Making End-of-Life Decisions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 64
About This Presentation
Title:

Making End-of-Life Decisions

Description:

Making End-of-Life Decisions A Review of Key Principles Jacques Mistrot M.D. End-of-Life Decisions Ordinary/Extraordinary Means Nutrition and Hydration Suffering/Pain ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:80
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 65
Provided by: catholicb
Category:
Tags: decisions | end | life | making

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Making End-of-Life Decisions


1
Making End-of-Life Decisions
  • A Review of Key Principles
  • Jacques Mistrot M.D.

2
End-of-Life Decisions
  • Ordinary/Extraordinary Means
  • Nutrition and Hydration
  • Suffering/Pain Relief

3
Change in Public Opinion
  • Growing fear of a long, lingering death
  • Emphasis on self-determination and autonomy
  • Diminished willingness of society to accept the
    pain and suffering of dying as an acceptable fact
    of life
  • Pleasure is good and should be sought!
  • Pain is evil and must be avoided!

4
Ordinary/Extraordinary Means
  • We must use ordinary means of preserving our
    health and life
  • We may refuse extraordinary means of preserving
    health and life

5
Ordinary/Extraordinary Means
  • Some procedures can benefit the patient - these
    can be pursued
  • Some procedures go beyond what can be expected of
    a patient - burden - these can be omitted.

6
Ordinary/Extraordinary Means
  • The terms ordinary and extraordinary refer to
    moral facts, not medical facts.
  • Medically, a procedure is ordinary when
  • it is . . .
  • - scientifically established
  • - statistically successful
  • - reasonably available

7
Extraordinary Moral Means
  • Pose excessive burdens for the patient (either
    physical/mental/economic)
  • Offer little benefit (usefulness)
  • This is a patient/proxy decision but one should
    use the judgment of medical professionals to aid
    the decision.

8
  • Benefits and Burdens
  • The ratio of benefit to burden occasionally
    shifts during the course of a chronic or terminal
    illness
  • Ordinary treatments may become extraordinary as
    the illness progresses
  • Reassessment of treatment can be made when that
    occurs

9
Excessive Burdens
  • Pain (physical/mental) as extraordinary means
  • 1500s amputation (before anesthesia)
  • 1600s excessive shame (woman treated by a male
    physician)
  • Today prolonged treatment for incurable cancer

10
Excessive Burdens
  • Risky or experimental procedures
  • Painful or other very unpleasant side effects
  • Interference with important activities during
    remaining lifetime
  • Refusal based on certain moral principles (ie JW
    blood transfusions/transplantation from
    deceased donor)
  • Psychological repugnance (amputation, deformity)
  • (Beware of quality of life arguments)

11
No Benefit
  • Suppose a man is being burned to death
  • He has water at hand, but only enough to quench
    part of the fire not put it out
  • There is no obligation to use the water, even
    though it would extend his life slightly
  • Cardinal Juan De Lugo (1600s)

12
Medical Example Benefit/Burden
  • Patient with cancer of the lung
  • Surgical Radiation treatment recurrence
  • Debilitated, trouble breathing, O2 _at_ home
  • Prognosis several weeks of life
  • Offered chemotherapy and respirator support if
    needed may add a few months to his life but
    without curing him
  • Chemotherapy little benefit extraordinary
    treatment - may be refused
  • Respirator may temporarily benefit the patient
    but is a burden because it requires
    hospitalization/discomfort/expense
    extraordinary treatment - may be refused

13
Excessive Costs
  • Expense has long been recognized as a valid
    consideration in evaluating means
  • Expensive hospitalizations, medications,
    procedures
  • Obviated somewhat by our wealth and health care
    system/insurance
  • Not required to bankrupt ourselves or families

Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic
Health Care Services (November, 1994) no.56-57
14
Role of Practical Wisdom
  • These are judgment calls that the patient and
    family (in conjunction with health care
    professionals) must make together
  • We can cause a patient unnecessary suffering at
    the end of life by over-zealous treatments

CCC 2278
15
Role of Practical Wisdom
  • What is true for one person
  • May not be true for another
  • Example a long and difficult program of
    treatment for cancer
  • a) A young woman with several children
  • b) An old woman whose social obligations are
    fulfilled

16
Nutrition and Hydration
17
Nutrition and Hydration
  • Care versus Treatment
  • Care routine attention to a patient
  • Treatment can cure disease or return to
    health

18
Care
  • Care -
  • Bathing
  • Changing the bedclothes
  • Keeping the patient warm/dry
  • Turning the patient to avoid bedsores
  • Pain relief
  • Providing food and water

19
Presumption in Favor
  • Food and water are normal care and obligatory as
    long as they provide benefit
  • But there are exceptions - burden
  • Not being absorbed persistent infections
  • Repeated aspirations suctioning of throat
  • Agitation and pulling of the tube requiring
    restraint/constant supervision

Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic
Health Care Services (November, 1994) no.58
20
The Patientwith (Persistent) Vegetative
StateVS
21
VS(Medical)
  • Unresponsive
  • Not a Coma (unconscious/no arousal)
  • No awareness of self/surroundings
  • Usually severe cortical brain damage
    (communication, understanding, willful actions,
    pain perception)
  • Sleep and wake cycles preserved
  • These patients are not dying!
  • Some of these patients are in a severe locked-in
    condition!

