International Council on Systems Engineering Introduction…..

About This Presentation

Title:

International Council on Systems Engineering Introduction…..

Description:

International Council on Systems Engineering Introduction .. Susan Jones, INCOSE Region V Director for Industry Affairs The Aerospace Corporation – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43

Avg rating:3.0/5.0

Slides: 84

Provided by: sesGsfcN

Learn more at: https://ses.gsfc.nasa.gov

more less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: International Council on Systems Engineering Introduction…..

1
International Council on Systems
Engineering Introduction..

Susan Jones, INCOSE Region V Director for
Industry Affairs
The Aerospace Corporation
Chantilly, VA USA
susan.e.jones_at_aero.org

2
Outline

Overview Ken Kepchar Region V Director
Technical Committees and John SnodderlyWorking
Groups President Elect Past Technical Board
Chair
Education and Research TC Dennis Buede Technical
Committee Chair
Chesapeake Chapter Jerry Woodall Chapter
President
Washington Metro Area Chapter Bruce Shelton
Chapter President
Southern Maryland Chapter Karl Geist Chapter
President

3
Our Past

Started in 1990 by 35 US leaders as National
Council on Systems Engineering (NCOSE)
First Annual Symposium held in 1991
Most early members from defense/aerospace
Most early activity focused on sharing within the
organization
Became International (INCOSE) in 1996

4
Our PresentINCOSE is an international
authoritative body promoting the application of
an interdisciplinary systems approach to enable
the realization of successful systems
5
Our Present

Steady growth in membership with increasing
diversity
Non-US participation and leadership has increased
significantly
Key participant in industry standards and models
Increasing collaboration between university,
industry, and government
Affiliations/interactions with other
professionals bodies and industry societies to
produce shared outcomes

6
INCOSE Goals

Provide a focal point for dissemination of
knowledge
Promote collaboration in systems engineering
education and research
Establish professional standards for integrity in
the practice of systems engineering
Improve professional status of all people engaged
in the of practice of systems engineering
Encourage support from government and industry
for research and educational programs

7
INCOSE Regions
III
I
IV
II
VI
V
8
INCOSE Governance Structure

Board of Directors
Executive Committee (officers)
Corporate Advisory Board
Technical Board
Technical Committees (7)
Working Groups/ Interest Groups (30)
Systems Engineering Center of Excellence
Administrative Committees (5)
Chapters, Communications, Membership, Symposium,
Ways Means
Central Office

9
Corporate Advisory Board

Consists of one representative from each
corporate sponsor (37 and growing)
Provides recommendations to INCOSE on overall
direction, focus, and priorities
Acts as a conduit between INCOSE and sponsoring
corporations for resolving key issues
Seeks to influence the future of systems
engineering standards, practices, education,
research and other key issues

NASA joined as a CAB Member in 1999
10
CAB Members

Aerojet
The Aerospace Corporation
Astrium GmbH
BAE Systems
The Boeing Company
Boeing Satellite Systems
Boeing - Military Aircraft Missiles Systems
C.S. Draper Laboratory
The Defence Evaluation and Research Agency
Delphi Automotive Systems
EADS Military Aircraft Division
Department of Energy - Idaho
General Dynamics Corporation
Honeywell International
Israel Aircraft Industries
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Litton/PRC
Litton/TASC
Lockheed Martin Corporation

Motorola
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Naval Air Systems Command
Naval Surface Warfare Center - Dahlgren Division
Northrop Grumman Corporation
Raytheon Systems Company
Raytheon Systems Company/Texas
Rockwell Collins Avionics Communications
Science Application International Corporation
Structural Dynamics Research Corporation
Software Productivity Consortium
TRW Systems Information Technology Group
Telelogic AB
Thomson-CSF Racal PLC
United Technologies
Vitech Corporation
Xerox Corporation

11
INCOSE Membership Benefits

INCOSE Journal
INSIGHT
Symposia, Workshops, Conferences
Membership discounts
Early visibility into emerging standards
Knowledge of engineering from a global
perspective
Means to tap expertise of industry experts
Networking with colleagues from around the world
..and more

12
Chapters
Interest Group
Region
Branch
Geographical
Domains
INCOSE Networking
Technical
Professional
Committee
Disciplines
Working Groups
Joint Activities
13
Our FutureINCOSE is the worlds premier
engineering professional society for enabling
holistic solutions to problems and needs
14
Six Strategic Priorities

(1) Provide high value products and services and
opportunities for professional networking
(2) Position INCOSE as a unifying force across
engineering communities and related specialties
(3) Promote growth through diversification of
stakeholder base and products/services

15
Six Strategic Priorities

(4) Attract highly qualified leaders and provide
infrastructure and balanced leadership
organization to accomplish targeted initiatives
(5) Gain further recognition of the importance of
systems engineering
(6) Achieve wide acceptance of INCOSE as
the leading systems engineering
society

16
Advancement

Develop products and services to foster
advancement of individual members knowledge
SE Body of Knowledge
Examine means to create partnerships between
industry universities
Academic Forum
Foster selected research opportunities through
INCOSE Systems Engineering Center of Excellence
(SECOE)
Expand the circulation of the INCOSE journal

