Title: Drug Companies in Developing Countries: What Should We Expect?
1Drug Companies in Developing Countries What
Should We Expect?
- Joel Lexchin MD
- Law 6867
- Osgoode LLM Health Law
2What is the Nature of a Drug Company?
3Why Are Drug Companies in Developing Countries?
- I would just be talking rubbish if I
- were to say that the multinational
- companies were operating in the less
- developed countries primarily for the
- welfare of those countries . . . They are
- not bishops, they are businessmen.
- Spokesperson for the British
pharmaceutical industry
4Outline
- The ethics of clinical trials in developing
countries - Examples from Nigeria, Latin America
- Provision of existing drugs - eflornithine
- The research agenda
- Promotion of drugs
- Intellectual property rights and drug prices
- Exporting of pharmaceuticals to developing
countries
5Growing Level of Research in Developing Countries
6Clinical Trials in Developing Countries
- Current estimate is 18,000 - 24,000 trials in low
- and middle income countries per year
- SOMO. Ethics for drug testing in low and middle
income countries - considerations for European Market Authorisation.
February 2008
7Why Are More Trials Being Done in Developing
Countries?
- Larger pool of sick people
- Less red tape oversight
- People sign up faster because of lack of
alternatives - Use of placebos--easier to show treatment effect
- Research personnel are paid less
- Research in India is 50 60 less expensive than
in the US - Other estimates are that trials in a first-rate
centre in India are 1/10 the cost of trials in a
second-rate centre in the US
8Ethical Approval - Developing Developed
Countries
Contemporary Clinical Trials 200728677-83
9Differences Between IRBs in Developing Countries
and US
On 10 other items no differences between IRBs in
developing countries and US - J Med Ethics
20043068-72
10Pfizer, Trovan, Meningitis and Nigeria
The Body Hunters As Drug Testing Spreads,
Profits and Lives Hang in Balance Washington
Post, Dec. 17, 2000
11Pfizer, Trovan, Meningitis and Nigeria
- Study planned in 6 weeks versus expected 1 year
in USA - Drug never tested before on children
- Oral form used
- Usual treatment in USA is intravenous drugs
- Company has no signed consent forms
12Surfaxin and Latin America
- Discovery Laboratories, Doylestown PA
- Synthetic surfactant (Surfaxin)
- 4 surfactants already on market (first in 1990)
- Associated with 34 relative reduction in
neonatal mortality - Without doubt the most thoroughly studied new
therapy in neonatal care (NEJM)
13Surfaxin and Latin America
- Further placebo controlled trials of synthetic
surfactant are no longer warranted (Cochrane
Collaboration) - FDA Conduct of a placebo controlled surfactant
trial for premature infants with RDS is
considered unethical in the USA - European trial Surfaxin vs. approved surfactant
14Surfaxin and Latin America
- Proposed locations for study Mexico, Peru,
Bolivia, Ecuador - Design Surfaxin vs placebo (vs approved
surfactant in some settings)
15Trials of Natural and Synthetic Surfactant
1985-2000
After 1992 only 2 trials against placebo
16Other Trials with Ethical Problems
Organizations involved range from local
companies to large multinationals
17Provision of Existing Drugs - Eflornithine
- First developed in France in 1970s by Merrell
- 1979 usefulness in treating African sleeping
sickness recognized - Only other drug available melarsoprol - caustic
arsenical - kills 5 of those who receive it - About 500,000 infected annually
- Subsequently tested by subsidiary of Aventis for
use as cancer agent but results negative - 1999 production discontinued
- Then found to be effective depilatory for women
in topical form (Vaniqa) marketing started by
Bristol-Myers Squibb - BMS MSF reached agreement to supply drug for
sleeping sickness
18Drugs for Neglected Diseases 1975-2004
- 1556 NCEs
- introduced
- 21 for
- neglected
- diseases
- Lancet 2006367
- 1560-1
19MSF, DND Working Group. Fatal imbalance the
crisis in RD for drugs for neglected diseases,
2001
20Industry Initiated Research in the Developing
World, 2005
- 5 of the top 12 multinationals do not conduct any
research into neglected diseases - These 5 companies do not want to, and will not,
go back into neglected disease RD no matter what
incentives are offered
Moran et al. The new landscape of neglected
disease drug development, 2005
21WHO Commission on Macroeconomics and Health
22The Model is Wrong
- "You can't expect for-profit organisation to do
- this produce new drugs for developing
- countries on a large scale. If you want to
- establish a system where companies
- systematically invest in this kind of area, you
- need a different system.
- Daniel Vasella
- CEO Novartis
23Promotion
24IFPMA Code of Pharmaceutical Marketing Practices
- Self-Regulation of Pharmaceutical Promotion
- The international pharmaceutical industry is
- committed to the improvement of the health of
- mankind through research and development of new
- medicines and the production and marketing of
- pharmaceutical products of reliable quality, in
- accordance with internationally defined standards
of - good practice
25Code of Marketing Practices
- Introduced 1981, most recent revision 2006
- At same time WHO had just passed International
Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes
talk of doing same for pharmaceuticals - Harry Schwartz (defender of industry)
- Code an attempt to repel a coming WHO effort to
impose unacceptable controls over all
pharmaceutical commerce in the Third World -
26IFPMA View of Advertising
- IFPMA Web Site
- Advertising and promotions are an
- essential means of alerting prescribers of
- the availability and use of new drugs and
- new uses for existing medicines
27Promotional Material Collected by a Malaysian GP
in One Month
6 updates on drugs or treatments, 10 pens,
9 notebooks, 24 brochures, 2 clinical manuals, 1
plush toy, multiple packs of two different
drugs, 3 articles, 4 plastic folders, 5 event
sponsorships and dinners, 5 small gifts,1
screening program
28Contents of Ads in Medical Journal in Developing
and Developed Countries
Herxheimer. International Journal of Health
Services 199323161-72.
