ASYMMETRIC CONFLICT - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

ASYMMETRIC CONFLICT

Description:

ASYMMETRIC CONFLICT GROUP # 3 Kunhui Cai, Madan Chauhan, Jim Jacaruso, Manoj Pant, Vinay Srivastava, Yoji Tsubaki Theory of Asymmetric Conflict Theory and Concept ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:135
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: staffMaxw
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ASYMMETRIC CONFLICT


1
ASYMMETRIC CONFLICT
  • GROUP 3
  • Kunhui Cai,
  • Madan Chauhan,
  • Jim Jacaruso,
  • Manoj Pant,
  • Vinay Srivastava,
  • Yoji Tsubaki

2
Theory of Asymmetric Conflict
  • Asymmetric Conflict is a term that describes a
    military situation in which two belligerents of
    unequal power or capacity of action , interact
    and take advantage of the strength and weaknesses
    of themselves and enemies. The interaction often
    involves strategies and tactics outside the
    bounds of conventional warfare. ( Wikipedia)
  • Synonymous with Terrorism/ Not synonymous with
    Terrorism?
  • Two Schools1) Descriptive in nature and Asian
    in its approach It assumes that asymmetric and
    indirect are synonyms. Indirect warfare as
    described by Sun Tzu, Mao Tse-tung, B.H.
    Liddell-Hart. Mao advises that one should come
    from the East and yet attack from the West..2)
    Reductive . ..Political scientist believe that
    asymmetric conflict involves two actors
    strong and weak. Demographic, military and
    scientific strengths.

3
Theory and Concept
  • Other definitions
  • a) Defined by transformational use of familiar
    and unfamiliar capability clusters or by
    pitting of different organizational structures
    against each other.
  • b) Involves states of unequal aggregate power
    capabilities, measured in terms of material
    resources i.e. size, demography, military
    capability and economic prowess, strategy and
    tactics. (T.V. Paul)
  • c) Asymmetric warfare is leveraging inferior
    tactical or operational strength against the
    vulnerabilities of a superior opponent to achieve
    disproportionate effect with the aim of
    undermining the opponents will in order to
    achieve the asymmetric actors strategic
    objectives.(Kenneth McKenzie).

4
Theory and Concepts
  • If you use pressure, we will deploy pressure and
    force. We know that you can harm us although we
    do not threaten you. But we too can harm you.
    Everyone can cause harm according to their
    ability and their size. We cannot come all the
    way to you in the United States, but individual
    Arabs may reach you.
  • -Saddam Hussein, 1990
  • Put simply, asymmetric threats or techniques are
    a version of not "fighting fair.
  • Asymmetric strategy may not only sidestep
    opponents or hit them where they aint but also
    go over them ( Desert Storm), or under them(
    terrorist attacks or cyber attacks).

5
SOME THOUGHTS ?
  • Trends in correlations of war data show that
    strong actors have been losing more asymmetric
    conflicts.A)1800-1849 34 asymmetric conflicts
    .
  • 88.2 won by strong actors.
  • Greek war of Indep,
  • US second seminole war,1835-42,
  • First Zulu War 1838-42,
  • First British Afghan War 1838-42.
  • B)1850-189969 asymmetric conflicts,
  • 79.5 won by strong actors.
  • The Second Opium War1856-60,
  • Second Schleswig-Holstein war,1864,
  • The Russo-Turkoman War 1878-81,
  • The Second Boer War1899-1902.

6
Trends
  • C)1900-1949 31 asymmetric conflicts,
  • 65.1 won by strong actors.
  • Russo-Japanese War 1904-1905,
  • The First Balkan War1912-1913,
  • The Iraqi-British Conflict1920-1921,
  • The US Nicaraguan Conflict1927-1933.
  • D)1950-199836 asymmetric conflict
  • 45 won by strong actors,.
  • South vietnam,1961-65,
  • The Anglo Portugal War 1961-75,
  • The Mozambique Conflict1964-75,
  • The Russo- Chechen War 1994-96.

7
REASONS FOR SUCH A TREND
  • The Nature of the Actor (Structural) Democratic
    v/s Authoritarian type of regime.
  • Arms Diffusion (Technological) Diffusion of
    relatively advanced small arms in Developing
    World raised the costs of conquest for strong
    actors.
  • The Growth of militant Nationalism ( Cultural)
    ideological asymmetries, national liberationists
    were more committed and willing to lay their
    lives.
  • The role of relative Resolve/ interests
    (Psychological) Relative vulnerability vis-à-vis
    relative power and interests. For strong actors
    survival is not at risk so have lower interest.
  • Strategic interactions ( Strategic/ conceptual)
    Wrong politico-military strategy against weak
    actor may result in losing. The Key variable is
    Time. Delay favors weak!

