
Ret
Ros/Sev
Met/Sea
Axl/Ark
family
PDGF receptor
receptor
Family
Trk
EGF
family
Family
family
family
family
Trk-B
receptor
Flg
Trk-C
family
c-Ros
Met (HGFR)
Eph
Axl
a
N-Flg
PDGFR-
INS.R
Sevenless
c-Sea?
Eck
Ark
Bek
IGF1R
PDGFR-ß
EGFR
Elk
FGFR-3
c-Fms(CSF1-R)
Neu
Eek
FGFR-4
IgG-like domain
c-Kit(SGFR)
ErbB3
Hek
Cysteine-rich box
Flt-1
EGF-like repeats
Flk-1
Fn type III repeats
Flk-2 (Flt-3)
Transmembrane helix
Intracellular
Flt-4
Plasma membrane
region
Catalytic domain
39Molecularly Targeted Therapies
- Drugs that target receptor tyrosine kinases
Gleevec, Tarceva - Antibodies that target receptors Herceptin,
Erbitux - Antibodies that target receptor ligands - Avastin
40Anti-EGF Agents (Antibodies)
- MoAb
- Erbitux
- ICR62
- mAb425
- Ior egf/r3
- Pantuzamab
- h-R3
- EMD72000
- Bispecific Antibodies
- MDX-447
- Toxin-Linked Conjugates
- ScFV (14E1)-ETA
- ScFV (225)-ETA
- MRI (Fv)-PE38
- TP40
- DAB389-EGF
41Anti-EGF Agents (Drugs)
- AG1478
- CGP59326
- CI1033
- EKB569
- IRESSA
- TARVECA
- LAPATINIB
- PKI-166
- PD158780
42Tumor AngiogenesisAngiogenic Balance or Switch
VEGF, bFGF, TGF-?, integrins, MMP, IL8, hypoxia,
NO (etc)
Angiostatin, endostatin, interferons, TIMP (etc)
Growing capillaries
Metastasis
43VEGF Ligands and Receptors
VEGFR-2 (Flk-1/KDR)
VEGFR-3 (Flt-4)
VEGFR-1 (Flt-1)
Angiogenesis
Angiogenesis
Lymphangiogenesis
Lymphangiogenesis
PlGF Placental growth factor
44Anti-Angiogenesis Agents
- Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors
- Sorefinib
- Sunitinib
- CHIR-258
- AEE788
- BIBF1120
- AZD 2171
- Biologic Agents
- Bevacizumab
- VEGFR-TRAP
45Biomarkers in Cancer Clinical Trials
- Should we treat only those patients that express
the target? - Do we need to treat at doses that cause some side
effects like with chemotherapy? - Should we measure the benefit in the same way
e.g. response rate?
46Biomarkers in Cancer Clinical Trials
- Should the agent be highly specific or affect
several target? - If the latter then how many?
- Should these agents be used in combination with
chemotherapy? - Should these agents be combined with each other?
47By Liz Szabo, USA TODAY
48Can we improve the effectiveness and/or decrease
the risk associated with cancer treatment while
keeping costs under control?
49Biomarkers for Target Effect
- Presence of the target eg ER, PR, HER2
- Effect of treatment on plasma tumor marker eg
CA125, PSA, aFP. - Effect of treatment on a downstream molecule eg
phospho-p70S6K with CCI-779 or RAD001 - Depletion of circulating tumor cells after
treatment - Decrease in metabolic imaging after treatment
50Types of Biomarkers
- Biologic Fluids plasma, serum, urine, CSF,
effusions - Tissue Normal or tumor
- Proteomic, Genomic, DNA
- Imaging
- PET scanning 18FDG, 18FLT, H2O15
- MRI
- CT perfusion
51IRESSA
Albanell. J Clin Oncol 20(1)7110-124, 2001.
52IRESSA
Albanell. J Clin Oncol 20(1)7110-124, 2001.
