RESPONDING TO DEMAND FOR A LOWER CARBON FOOTPRINT REVISION OF THE AUSTRALIAN CEMENT STANDARD - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

RESPONDING TO DEMAND FOR A LOWER CARBON FOOTPRINT REVISION OF THE AUSTRALIAN CEMENT STANDARD

Description:

RESPONDING TO DEMAND FOR A LOWER CARBON FOOTPRINT REVISION OF THE AUSTRALIAN CEMENT STANDARD Concrete and the environment Concrete is ubiquitous It is the largest ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: concreteN
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: RESPONDING TO DEMAND FOR A LOWER CARBON FOOTPRINT REVISION OF THE AUSTRALIAN CEMENT STANDARD


1
RESPONDING TO DEMAND FOR A LOWER CARBON
FOOTPRINTREVISION OF THE AUSTRALIAN CEMENT
STANDARD
2
Concrete and the environment
  • Concrete is ubiquitous
  • It is the largest volume man-made construction
    material used
  • Concrete uses a number of natural raw materials
    and their acquisition has some environmental
    impacts
  • Concrete delivers many environmental benefits,
    including
  • - buildings are low maintenance and long lasting
  • - its thermal mass can increase the energy
    efficiency of buildings
  • - buildings can be designed for reuse and then
    recycled at the end of their lives
  • - it provide good indoor air quality
  • - it is non-combustible and has good fire
    resistance
  • - it is of high quality and affordable

3
Concrete and CO2
  • The strength and resilience of concrete is due
    primarily to its binder, that is, Portland cement
  • Portland cement has a high carbon intensity and
    its manufacture is generally viewed as
    contributing about 5 of global carbon dioxide
    production
  • This carbon intensity derives from several
    process components
  • - the calcination of limestone (which is
    effectively 44 CO2)
  • - the combustion of fossil fuels to provide the
    approximately 1400 degrees Centigrade
    temperatures required to effect the chemical
    conversion of the raw materials into the Portland
    cement minerals
  • - the use of electricity to drive equipment used
    to process raw materials (raw mill, kiln, fans)
    and to grind cement clinker into cement powder
  • Historically it was viewed that 1 tonne of cement
    1 tonne CO2

4
Cement industry response to CO2
  • The Australian cement industry has responsibly
    worked to address concerns about CO2 for some
    years. Several approaches have been taken,
    including
  • Modernisation of cement making technology
  • Use of alternative fuels
  • Use of supplementary cementitious materials
    (SCMs)

Ref 2009 Australian Cement Industry
Sustainability Report - CIF
5
Ongoing cement industry activity
  • The cement industry, through its involvement with
    the Cement Industry Federation and Cement
    Concrete Aggregates Australia, has a number of
    continuing and ongoing initiatives to reduce CO2
    and reduce energy consumption, including
  • Working collaboratively with Government in
    several areas
  • Pursuing emerging technology opportunities
    through the Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean
    Development and Climate
  • Targeting higher usage levels for SCMs
  • Increasing efficiency in the use of energy and
    resources
  • Maximising use of recycled materials (eg.
    alternative fuels)
  • Directly reducing the clinker content of cement
    products through use of higher levels of mineral
    addition

6
Mineral addition in cement
  • Mineral addition was introduced into the
    Australian Standard for cement in 1991, at a
    level of up to 5 for all cements.
  • Allowable mineral additions are fly ash, slag and
    limestone.
  • Mineral additions are also included in EN and
    ASTM Standards in all of the cements covered in
    those Standards.
  • Over two years ago, CCAA began work on proving
    the use of a higher level of mineral addition, at
    up to 10, for use in all cements included in
    the AS 3972 Portland and blended cements
    Standard.
  • This meant that, if approved, Australia would be
    the first country where gt5 mineral addition was
    allowed in all cement types. Trial work was to
    be carried out using 10 limestone mineral
    addition.