29Analysis of Ads to Thai Doctors, 2003
36/207 ads judged to provide balance of
information 38/207 ads misleading Kiatying-Angsul
ee et al. Presentation at Second International
Conference on Improving Use of Medications,
Thailand, 2004
30Comparison of Information in United States and
Brazil Drug Compendia - 44 Top Selling Drugs in
Brazil
de Barros. Pharmacoepidemiology Drug Safety
20009281-7
31(No Transcript)
32Indian Journal of Dermat- ology, Veneralogy,
Lep- rology 2005 vol. 71, Issue 6
33IFPMA Code
- It is understood that national laws and
- regulations usually dictate the format and
- content of the product information
- communicated on labelling, packaging,
- leaflets, data sheets and in all promotional
- material. Promotion should not be inconsistent
- with locally approved product information
34Self-Regulation
- IPFMA will continue to support
- self-regulation as the most
- appropriate mechanism for
- regulating marketing and
- promotional practices by
- companies
35(No Transcript)
36Whats the Penalty?
Adverse Publicity!!!
37Intellectual Property Rights (Patents)
Jonas Salk discoverer of Polio vaccine "There is
no patent. Can you patent the sun?"
38IFPMA Intellectual Property Rights
- Strong patent and other
- intellectual property rights are
- vital incentives and protection for
- innovation, especially in the
- pharmaceutical sector
39A Shortsighted View of History
40International Prices - AIDS Drugs (Circa 1999)
41HIV/AIDS Treatment Need in Relation to Drug
Expenditure
WHO. World Medicines Situation, 2004
42Generic Competition and the Price of HIV/AIDS
Drugs
43TRIPS Agreement Patents
- 20 years protection from time patent filed
- However, provisions in TRIPS for compulsory
licensing - Ability to produce drug by other companies while
product still protected by patent
44Compulsory Licensing Drug Prices
Price of lopinavir/ ritonavir offered to
Thailand by Abbott
45IFPMA on Compulsory Licensing
- Compulsory licensing benefits nobody
- except the fortunate commercial entity that is
the - beneficiary of the largesse offered by such
licenses. - In the medium and long-term, it is patients who
will - lack new treatments for serious diseases that
suffer, - as researchers will undoubtedly stay away from
- targeted disease groups subject to CL policies
- Harvey Bale, Director General IFPMA
- April 1999
46U.K. Commission on Intellectual Property Rights
- Higher IP standards should not be
- pressed on developing countries without
- a serious and objective assessment of
- their development impact
47IFPMA Response to CIPR
- Most importantly, the report fails
- to underline the real needs of
- developing countries to have
- strong intellectual property
- protection
48Canadian Efforts to Promote Generic Exports to
Developing Countries
- September 2003
- Canada announced initiative to allow Canadian
generic companies to export to developing
countries - Response from Harvey Bale, head of IFPMA It
wont solve a thing . . . It will be a negative
black eye for Canada that will very well affect
the investment climate
49Costs of AIDS Drugs Will Go Up
50 Source DST/AIDS
51Estimates of No. of People in Developing
Countries Needing Second-Line Therapy
52Global Disease Burden
WHO - World Health Report 2003
53Bullying Developing Countries
- 1999
- 39 companies launch lawsuit against South Africa
arguing that new medicines law is
unconstitutional because it allows for compulsory
licensing - 2006
- Novartis challenging Indian patent law that
prevents patenting of trivial improvements of
known molecules - Claimed not consistent with TRIPS
54Drug Exports to Developing Countries
55German Drug Exports to Developing Countries
2534 drugs
1321 drugs
1310 drugs
1417 drugs
2179 drugs
German drugs poor choices for poor countries.
BUKO Pharma- Kampagne, 2004.
56Some Examples
- Aspirin (Bayer)
- Germany Not for use in children under the age
of 12 (risk of Reyes syndrome - often fatal
liver disease) - Brazil Specifically promoted for children
- Lesterol (Aventis)
- Withdrawn in USA in 1995, in Germany in 1998
- Continued to be sold in Brazil until May 2004
- Dipyrone (Boehringer Ingelheim)
- Not sold in Canada, Sweden, UK, USA
- Marketed in Brazil, Central America, Mexico,
Pakistan, South Africa
57Irrational, Non-essential or Hazardous Drugs,
India 1999
National Commission on Macroeconomics Access to
Essential Drugs and Medicine
58What Should We Expect?
- Just what we get!
- The primary obligation of pharmaceutical
- companies is to their shareholders NOT
- to the people of the developing (or
- developed) world
59I hear a pharma justifying its actions on the
grounds of Humanity, Altruism, Duty to Mankind, I
want to vomit . . . Its because Im reading at
the same time how the US pharma-giants are trying
to extend the life of their patents so that they
can preserve their monopoly and charge what they
damn well like and use the State Dept to frighten
the Third World out of manufacturing their own
generic products at a fraction of the price of
the branded version. John LeCarré The
Constant Gardener