53IRESSA
Albanell. J Clin Oncol 20(1)7110-124, 2001.
54Therapy of Patients with Metastatic Colon Cancer
- How do we know if the treatment is working?
- Wait 2 months and expose the patient to the side
effects - Does a test that predicts the effectiveness
- Blood test
- Imaging
55GIST PET Shows a complete response before and
after 5 days of Gleevec
56FDG-PET predicts response to chemotherapy in
NSCLC. Median PFS and OS are significantly longer
for responders than nonresponders (163 versus 54
days and 252 versus 151 days, respectively).
Kelloff, G. J. et al. Clin Cancer Res
2005112785-2808
57Circulating tumor cells
- Peripheral blood epithelial cells shed from tumor
surface of cancer patients - Defined by phenotypic characteristics
- Expression of cytokeratin or mucin markers such
as CK18, CK19, and MUC-1 - Phenotypically similar to primary and/or
metastatic tumor cells
Fehm T, et al. Clin Cancer Res. 200282073-2084.
58Detection Methods
- Direct methods (enrichment/detection)
- Immunomagnetic
- Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
- PCR analysis
- Automated fluorescent methods
59Prognostic and Predictive Value of CTCs in MBC
- Hypothesis
- Measurement of CTCs in metastatic breast cancer
may - Identify aggressive disease (prognostic value)
- Provide early determination of treatment
efficacy/benefit (predictive value)
60Prognostic Value of Baseline CTC Counts
Overall Survival
100
90
80
70
60
Log rank P lt .0001
Probability of Progression-Free Survival
21.9 months
50
10.9months
40
30
20
n 87 (49)
10
0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
22
24
26
28
30
20
Time From Baseline (Months)
Cristofanilli M, et al. N Engl J Med.
2004351781-791.
61Change in CTC Count During Therapy Predicts
Overall Survival
1
lt5 CTCs at all time points
83 (47)
2
gt 5 at baseline and lt 5 CTC at last draw
38 (21)
3 lt 5 at Early Draw and gt 5 CTC at last
draw 17 (10)
100
4
gt 5 CTCs at all time points
39 (22)
90
1
vs
2
P .3188
80
1
vs
3
P .0014
70
1
vs
4
P lt .0001
60
Probability of Survival
2
50
1
40
2
vs
3
P .0397
30
20
2
vs
4
P lt .0001
10
3
vs
4
P .0051
4
3
0
0
2
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
22
24
26
28
20
4
30
Time From Baseline (Months)
Cristofanilli M, et al. ASCO
2005. Abstract 524.
62(No Transcript)
63(No Transcript)
64(No Transcript)
65(No Transcript)
66(No Transcript)
67Tamoxifen metabolic pathway
68Tamoxifen Pharmacogenetics(Goetz, Ingle,
Weishilboum, Flockhart)
- Does CYP2D6 genetic variation affect the clinical
outcomes of women receiving tamoxifen? - Do women who are co-prescribed medications which
inhibit CYP2D6 have a higher risk of breast
cancer relapse?
69CYP2D6 Gene
- Encompasses nine exons with an open reading frame
of 1383 bp coding for 461 amino acids. Highly
polymorphic - At least 46 major polymorphic alleles with 4
well-defined phenotypes - Poor metabolizers (PM)
- Intermediate metabolizers (IM)
- Extensive metabolizers (EM)
- Ultra-rapid metabolizers (UM)
70CYP2D6 Gene
- CYP2D6 PM 7-10 of Caucasians lack functional
CYP2D6 - CYP2D6 4 Most common variant leading to null
CYP2D6 enzyme in Caucasians (accounts for 75 of
the Caucasian PM)
71NCCTG 89-30-52
RANDOMIZATION
Postmenopausal women Early ER breast cancer
5 years of Tamoxifen
5 yrs of Tamoxifen 1 yr of Fluoxymesterone
(10 mg po bid)
541 women accrued
5 years total therapy
72NCCTG 89-30-52
- Median follow-up of 12 years
- Accrual completed in April 1995
- No difference between the arms in terms of
primary endpoint (breast cancer relapse) - Ingle J, Suman V, Mailliard J, et al Breast
Cancer Res Treat (In Press)
73Tamoxifen only arm
- 230/257 eligible patients--Formalin fixed
paraffin-embedded tumor blocks - Three 10 micron sections
- DNA extracted
- Genotyping
- CYP2D6 (4) (n190)
- CYP3A5 (3)
- SULT1A1 (2)
74Relapse-free Time
CYP2D6 Wt/Wt
CYP2D6 4/Wt
CYP2D6 4/4
P0.030
Years after randomization
CP1193836-1
Goetz et al J Clin Oncol. 200523(36)9312-8.