7
Use of limestone in cement
  • Limestone was chosen for use in the test program
    as it should be the most difficult test of the
    10 mineral addition proposition.
  • Limestone is commonly used in general purpose
    cements, particularly in Europe. This also
    meant that there would be a plentiful supply of
    technical data, as these cements have been in use
    since the 1970s.
  • Note EN 197 has a product called Portland
    Cement where the only allowable additions to
    cement clinker are gypsum and mineral addition at
    a level of up to 5.
  • The CCCA proposal was for all AS 3972 cement
    types to be allowed to have mineral addition
    levels of up to 10

8
Limestone cements worldwide
9
Limestone cement use in Europe
  • Limestone cements containing 6-20 limestone are
    now the typical general purpose cements used in
    many parts of Europe, particularly France and
    Switzerland
  • Their use is not confined to basic concrete
  • There are two levels of limestone use from
    6-20 (CEM II/A-L) and from 21-35 (CEM II/B-L)
  • CEM II / A-L used in paving for the Gotthard
    Tunnel, Switzerland

10
The CCAA proposal and trials
  • The proposed amendment to the Australian Standard
    3972 was in several parts
  • To increase the allowable level of mineral
    addition to 10 for all cement types (Type GP,
    Type GB, Special Cements)
  • To allow part (up to 5) of the mineral addition
    to be minor additional constituents selected
    inorganic mineral materials derived from the
    clinker production process such as cement kiln
    dust
  • To assess the effects of these materials, trials
    were carried out at 8 cement plants, followed by
    extensive cement and concrete testing
  • The trials were hampered by short runs, and the
    trial product was not able to be fully optimised

11
Trial results
  • Cement testing showed that the trial products
    gave similar performance to Type GP containing 5
    mineral addition similar workability slightly
    lower strength slightly lower shrinkage
  • Laboratory concrete testing results mirrored the
    cement test results, both with and without SCMs.
  • Field testing of concrete gave results that were
    at least as good as those from cement containing
    5 mineral addition.
  • Test results were provided to interested parties,
    and presented to a reconstituted Standards
    committee (BD 10), along with substantial
    literature reviews that compiled and assessed the
    international experience with limestone mineral
    addition levels gt5.

12
Standards deliberations
  • The Standards committee was reasonably evenly
    weighted between the cement and concrete
    representatives and the specifier nominees
    representing APCC, Austroads, Engineers Australia
    and ATIC.
  • The major area of contention was the lack of
    published information on the Australian
    experience with cement and concrete using higher
    levels of mineral addition. Despite a wealth of
    information on experiences with these products in
    Europe and Canada, and technical substantiation
    of the physical and chemical reaction mechanisms
    occurring with mineral addition, an effective
    stalemate was reached on the 10 addition level
    proposal.
  • The opportunity to move forward came with the
    decision to compromise on a 7.5 mineral addition
    level, and agreement to enter into a 2 year
    research program to establish the optimum level
    of mineral addition.

13
AS 3972 - 2010
  • The new version of AS 3972 has been published,
    with the following changes from the previous
    addition
  • The allowable level of mineral addition increased
    to 7.5
  • The mineral addition may contain up to 5 minor
    additional constituents
  • Introduction of a new type of cement general
    purpose limestone cement - Type GL which
    contains 8-20 limestone
  • A limit of 0.10 by mass of chloride
  • Additional compliance requirements for sampling,
    testing and labelling
  • The option for data on the Evaluation of
    uniformity of cement strength from a single
    source to be requested by users

14
The new Standard
  • This Standard provides rigour around the
    manufacture, testing and reporting of cement
    quality that is the equal of any in the world,
    and is in fact significantly stronger than most
    other Standards. It retains its fundamental
    performance-based approach
  • The Standard moves us a little closer to our
    goals relating to reducing the carbon footprint
    of concrete, without any detriment to quality
  • (If adopted fully, the nominal reduction in CO2
    is about 200kt per annum)
  • The Standard provides an opportunity to trial
    higher mineral addition levels while maintaining
    conformance with AS 3972 requirements, through
    the use of the Type GL product
  • Deliberations about the Standard gave all
    industry groups the opportunity to elaborate on
    their particular expectations in relation to
    product performance and concrete durability

15
Next moves
  • A Working Group of industry parties will now
    develop a testing program that will be undertaken
    (primarily) by the cement and concrete members of
    CCAA
  • There will be the integral involvement of the
    various specifier groups in both developing the
    testing program and reviewing results
  • The fundamental aim will be to achieve an
    optimised position where the carbon footprint of
    the industry is minimised and the effectiveness
    of our products is enhanced

16
(No Transcript)
17
The beginning .
  • Of the next round of work with our industry
    partners to improve the technical performance of
    our products, while even further reducing the
    carbon footprint of our industry!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com