Public Administration Shaping the ‘Unscripted Future’ - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Public Administration Shaping the ‘Unscripted Future’

Description:

Public Administration Shaping the Unscripted Future Examining the Nature of Change in Public Administration: Limitations and Possibilities in Public ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:156
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: 2010naspaa
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Public Administration Shaping the ‘Unscripted Future’


1
Public Administration Shaping the Unscripted
Future
2
Examining the Nature of Change in Public
Administration Limitations and Possibilities in
Public Administration Reform
  • Rapid global, economic and social changes are
    profoundly affecting institutions and the lives
    of individuals. These changes are challenging
    the prevailing paradigms in public
    administration.
  • Public Administration Reform in the Past
    Influenced by external forces, history, and
    institutional constraints.
  • Public Administration Reform in the Future
    Requires a new theoretical framework that can
    deal with the complexities of the 21st Century.

3
Public Administration Reform in the
PastPath-dependency vs. External Forces
  • Public administration has traditionally reformed
    in response to external forces, but it has done
    so within constraints. During the 20th Century,
    significant political, social and economic
    changes took place, but public administration
    remained relatively constant.
  • One possible explanation for the consistency in
    public administration during the 20th Century is
    that public administration reform has been
    path-dependent (Pollitt and Boukaert 2004 Peters
    and Pierre 1998).

4
Path Dependency Key Concepts
  • Originally applied to technology.
  • History Matters
  • Key Concepts
  • Patterns of timing and sequence are important.
  • Large consequences can result from small events.
  • Courses of action, once initiated, can be almost
    impossible to reverse
  • Political development is punctuated by critical
    junctures.
  • (Pierson 2000)

5
Path Dependency Increasing Returns
  • Path Dependency is frequently described as an
  • increasing returns or positive feedback
    process
  • which highlights two important features
  • 1. The cost of switching to another
  • alternative increases over time.
  • 2. Timing, sequence, and formative events
  • are important.
  • (Pierson 2000)

6
Path Dependency Increasing Returns
  • Aspects of technology and institutions that
    generate
  • an increasing-returns process.
  • Large set up or fixed costs.
  • Learning effects
  • Coordination effects
  • Adaptive expectations
  • (Pierson 2000, North 1990)

7
Public Management Reform as Path-Dependent
  • Peters and Pierre (1998) The objectives and
    concrete design of administrative reform mirror
    the historical, political, and societal roles of
    public administration as well as its internal
    culture. Such reforms are path-dependent,
    probably to a much greater extent than we
    generally realize (224).

8
Public Management Reform as Path-Dependent
  • Pollitt and Bouckaert (2004) View management
    reform as influenced by global economic factors,
    socio-economic change, and new management ideas,
    but also acknowledge the role of path-dependency.
  • Certain laws, rules, and institutions can create
    heavy disincentives for change (Pollitt and
    Boukaert citing Pierson 2004, 33).
  • The costs of change in management reform
    include learning new methods of operation,
    developing new networks and new patterns of
    authority (Pollitt and Boukaert 2004, 33).

9
Criticisms of Path-Dependency
  • Ignores the importance of smaller, more
    incremental change.
  • Engages in retrospective rationality (Peters,
    Pierre, King 2005, 1277)
  • Does not account for political conflict properly.
  • Inadequately explains political and policy
    change.
  • Does not have a convincing account of
    decision-making.
  • (Peters, Pierre, King 2005 Kay 2005)

10
Criticisms of Path-Dependency
  • Criticisms are not fatal to the validity of
    path-dependency (Kay 2005).
  • The concept is useful for understanding the
    limits to intentional reform which are due to the
    presence of institutional inertia (Torfing 2009,
    81).

11
Public Administrations Legacy Effects
  • Public Administration is bound by tradition
  • and is subject to legacy effects in the sense
  • that its inheritance exerts its influence in the
  • face of pressures for change (Painter and
  • Peters 2010, 13).

12
Traditional Public Administration A Critical
Juncture
  • Growth of capitalism, influx of immigrants,
    urbanization, and the Progressives.
  • The Traditional Doctrine was crafted around
  • Wilsons (1887) ideas of efficiency, businesslike
    administration, the separation of politics from
    administration, and hierarchy.
  • Webers (1922) account of bureaucracy which
    emphasized control from the top, hierarchy, rules
    and regulations, and a rational system of control
    which made the bureaucrat subordinate to his
    political superior.
  • (Moore 1995 Pfiffner 2004).