17
Influence

Sponsor/participate in targeted conferences
Many regional/chapter events, and INCOSE track at
Software Technology Conference
34th Engineering and Technical Management
Conference (EIA/GEIA, INCOSE, NDIA)
2nd European Systems Engineering Conference
Continue participation and leadership in
standards
ISO, IEEE, EIA and others
Offer INCOSE's expertise and participation in
selected industry initiatives/advisory boards
BOD voted yes opportunities being identified

18
2001 International Symposium
19
Other Events

Regional Conferences
Events hosted by regions or chapters with most of
the elements of the annual symposium
Chapter Events
Local events which may include chapter business
meetings, special working sessions, tutorials,
speakers
Working/Interest Group Meetings
Events held in one location or as virtual
meetings with focus on a particular
product or topic area

20
SUMMARY

Local Chapters Sponsor a Variety of Activities of
Interest for NASA Personnel
The Mid-Atlantic Chapters Work Together to Bring
Quality Programs to their Members
The Chapter Meetings and Programs Provide an
Avenue
For Attendees to Exchange Ideas
Learn New Concepts to Employ at Work
Develop New Resources for Research

21
International Council on Systems
Engineering Advancing the State of the Art in
Systems Engineering

John Snodderly, INCOSE President Elect and Past
Technical Committee Chair
Defense Systems Management College
Fort Belvoir, VA USA
john.snodderly_at_incose.org

22
Vision
An international body comprised of leading
organizations and experts contributing to the
body of knowledge on systems engineering An
organization whose leadership and members are
recognized as having the highest expertise to
solve systems problems A contributing partner
in strategic alliances with other professional
societies and leading universities worldwide A
center of competence for research, theory, and
practices applied to systems challenges
INCOSE is the worlds premier engineering
professional society for enabling holistic
solutions to problems and needs
23
WHY is INCOSE Needed ?

Is the world of SE in trouble today?
How would you know?
What are some recent examples that point out a
lack of SE?

24
DoD SE Problems

USAF Urges F-22 Production Without Test- ready
to move into its production phase even if an
important software milestone, which legally must
be reached first, is not passed
Software Pushes Up JSF Price Tag to 31 Million
- Marketplace changes, the software went
straight up. Turns out it was more for software
than we thought.
A draft report from the GAO, a government
watchdog agency here, charges that the JSF
program is rushing to the engineering
manufacturing and development stage before
critical technologies have matured.
Integrating JSF engine-control software with
avionics software has proven challenging.
Defense news April 10, 2000

25
From the Mars Climate Orbiter Mishap
Investigation Board Phase I Report

Absence of a mission systems engineer during the
operations phase to provide the bridge between
the spacecraft system, the instrument system and
the ground/operations system.
Lack of identification of acceptable risk by the
operations team in the context of the Faster,
Better, Cheaper philosophy.
Navigation requirements set at too high a
management level, insufficient flowdown of
requirements and inadequate validation of these
requirements.
Several significant system and subsystem design
and development issues, uncovered after the
launch of the Mars Climate Orbiter
Inadequate attention, within the system
engineering process, to the transition from
development to operations.

26
From the Wide-field Infrared Explorer Mishap
Investigation Board Report (Briefing by Darrell
Branscome, Board Chair)

Detailed, independent technical peer reviews are
essential. Furthermore, it is essential that peer
reviews be done to assess the integrity of the
system design, including an evaluation of
system/mission consequences of the detailed
design and implementation.
Perform electronics power turn-on
characterization tests, particularly for
applications involving irreversible events.
Test for correct functional behavior and test
for anomalous behavior, especially during initial
turn-on and power-on reset conditions.

27
From Lewis Spacecraft Mission Failure
Investigation Board Report

Especially in Faster, Better, Cheaper projects,
communication of decisions to senior NASA and
contractor management is essential to successful
program implementation.
Requirements changes without adequate resource
adjustments indirectly contributed to the
failure.
Inadequate engineering discipline indirectly
contributed to the failure.
The Government and the contractor must be clear
on the mutual roles and responsibilities of all
parties, including the level of reviews and what
is required of each side and each participant in
the Integrated Product Development Team.

28
From the Faster, Better, Cheaper Study
(Briefing by Tony Spear)

NASA must pick capable PMs. PMs should be
certified.
Important to communicate project risks to project
team, senior management, and to the public. PMs
should project a risk profile or risk
signature at start of project, monitor for
changes over life of project and explain them.
Peer reviews must include the right people.
For a lander mission, its important to have
telemetry on spacecraft descent.
PMs must pick capable project teams.
Certification of project team members should be
considered.

29
Orlando Figueroa's 5 major points

Engineering Excellence in NASA
Advance Engineering excellence in NASA
Strengthen Systems Engineering
Process Documentation
PAPAC (Agency -wide process) Policy 7120
Promote infrastructure to move to a collaborative
environment
Advanced Engineering Environments
NASA Collaboration with National International
bodies(i.e. INCOSE)
Stimulate NASA Engineering participation in
National Academy of Engineering

30
How does INCOSE Advance the SE State of the Art?

Through innovative INCOSE Technical Board
Products Services
Provide Products and services by INCOSE Working
Groups Interests Groups
Examples

