MAIN CHARACTERS in Erin Brockovich - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

MAIN CHARACTERS in Erin Brockovich

Description:

MAIN CHARACTERS in Erin Brockovich Erin Brockovich Main character in movie, leading role Smart with a very powerful voice, always says what s on her mind – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:797
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: melissaawa
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MAIN CHARACTERS in Erin Brockovich


1
MAIN CHARACTERS in Erin Brockovich
  • Erin Brockovich
  • Main character in movie, leading role
  • Smart with a very powerful voice, always says
  • whats on her mind
  • Willing to do whatever it takes to support
  • her family 3 children
  • Matthew 8
  • Katie 6
  • Beth 10 months
  • Married divorced twice
  • Beginning of the movie she is on her last 16
    dollars
  • her bank account later becomes a millionaire
    after
  • she wins the case

2
Ed Masry
  • Boss of Erin owns his own law firm
  • Firm turns from small town, independent law firm
    to big time corporate law firm at the end of the
    movie
  • First hesitant to hire Erin she persuaded him to
    do so
  • First impression of Erin was a dumb hick who
    looks like someone who has a lot of fun
  • Smart man, but is unwilling to speak up, so Erin
    does
  • Rewards Erin greatly at the end of the movie with
    a large sum of money

3
George
  • Erins love interest throughout the movie
  • Watches her kids while she is at work
  • In a motorcycle crew
  • Nice and caring man treats kids and Erin with
    respect
  • Leaves Erin in the middle of the movie because
    she works too much and he doesnt have time for
    himself
  • Gets back together with Erin at the end of the
    movie

4
Charles Embry
  • Meets Erin in the beginning of the
  • movie seen as weird, creepy man
  • Erin meets him again at a bar, but this time she
    thinks he is hitting on her
  • Ends up being the man that cracks the case
  • He tells her that he worked at the Hinkley plant
    cleaning the cooling towers and he was told to
    destroy certain documents
  • Turns out he kept the documents that proved the
    main PGE plant in San Francisco knew what was
    going on in Hinkley and he turned them over to
    Erin
  • Cousin passed away from kidney tumors caused by
    the chromium poisoning

5
Donna Jensen
  • The case that started Erins investigation
  • Erin wanted to find out why PGE needed to know
    their medical records and what it had to do with
    selling a house
  • Has cancer caused by chromium poisoning (this
    wasnt found out until later in the movie)
  • Has a husband and two kids
  • She is the first person Erin tells about winning
    the case
  • Receives 3 million in compensation
  • Says to Erin after being diagnosed with cancer
    again You gotta promise me we are going to get
    them.

6
Kurt Potter
  • Joins with Masry and Brockovich
  • Provides Masry firm with money to fund the case
  • Receives compensation if the court case is won
    (and it is)
  • Case would not have been won without his
    interference
  • At first, doesnt seem like a nice man, but later
    we learn to trust him
  • Does not think Erin is going to put everything
    together until she uncovers the information given
    to her by Embry

7
Factual Information About Hinkley vs. PGE
  • The court case was actually called Anderson vs.
    Pacific Gas Electric.
  • It took place in Hinkley, California. Hinkley is
    located in the Mojave Desert, near the town of
    Barstow, California. It is not far off the famous
    Route 66, about 150 miles from Las Vegas.
  • On December 7, 1987 officials from the company
    advised the State of California they had detected
    levels of hexavalent chromium (chrome 6), a
    highly toxic and fatal cancer-causing chemical in
    a groundwater monitoring well north of the
    compressor station's waste water ponds. The
    levels were ten times greater than the maximum
    amount allowed by law.

8
  • After PGE reported the pollution to the
    government, company officials started a program
    to buy every piece of property in the community
    thought to be affected by the pollution. In what
    was said to have been a response to vandalism,
    PGE had 75 of those houses and buildings
    destroyed.
  • PGE told the citizens of Hinkley that they had
    been using chromium in their drinking water
    making it seem as if it had actually been
    beneficial, but failed to mention the dangerous
    type of chromium it had dumped in the
    environment, also making it seem like the
    detection was a new development.

9
  • Based on the evidence, high levels of chrome 6
    contamination found in 1987 could not have been a
    surprise to the company, notwithstanding whether
    senior management knew. People and animals who
    lived in the area had been breathing, ingesting,
    and absorbing dangerous toxins into their bodies
    for decades. Evidence was later found proving
    that the main branch of PGE in San Francisco did
    know what was going on in Hickley.
  • PGE didn't line the ponds until 1972. The
    company sent 750,000 additional gallons of chrome
    6 wastewater every month to the ponds for another
    six years.

10
  • Once the toxic material was in the unlined ponds,
    there was nothing to stop it from migrating to
    the wells that supplied nearby homes, farms and
    ranches.
  • Erin Brockovich and her boss made the decision to
    represent these people. When 77 initial
    plaintiffs filed their lawsuit against PGE in
    1993, it was the direct result of a monstrous
    effort by this dedicated legal team.

11
  • As lawyers for both sides fought, the case grew.
    Eventually 648 plaintiffs joined the lawsuit.
  • by September 19, 1994 the parties reached an
    agreement to arbitrate/mediate. The agreement
    pulled the case out of the trial court - where a
    jury would have decided it - and placed it into
    the hands of Justice John K. Trotter and Judge
    Daniel H. Weinstein, two outstanding retired
    jurists

12
An End to Anderson vs. PGE
  • At the end of the two year long arbitration
    trial, the plaintiffs reached a global settlement
    with PGE which
  • Compensated all the named plaintiffs in the
    amount of 333 million
  • Required PGE to clean up the environment
  • Required PGE to stop using chromium 6
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com