Title: EMatrix: Electronic Resource Management at NCSU
1E-Matrix Electronic Resource Management at NCSU
- Andrew K. Pace
- NCSU Libraries
- May 11, 2006
2Electronic Resource Management
- Who libraries, vendors, patrons
- What the scope and extent of ERM
- When a timeline of work thus far
- Where in libraries, at vendors
- Why advantages and risks
- How development efforts at NCSU Libraries
3What is ERM?
- Digital Library FederationElectronic Resource
Management Initiative(DLF ERMI)
As libraries have worked to incorporate
electronic resources into their collections,
services and operations, most have found their
existing Integrated Library Systems to lack
important functionality to support these new
resources. - Digital Library Federation
Electronic Resource Management Initiative
Report August 2004
4Who is working on ERM?
- Goals
- Describe architectures needed to manage large
collections of licensed e-resources - Establish lists of elements and definitions
- Write and publish XML Schemas/DTDs
- Promote best practices and standards for data
interchange
- Team
- Ivy Anderson (Harvard)
- Adam Chandler (Cornell University)
- Sharon E. Farb (UCLA)
- Timothy D. Jewell (Chair, University of
Washington) - Kimberly Parker (Yale)
- Angela Riggio (UCLA)
- Nathan D.M. Robertson (Johns Hopkins)
5Who is working on ERM?
- 46 pages of text
- Describes the problem
- Outlines existing solutions and efforts
- Introduces the appendices. . . .
- Appendix A Functional Requirements
- Appendix B Workflow Diagram
- Appendix C Entity-Relationship Diagram (ERD)
- Appendix D Data Element Dictionary
- Appendix E Data Structure
- Appendix F XML Investigation
6Who is working on ERM?
Vendors
- CARL / TLC Gold Rush
- EBSCO Electronic Journal Service
- Elsevier / Endeavor Meridian
- Ex Libris Verde
- Innovative Interfaces ERM module
- Serials Solutions ERMS
- SirsiDynix Horizon Electronic Resource
Management - TDNet e-Resource Manager
- VTLS VERIFY
7Who is working on ERM?
Libraries
- MIT
- Penn State
- Tri-College Consortium
- UCLA
- University of Georgia
- University of Minnesota
- University of Washington
- Yale University
- Boston College Library
- California Digital Library
- Cornell University
- Emory University
- Griffith University
- Johns Hopkins
- Kansas State University
8Who does ERM affect?
Serials Librarians Acquisitions
Staff Catalogers Digital Library
Developers Collection Managers Systems
Librarians Web Librarians Reference
Librarians ILS Managers Bibliographers Faculty Sta
ff Students ILS Vendors Knowledge Base
Vendors Subscription Agents Publishers
EVERYBODY
9What is ERM, and why get involved?
- Electronic Resource Management is an attempt to
address the shortcomings of existing systems,
processes and procedures for managing collections
that are available in electronic format and
generally subject to licensing terms, conditions
and restrictions.
10Classic Integrated System
MARC Records
Patron Records
Patron self-service
WEBPAC
circ transactions
- websites (856)
- e-books
- e-journals
- databases
- datasets
reserve records
item holdings
serial holdings
Acquisitions Records
Serials Control Records
11Dis-integrated Library System
- Licensing Files
- ILL Files
- Collection Management Files
- Helpdesk Files
- Statistical Files
alpha list of databases
subject list of databases
Library Portal
web subject guides
- websites (856)
- e-books
- e-journals
- databases
- datasets
e-journal finder
institutional repository
TDNet
SERIALS!!!!
Serials Solutions
SFX
Openly
alert services
Authentication Authorization
12Serials?