31
Technical Committees Hierarchy Diagram
Technical Committees
Technical Board
Measurement Technical Committee
Process Methods Technical Committee
Standards Technical Committee
Education Research Technical Committee
SE Applications Technical Committee
Education Development Working Group
Capability Assessment Working Group
Comm Public Internet Working Group
Principles Working Group
SE Management Technical Committee
Space Systems Working Group
Concepts Terms Working Group
Measurement Working Group
Systems Architecture Working Group
Requirements Working Group
Resource Mgmt. Working Group
Education Measurements Working Group
Human Systems Working Group
Modeling Tools Technical Committee
Telecommunications. Working Group
Risk Management Working Group
Systems Supportability Interface
Research Working Group (SECOE)
SE Handbook Working Group
Tools Database Working Group
Joint Comm. Aircraft Working Group
SE Mgmt Methodology Working Group
SE and the Internet Interest Group
Systems Engineering Body of Knowledge (SE BOK)
Working Group
Tools Integration Working Group
Environmental Systems Working Group
Verification Validation Interest Group
Model-Driven System Design Working Group
Motor Vehicles. Interest Group
Infrastructure Systems Working Group
Configuration Mgmt. Interest Group
Information Model Process Working Group
Health Care Interest Group
Railway Transportation Interest Group
Soft Systems Interest Group
1.2
32
Systems Engineering Applications Technical
Committee (SEATC)
Excerpts from International Workshop Summary
Presentation Mesa, AZ January 2001 Dr. William
Mackey, Chair Ralph Godau, Co-Chair Scott
Jackson, Co-Chair Pat Sweeney, Co-Chair
33
Systems Engineering Applications Technical
Committee Charter

Foster formation and operation of working groups
and interest groups
Specific application domains
Across domains
Examine systems engineering tools, techniques,
and processes within specific application domains
WG/IGs grow from a core WG (the CPIWG) into
specific application domain WG/IGs

34
Interfaces With Other Technical Committees and
Working Groups
Education and Research
Modeling and Tools
SE Management
Processes and Methods
Communications
Measurement
Standards
Cross Applications
Commercial and Public Interest Commercial
Aircraft Environmental Systems Infrastructure
Systems Engineering Resource Management Space
Systems Telecommunications Health Care Motor
Vehicles Railway Transportation
UMUC Profiles
INSIGHT V1-I3-1998
Joint Symposium Panel
Specific Applications
Aircraft Guidelines
UNLV Seminar
INSIGHT V2-I2-1999
INSIGHT V3-I3-2000
U. Birming Rail Activity
35
Where We Are Today

Transportation SectorAshok Jain
Joint Commercial Aircraft Working Group (JCAWG)
Greg Mathers, and Erwin Duurland
Motor Vehicles Interest Group (MVIG)Paul Berry
Railway Transportation Interest Group
(RWTIG)John Williams and Jeff Allan
Resources SectorRalph Godau
Infrastructure Systems Engineering Working Group
(ISEWG)Pat Sweeney and Ralph Godau
Resource Management Working Group (RMWG) Ted
Dolton and Bill Cutler
Environment Systems Working Group (ESWG)Ralph
Hill

36
Where We Are Today (Contd)

Public Services SectorPat Sweeney
Commercial and Public Interest Working
GroupJerry Bauknight and William Mackey
Space Systems Working Group (SSWG)David Durham
and Ray Granata
Telecommunications Working Group (TELWG)Martin
Warner and Ruediger Kaffenberger
Health Care Interest Group (HCIG)John Zaleski
and Orlando Illi

37
SEATC Accomplishments

Approximately 242 SE applications papers have
been presented in 20 commercial and public
interest domains at the Symposia from 1992 to
2000
The SEATC has offered application specific
sessions at the symposia since 1996
Nine symposia panels and five regional seminars
in commercial and public interest domains have
been presented

38
SEATC Accomplishments (Contd)

Key products include
SE Applications Profiles Document (Version 3.0 on
WEB)
SE Applications Organization Document (Version
1.0 on WEB)
Edited three commercial themed issues of INSIGHT
(1998. 1999, 2000)
Framework for the Application of SE in the
Commercial Aircraft Domain (Version 1.2 Released
in July 2000)
Telecommunications Industry Application Guidebook
(TBD)
Space Systems Application Guidebook (TBD)
44 professional papers and 5 SE Applications
Panels were conducted at the Minneapolis, MN
Symposium
Several volunteer SE projects are underway in San
Francisco Bay Area Chapter and other local
chapters

39
Systems Engineering Applications Domains

1. Agriculture 14. Housing and Building Systems
2. Commercial Aircraft 15. Information Systems
3. Commercial Avionics 16. Manufacturing
4. Criminal Justice and Legal 17. Medical
Devices
Systems 18. Motor Vehicles
5. Drug Abuse Prevention 19. Natural Resource
Management
6. Emergency Systems 20. Political and Public
Interest
7. Energy Systems
8. Environment Restoration 21. Service
Industries
9. Facilities Systems Engineering 22. Space
Systems
10. Food Service 23. Telecommunications
11. Geographic Information Systems 24. Transportat
ion
12. Health Care 25. Urban Planning
13. Highway Transportation Systems 26. Waste
Management and Disposal

Applications domains currently represented in
document
40
Standards Technical Committee
January 2001 James Martin, Chair John Velman,
Co-Chair Alain Faisandier, Co-Chair
1.1
41
Current SE Standards

ANSI/EIA-632
Processes for Engineering a System, Dec 1998
www.geia.org/eoc/G47/main.html
EIA/IS-731
Systems Engineering Capability Model, Dec 1998
www.geia.org/eoc/G47/main.html
IEEE 1220
Application and Management of the Systems
Engineering Process, 1998
ECSS-E-10A
System Engineering, Apr 1996
European Cooperation for Space Standardization
www.estec.esa.nl/ecss/standard/status.html