13
The Traditional Doctrine A Critical Juncture
  • Work was organized, structures were designed and
    superior-subordinate relationships were crafted
    around the principles of efficiency, hierarchy
    and the separation of politics from
    administration.
  • There were 11 major reform initiatives during the
    20th Century, but these basic principles
    continued to resurface.

14
The Traditional Doctrine and Path Dependency
  • Timing was important. Early events mattered more
    than later ones.
  • The cost of switching to other alternatives
    increased over time. Scholarship and practices
    were guided by the doctrine.
  • Wilsons and Webers writings had large and
    lasting consequences.
  • Self-reinforcing since there were large set up
    costs that made it difficult to change
    established methods and relationships, learning
    effects led to innovations based on this dominant
    framework, and coordination effects and adaptive
    expectations led to interdependence.

15
Reform Movements Constrained by the Traditional
Doctrine
16
The New Public Service A Break from the Past?
  • The New Public Service
  • (Denhardt and Denhardt 2007)
  • Concepts
  • Citizens as bearers of rights and duties within
    the context of a wider community
  • (60)
  • Citizens as central to administration,
    policymaking and implementation.
  • Public administrators as guided by shared values
    and collective citizen interests
  • (78)
  • The public administrator is only one key actor
    within a larger system of
  • governance (81).
  • Concerns
  • Not a blueprint for a structure. . .an ideal
    (187).
  • Not yet determined if it represents a distinct
    break from the past.

17
A New Path for the 21st Century?
  • Possible cost of following the same path is that
    it may lead to suboptimal outcomes (Pierson
    2000).
  • Rapid rate of global, economic and political
    change is making it impossible to stay on the
    same path. We may now be at a critical juncture
    similar to the one at the beginning of the 20th
    Century.
  • The traditional visions of public management can
    no longer be stretched to accommodate the growing
    complexity of the world (Kiel 1994, 3).

18
Factors Influencing Reform in the 21st Century
19
Preparing Public Administrators for the 21st
Century New Skills for Public Managers
  • Change presents new challenges for public
    administration educators.
  • In order to be prepared for the 21st Century,
    public managers will need a new skill set.
  • Kiel (1994), Drucker (1994), and Freidman (2007)
    offer insight on the type of skills that
    employees and public managers will need.

20
Preparing Public Administrators for the 21st
Century New Skills for Public Managers
  • Kiel (1994) Instead of relying on an organizing
  • theory for direction, public managers will lead
    by
  • being unthreatened by change
  • letting go of control
  • looking for the deep order in work
  • focusing on processes instead of structure
  • accepting that uncertainty is inevitable
  • recognizing that values can provide underlying
    order in an organization (201-212).

21
Preparing Public Administrators for the 21st
Century New Skills for Public Managers
  • Drucker (1994) Public managers are
  • knowledge workers who must have the
  • ability to understand and apply both
  • theoretical and analytical knowledge, and the
  • habit of continual learning.

22
Preparing Public Administrators for the 21st
Century New Skills for Public Managers
  • Friedman (2007) In a flat world students must
  • learn how to learn (309)
  • have the ability to navigate the virtual world
    (310)
  • have an attitude of curiosity and passion
  • have a background in the liberal arts
  • Educators must nurture right-brain skills that
    deal
  • with emotions and synthesis.

23
Implications for Education
  • This shift to a new set of skills will also
  • require higher education to reconsider its
  • pedagogy, orthodoxy and structure.