- E-journals are, well, still journals
- Databases
- Subscription oriented commit payments on a
continuing basis - Content is licensed and leased access is based
on a continuing relationship with a publisher or
vendor - Contain serial content that is updated on a
continuing basis
13The Previous NCSU Libraries ERM System
14The David Goldsmith v2002 ERM System
- Pros
- Intelligent query interpretation logic and
reasoning (uses fuzzy logic technology) - Capable of learning/adapting to new scenarios
- Cons
- 10s of thousands of dollars per year to maintain
- Shuts down completely in sleep mode for 7-8 hours
per night - Availability to staff subject to meeting schedule
of a department head
15How NCSU Libraries E-Matrix
- July 1999 NCSU E-Shepherding specification
written (and shelved) - 2000-2002 the square peg and round hole era ?
ERM begins to emerge DLIF-ERMI takes shape - Fall 2002 electronic resources in the catalog
E-Journal Finder SFX Licensing database
Collection Management OASIS database? E-Matrix
begins to emerge
16NCSU Libraries E-Matrix
- An ad hoc committee charge
- The ad hoc E-Matrix Committee will implement a
prototype electronic resources management system
to support acquisition and licensing, collection
management, and resource discovery for the
Libraries' electronic resources and all the
print journals, too, please
17E-Matrix
ADMINISTRATIVE METADATA
Website Catalog E-resources Alert Services Local
DBs Collections Digital Archives
licensing
I L S
Data Repos- itories
subscript-ion info
statistics
E-MATRIX
DATA HOOKS
PRESENTATION LAYER
technical support
remote access
Other Databases E-journal finder ETDs Instnl
Repository Etc.
evaluative data
Evaluative Tools
vendor data
18The Crew
- Andrew Pace, Systems, Chair
- Stephen Meyer, Project Fellow
- Kristin Antelman, Administration (IT)
- Karen Ciccone, Natural Resources Library
- Jason Crocker, Systems (Programmer)
- David Goldsmith, Acquisitions
- James Jackson Sanborn, Digital Library
Initiatives - Karen Letarte, Cataloging
- Tim Mori, Systems
- Greg Raschke, Administration (Collections)
- Shirley Rodgers, Systems
- Rob Rucker, Distance Learning Services
- Will Wheeler, Collection Management
19E-matrix Challenges
- Public interface is secondary concern
- Leveraging existing dataall of it!
- Workflow, Workflow, Workflow
- Avoid solutions looking for problem
- Embrace the serial work
20E-Matrix Objectives
manage electronic and print serial subscriptions,
other e-resources, support licensing local
control
Acquisitions
enhance access points improve user displays
leverage local metadata access at the work level
Discovery anddisplay
support resource selection, allocation, and
evaluation manage and use faculty-provided data
integrated data reports
CollectionManagement
21Acquisitions
- 19 of total collections budget spent on
electronic resources - 28 of serials budget on e-resources
- Still in a bi-model mode for many titles and
divergent workflow is costly
22Licensing
- Systematically tracking terms and conditions of
materials - Digital Rights Management (DRM) will govern use
over fair use rights - Breach control will increase as vendor monitoring
methods become more sophisticated
23MyLibrary
Patron Database
MyTOCs
MyAccount
Collection Mgmt evaluative data
SJERMs Journals / Serials Electronic
Resources Databases
My Courses
Bib Data
Acquisitions and licensing data
Course Reserves
Statistical Data
Local subjects
Search / Browse
24The public sphere of E-Matrix
- Modeling the facets of access to article
databases, data stores and our journal collection
25Database Descriptions real world examples
- articles - mixed scholarly, popular, news, trade
- articles - news
- articles-scholarly, plus other scholarly
materials - biological data
- books - ebooks, catalog, WorldCat
- citation trails
- company information
- conference proceedings
- digital collections
- directories
- dissertations
- financial data/accounting/taxes
- GIS
- grant information
- images
- industry information
- information about journals
- job and career information
- legal and government information
- maps
- marketing and advertising
- patents and trademarks
- physical data/properties
- portal/website
- preprints
- reference/quick facts (handbooks, encyclopedias,
dictionaries, etc) - social data / statistics / demographics
- standards
- technical reports
26Description of Databasescontainer vs. content
Container What kind of resource is it (e.g.,
article database, online data set, electronic
reference work)?
