NSTec Presentation Template - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

NSTec Presentation Template

Description:

Risk & Work Configuration Management as a Function of Integrated Safety Management Lana Buehrer & Paul Cakanic National Security Technologies, LLC – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:60
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: hssEnergy3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NSTec Presentation Template


1
Risk Work Configuration Management as a
Function of Integrated Safety Management
Lana Buehrer Paul Cakanic National Security
Technologies, LLC November 2007
2
The Nevada Test Site (NTS)
  • Covers approximately 1,350 square miles provides
    experimental capabilities in support of the
    Stockpile Stewardship Program
  • Subcritical experiments to obtain technical
    information on US nuclear weapons stockpile
  • Joint Actinide Shock Physics Experimental
    Research (JASPER)
  • Atlas Pulsed Power machine testing
  • Big Explosives Experimental Facility (BEEF)
  • Device Assembly Facility (DAF)
  • Criticality Experiments Facility (CEF) under
    construction
  • Work for Others
  • Nonproliferation Test and Evaluation Complex
    (NPTEC)
  • WMD/First Responder Training
  • Radioactive Waste Management Sites
  • Environmental Restoration
  • Additional Department of Defense (DoD) support

3
NTS (cont.)
  • Extremely diverse missions conducted by multiple
    organizations
  • National Security Technologies (NSTec) is the
    primary MO contractor
  • Three National Weapons Laboratories (NWLs)
    maintain a presence to conduct experiments (LANL,
    LLNL, SNL)
  • Other NWLs also participate (e.g., BNL)
  • Department of Homeland Security and DoD missions
  • Non-defense research and development
  • Unique challenges
  • Physical size (1,350 square miles)
  • Distance between Nevada facilities (NTS and
    NLV/LV)
  • Facilities in Nevada, California, New Mexico and
  • Washington, D.C.
  • Maintain over 700 buildings plus associated
  • utilities roads
  • Multiple NWLs Contractors
  • Diversity of missions

4
Step OneThe Plan and the System
Lana Buehrer, PMP Manager, Facility
Services National Security Technologies, LLC
5
Risk Work Configuration Management
  • Past
  • Documented chain of responsibility did not exist
    prior to PLN -1014
  • No written direction/Company Directives to
    cover
  • Acceptance of performance direction
  • Acceptance of business risk
  • Approval of physical risk
  • Present
  • Company directive for Risk and Work
    Configuration Management
  • Software being used to ensure work authorization
  • e-FOM provides replacement for Support,
    Facility, part of Project
  • Execution Plans
  • Future
  • Establish Configuration Management for the
    Facility Manager Program
  • Establish full integration with the sitewide
    Work Control Process

6
Risk Work Configuration Management
7
(No Transcript)
8
Risk Work Configuration Management
  • PLAN-1014
  • Establishes electronic ISM implementation process
  • Establishes management structure for acceptance
    of business physical risks
  • Establishes a risk-based graded approach for work
    authorization
  • Implements ISM Safety Chain Responsibilities
    for Work Authorization
  • Establishes General Employee Safety (GES) concept
  • Senior Managers/staff are default GES
  • Does not require further controls or
    authorization
  • Hazards at transient locations are controlled by
    host operations and Facility Managers.
  • Creates electronically applicable
    DOE/NNSA-required permits

9
Integrated Safety Management (ISM)Implementation
  • NSTec Written Authorization Basis
  • Identify work scope
  • Identify hazards
  • Establish standards requirements for performing
    work
  • Feedback improvement mechanisms
  • NNSA/NSO Real Estate Permit (REOP)
  • Work scope is well-defined within geographical
    boundaries
  • Identify hazards
  • Implement controls to mitigate hazards
  • Authorized work
  • Managed effectively

10
(No Transcript)
11
e-FOM Software Application
  • Created as a Company Information Officer Business
    System
  • Eighteen Basic Questions to Cover
  • Work Scope
  • Conduct of Operations
  • Hazard Analysis
  • Security Activity Analysis
  • National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
  • NNSA/NSO REOP Risk Management Checklist
  • Identified Implemented Controls
  • Facility Characteristics
  • Facility Hazard Category
  • Real Estate Permitting Process
  • Data Mining of Facility and Authorization Basis

