Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation An Expert Commentary With Paulus Kirchhof, MD A Clinical Context Report - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation An Expert Commentary With Paulus Kirchhof, MD A Clinical Context Report

Description:

Jointly Sponsored by: and Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Expert Commentary Supported in part by an educational grant from Ortho-McNeil, Division of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:182
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: medpageto
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation An Expert Commentary With Paulus Kirchhof, MD A Clinical Context Report


1
Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation An
Expert Commentary With Paulus Kirchhof, MDA
Clinical Context Report
2
Stroke Prevention in Atrial FibrillationExpert
Commentary
  • Jointly Sponsored by
  • ?
  • and

3
Stroke Prevention in Atrial FibrillationExpert
Commentary
  • Supported in part by an educational grant from
    Ortho-McNeil, Division of Ortho-McNeil-Janssen
    Pharmaceuticals, Inc., administered by
    Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC.

4
Stroke Prevention in Atrial FibrillationClinical
Context Series
The goal of this series is to provide up-to-date
information and multiple perspectives on the
pathogenesis, symptoms, risk factors, and
complications of stroke prevention in atrial
fibrillation as well as current and emerging
treatments and best practices in the management
of stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.
5
Stroke Prevention in Atrial FibrillationClinical
Context SeriesTarget Audience
Electrophysiologists, cardiologists, primary care
physicians, nurses, nurse practitioners,
physician assistants, pharmacists, and other
healthcare professionals involved in the
management of stroke prevention in atrial
fibrillation.
6
Activity Learning Objective
  • Upon successful completion of this educational
    program, participants should be able to?
  • Review the relevance and significance of the
    activity in the broader context of clinical care?

7
CME Information Physicians
  • Statement of Accreditation
  • This activity has been planned and implemented
    in accordance with the Essential Areas and
    Policies of the Accreditation Council for
    Continuing Medical Education through the joint
    sponsorship of the University of Pennsylvania
    School of Medicine and MedPage Today. The
    University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine is
    accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing
    medical education for physicians.

8
CME Information
  • Credit Designation
  • The University of Pennsylvania School of
    Medicine Office of CME designates this enduring
    material for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1
    Credits. Physicians should claim only the
    credit commensurate with the extent of their
    participation in the activity.

9
CME Information Physicians
  • Credit for Family Physicians
  • MedPage Today "News-Based CME" has been reviewed
    and is acceptable for up to 2098 Elective credits
    by the American Academy of Family Physicians.
    AAFP accreditation begins January 1, 2011. Term
    of approval is for one year from this date. Each
    article is approved for 1 Elective credit. Credit
    may be claimed for one year from the date of each
    article.

10
CE Information Nurses
  • Statement of Accreditation
  • Projects In Knowledge, Inc. (PIK) is accredited
    as a provider of continuing nursing education by
    the American Nurses Credentialing Centers
    Commission on Accreditation
  • Projects In Knowledge is also an approved
    provider by the California Board of Registered
    Nursing, Provider Number CEP-15227
  • This activity is approved for 0.75 nursing
    contact hours

DISCLAIMER Accreditation refers to educational
content only and does not imply ANCC, CBRN, or
PIK endorsement of any commercial product or
service.
11
CE Information Pharmacists
  • Projects In Knowledge is accredited by the
    Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education
    (ACPE) as a provider of continuing pharmacy
    education. This program has been planned and
    implemented in accordance with the ACPE Criteria
    for Quality and Interpretive Guidelines. This
    activity is worth up to 0.75 contact hours (0.075
    CEUs). The ACPE Universal Activity Number
    assigned to this knowledge-type activity is
    0052-9999-11-2399-H04-P.