8
What guides Weaker Power to go to Conflict with
Stronger power( T V Paul)
  • Politico Military Strategy in asymmetric war
    initiation
  • blitzkrieg (lightning strike)
  • attrition/maneuver
  • limited aims/fait accompli.
  • Offensive weapons , limited capability and
    asymmetric war initiation
  • Alliance Support and war calculation
  • Domestic Structure and asymmetric war initiation
  • Time Pressure

9
SOME EXAMPLES
  • Use of terrorism by much lesser Mongol forces in
    the creation and control of the Mongol Empire.
  • Non violent struggle by Mahatma Gandhi
  • Israel and Palestine warfare.
  • India-Pakistan Kargil warfare.
  • U.S. Cuba Conflict.
  • China- Taiwan Conflict.
  • North Korea- South Korea .
  • U.S.- Iran Conflict.

10
WHY US IRAN CONFLICT IS ASYMMETRIC
  • UNEQUAL POWER BASE
  • LEVERAGING TACTICS
  • TERRORISM
  • RELIGIOUS
  • DESIRE TO RISE

11
US - Iranian History
  • 1883 - U.S and Persia appoint diplomatic envoys
  • 1941 - Allied Powers force Shah to abdicate
    throne to his more pro-allies son. Allied Forces
    use Iran as staging base for re-supply of Russian
    forces in WWII.
  • 1951 - Iranian Prime Minister Mossadegh tries to
    nationalize oil industry and limit the power of
    Shah
  • 1953 - American and British intelligence services
    sponsor a coup that overthrows Mossadegh.
  • 1963/64 - Shahs White Revolution. Ayatollah
    Khomeini exiled for denunciation of Shahs status
    of forces bill for US Military Personnel.
  • 1965/72 - America provides significant military
    support to Iran. Shah leverages Irans strategic
    position in US containment policy.

12
US - Iranian History
  • 1978 - Iranian Islamic Revolution Council is
    formed
  • 1979 - Shah is forced into exile - later enters
    US for cancer treatment - students seize US
    embassy and diplomats beginning a 444 day
    hostage crises.
  • 1980 - President Carter severs diplomatic ties
    with Iran - expels Iranian diplomats from US
  • 1980 - Iraq invades Iran leading to a 10 year war
    during which the US openly supports Iraq.
  • 1982 - American supported Lebanese Christian
    forces kidnap Iranian diplomats - begins a nine
    year period of kidnapping of western hostages.
  • 1983 - Bombing of US embassy and US Marine
    Barracks in Beirut - US places blame/suspicion
    for both events on Iranian supported Hezbollah

13
US - Iranian History
  • 1984 - Bombing of Embassy annex in Beirut - US
    says Hezbollah known to have been involved
  • 1985/86 - Iran-Contra scandal
  • 1988 USS Vincennes shoots down Iranian Airliner
    over the gulf killing 290. Iran views this as
    evidence the US was going to get involved in the
    Iran - Iraq war.
  • Two weeks later Khomeini accepts UN brokered
    cease-fire with Iraq
  • 1990 - Iran remains neutral in US led war against
    Iraq denouncing both the US and Iraq
  • 1993 - President Clinton takes office -
    institutes a policy to isolate Iran
  • 1995 - Clinton signs an executive order banning
    all trade with Iran.

14
US - Iranian History
  • 1996 - Khobar Tower bombing in Saudi Arabia - 19
    US service personnel killed - Hezbollah blamed.
  • Iran - Lybia Sanctions act passed.
  • 1999 - US eases sanctions against state
    supporters of terrorism
  • 2000 - US officially acknowledges US role in 1953
    coup but does not apologize.
  • 2001 - US releases 46 count indictment against
    unidentified Iranians in the Khobar Towers case.
  • Iran condemns US air strikes in Afghanistan yet
    agrees to perform search and rescue missions for
    US pilots downed in Iran.
  • Iranian President denounces Osama Bin Laden and
    rejects US assertions that Iran supports
    terrorism.

15
US IRAN
  • Current Relationship
  • 2001, President Bush unfreezes the Nuclear
    program
  • 2002 - President Bush refers to Iran as part of
    an Axis of evil and states they are pursuing WMD
    and Terrorist Activities
  • Defense Secretary Rumsfeld links Iran to suicide
    attacks in Israel
  • 2003, IAEA reports that Iran is Enriching Uranium
  • Since then
  • US asserts that Iran is supporting terrorists
  • Iran asserts that US is violating Iranian
    sovereignity
  • 2007, US arrests Iranian diplomats in Iraq
  • UNSC imposes sanctions on Iran
  • Iran arrests 15 British Sailors for venturing
    into Iranian Waters
  • Is War Imminent?