24
References
  • David, Paul A. 1985. Clio and the Economics of
    QWERTY. The American Economic Review 75 (2)
    332-337.
  • Denhardt, Janet V. and Robert B. Denhardt. 2007.
    The New Public Service Serving, Not Steering.
    Armonk, New York ME Sharpe.
  • Denhardt, Robert B. 2008. Theories of Public
    Organization. 5th ed. Belmont, CA Thomson
    Wadsworth.
  • Drucker, Peter F. 1994. The Age of Social
    Transformation. The Atlantic Monthly,
    November. www.theatlantic.com/politics/ecbig/soctr
    ans.htm. Accessed 3/29/2009.
  • Drucker, Peter F. 1999. Management Challenges for
    the 21st Century. New York, New York
    HarperCollins.
  • Frederickson, George. 1996. Comparing the
    Reinventing Government Movement with the New
    Public Administration. Public Administration
    Review 56 (3) 263-270.
  • Friedman, Thomas. 2007. The World is Flat A
    Brief History of the Twenty-First Century.
    NewYork Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  • Heinrich, Carolyn J., Carolyn J. Hill and
    Laurence E. Lynn, Jr. 2004. Governance as an
    Organizing Theme for Empirical Research. In The
    Art of Governance Analyzing Management
    and Administration, edited by Patricia W.
    Ingraham and Laurence E. Lynn, Jr, 3-19.
    Washington D.C. Georgetown University Press.
  • Kay, Adrian. 2005. A Critique of the Use of Path
    Dependency in Policy Studies. Public
    Administration 83 (3) 553-571.
  • Kettl, Donald F. 2005. The Global Public
    Management Revolution. Washington, D.C.
    Brookings Institution Press.
  • Kiel, Douglas L. 1994. Managing Chaos and
    Complexity in Government. San Francisco Jossey
    Bass.
  • Mehhan, Elizabeth. 2003. From Government to
    Governance, Civic Participation and
    New Politics the Context of Potential
    Opportunities for Better Representation of Women.
    Occasional Paper No. 5. October.
    www.qub.ac.uk.cawp/research/meehan.pdf Accessed
    5/27/2010.

25
References
  • Moore, Mark H. 1995. Creating Public Value
    Strategic Management in Government. Cambridge,
    Massachusetts Harvard University Press.
  • National Intelligence Council. 2004. Mapping the
    Global Future. December.http//www.foia.cia.gov/20
    20/2020.pdf Accessed 6.15.2010.
  • North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions,
    Institutional Change and Economic Performance.
    Cambridge Cambridge University Press.
  • Painter, Martin and B. Guy Peters. 2010. The
    Analysis of Administrative Traditions. In
    Tradition and Public Administration, edited by
    Martin Painter and B. Guy Peters, 3-16. New York,
    NY Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Peters, B. Guy and John Pierre. 1998. Governance
    without Government? Rethinking Public
    administration. Journal of Public
    Administration Research and Theory 8 (2)
    223-243.
  • Pfiffner, James P. 2004. Traditional Public
    Administration versus The New Public Management
    Accountability versus Efficiency Festschrift for
    Professor Klaus Konig of Speyer, Germany. In
    Institutionenwandel in Regierung und Verwaltung
    Festschrift fur Klaus Konig, edited by Arthur
    Benz, HHeinrich Siedentopf, and Karl-Peter
    Sommermann. 443-454. Berlin, Germany Duncker
    Humblot. http//gunston.gmu.edu/pfiffner/index_fi
    les/Page2533.htm. Accessed 7/11/2010
  • Pierson, Paul. 2004. Increasing Returns, Path
    Dependence, and the Study of Politics. The
    American Political Science Review 49 (2)
    251-267.
  • Pierre, Jon. 2010. Administrative Reform in
    Sweden The Resilience of Administrative
    Tradition? In Tradition and Public
    Administration, edited by Martin Painter and B.
    Guy Peters, 191-202. New York, NY Palgrave
    MacMillan.
  • Pollitt, Christopher and Geert Bouckaert. 2004.
    Public Management Reform A Comparative
    Analysis. 2ed. Oxford Oxford University
    Press.
  • Torfing, Jacob. 2009. Rethinking path dependence
    in public policy research. Critical Policy
    Studies 3 (1) 70-83.
  • Victoria Sate Services Authority. 2007. Joined
    up government A review of national and
    international experiences. Working Paper No. 1
    www.saa.vic.gov.au/CA2571410025903D/webobj/OccPap
    er_JoinedupGovenrment/File/OccPaper JoinedupGover
    nment.pdf Accessed 6/2/2010.
  • Wilson, Woodrow. 1887 1997. The Study of
    Administration. In Classics of Public
    Administration. edited by Jay M. Shafritz and
    Albert C. Hyde. 14-26. Ft. Worth, TX Harcourt
    Brace College Publishers.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com