Co-developed by INCOSE
42
International Standards(under development)

System Life Cycle Processes, ISO/IEC 15288
JTC1/SC7/WG7
SE Capability Maturity, ISO/IEC 15504 (SPICE)
JTC1/SC7/WG10
SE Data Exchange, ISO 10303-AP233
TC184/SC4/WG3/T8
Systems Engineering (Space Systems)
TC20/SC14
To adopt ECSS-E-10 as ISO standard

43
Other Standards (under development)

Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI)
National Defense Industry Alliance (NDIA)
Electronic Industries Alliance (EIA)
System Architecture, IEEE P1471
INCOSE Architecture WG working this task
Engineering Management Book of Knowledge (EMBOK)
IEEE Engineering Mgmt Society
Project Management Book of Knowledge (PMBOK)
Project Management Institute (PMI)
Currently available, but upgrades are planned

44
Liaison Activities

INTERNATIONAL
ISO JTC1/SC7, Technical Liaison
Robert Halligan appointed by BOD
Standards 15288/15504 under authority of SC7
working groups
ISO 15288, System Life Cycle Processes
SC7 Liaison, Robert Halligan
ISO 15504, Systems Engrg Capability Model
SC7 Liaison, Robert Halligan
ISO 10303-AP233, STEP Systems Engrg Data Exchange
POC is Sylvain Barbeau
David Oliver, INCOSE Liaison

UNITED STATES
EIA G47, Systems Engineering Committee
TBD, primary
Richard Harwell, alternate
AIAA, Systems Engineering Technical Committee
Informal POC is Richard Harwell
Formal liaison being considered
IEEE, Systems Engineering Standards Committee
Liaison being worked with Paul Croll

45
(No Transcript)
46
(No Transcript)
47
Chapters - Technical Board Combined Efforts

Positive Steps taken for cooperative efforts
Potential Funding of Special Projects By Chapters
EIA AP233 UML Effort
GEIA G-47

48
INSIGHT Magazine for July
Reports from INCOSEs Technical Board, Technical
Committees and Working Groups
49
INCOSE Technical Journal
Quarterly Publication Refereed Journal Andy Sage
GMU Editor
50
Commercial Aircraft Guidebook
Draft Circulated for comment July 00
DRAFT Framework for the Application of
Systems Engineering in the Commercial Aircraft
Domain Version 1.1 Jun 15, 2000
51
Establishment of Liaisons for Standards

Definition of Liaison - A linking up or
connecting of the parts of a whole, as of
military units, in order to bring about proper
coordination of activities
Robert Halligan SC-7 Liaison for 15288
David Oliver AP-233 Liaison
Richard Harwell EIA/G-47 Liaison

Webster New World Dictionary
52
SE Handbook Update
Handbook currently being reviewed.
53
Proposed INCOSE SE BoK similar to PMI-PM BoK and
ISO-SE BoK

Advantage
Format widely accepted
Significant similarity and overlap with PMI and
ISO models
Integration with other disciplines is simplified
Broad perspective is useful for many
Simplified update over a comprehensive document
Disadvantages
Not comprehensive in the near to intermediate
term thus requiring multiple references
Format May reduce likelihood of SE BoK becoming a
standard
Requires constant monitoring of references

54
We need NASAs help!

Provide their SE technical expertise to INCOSE
WGs (especially Space WG)
Provide technical input to special projects (I.e.
SEBOK)
Become members of our (Corporate Advisory Board -
Orlando is NASA HQ CAB member), David Durham is
JPL CAB member
Attend and participate in local chapters
activities and working groups.

55
International Council on Systems
Engineering Education and Research in Systems
Engineering

Dennis Buede, Education and Research Technical
Committee
George Mason University
Fairfax, VA USA
dbuede_at_gmu.edu

56
Status of SE Research Education
57
Topics

Activities in the Education Research TC
Charter and Working Groups
Education development WG
SE Body of Knowledge WG
Research in SE Center of Excellence

58
Education and Research Technical Committee

To make Systems Engineering education a proven,
value-adding, activity that matures in a systemic
manner to the satisfaction of the key stakeholder
groups - Industry, Systems Engineers and
Educators
Chair - Dennis Buede, 1 703-993-1727,
dbuede_at_gmu.edu
CoChairs
Phil Brown, 1 972-262-0530, phil.brown_at_seconcepts
.com
Stephen Cook, 61 8 8302 3818, stephen.c.cook_at_unis
a.edu.au
Education Development Working Group
Define and develop databases that describe
educational opportunities at the undergraduate
and graduate level of systems engineering that
can be used as a guide for formal academic
programs at all levels.
Concepts and Terms Working Group
Define and document the conceptual foundations of
SE within the framework of a common set of terms
(with definitions) to support more effective
communication of SE.
Educational Measurements Working Group
To assist and make Systems Engineering education
a proven, value-added, activity that matures in a
systemic manner.
Systems and Supportability Interface Research
Working Group
To research cause-and-effect relationships that
link system architectural and design decisions to
impacts on system operational effectiveness and
life-cycle cost in an increasingly competitive
and resource constrained environment.
SE Body of Knowledge Working Group
To create a Guide to the SE Body of Knowledge.