16
Tracing the Conflict
  • US MEDIA PORTRAYAL OF IRAN
  • Iran is the country that grabbed U.S. embassy
    officials as hostages and then embarked on a
    series of terror strikes against U.S. targets.
  • Iranians will stop at nothing to preserve their
    homeland the taking of hostages, terrorism, and
    nuclear weapons are just instruments for them to
    scare America out of their backyard.
  • IRANIANS VIEW OF AMERICA
  • America remains an enemy that has repeatedly
    expressed its desire to overthrow the Iranian
    government.
  • Most Iranians believe the Khat e-Imam took the
    American embassy to destroy its network of spies
    and put an end to American plans to launch a
    military coup in Iran
  • US INTENTIONS

17
ISSUES
  • OIL
  • Nuclear Aspirations
  • Regional Balance of Power
  • Support of Terrorism
  • UN Sanctions

18
Issues involved
  • Issue 1 Petro
  • BY 2010, US NEEDS 50 MILLION BARRELS A DAY OF OIL
  • While many regions of the world offer great oil
    opportunities, the Middle East with two thirds of
    the world's oil and the lowest cost, is still
    where the prize ultimately lies.
  • PETRODOLLARS AND OIL TRADEThe world buys and
    sells oil in dollars, meaning that all the
    countries of the world subsidise the US economy
    as the US has a monopoly on printing dollars.

19
Issues involved
  • The oil-producing countries have to trade in
    dollars and any country wanting to buy oil must
    first acquire dollars which can only be obtained
    by trading with the US, that is, buying US
    products and services.
  •   This means that trillions of dollars are traded
    daily on the major currency exchanges, based in
    Washington, DC and in London.
  • The surplus generated through these exchanges
    and sales of US financial instruments subsidizes
    an otherwise bankrupt US economy.  

20
NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN OIL TRADE
  • Over the past four years the value of the euro
    has appreciated by 13 against the dollar making
    it a preferred currency to sell oil with, hence
    Iraqs switch to the euro in 2002
  • Upcoming establishment of an Iranian oil bourse
    based on euros which presents a direct threat to
    the power of the US dollar
  • Venezuela to trade its oil in euros and in spite
    of the USs military supremacy, the US economy is
    in serous trouble if Iran and Venezuela go ahead
    with the switch
  • Countries such as Russia are mixing oil sales
    using a basket of currencies

21
Nuclear Issues
  • The IAEA reported in 2003, that Iran had hidden a
    Uranium enrichment program for 18 years.
  • Western Members of IAEA called on Iran to commit
    itself to stopping all enrichment activities
    permanently, but it has refused to do so and has
    abandoned the temporary halt as well.
  • The clash with Iran escalated in Feb 2006, when
    the IAEA as a whole reported Iran to Security
    Council and in March Security Council decided to
    take up the issue after receiving the copy of the
    report on Iran.
  • UN had issued dead line to suspend Uranium
    enrichment program which ended on 21st Feb 2007,
    but Iran ignored the UN deadline.
  • UNSC slaps sanctions on Iran in March 2007

22
MILITARY DOCTRINE SO FAR
  • Iran's military doctrine and capacity is defense
    of its own territorial integrity only
  • Iran has never attacked any of its neighbors in
    the region in the past 300 years, even when it
    was badly provoked in 1998 by the Taliban in
    Afghanistan

23
IRANIAN MILITARY STRENGTH
  • Iran has two kinds of armed forces the regular
    forces and the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps
    (IRGC), totaling about 545,000 personnel
  • Iran also has a paramilitary, volunteer militia
    force called the Basij, which includes about
    90,000 full-time, active-duty uniformed members,
    up to 300,000 reservists, and a further 11
    million men and women who could be mobilized.
  • Iran's military capabilities are kept largely
    secret. Since 1992, it has produced its own
    tanks, armored personnel carriers, guided
    missiles, submarines, and a fighter plane

24
WEAPON DEVELOPMENT
  • In recent years, official announcements have
    highlighted weapons such as Fajr-3 (MIRV)
    missile, Hoot, Kowsar, Fateh-110, Shahab-3, and
    unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs)
  • The Fajr-3 (MIRV) is currently Iran's most
    advanced ballistic missile. It is a
    domestically-developed and produced liquid fuel
    missile with an unknown range

25
MISSILE PROGRAM
  • The IRIS solid-fuelled missile is a program which
    is supposed to be Iran's first missile to bring
    satellites into orbit

26
Stakeholders
  • UN
  • US
  • Iran
  • Russia
  • Israel
  • Saudi Arabia and other US allied Arab nations
  • Turkey
  • Iraq
  • UK
  • EU
  • IAEA

27
Group Exercise
  • Break up into groups
  • Clarify their Frames, their positions, interests.
  • What could be some of the possible ways of
    resolving or de- escalating the conflict

28
From PPA 601 class lecture Spring 2007, Framing-
Prof Catherine Gerard
29
POSITIONS AND INTERESTS
30
Strategies for Resolution
  • Diplomacy
  • Dialogueinterest based negotiations
  • Multi-track Diplomacy
  • Economic Pressure
  • Public Diplomacy
  • Military Action
  • Truth and Reconciliation Commissions
  • Reframing

31

THANK YOU
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com