12
Discussant
  • Paulus Kirchhof, MD
  • Chair in Cardiovascular Medicine
  • University of Birmingham
  • Birmingham, UK
  • Professor, Cardiology and Angiology
  • University of Müenster
  • Müenster, Germany

13
Disclosure Information
  • Michael Mullen, MD, Clinical Instructor of
    Vascular Neurology, University of Pennsylvania
    Todd Neale and Dorothy Caputo, MA, RN, BC-ADM,
    CDE, Nurse Planner, have disclosed that they have
    no relevant financial relationships or conflicts
    of interest with commercial interests related
    directly or indirectly to this educational
    activity.
  • The staff of The University of Pennsylvania
    School of Medicine Office of CME, MedPage Today,
    and Projects In Knowledge have no relevant
    financial relationships or conflicts of interest
    with commercial interests related directly or
    indirectly to this educational activity.

14
Disclosure Information
  • Paulus Kirchhof, MD,
  • has disclosed the following relevant financial
    relationships?
  • Served as an advisor or consultant for 3M
    Medica, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Bayer
    HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim
    Pharmaceuticals, Inc, MEDA Pharmaceuticals, Inc,
    Medtronic, Inc, Merck Co.,Otsuka Pharma,
    Pfizer/BMS, sanofi-aventis, SERVIER, Siemens,
    Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.
  • Received grants for clinical research from 3M
    Medica/MEDA Pharmaceuticals, Inc, CV
    Therapeutics, Medtronic, Inc, Omron Healthcare,
    Inc, German Federal Ministry of Education and
    Research (BMBF), European Union, Fondation
    LeDucq, German Research Foundation (DFG), St.
    Jude Medical, sanofi-aventis

15
KEY Points of AFNET/EHRA Report
  • Diagnose atrial fibrillation early enough to
    start therapy and prevent complications such as
    stroke
  • Identify both conventional and emerging risk
    factors for atrial fibrillation and stroke
  • Identify needs to start using newer
    anticoagulants in clinical practice as they enter
    the market
  • Educate patients, physicians, payers, and
    healthcare organizations on the use of the newer
    drugs

Source Kirchhof P, et al Comprehensive risk
reduction in patients with atrial fibrillation
emerging diagnostic and therapeutic options -- a
report from the 3rd Atrial Fibrillation
Competence Network/European Heart Rhythm
Association consensus conference Europace 2011
DOI 10.1093/europace/eur241.
16
Burden of Atrial Fibrillation
  • In an unselected population of 40 year olds, 25
    will develop atrial fibrillation in their
    lifetime
  • Every fourth to fifth stroke is related to atrial
    fibrillation
  • Emerging data show that a portion of cryptogenic
    strokes are related to silent, undiagnosed
    paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

17
Risk Factors for Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation
  • Previous stroke or TIA
  • Older age
  • Hypertension
  • Diabetes
  • Heart failure
  • Female gender
  • Vascular disease

18
CHADS2 Stroke Risk Score
  • Total possible score of 6
  • Congestive heart failure 1 point
  • Hypertension 1 point
  • Age 75 or older 1 point
  • Diabetes 1 point
  • Previous stroke or transient ischemic attack 2
    points

Source JAMA 2001 285 2864-2870.
19
CHA2DS2-VASc Stroke Risk Score
  • Total possible score of 10
  • Hypertension 1 point
  • Age 75 or older 2 points
  • Age 65 to 74 1 point
  • Diabetes 1 point
  • Previous stroke, transient ischemic attack, or
    thromboembolism 2 points
  • Vascular disease 1 point
  • Female gender 1 point

Source CHEST 2010 137(2) 263-272.
20
ATHENA Trial
  • Main results showed that dronedarone 400 bid
    significantly reduced cardiovascular
    hospitalization or all-cause death in patients
    with atrial fibrillation
  • A post hoc analysis showed that dronedarone
    reduced the risk of stroke from 1.8 to 1.2 per
    year (HR 0.66, 95 CI 0.46 to 0.96)
  • The effect was greater in patients with higher
    baseline stroke risk

Source Circulation 2009, 120 1174-1180.
21
Early treatment of Atrial fibrillation for Stroke
prevention
  • Hypothesis Adequate and early comprehensive
    rhythm control therapy can prevent AF-related
    major complications (stroke, death, heart
    failure) compared to usual care