22
John Paul IIMarch 20, 2004Life Sustaining
Treatments and the Vegetative State
  • A man, even if seriously ill, will always be a
    man and never a vegetable or animal.
  • The right of the sick person, even one in the VS,
    to basic health care.
  • The moral obligation to provide food and water to
    persons in the VS by even tube feeding.
  • The need to resist making a persons life
    contingent on its quality.
  • The principle of solidarity to support the
    families of a love one stricken with this
    terrible condition.

23
CDFAugust 1, 2007
  • The administration of food and water even by
    artificial means is, in principle, an ordinary
    and proportionate means of preserving life. It
    is therefore obligatory to the extent to which,
    and for as long as, it is shown to accomplish its
    proper finality (benefit), which is the hydration
    and nourishment of the patient. In this way
    suffering and death by starvation and dehydration
    are prevented.

24
VSWhy Is Removal Wrong?
  • Patient is not dying!
  • Death is not caused by the underlying disease
    that led to the inability of the patient to drink
    or eat.
  • Death is caused by starvation or dehydration.

25
(No Transcript)
26
(No Transcript)
27
Jan Grzebski19 year coma
  • Railway worker - fell into a coma after he was
    hit by a train in 1988.
  • Doctors gave him only two or three years to live
    after the accident.
  • He remembers everything that was going on around
    him He talks about it and remembers the weddings
    of our children.

28
  • Vegetative State
  • 23 year old female, MVA, TBI - July 2005
  • 5 months later in vegetative state
  • Functional MRI performed

29
Vegetative State
  • Imagine playing a game of tennis - fMRI
  • Imagine walking through all of the rooms in your
    house - fMRI

30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
VS/MCS
  • Wide variety and lack of consistency of these
    semi or unconscious states
  • Not in immediate danger of death
  • Long term status is unknown in many of them
  • Better medical technology will help answer some
    of these unknowns
  • But no matter what science tells us
  • these are human persons and deserve normal care

33
Pain/Suffering
34
Catholic Understandingof Suffering
  • Pain, suffering and death result of original
    sin
  • God embraces suffering caused by our sins in
    Christs passion and death
  • Result of Christs passion and death is victory
    over the sin and death imparted to us
  • John Paul II, Salvifici Doloris (1984)

35
Christian Understandingof Suffering
  • By Christs suffering for our Redemption, He has
    raised all human suffering to the level of
    Redemption
  • We are united to Christ by our baptism and can
    thus unite our suffering to His for the salvation
    of souls
  • Christ encourages us to take up our cross
    (including suffering) and follow Him
  • John Paul II, Salvifici Doloris (1984)

36
Pain/Suffering
  • Catholic understanding
  • Not required to suffer
  • Pain relief allowed to significant degree

37
The Use of Pain Killers
  • Doctors have a moral obligation to alleviate
    pain.
  • Pain is debilitating in itself
  • Fear, anxiety, loss of sleep, etc.
  • These conditions effect the spiritual goods of
    the patient - friendship, communication, prayer

38
Foreseeing versus Intending
  • Doctors may relieve a patient of pain even if
    it shortens life.
  • To foresee that life will be shortened is not to
    intentionally kill.
  • CCC 2279

39
Double Effect
  • Principle of double effect
  • intend the good effect
  • tolerate the bad effect
  • One may aggressively alleviate pain even if it
    indirectly shorten life.
  • One may not directly kill to alleviate pain this
    is euthanasia.

40
Pain Control
  • Important advances in pain control
  • Cancer Patients
  • Greater physician willingness to treat pain
  • Earlier use of narcotic medications
  • Addiction usually not a concern in terminal
    patients with no history of drug abuse

41
Pain Control- Faith -
  • Studies show that faith is a key factor in
    managing pain and suffering
  • Those with faith are generally more at
  • peace during the dying process and
  • generally require less pain medication

42
Palliative Sedation
  • Most pain can be alleviated, but . . .
  • not all!
  • Palliative sedation strong pain medication puts
    the patient into an semi-conscious state

43
  • Palliative Sedation
  • vs.
  • Terminal Sedation (Euthanasia)
  • Palliative relief of severe pain
  • confusion tolerated!
  • Terminal relief of severe pain
  • death intended!

