Title: Trigger Locks & Mandatory Storage Laws
1Trigger Locks Mandatory Storage Laws
- by Jeremy D. Blanks, Ph.D.
- Click your mouse or use Page Down to advance
each stage of this presentation
2Proposals and Positions from Gun Control Groups
and Politicians
- Force the sale of a trigger lock with all
firearms - Require that all current firearm owners purchase
a trigger lock - Mandatory storage laws that demand a firearm be
locked away and inaccessible regardless of
personal situation - Perform inspections and unwarranted searches of
individual homes to insure that firearms are
properly stored - Concerns over storage laws preventing people from
accessing a firearm for self-defense are
irrelevant, since most gun control supporters and
politicians like Bill Clinton and Al Gore do not
believe law-abiding citizens have a right to
self-defense against murderers, rapists, and
other violent felons
3A Few Facts About Trigger Locks and Guns
- Today, essentially all firearms sold have trigger
locks with them - as has been the case for many
years - Responsible storage is already a part of the
safety approach of greater than 99 of gun owners - Accidents are at an all time low due directly to
educational programs, such as the Eddie Eagle
program from the National Rifle Association - Even though the number of firearms has quadrupled
since 1930, the number of firearm accidents has
declined by 62
4More Facts About Trigger Locks and Guns
- Firearms are only involved in just over 1 of
accidental fatalities, whereas motor vehicles are
responsible for 47 , falls for 15 , poisons for
10 , drowning for 4 , fire for 3 , suffocation
of an ingested object for 3 , and even the
category other has a higher level than firearms
- It is dangerous to store a loaded firearm with a
trigger lock on it, since such a lock could cause
the firearm to discharge as has happened numerous
times - Trigger locks can create a false sense of
security, due to the reliance on a lock instead
of following established safety guidelines
5Do Trigger Lock Laws Save Lives?
- There is no evidence which shows that trigger
lock laws save lives - Responsible gun owners already follow established
safety guidelines as shown by the fact that
firearm accidents are at an all time low - Irresponsible people and criminals will not
magically use trigger locks due to the passage of
a law - To force responsible gun owners to use a trigger
lock, even though they have secured their firearm
by other means, will put the individual at a
disadvantage if the firearm is needed and a lock
must be removed prior to use - Trigger locks and similar devices have failed and
in turn caused accidents and loss of life
6Trigger Lock Comparison to Child Resistant Safety
Caps on Medicine
- Bill Clinton, Al Gore, and many others have
compared gun locks to safety caps on medicine - Such a comparison is fairly accurate and the
results would be similar - Research by Harvards Prof. Kip Viscusi has shown
that child resistant caps have caused an increase
in accidental poisonings - People have become more careless with their
medicines, since they began to rely on child
resistant caps for protection instead of using
their basic common sense - A similar situation would develop with gun locks
- The fact is that no cap is truly resistant - they
can all be defeated - The same can be said for trigger locks
7What Would Be the Results of a Mandatory Storage
Law?
- Compliance with storage laws is not likely since
inherently irresponsible people will not obey
such a law - Enforcement of storage laws would lead to abuses
of civil liberties - Unwarranted searches of individual homes would be
required to confirm compliance with storage laws - A one size fits all law cannot possibly meet
the needs or properly address the situations of
all gun owners - people would be put at risk - Such mandatory storage laws would handicap a
person who needs a gun for self-defense against a
murderer, rapist, or other violent felon - Today, millions of crimes are prevented every
year by law-abiding citizens - mandatory storage
laws would hinder self-defense and cost lives - Such laws have been called criminal protection
acts, which is an accurate description
8How Have Mandatory Storage Laws Affected Crime
and Accidents in Other Countries?
- Canada enacted such laws several years ago
- Canada now has a burglary rate significantly
higher than that of the United States - Canadian burglars are three times more likely
than U.S. burglars to break into a home while it
is occupied - Accident rates in Canada actually went up
following the enactment of such laws - England enacted safe storage laws in the 1930s
- Not only does England have a higher burglary rate
than the U.S. and has so for decades, but their
home invasion rate is also much higher than that
of the U.S. - In the U.S., burglars almost always avoid
occupied homes due directly to their concern over
armed law-abiding citizens - The low home invasion rate for the U.S. is
significant, since many such instances also lead
to rape, assault, and murder
9What Were the Results of Mandatory Storage Laws
on Civil Liberties in England?
- In 1936, the British police added a requirement
to their firearms licenses related to safe
storage - Initially, this was a minor point and was
designed to discourage irresponsible people from
carelessly storing a firearm - However, as is the case with gun control laws in
general, such measures were gradually tightened
with their goals being changed with time - Today, self-defense is no longer accepted as a
sufficient reason for owning a firearm - and thus
the severity of the storage laws have been
greatly increased - Generally, the police in England will not issue a
permit for a shotgun or hunting rifle without
first conducting an unwarranted in-home
inspection - In most areas, gun safes are no longer sufficient
storage mechanisms - In the end, such mandatory storage laws have been
used to further harass, discourage, and prevent
law-abiding citizens for owning any type of
firearm
10How Should Guns Be Stored?
- The answer to this simple question is very
complex and dependent on individual situations - For example, a family with small children living
in a crime plagued area may prefer alternative
methods to trigger locks, such as quick access
safes, since they may need ready access to a
firearm for self-defense - On the other hand, a family with small children
living in an area with little if any crime, may
prefer to use a safe for their firearms - In all cases, the parents have a responsibility
to insure that a firearm does not fall into the
hands of a child, but there are many ways of
accomplishing this goal and there are no one
size fits all solutions - The best approach is to allow parents, not
members of Congress or some uninformed gun
control group, to decide what is best for their
families - Educational programs, such as those offered by
the NRA and other gun safety groups, are key to
this issue through providing information on the
available choices for safe storage and general
gun safety
11Are There Alternatives to Trigger Lock Laws?
- Education, education, and education!
- Educational programs have consistently shown that
they have and will prevent accidents involving
firearms - this is especially true for children
as is evident by the current all time low
accident rate - One study after another has shown that children
who are educated about firearms early in their
lives and taught to respect them are not prone to
be involved in firearm accidents or violence - One way the government can play a positive role
in this matter is to offer tax breaks and
incentives for the purchase of storage items - a
significant expense for low income families - The most important point about firearm safety is
common sense and following safety guidelines -
there is no law that will increase common sense
in inherently irresponsible people
12Conclusions
- Trigger locks are easily defeated and they will
lead to a false sense of security that will cause
more accidents - Such laws will be impossible to impose without
using unwarranted searches of individual homes to
insure compliance - Trigger lock and mandatory storage laws will lead
to more crime, since the criminals fear of an
armed citizen will be reduced - Mandatory storage laws are more accurately termed
criminal protection acts, due to the
disadvantages placed on law-abiding citizens who
may need a firearm for self-defense against a
home intruder, rapist, murderer, etc. - Trigger locks will not prevent theft, since such
devices are easily removed with simple tools - Education is the proven answer to lowering
accidents as is evident by the all time low
levels we are currently enjoying - Trigger locks and mandatory storage laws cannot
impose common sense on the inherently
irresponsible people
13References and Suggested Reading
- Kopel, D. Volokh, E. What Kids Dont Know Can
Kill Them, The Cato Institute, May 27, 1999.
http//www.guncite.com/gun_control_rrtrigger.html
- Sherman, R. D. Trigger Locks Are Dangerous, The
Harford Courant, September 12, 1998. - Tavares, C. D. Trigger Locks and Airbags,
Middlesex News, July 19, 1998.
http//www.goal.org/articles/cdttriggerlocks.htm
l