Title: Lessons from MA reform
1Lessons from MA reform
- The good, the bad, and the ugly
2Incrementalism made MA reform easier
- Access was expanded over 15 years with reforms.
Chapter 58 built on those reforms - MA had been aggressive with FFP funding and 1115
Waivers in the past - MA had a highly regulated insurance market with
guarantee issue - ESI in MA much stronger than the rest of U.S.
3MA incremental reforms
4MA took money for free care and
- Expanded S-Chip from 200 to 300 FPL
- Removed eligibility caps on Medicaid (MassHealth)
(about 75,000). Still no caps on eligibility - Commonwealth Care-subsidized for those under 300
FPL (about 175,000 insured). Provided by MMCOs
currently in market. Public design and
financing, private insurance. - Commonwealth Choice and private insurance-not
subsidized, for individual and small businesses
(about 21,000 CommChoice and 170,000 private).
Only now expanding CommChoice into small business
market - Used close to one billion in the free care pool
as funding for insurance coverage CMS tied this
to ending the IGT payments and special funding to
big DSH hospitals within 3 years (now).
5MA the National Context
- MA represents 2 of the national population
- MA is responsible for 24 of the decline
nationally in the number of uninsured
6MA pays coverage by
- Provider tax 160M 20M
- Insurers 160M 33M from reserves
- Businesses Increased who covered by fair and
reasonable (25 take-up, 33 payment), and 35M
from MSTF - Consumers increased co-pays and premiums
Tobacco tax of 150M
7MA built reform around ESI
- MA decided to build around ESI so that employer
was not lost to finance health insurance
coverage - People are generally happy with their ESI- high
quality, low deductible plans, with average
Employer payment of premiums at 75 coverage of
premiums for both individual and family - There has not yet been crowd-out, with the number
insured by ESI growing 160,000. From 68 to 72
ESI covered. - Has added more admin complexity
- 60,000 or 10 of all uninsured have ESI but cant
afford it. This will be true nationally and a
problem MA has not been able to address. - ERISA is an obstacle to changing insurance and
coverage, and is a continuing fear in MA. Many
states have worse ESI coverage that MA. - Section 125 plans, and fair and reasonable
standards
8(No Transcript)
9(No Transcript)
10An Individual Mandate to expand coverage
- MA has the first individual mandate
- No political backlash yet-shared responsibility
is accepted regionally - Support is still strong (at 69 support, up from
60) - Signed up 70 of uninsured in less than 3 years
- Tax penalties on individual growing gradually
(219/917) - Shared responsibility is something that resonates
- Mandate is on individual adults
- Problem of family coverage S-CHIP was made free
in MA if adults signed up. Many cant afford
family coverage through ESI and cant get into
CommCare. Unresolved - ERISA means the mandate is on individuals, not
businesses-if a plan does not meet MCC,
individual is on the hook for penalty, not
employer
11How did we get young workers insured?
- Biggest group of uninsured are young males-the
invincibles-some because MA regulated market
meant younger workers paid a lot, and had left
the market. - In MA, 60 uninsured were young males
- Even with mandate, they are the group that is
most resistant to buying coverage. When young
adults opt-out, this raises the costs of those
who do buy - Tension between creating lower cost options for
young adults, and bringing them into higher risk
pools vs. raising the cost of broader coverage
for young adults - Young-Adult-Plans (like student coverage), and
families may now cover children until 26.
12MA Insurance market reforms started before
Chapter 58
- Guarantee issue no medical underwriting rate
bands limited to 21. - More expensive for young adults less expensive
for older adults. - 60 of uninsured were young males.
- Chapter 58 merged non-group and small group
markets, which lead to decrease in non-group
costs by 25-30, with improved benefits
13Whats happened in the non-group market?
- Pre-reform plan choice for 37-year-old
- Monthly premium of 335
- No Rx coverage
- 5,000 deductible
- Post-reform plan choice for 37-year-old
- Monthly premium of 175
- Rx coverage
- 2,000 deductible, with office visits and ER
coverage prior to the deductible
14Universal Coverage requires guaranteed issue and
no medical underwriting
- Only 5 states have guaranteed issue
- MA uses age and gender rating bands substitute
for medical underwriting (paying more if you are
sick) modified community rating - In CA, individual mandate was demand of insurers
if they were to play ball - AHIP has said they would agree to guarantee issue
if combined with individual mandate - I.M. gets younger (healthier) people into market
and risk pool
15MA set a high bar for what minimum coverage must
be
- Need to define what minimum coverage is
- Think of MCC as a minimum wage for health
benefits - MA Connector Board defined it (MCC)-not
politicians! - ERISA is an obstacle to raising quality of
coverage-threat of an ERISA challenge if we
mandate too high a level of coverage individuals
will be penalized if not MCC compliant, not
businesses - Real struggle with Taft-Hartley's
- Without a definition, many skinny products
could have entered our market without solving
coverage needs. - MA requires drug coverage, deductibles of no more
than 2,000 for individual/4,000 for family at
least 3 preventative visits pre-deductible no
annual or per-episode limit a broad range of
medical services - MCC does not cover larger self-insured and
Taft-Hartley plans - Most insurance regulation is set state-by-state
and could be an obstacle to reform from the
national level. Progressive state leaders are
looking for flexibility in reform.