Content What is inside of, or indexed by, the
container (e.g., citations, images, statistics)?
27Databases in E-Matrix
Backend storage of metadata used by the
redesigned public website
- Assignment of web subjects
- Assignment of resource types
- Assignment of content types
28Resource types
- data set
- digital collection
- index
- reference
- dictionary
- directory
- encyclopedia
- handbook
29Content types
- annual reports
- articles
- popular
- news
- scholarly
- trade
- bibliographic citations
- books
- citations
- conference proceedings
- dissertations
- grants
- images
- journals
- maps
- patents
- preprints
- scientific properties
- standards
- statistics
- technical reports
- trademarks
30Real world / Data model crosswalks(captured in
E-Matrix)
articles - mixed scholarly, popular, news, trade
?
Container Type(s) Index Content
Included Scholarly articles, Dissertations,
Technical reports
31Real world / Data model crosswalks(captured in
E-Matrix)
biological data
?
Container Type(s) Data set Content
Included Scientific properties Subject(s) Biolo
gyBiological Agricultural Engineering
32Real world / Data model crosswalks(captured in
E-Matrix)
company information
?
Container Type(s) Index, Data set Content
Included Trade articles, Annual reports,
Statistics Subject(s) Business and
managementIndustry
33How do we apply the data model
- Richer reports about our collection
- User-centered resource discovery
34(No Transcript)
35Databases in E-Matrix
- New Authoring Tools
- Mix and match Content, Containers and Subjects to
create new lists - Author dynamic pages with stored queries
36Journals E-Matrix
- E-Matrix brings together different manifestations
of a single work - Includes print and electronic
- Will be able to make a distinction between
library selected titles and aggregated titles
37Managing the journal work
- E-Matrix will manage journals through a locally
assigned resource ID - Data imported from SFX has been matched against
data imported from our catalog - LC Subjects, SFX Subjects, and Fund codes from
our catalog mapped to web subjects when imported
into E-Matrix
38Collocating manifestations
- Establishing a link between catalog records and
SFX Knowledgebase records enables
- Summary availability of works Simultaneous
display of electronic and print - Intuitive presentation of holdings Dynamic
retrieval of print holdings combined with web
link to SFX window to access online issues
39(No Transcript)
40(No Transcript)
41(No Transcript)
42Journal discovery
43Future possibilities for journals
- Subject assignments for core journals
- Content included assignments for core journals
(e.g., scholarly articles) - Public aggregated title / provider displays
44Demo
45E-Matrix Technical Framework
------------------------- JAVA -------------------
------
---------------- ORACLE --------------
JSP
SQL
Stored Java Server Pages
E-MATRIX
Spring/Hibernate XML framework for data flow
control
Tomcat Web Server
SQL
HTTP requestsHTML output
SQL
PL/SQL Packages Procedures
Database tables data
Web-based Staff Interfaces
46Some expected (and unexpected) discoveries
- Non-standard data aint so bad (SFX KB,
acquisitions, serials, etc.) - Standard data aint as good as you think it is
- Theres a reason no one has provided a definitive
solution for expressing the serial work - ERM strongly suggests radical changes to
technical services workflow - Theres as much data about data as there is data
(at least it seems that way)
47E-matrix / ERM Future
- Taking the E out of E-matrix
- Standards
- Is the ILS superfluous?
- Is MARC dead?
- Will libraries or their vendors corner the ERM
market? - Would we do it again?
- Are we going to share the code?
we must
sure, what the heck
sort of
I can dream, cant I?
yes
definitely
sort of
48Yes, we would do it again
- The Serial Work
- Migration of / Interoperability with existing
data - Putting our development dollars where our
collections dollars are
49How will we share?
http//www.lib.ncsu.edu/ematrix
- Oracle
- Java
- Sirsi
- SFX
- Etc.
- We welcome your thoughts
50Thank You.
http//www.lib.ncsu.edu/staff/presentations
Andrew K. Pace Head, Information Technology NCSU
Libraries andrew_pace_at_ncsu.edu