12
Facility Managers Main Menu (e-FOM)
13
Conduct of Operations Survey
14
Security Activity Analysis
15
Integrated Risk Management Analysis (IRMA)
16
Expanded IRMA
17
Integrated Facility Characteristics Analysis
(IFCA)
18
Facility Data Warehouse
19
Step TwoThe Work Control Process
Paul Cakanic Defense Facilities and Nuclear
Operations National Security Technologies, LLC
20
Implementation of ISM into the NSTec Activity
Level Integrated Work Control Process
C1 C5
P1 P8
8th Guiding Principle anticipated
21
Process Driver NNSA Activity Level Work Planning
and Control Processes (January 2006)
Roadmap for ISM Implementation
22
Planning Activity Level Work
CORE ISM Function 2-3, Guiding Principles 1-6, 8
  • Job Hazard Assessment required
  • Field walk-down to identify hazard information
    BEFORE planning of work
  • Work Planners, Workers, Subject Matter Experts
    (SMEs)
  • Focus is on the ENTIRE SCOPE OF WORK and
    co-located work
  • One Form/Process for ALL activity level work
    data feeds into Binning
  • Activity Screening/Binning Process
  • Scope of Work Complexity How easy or how
    difficult the ENTIRE scope of work is to
    accomplish. Consists of many tasks.
  • Consequence of Improper Performance The
    undesired consequences of things that can happen
    if work is improperly performed
  • Health and safety, equipment damage,
    environmental impact, legal ramifications,
    mission impacts, financials
  • Frequency of Performance Deals with how often
    the work is performed. Not how often a worker
    performs the work.
  • Human judgment and experience must always be
    applied during this process

23
Activity Screening/Binning Guidance
24
Work Scope Complexity Examples
Examples Only
25
Activity Screening/Binning Tool
Establishes a process
26
3 Integrated Work Control Documents (IWDs)
  • Four Work Package Types (I, II, III, IV)
  • Each based upon the level of rigor required
  • Type I is most rigorous with strictest controls
  • Type IV is minor work
  • Standardized template planned

27
3 Integrated Work Control Documents (IWDs)
  • Technical Procedures
  • 3 Categories (In-Hand, General Use, Reference
    Use)
  • Used for Routine/Repetitive work
  • Based upon DOE-STD-1029, Writers Guide for
    Technical Procedures
  • Project Level Construction Documents
  • Applies to new or major alterations that require
    REOP/EP
  • Work packages not required IF and ONLY IF other
    more appropriate mechanisms are used to ensure
    safety
  • Design documents
  • QA Plans, Hold Points, Safety Manuals,
    Inspections, etc.
  • Responsible Manager can always use Work Packages
  • All other Construction work requires work packages

28
Skill of the Worker (SOTW)
  • Broadened definition vs. SOT Craft
  • Applicable to all trades and professions
  • Concept is applied as an Administrative Control
  • Applicable to all levels of work
  • Allows more focus on the control of hazards
  • Reduces details of the instruction set when SOTW
    is verified
  • Requires a Skill of the Worker Record
  • Listing of the tasks
  • Proof of training and qualification required

29
Work Planner Training Qualifications
Maintenance Construction Work Planner
Qualification
Nuclear Maintenance Work Planner Qualification
Core Work Planner Qualification
Organizational Work Planner Quals Based upon
the Core Work Planner Qualification
Diagnostics Work Planner
Homeland Security Work Planner
30
Implementation
  • NSTec was given a Performance Objective by local
    Nevada Site Office to integrate the existing work
    control programs
  • Met the Performance Objective by developing the
    NSTec Integrated Work Control Manual
  • Work Control affects many organizational
    documents
  • Developed an Implementation Plan
  • Full implementation targeted for September 19,
    2008 (Future Effective Date)

31
Contact Information
  • Lana Buehrer
  • (702) 295-2575
  • E-Mail BUEHRELK_at_NV.DOE.GOV
  • Paul Cakanic
  • (702) 295-7502
  • E-Mail CAKANIP_at_NV.DOE.GOV
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com