16Affordability schedule
- Built around subsidized plans
- Only up to 300 FPL
- Does not consider OOP costs only premiums
- Were unable to resolve OOP because progressives
wanted it as of income (10), but how do you
calculate OOP (at sickest level), and does the
shoebox approach really work? - Big hole for those 300-500 FPL. Unaffordable,
but no access to plans
17(No Transcript)
18Medicaid and Medicare payments need to be
restructured
- MA had maximized Federal Medicaid dollars, and
negotiated a 1115 waiver that allowed reform - Promise of 90M/90M/90M in higher Medicaid rates
for providers. Has been cut back because of
economic downturn. Big problem. DSH hit
hardest. - Will every state be allowed this flexibility, and
access to Medicaid dollars. Where will the
additional funding come from? - Even with expanded federal matching funds, it
will require states to increase their expense on
health care. How will national reform make that
possible?
19MA reform took money from free care and provider
DSH payments, and used it to buy insurance for
individuals
- Through 1115 waiver, MA took safety net dollars
to pay for insurance coverage for the poor. - Built in a 3 year transition for MMCOs-sole
contractors - Has been a rough transition for Safety Net
providers - Patients have choice-some leaving safety net
facilities - Isolates undocumented immigrants in old free
care/emergency system - If the poor are insured, how do we get our safety
net hospitals to compete in the market to capture
patients they use to serve?
20Safety Net Care Pool
Before 2nd Waiver Extension
Now
State 287m Fed 287m
Chapter 58
State 385m (via IGT) Fed 385m
21Pre-Reform Funding Flow
Federal Govt.
Providers DSH hospitals BMC CHA
Medicaid 385 M
via IGT
Patients
UCP
Other Providers
22Post-Reform Funding Flow
Fed
MMCOs
UCP shrinks
Insured Patients
Providers All hospitals
23Free Care versus Comm Care Patients - Patient
volume continues to change but will stabilize as
the remaining Comm Care eligible patients
enroll(BWH and MGH Only)
Note Effective 10/1/07, those eligible for
Commonwealth Care could no longer choose to
remain on Free Care. These patients will
eventually become self pay patients unless they
enrolled in Commonwealth Care. Data Source SDSM
24(No Transcript)
25(No Transcript)
26(No Transcript)
27Which comes first, the chicken (cost and quality)
or the egg (access)?
- Obama wants CQ first, before considering a
mandate - MA decided to do access first, and is now
attacking cost and quality - MA leaders think in hindsight their approach
worked-people bought into the system, and are
more willing to tackle cost economic downturn
has increased this pressure. New Payment Reform
Commission considering global payments
28Primary Care workforce development
- MA moved 442,000 new patients into a system over
two years. The lack of primary care clinicians
is a huge problem. National needs will be
staggering. - Need for rate changes that pay better for primary
care - Need for larger workforce, broader set of titles
(PA, NP, LPNs, what else?) - Need for training and workforce development
- Where will primary care be provided? Clinics,
community health centers? Where will new
workforce be employed?
29(No Transcript)
30MA reform built around the Connector
- MA Connector was responsible for
- Making many policy decisions that politicians
could not resolve (affordability, what should
health insurance cover, etc.) - Operated by consensus
- In charge of implementation and creating
subsidized plans - Not clear that small business offerings are a
viable role for Connector - Will that work nationally?
- National Connector for federal policy
- Local/regional Connectors to interpret and
implement federal ideas - Laws, regulations, and market are local and
different. - The politics of surviving backlash means a local
face and stakeholders is important.
31MA was unable to cover undocumented immigrants
through reform
- MA has historically treated undocumented
immigrants primarily through a free care pool. - As others are pulled out of the pool and insured,
the pool has become a ghetto for many
immigrants. Have access to emergency care only
and a bit of preventative care. - Will need to have a federal change to allow
Medicaid/CMS money to be used to cover everyone.
32(No Transcript)
33Lessons/Issues
- Let Connector make many key policy decisions (not
politicians)-affordability, minimum plans - Implementation is as critical as the bill.
- MA put off issues of cost and made access first
recent cost bill - Health delivery system not reformed-just
starting less complaints about Primary Care
access than expected - Built around Medicaid system-Kingsdale
disagrees-interdependency - CommCare is designed like MassHealth program-a
private program build on 4 MMCOs-no public
program - Consensus decision-making-more power to the left
- How cover families, not individuals S-CHIP free
- Affordability on premiums only-unresolved debate.
- Those between 300-500 FPL not required to buy,
but no coverage - Those working but cant afford coverage left
out-potential cost for those already buying
coverage. - Problems getting around ERISA on state level for
funding and benefit levels - States will have to spend more to get Federal
- What will happen to Safety Net providers?
- List billing for small groups
- How will the undocumented get covered?
34Problems for DSH hospitals
- CMS under Bush demanded that special DSH
payments to big DSH systems be converted to
health insurance. Pools of money for
uncompensated care is now for insurance cards - Special payments to MMCOs was declining, and will
be eliminated by July 2009 - In economic downturn, MA Governor cut other
special payments for high public providers, and
cut Medicaid rates to DSH hospitals by 22 - Now Gov is asking the question What is the role
of the safety net hospitals? Cant patients just
go to Mass General now?
35Baucus/House plan like MA
- Individual mandate/shared responsibility
- Builds around ESI
- Guarantee issue and no medical underwriting
- Affordable/subsidies to 400
- Public programs
- An Exchange/Connector/Board to set policy
- Minimum coverage defined nationally
36- Resources
- www.mahealthconnector.org
- www.bcbsfoundationma.org
- www.roadmaptocoverage.org
- www.massmedicaid.org
- www.mass.gov/dhcfp
- www.hcfama.org
- www.mass.gov/myhealthcareoptions
- Celia.Wcislo_at_1199.org