44
A Conscious Death
  • Consciousness should be suppressed only for a
    very serious reason (severe pain)
  • Time for prayer, reception of Sacraments
  • Pain and suffering have salvific value
  • But no one is obliged to suffer pain

45
A Conscious Death Important Needs Fulfilled
  • Heal broken relationships
  • Allows patient to experience the caring provided
    by loved ones
  • Benefits the family to care for a patient who can
    gratefully respond
  • -Turn ones attention toward God . . .
  • Sacramental forgiveness

46
A Conscious Death
  • At the time of death, the person who has loved
    Christ throughout a whole lifetime should meet
    the Bridegroom in a condition that reflects the
    dignity of a rational creature.

Congregation for the Doctrine of the
Faith Declaration on Euthanasia (May 1980)
47
Summary
48
Ordinary/Extraordinary Means
  • One is obligatory the other optional
  • These refer to moral means (not medical)
  • Reasons for forgoing treatments
  • Excessive burdens (physical or mental pain)
  • Little benefit (risky or unlikely to help)
  • Too expensive (self or family)
  • Role of practical wisdom in each case

49
Nutrition and Hydration
  • Food and water are ordinary care
  • Presumption in favor of their use
  • But there are exceptions (extraordinary)
  • VS patients should receive food and water because
    life is a basic good
  • VS is not a consistent medical condition
  • Removal of food and water causes death

50
The Use of Pain Killers
  • We are not obliged to suffer
  • Relieving pain is a moral obligation
  • Foreseeing death is not intending death
  • Aggressive pain-relief may shorten life, but this
    is permitted by double effect
  • Consciousness may be suppressed (side effect of
    analgesia) for a very serious reason - palliative
    sedation

51
Church Teaching on Suffering
  • Christ encourages us to take up our cross
    (including suffering) and follow him
  • We are not obliged to suffer during the dying
    process and can receive relief through medication
    to the point of confused consciousness but

52
Church Teaching on Suffering
  • we are encouraged not to do so until we have
    had an opportunity to receive sacramental
    forgiveness and to have made peace with our
    fellow man

Pius XII ADDRESS of February 27, 1957,
145-147.
53
  • Even pain and suffering have meaning and value
    when they are experienced in close connection
    with love received and given
  • John Paul II
  • Evangelium Vitae n.97

54
Thank You
  • jmistrot_at_nc.rr.com
  • www.catholic-bioethics-nc.org

55
Advance Directives
  • What is valid in my State?
  • Many different state laws
  • Typically a statement of wishes
  • Signed and witnessed by two others (18)
  • Key is to Express Your Intentions
  • -Terri Schiavo case

56
Benefits of ADs
  • An expression of your wishes can aid your family
    and other decision-makers give comfort
  • Fulfills a legal requirement of health care
    facilities (though patients are not obliged to
    have an advanced directive)

57
Problems with ADs
  • They are inflexible written in stone
  • Cannot anticipate course of future illnesses
  • Can give moral misdirection (our duty to ignore)
  • Can lead to conflicts of interpretation
  • Destroy old copies
  • Some standard ADs are morally problematic

58
Health Care Proxies
  • Recommendation of the NCBC
  • Designate a Health Care Proxy
  • A trusted person who knows you
  • Someone who shares your values
  • Positive avoids conflict over who decides
  • Negative frustration among those excluded

59
Health Care Proxies
  • Some Important Notes
  • The proxy must outlive the patient (you can
    designate and additional alternative agent)
  • A Health Care Proxy is not necessarily the same
    as a Durable Power of Attorney
  • Makes sure others know your views

60
Serving as Surrogate
  • How do I decide what to do?
  • Substituted Judgment Make the decision the
    patient would make if able
  • Best Interests Make the decision that is in the
    best interest of the patient
  • These sometimes conflict
  • - Accident patient with AD no ventilator but
    suppose it is a temporary measure and would save
    his life

61
Serving as Surrogate
  • My moral life is implicated in yours when I serve
    as your proxy
  • I cannot engage in actions that contradict my
    faith or morals, e.g., perform euthanasia
  • Be sure you can fulfill an AD before accepting
  • Problem of cooperation with evil exists

62
Proxies and Advance Directives
  • Key is to Express Your Intentions
  • To a proxy or through an advance directive
  • NCBC favors proxies over directives
  • Do not sign a defective directive
  • Substituted judgment versus best interests

63
  • Whether we are dealing with children in the
    womb, old people, accident victims, the
    physically or mentally ill, we are always dealing
    with our fellow human beings whose credentials of
    nobility are to be found on the very first page
    of the Bible God created man in his own image
  • Paul VI, 1974

64
Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com