75Relapse-free Survival
CYP2D6 WT/WT
CYP2D6 4/WT
CYP2D6 4/4
P0.020
Years after randomization
Goetz et al J Clin Oncol. 200523(36)9312-8.
CP1193836-2
76Informed Consent and Regulations
77Ethics of Phase I Trials
- No known benefit
- Risk of toxicity is unknown
- Patients expectations are high
- Patients discount risk of toxicity
78Ethics of Phase I Trials
- Patient assessment of benefit
- Phase I 59.8
- Standard 36.8
- Patient assessment of toxicity
- Phase I 29.8
- Standard 45.6
- Based on analyses of multiple phase I trials
- Benefit (Response) 5
- Toxicity (Death) 0.5
79INFORMED CONSENT
80Consent Form Excerpts
- Why is this study being done?
- This study is being done to
- Learn the highest safe dose of the
investigational drug 17-AAG when it is given over
1 hour once each week for 3 out of every 4 weeks
to patients with advanced cancer. - Learn the side effects of 17-AAG and how the body
responds to and removes 17-AAG.
81Consent Form Excerpts
82Consent Form Excerpts
83Consent Form Excerpts
- Are there benefits to taking part in this study?
- No help can be promised by taking part in this
study, and the chance of help from this study
cannot be accurately predicted.
84Consent Form Excerpts
85Consent Form Excerpts
- During the first month of this study, the
following additional tests and procedures will be
done to test the amount of 17-AAG in your body
and to learn what effect it has on your body.
These will be done at no additional cost to you
and/or your health plan and include - Nineteen (19) blood samples (totaling about 1¼
cup) will be collected. - Before and at one day after your first and third
weekly 17-AAG treatments, samples of tissue will
be taken by gently scraping the inside of your
cheeks or mouth with a tongue depressor. - You will need to save your urine for 24 hours
before and after your first 17-AAG treatment. - If you have a tumor that can be safely and easily
biopsied, you may be asked to have two additional
biopsies. One before you start and the other one
day after the start of your treatment.
86Consent Form Excerpts (HIPAA)
- Authorization To Use And Disclose Protected
Health Information - By signing this form, you authorize Mayo Clinic
Rochester and the investigators to use and
disclose any information created or collected in
the course of your participation in this research
protocol. - This information may include information relating
to sexually transmitted disease, acquired
immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), or human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV). It may also include
information relating to behavioral or mental
health services or treatment and treatment for
substance abuse.
87Consent Forms in Phase I Oncology Trials
- S. Horng et al NEJM 2002 347(26)2134-2140
- never promise benefit
- rarely mention cure
- communicate risk and its unpredictability
- do not contribute to patients expectation of
benefit
88ADHERENCE TO STUDY PROTOCOL IS CRITICAL
89COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATIONS
- NCI regulations
- Cancer Center
- Cooperative groups
- FDA regulation
- OHRP regulations as interpreted by IRB
90INVESTIGATOR OBLIGATIONS
- Ensure informed consent is obtained
- Report serious adverse events
- Report adverse events
- Data monitoring safety plan
- Data safety monitoring committee
- Protocol compliance
- Regular auditing of cases on study
91QUESTIONS ARE WELCOME