Primary outcome composite of cardiovascular
death, stroke, and heart failure or acute
coronary syndrome measured as hospitalization Enr
olment Patients with recent-onset AF at risk for
stroke or death
www.easttrial.org
22
SPORTIF V Trial
3,922 patients with nonvalvular AF and risk
factors for stroke (previous stroke,
hypertension, or CHF)
Randomized Double-blind to
  • Ximelagatran (36 mg bid)
  • A novel, oral direct thrombin inhibitor
    ximelagatran
  • (n 1,960)
  • Warfarin
  • Target INR 2.0-3.0
  • (n 1,962)
  • Endpoints (mean follow-up 20 months)
  • Primary All strokes (ischemic or hemorrhagic)
    and systemic embolic events, based on an
    intention-to-treat analysis for non-inferiority
  • Secondary Composite of death, stroke, systemic
    embolism, and MI and safety variables,
    specifically bleeding and liver enzyme elevations

AHA 2003 Late Breaking Trials
23
RE-LY Study Overview
  • In a large, randomized trial, two doses of the
    direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran were
    compared with warfarin in patients who had atrial
    fibrillation and were at risk for stroke
  • At 2 years, the 110-mg dose of dabigatran was
    found to be noninferior, and the 150-mg dose
    superior, to warfarin with respect to the primary
    outcome of stroke or systemic embolism

24
Primary Efficacy Outcome Stroke and non-CNS
Embolism
Warfarin
Rivaroxaban
Cumulative event rate ()
HR (95 CI) 0.79 (0.66, 0.96) P-value
Non-Inferiority lt0.001
Days from Randomization
No. at risk Rivaroxaban 6958 6211 5786
5468 4406 3407 2472 1496
634 Warfarin 7004 6327 5911
5542 4461 3478 2539 1538 655
Event Rates are per 100 patient-years Based on
Protocol Compliant on Treatment Population
25
ROCKET AF Summary
  • Efficacy
  • Rivaroxaban was non-inferior to warfarin for
    prevention of stroke and non-CNS embolism
  • Rivaroxaban was superior to warfarin while
    patients were taking study drug
  • By intention-to-treat, rivaroxaban was
    non-inferior to warfarin but did not achieve
    superiority
  • Safety
  • Similar rates of bleeding and adverse events
  • Less ICH and fatal bleeding with rivaroxaban
  • Conclusion
  • Rivaroxaban is a proven alternative to warfarin
    for moderate or high risk patients with AF

26
ARISTOTLE Data
  • Treatment with apixaban as compared to warfarin
    in patients with AF and at least one additional
    risk factor for stroke
  • Reduces stroke and systemic embolism by 21
    (p0.01)
  • Reduces major bleeding by 31 (plt0.001)
  • Reduces mortality by 11 (p0.047)
  • with consistent effects across all major
    subgroups and with fewer study drug
    discontinuations on apixaban than on warfarin,
    consistent with good tolerability.

Source N Engl J Med 2011 365 981-992.
27
Summary
At the end of this activity, participants should
understand
  • In an unselected population of 40 year olds, 25
    will develop atrial fibrillation in their
    lifetime
  • Every fourth to fifth stroke is related to atrial
    fibrillation
  • Risk factors for atrial fibrillation overlap with
    those for stroke in atrial fibrillation and
    include older age, previous stroke or TIA,
    hypertension, diabetes, and heart failure

28
Summary
  • Newer anticoagulants are challenging warfarin and
    other vitamin K antagonists for the prevention of
    stroke in atrial fibrillation
  • Dabigatran (Pradaxa), a direct thrombin
    inhibitor, has been approved for the prevention
    of stroke in this patient population
  • Investigational oral direct factor Xa inhibitors,
    including rivaroxaban and apixaban, have been
    shown to be at least as effective as warfarin at
    preventing strokes apixaban was superior in the
    ARISTOTLE trial

29
Summary
  • The newer anticoagulants do not require regular
    testing of INR, as with the vitamin K antagonists
  • Patients who are difficult to maintain in the
    therapeutic INR range may be good candidates for
    one of the newer agents
  • The educational efforts surrounding vitamin K
    antagonists in past decades will need to be
    repeated for the newer agents
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com