Federal Geospatial Market: An Overview - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

Federal Geospatial Market: An Overview

Description:

How much does the government spend every year on geotechnology? ... Top ten vendors account for 70% of dollar-value of all geotechnology contracts ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:75
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: tina85
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Federal Geospatial Market: An Overview


1
Federal Geospatial MarketAn Overview
  • Tina Cary, PhD
  • President, Cary and Associates
  • Presented 2 February 2004
  • MAPPS Winter Meeting, Phoenix

2
Did you know that
  • (on average) every 48 minutes of every workday
    the federal government reports another
    transaction for geo-technology products and
    services?
  • And the average value of every transaction is
    more than 2 million dollars?

3
Key Questions
  • What is the business opportunity?
  • How much does the government spend every year on
    geotechnology?
  • Which agencies buy geotechnology goods and
    services?
  • What do the agencies buy?
  • What vendors do they buy from today?
  • What can we expect in the future?

4
What Data Are Available?
  • Congress also has questions about the federal
    budget
  • What is the geographic distribution of
    contractors?
  • What are the socio-demographic characteristics of
    contractors?
  • and more
  • Congress established the Federal Procurement Data
    System to provide answers

5
Federal Procurement Data System
  • Contract spending is reported by civilian and DoD
    agencies on Forms SF279 and SF281
  • Required all transaction of 25,000 or more
  • Optional smaller transactions
  • Not required to report US Postal Service,
    Legislative Branch (Congress, GPO, GAO, etc) and
    Judicial Branch

6
Federal Procurement Data System
  • Data Collected
  • Federal agency awarding the contract
  • Contract identification number
  • Contracting office name and address
  • Date agency made award
  • Name and address of company to which contract is
    awarded
  • City, state, or country where service is
    performed or item is manufactured
  • Amount of award
  • (continued)

7
Federal Procurement Data System
  • Kind of contract action (new, modification, order
    under GSA Schedule, termination)
  • Principal product or service
  • North American Industry Classification System
    (NAICS) code
  • Whether competitive or noncompetitive
  • Type of Business (size, disadvantaged status,
    state/local government, profit or nonprofit,
    etc.)
  • and dozens more

8
Federal Procurement Data System
  • How good are the FPDS data?
  • Not ideal quality

9
House Hearing 10 June 2003
  • Geospatial Information
  • A Progress Report on Improving Our Nations
    Map-Related Data Infrastructure
  • How much does the government spend on geospatial
    data?
  • And which agencies use the data? For what?
  • Rep. Adam Putnam (R-FL), Chairman of
  • Technology, Information Policy,
    Intergovernmental Relations and Census
    Subcommittee
  • of the House Government Reform Committee

We dont know. Billions of dollars are being
spent but federal agencies do not fully or
accurately report their geospatial activities.
Mark Forman, Administrator for the Office
of E-Government Information Technology
10
GAO Audit of FPDS Data
December 30, 2003 Dear Mr. Bolten The purpose
of this letter is to convey our serious and
continuing concerns with the reliability of the
data contained in the Federal Procurement Data
System (FPDS) Congress and executive branch
agencies rely on FPDS to assess the impact that
governmentwide acquisition policies and process
are having on the system generally, as well as
with respect to specific geographical areas,
markets, and socio-economic goals. Yet despite
the importance of the data, we continue to find
that FPDS data are inaccurate and incomplete.
11
Federal Procurement Data System
  • How good are the FPDS data?
  • Not of the desired quality
  • Then why use them?
  • The best spending data available
  • Approximations are better than guesses
  • Our methodology sidesteps some of the problems

12
Methodology
  • Sources
  • Federal Procurement Database System (FPDS)
  • Proprietary database of geotech companies
  • Analysis Tool
  • Microsoft Access

13
Company database
  • 1200 companies in North America
  • Broad definition of geotech
  • GIS and image processing software
  • Data conversion and digitizing
  • Satellite and aerial imagery
  • Environmental management and consulting
  • GIS consulting and application development
  • Surveying mapping services
  • Professional engineering services

14
The Process
  • The FPDS purchasing data are delivered on CD-ROM
    in Access database format.
  • Our list of companies was used to extract from
    the approximately half-million actions in the
    detailed reports approximately 2,500 actions per
    year in geotechnology.

15
  • Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy,
    it deosn't mttaer  in waht oredr the ltteers in a
    wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the 
    frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The
    rset can be a total mses and you can sitll raed
    it wouthit porbelm.Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid
    deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, butthe wrod
    as a wlohe.

16
Findings
  • Overview of reported federal procurement
  • Number of actions
  • Dollars
  • Geotechnology
  • By agency
  • By category
  • Vendors

17
Federal Procurement 2000-02
18
Federal Procurement 2000-02
19
Geotechnology
  • 393 companies from our list of 1200 were found in
    the FPDS data
  • Number of actions averaged 2500 per year
  • The actions involved 117 agencies
  • The actions totaled more than 5 billion/year
  • 2 of total reported spending

20
Federal Procurement 2000-02
21
  • Geotechnology Procurement
  • by
  • Agency

22
Geotechnology by Agency
23
Geotechnology by Agency
24
Geotechnology by Agency
  • Seven agencies in the top ten every year
  • Of those seven, only NASA and Federal Technology
    Service are not defense-related
  • Top ten agencies consistently account for 88 of
    total spending on geotech
  • the other 107 agencies spend 600-750 million

Other
25
  • Geotechnology Procurement
  • by
  • Category

26
Geotechnology by Category
  • SIC (2000 01) and NAICS (2002) codes of vendors
  • Six high-level categories
  • Computer related services
  • Engineering services
  • Other services
  • Research
  • Products/equipment
  • Software

27
Geotechnology by Category
Table 5
28
Geotechnology by Category
29
  • Vendors

30
Top ten vendors
  • Top four are consistent year-to-year
  • SAIC is number one every year
  • Top ten vendors account for 70 of dollar-value
    of all geotechnology contracts
  • 383 vendors share the remaining 30, or 1.5
    billion

31
Review of Findings
  • The federal government reports purchases of
    geotechnology products and services worth more
    than 5 billion per year
  • For the three years analyzed, geotech was
    consistently 2 of the total reported value of
    transactions
  • 393 vendors supplied 117 agencies through 2500
    actions with an average value of 2 million per
    action

32
The Future
  • Continuation of transition to e-government and
    e-commerce
  • Increasing use of credit cards for purchases
    under 25,000
  • FPDS-NG
  • A single vendor database

33
Trends in Credit Card Use
34
Trends in Credit Card Use
35
What Does This Mean to Us?
  • If you offer products or services in the range
    under 25,000
  • If you do not accept credit cards, you may want
    to begin reviewing that decision more frequently
  • The day may come when failure to accept credit
    cards will be a disadvantage to your business

36
FPDS Transition Underway
FY2004 is entirely in FPDS-NG
  • FPDS
  • Data available in 3 to 9 months
  • Details about 500,000 transactions and aggregated
    information about 11.5 million transactions
  • 36-40 per detailed transaction (estimate)
  • FPDS-NG
  • Data available in one week or less
  • Details about all 12 million actions
  • Provide direct on-line access to managers
  • Do it for less - 1/transaction
  • Be interoperable

37
Single Vendor Database
  • In the past small businesses had to register in
    PRO-net to be identified as a small business and
    register in Central Contractor Registration (CCR)
    if they wished to bid on defense-related
    projects.
  • Beginning 1 January 2004, SBAs PRO-net has been
    integrated with CCR

38
Thank You
  • For more information
  • Cary and Associates
  • http//caryandassociates.com
  • 303.774.8415
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com