59
Education Development WG

SE Bibliographies
SE Education and Training Resources

60
SE Bibliographies

Overall Bibliography
Started with SEFT Bibliography (53 pages)
Updated with Annotations by GMU M.S. Students (79
pages)
Updated by Jack Fishers Bibliography (98 pages)
(To be) Updated by Don Clausings Bibliography
Bibliography of SE Books
Bibliography of Books about Systems

Goal Update once each year Publish on INCOSE web
site Advertise in INSIGHT
61
Books on Systems Engineering
Ostwald, P.F. and Munoz, J. (1997). Manufacturing
Processes and Systems. Padulo, L. and Arbib, M.
(1974). System Theory A Unified State-Space
Approach to Continuous and Discrete Systems.
Pages, A. and Gondran, M. (1986). System
Reliability Evaluation and Prediction in
Engineering. Perrow, C. (1984). Normal Accidents
Living with High-Risk Technologies. Perry, W.E.
(1988). A Structured Approach to Systems
Testing. Phadke, M. (1989). Quality Engineering
Using Robust Design. Prasad, B. (1996).
Concurrent Engineering Fundamentals Integrated
Product and Process Organization. Proctor, R.W.,
Van Zandt, T., and Ehrenstein, A. (1993). Human
Factors in Simple and Complex Systems. Pugh, S.
(1990). Total Design. Purdy, D.C. (1991). A Guide
for Writing Successful Engineering
Specifications. Rasmussan, J. (1986). Information
Processing and Human-Machine Interaction. Rasmussa
n, J. et al. (1994). Cognitive Systems
Engineering. Rea, K.P. and Lientz, B.P. (1998).
Breakthrough Technology Project
Management. Rechtin, E. and Maier, M.W. (1996).
The Art of Systems Architecting. Rechtin, E.
(1991). Systems Architecting Creating and
Building Complex Systems. Reilly, N.B. (1993).
Successful Systems Engineering for Engineers and
Managers. Revelle, C.S., et al. (1997). Civil and
Environmental Systems Engineering. Roland, H.E.
and Moriarty, B. (1990). System Safety
Engineering and Management. Rouse, W.B. (1991).
Design for Success A Human-Centered Approach to
Designing Successful Products and Systems. Rouse,
W.B. and Boff, K.R. (1987). System Design
Behavioral Perspectives on Designers, Tools, and
Organizations Ryschkewitsch, M.G. (1992). The
NASA Mission Design Process An Engineering Guide
to the Conceptual Design, Mission Analysis, and
Definition Phases. Sage, A.P. (ed.) (1999).
Handbook of Systems Engineering. Sage, A.P.
(1995). Systems Management for Information
Technology and Software Engineering. Sage, A.P.
(1992). Systems Engineering. Sage, A.P. (1991).
Decision Support Systems Engineering. Sage, A.P.
(1977). Methodology for Large-scale
Systems. Savas, E.S. (1965). Computer Control of
Industrial Processes. Schuman, S. et al. (1994).
Systems, Models, and Measures Formal Approaches
to Computing and Information Technology. Shearer,
J.L. et al. (1997). Dynamic Modeling and Control
of Engineering Systems. Shina, S.G. (ed.).
(1994). Successful Implementation of Concurrent
Engineering Products and Processes. Shinners,
S.M. (1976). A Guide to Systems Engineering and
Management. Shuey, R.L., Spooner, D.L., and
Frieder, O. (1997). The Architecture of
Distributed Computer Systems. Sommerville, I.
(1997). Requirements Engineering A Good Practice
Guide. Stevens, R., et al. (1998). Systems
Engineering Coping with Complexity. Suh, N.P.
(1990). The Principles of Design. Taguchi, G.
(1989). Introduction to Quality
Engineering. Taguchi, G., Elsayed, E.A., and
Hsiang, T.C. (1989). Quality Engineering in
Production Systems. Thayer, R.H. and Dorfman, M.
(eds.) (1990) System and Software Requirements
Engineering. Thome, B. (ed.) (1993). Systems
Engineering Principles and Practice of
Computer-Based Systems Engineering. Truxal, J.G.
(1972). Introductory System Engineering. Turbide,
D.A. (1996). Why Systems Fail And How to Make
Sure Yours Doesnt. Turner, W.C., Mize, J.J.,
Case, K.E., Nazemetz, J.W., Mize, J.H. (1992).
Introduction to Industrial and Systems
Engineering. Van Gigch, J.P. (1978). Applied
General Systems Theory. Vickers, G. (1983). Human
Systems Are Different. Von Bertalanffy, L.
(1968). Gerneral Systems Theory. Wallace, I.
(1995). Developing Effective Safety
Systems. Wallace, R., Stockenberg, J. and
Charrette, R. (1987). A Unified Methodology for
Developing Systems. Warfield, J.N. (1990). A
Science of Generic Design Managing Complexity
through Systems Design. (Vol. 1 and 2).
Warfield, J.N. (1976). Societal Systems
Planning, Policy, and Complexity. Warfield, J.N.
and Hill, J.D. (1972). A Unified Systems
Engineering Concept. Williams, T.J. (1961).
Systems Engineering in the Process
Industries. Wilson, B. (1984). Systems Concepts,
Methodologies, and Applications. Wright, R.T.
(1990). Manufacturing Systems. Wymore, A.W.
(1993). Model-based Systems Engineering. Wymore,
A.W. (1977). A Mathematical Theory of Systems
Engineering The Elements. Wymore, A.W. (1976).
Systems Engineering Methodology for
Interdisciplinary Teams.
Ackoff, R.L. and Emery, F.E. (1972). On
Purposeful Systems. Akao, Y.A. (1990). QFD
Integrating Customer Requirements into Product
Design. Alexander, C. (1964). Notes on the
Synthesis of Form. Andriole, S.J. (1996).
Managing Systems Requirements Methods, Tools,
and Cases. Asimow, M. (1962). Introduction to
Design. Athey, T.H. (1982). Systematic Systems
Approach An Integrated Method for Solving
Systems Problems. Baumgartner, J.S. (1979).
Systems Management. Baylin, E.N. (1990).
Functional Modeling of Systems. Beam, W.R.
(1990). Systems Engineering Architecture and
Design. Beam, W.R. (1989). Command, Control, and
Communications Systems Engineering. Beer, S.
(1985). Diagnosing the System for
Organizations. Belcher, R. and Aslaksen, E.
(1992). Systems Engineering. Bellamy, L.J.
(1985). The Safety Management Factor An Analysis
of the Human Error Aspects of the Bhopal
Disaster. Blair, R.N. and Whitston, C.W. (1971).
Elements of Industrial Systems Engineering. Blanch
ard, B.S. (1991). System Engineering
Management. Blanchard, B.S., and Fabrycky, W.J.
(1998). Systems Engineering and
Analysis. Boardman, J. (1990). Systems
Engineering An Introduction. Bowen, J.P. and
Hinchey, M.G. (1999). High-Integrity System
Specifications and Design. Buede, D.M. (2000).
The Engineering Design of Systems Models and
Methods. Card, S.K., Moran, T.P., and Newell, A.
(1983). The Psychology of Human-Computer
Interaction. Carroll, J.M. (ed.). (1995).
Scenario-Based Design. Carter, D.E. and Baker,
B.S. (1992). Concurrent Engineering The Product
Development Environment for the 1990s. Chapanis,
A. (1996). Human Factors in Systems
Engineering. Chapman, W.L., Bahill, A.T., and
Wymore, A.W. (1992). Engineering Modeling and
Design. Chase, W.P. (1974). Management of System
Engineering. Checkland, P.B. (1981). Systems
Thinking, Systems Practice. Chestnut, H. (1967).
Systems Engineering Methods. Chestnut, H. (1965).
Systems Engineering Tools. Chorafas, D.N. (1989).
Systems Architecture and Systems
Design. Churchman, C.W. (1971). The Design of
Inquiring Systems. Churchman, C.W. (1968). The
Systems Approach. Cochin, I. And Plass, H.J.
(1997). Analysis and Design of Dynamic
Systems. Cooper, D. and Chapman, C. (1987). Risk
Analysis for Large Projects Models, Methods and
Cases. Corbett, J., Dooner, M., Meleka, J., and
Pym, C. (1991) Design for Manufacture
Strategies, Principles, and Techniques. Coulouris,
G., Dollimore, J., and Kindberg, T. (1994).
Distributed Systems Concepts and Design. Cross,
N. (1989). Engineering Design Methods. Daenzer,
W.F. (ed.) (1976). Systems Engineering. Dandy,
G.C. and Warner, R.F. (1989). Planning and Design
of Engineering Systems. Defense Systems
Management College. (1989). Risk management
Concepts and guidance. DeMarco, T. (1978).
Structured Analysis and System Specification. de
Neufville, R. and Stafford. J.H. (1971). Systems
Analysis for Engineers and Managers. Dept. Of
Army, (1969). A Guide to Systems
Engineering. Dhillon, B.S. (1989). Life Cycle
Costing Techniques, Models, and
Applications. Dhillon, B.S. (1982). Reliability
Engineering in Systems Design and
Operation. Dickinson, B.W. (1991). Systems
Analysis, Design, and Computation. Dix, A.J.
(1991). Formal Methods for Interactive
Systems. Dixon, J.R. (1966). Design Engineering
Inventiveness, Analysis, and Decision-Making. Domm
asch, D.O. and Landeman, C.W. (1962) Principles
Underlying Systems Engineering. Dorny, C.N.
(1993). Understanding Dynamic Systems Approaches
to Modeling, Analysis and Design. Eisner, H.
(1988). Computer-Aided Systems Engineering. Eisner
, H. (1996). Essentials of Project and Systems
Engineering Management. Fabrycky, W.J., Thuesen,
G.J., and Verma, D. (1997). Economic Decision
Analysis. Fabrycky, W.J. and Blanchard, B.S.
(1991). Life-Cycle Cost and Economic
Analysis. Faurre, P. and Depeyrot, M. (1977).
Elements of System Theory. Flagle, C.D., Huggins,
W.H. and Roy, R.H. (eds.) (1960). Operations
Research and Systems Engineering. Flood, R.L. and
Carson, E.R. (1988). Dealing with Complexity, an
Introduction to the Theory and Application of
Systems Science. Forrestor, J.W., (1968).
Principles of Systems. F ortune, J. (1995).
Learning from Failure The Systems Approach.
Fowlkes, W.Y. and Creveling, C.M. (1995).
Engineering Methods for Robust Product
Design. Frankel, E.G. (1988). Systems Reliability
and Risk Analysis. Gane, C. and Sarson, T.
(1979). Structured Systems Analysis Tools and
Techniques. Gasparski, W. (1984). Understanding
Design The Praxiological-Systemic
Perspective. Gheorghe, A. (1982). Applied Systems
Engineering. Gibson, J.E. (1968). Introduction to
Engineering Design. Glegg, G.L. (1981). The
Development of Design. Glegg, G.L. (1969). The
Design of Design. Goode, H.H. and Machol, R.E.
(1957). System Engineering An Introduction to
the Design of Large-Scale Systems. Gosling, W.
(1962). The Design of Engineering Systems. Grady,
J.O. (1995). System Engineering Planning and
Enterprise Identity. Grady, J.O. (1993). System
Requirements Analysis. Grady, J.O. (1994).
Systems Integration. Grady, J.O. (1997). System
Validation and Verification. Hajek, V.J. (1984).
Management of Engineering Projects. Hall, A.
(1962). A Methodology for Systems
Engineering. Hall, A. (1989). Metasystems
Methodology. Hartley, J.R. (1990). Concurrent
Engineering. Hatley, D.J. and Pirbhai, I.A.
(1988). Strategies for Real-Time System
Specification. Hazelrigg, G.A. (1996). Systems
Engineering An Approach to Information-Based
Design. Hill, P.H. (1968). The Science of
Engineering Design. Hitchins, D.K. (1992).
Putting Systems to Work. Hollnagel, E., Mancini,
G., and Woods, D. (1988). Cognitive Engineering
in Complex Dynamic Worlds. Hubka, V. and Eder,
W.E. (1988). Theory of Technical Systems A Total
Concept Theory for Engineering Design. Hunger,
J.W. (1995). Engineering the System
Solution. Jalote, P. (1994). Fault Tolerance in
Distributed Systems. Jenkins, G.M. and Youle,
P.V. (1971). Systems Engineering a Unifying
Approach in Industry and Society. Jerger, J.L.
(1960). Systems Preliminary Design, Principles of
Guided Missile Design. Johnson, R.A., Kast, F.E.,
and Rosenzweig, J.E. (1963) The Theory and
Management of Systems. Karayanakis, N.M. (1995).
Advanced System Modeling and Simulation with
Block Diagram Languauges. Katzan, H. (1976).
Systems Design and Documentation. Kavi, K.M.
(ed.) (1992). Real-Time Systems Abstractions,
Languages, and Design Methodologies. Kerzner, H.
(1995). Program Management A Systems Approach to
Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Klir, G.
(1985). Architecture of Systems Problem
Solving. Kusiak, A. (ed.) (1992). Intelligent
Design and Manufacturing. Kusiak, A. (1992).
Concurrent Engineering Automation, Tools, and
Techniques. Lacy, J.A. (1992). Systems
Engineering Management Achieving Total
Quality. Laplante, P.A. (1997). Real-Time Systems
Design and Analysis An Engineers Handbook.
Larson, W.J. and Wertz, J.R. (eds.) (1992).
Space Mission Analysis and Design. Lee, A.M.
(1970). Systems Analysis Frameworks. Levi, S. and
Agrawala, A.K. (1994). Fault Tolerant System
Design. Lin, Y. (1999). General Systems Theory A
Mathematical Approach. Lucas, H.C. (1974).
Towards Creative System Design. MacAulay, L.A.
(1996). Requirements Engineering. Machol, R.E.
(1965). Systems Engineering Handbook. Martin,
J.N. (1996). Systems Engineering Guidebook A
Process for Developing Systems and
Products. McClamroch, N.H. (1980). State Models
of Dynamical Systems. McLeod, R. Jr. (1994).
Systems Analysis and Design An Organizational
Approach. McMenamin, S.M. and Palmer, J.F.
(1984). Essential Systems Analysis. Meredith,
D.D. and Wong, K.W. (1973). Design and Planning
of Engineering Systems. Mesarovic, M.D. and
Takahara, Y. General Systems Theory Mathematical
Foundations. Michaels, J.V. and Wood, W.P.
(1989). Design to Cost. Miles, R.F. (ed.) (1971).
Systems Concepts. Miller, J.G. (1978). Living
Systems. Moody, J.A. et al. (eds) (1997). Metrics
and Case Studies for Evaluating Engineering
Designs. N adler, G. (1967). Work Systems Design
The IDEALS Concept. Norman, D.A. (1988). The
Design of Everyday Things. Norman, D.A. and
Draper, S.W. (1986). User Centered System
Design. Oliver, D.W., Kelliher, T.P., and Keegan,
J.G., Jr. (1997). Engineering Complex Systems
with Models and Objects. Optner, S.L. (ed.)
(1973). Systems Analysis.
62
SE Education Resources World-wide

U.S. Programs
32 M.S. and Ph.D. Programs
21 B.S. Programs
U.K. Programs
5 Graduate Programs
2 Undergrad Programs
Europe Programs embedded in other disciplines
Australia 2 Graduate Programs
Remaining World 3 Graduate Programs
(Israel, South Korea, Viet Nam)

63
INCOSE Members from Universities
Region V
Other Regions
98 - University of Virginia 21 - Hampton
University 14 - George Mason University 09 -
University of Houston 08 - George Washington
University 06 - Virginia Tech 05 - University of
Maryland 05 - Texas A M University 04 -
University of Alabama 04 - University of South
Florida 04 - Georgia Tech University 03 - Old
Dominion University 02 - University of Texas 02 -
Texas Tech University
55 - University of Arizona 11 - MIT 11 - US Naval
Postgraduate School 09 - University of
California 06 - University of Colorado 05 -
University of Washington 05 - University of
Missouri Rolla 04 - University of Southern
California 04 - University of Idaho 04 - Stanford
University 02 - United States Military Academy 02
- University of Kansas 02 - University of
Michigan 17 - 5 international universities
Based on November 2000 INCOSE Membership Roles
64
Guide to the SE Body of Knowledge

Goal and Objective
Structure for the Guide to the SE BoK
Implementation of Guide to SE BoK

65
Goal and Objective

Short-term goal is to identify and connect
existing sources of knowledge through a common
framework using document automation techniques
such as links, tiering or outlining, hot points,
etc.
Intermediate-term is to discover or produce
missing knowledge as indicated by the framework
Long-term objective is to win standards bodies
recognition of the SEBOK and INCOSE as the
producer of the SEBOK Guide.
Long-term goal is to create an auto-evolvable KM
system for SEBOK.

66
Org. Structure for the Guide to the SE BoK

I - Systems Engineering Fundamentals
Purpose, What is a system?, What is SE?,
II - SE Processes
Librarian description of process views (e.g.,
DoD, Comml A/C, Automotive, Intl Aerospace)
III - Career Development of SE Practitioners
Education Training suppliers, standards
bodies, professional societies, OJT
IV - SE Process Capability/Assessment
CMM models

67
Implementation of Guide to SE BoK
----------------- Guide Section
---------------- I II III IV 1. Manage
development of Guide Rob Leibrandt, ? 2.
Produce sections of guide P. Brown B. Tufts J.
Ring ? CAWG? J. Clymer J. Fisher W.
Wymore 3. Design / Select Usage Arch Jack Ring,
? 4. Develop references 5. Review /
Test Rob Leibrandt, ? (Academic, Prof.
Soc., Stds. Bodies, Ed./Tng Suppliers)
68
Research in the SE Center of Excellence

Research Initiatives
Value of SE and Elements of SE
Human Productivity in SE Activities
SE Processes and Process Improvement
SE Methods
Design Techniques
Cost Issues
Risk and Trade Techniques
SE Automation
Formal Methods for SE

Decision-based Design via Life-Cycle Modeling and
Simulation
Create a decision architecture for design
decision making
Create a process for developing an interconnected
set of variable-resolution simulation models
Create a modeling structure for the development
system and operational system with their key
modes of interaction so as
to examine effective and ineffective development
system structures
to examine trade offs between testing and
modeling

69
International Council on Systems
Engineering Chesapeake Chapter

Jerry Woodall, Chesapeake Chapter President
Zyan Corporation
jwoodall_at_zyan.com

Chartered January 1994 with Constitution,
Operating Plan, etc., prior to Chartering
Key Mission - Providing a forum and
communications channel to exchange systems
engineering information, questions, concepts,
etc. on a local level, complementing the
international level organization

71
Chesapeake Chapter Area Served
State College
York
Membership
97 Members in 2001 Representing gt 43 Organizations
Organizations
PA
MD
Fredrick
Baltimore
270
Rockville
BWP
VA
50
DC
Annapolis
72
Chesapeake Chapter Area Served
State College
York
Membership
Organizations
PA
Dr. Eric W. Young NASA/GSFC
MD
Fredrick
Baltimore
270
Rockville
BWP
VA
50
DC
Annapolis
73
Chesapeake Chapter Accomplishments in 2000

Technical Meetings Focus on Systems Engineering
Tools, with presentations by seven tool vendors
Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference Participated
with leader WMA in very successful technical
conference in DC
Hosted Object Oriented SE (OOSE) Seminar At
JHU/APL based on earlier WMA sponsored event
Contributed To review of 15288 International
Standard
Baltimore Engineering Society Joined as
associate member organization Interaction with
non-aerospace, commercial organizations and
members plus gaining access to excellent
facilities of the Society
Initiated OOSE Interest Group formation

74
Chesapeake Chapter Plans for 2001

Technical Meetings Every other month (March)
focusing on OOSE IG/WG progress new topics
Members Meetings On alternate months w/topics
of general interest (at GSFC on 21 Feb)
expansion outside aerospace
Chartered OOSE Interest Group Chairman Jim
Chism, IG is underway and meets at APL on
designated Saturdays
Second Review of 15288 Committee being formed
Update of Chesapeake Chapter (CSPK) Website To
improve communications using available tools more
effectively http//www.incose.org/ch
esapek

75
International Council on Systems
Engineering Washington Metropolitan Area
Chapter

Bruce Shelton, WMA Chapter President
ANSER Inc.
Washington, DC USA
sheltonb_at_anser.org

76
Washington Metropolitan Area Chapter (WMA)

Largest Chapter within INCOSE - 450 members
Will Host the INCOSE 2003 International Symposium
in Concert with the other Mid-Atlantic Chapters
Hosted INCOSE Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference
2000
200 attendees, 10 Patrons, 19 Exhibitors
60 technical papers-3 tracks, 2 panels, 4
tutorials, 3 featured speakers

77
Chapter Activities