Title: Twenty-five years of doing (regional) anesthesia.
1Twenty-five years of doing (regional) anesthesia.
Have I learned anything?
2Doing anesthesia is not like flying a plane it
is not even close
- With your feet on the ground in the operating
room, things happen slowly
- Things happen fast when approaching the ground at
115 mph
3Airline pilots would never put up with a cockpit
that looks like ours
4Small Plane Instruments
5Operating Room Instruments
6A Glimpse of Instrument Flying
7Doing anesthesia is not like flying a plane it
is not even close
- Aviation is not inherently dangerous, but unlike
the land (operating room) and the sea, it is
unforgiving of any incapacity, carelessness, or
neglect.
- Airplanes are wonderful machines.
- Their only fault is an inability to forgive.
8My personal close encounters with crashing
patients
- In a plane, the pilot crashes
- In the operating room, the patient crashes
9Dont talk patients into having regional
anesthesia
- If a patient tells you they dont want a spinal
or epidural because they will have a headache or
backache afterwards
- They will have a headache or backache afterwards
10Please sedate patients who are having regional
anesthesia
- Unless the patient really wants to know what is
going on and insists on no sedation
- Ill never have another spinal it lasted too
long and I didnt like the way it felt
11Please sedate patients who are having regional
anesthesia
- The anesthetic isn't over after the patient is
transferred to the PACU
- As Yogi Berra said, It aint over until its
over
12Learn from the mistakes of others
Air SafetyFoundationAnnual Reports(like the
APSF and the Closed Claims database)
13Learn from the mistakes of others
14Learn from the mistakes of others
- High-Severity Injuries Associated with Regional
Anesthesia in the 1990s
Cheney F ASA Newsletter, 2001, pp 6-8
15High-Severity Injuries Associated with Regional
Anesthesia in the 1990sDEATH
- 4,723 closed malpractice claims
- 35 insurers insuring 14,500 doctors
- 3,180 (67) general anesthesia
- 1,133 (24) regional anesthesia
- 30 (9) of deaths owing to cardiac arrest during
spinal or epidural anesthesia
- 1980-1990 40 cardiac arrest and death
- 1970-1980 61 cardiac arrest and death
- 10 (3) of deaths due to intravascular injection
- median payment for death 310,000
16High-Severity Injuries Associated with Regional
Anesthesia in the 1990sPERMANENT DISABLING
INJURIES
- mostly neuraxial narcotic or neurolytic block
- cause not clear but presumed needle trauma
- hematoma usually associated with heparin
- 21 due to pain management (mostly chronic pain)
17High-Severity Injuries Associated with Regional
Anesthesia in the 1990sCONCLUSIONS
- regional anesthesia claims are more likely to be
of a lower severity than those associated with
general anesthesia
- cardiac arrest/circulatory collapse associated
with neuraxial block continues to be the leading
cause of regional anesthesia-related death
- comparative safety of regional versus general
anesthesia cannot be determined (no denominators)
- death more common with general anesthesia, while
permanent-disabling and non-disabling temporary
injuries are more prevalent with regional
anesthesia
18Learn from the mistakes of others
- Obstetric Versus Non-obstetric Claims
Chadwick H ASA Newsletter, 1999, pp 12-15
19Obstetric Claims
- 12 (434/3,533) for c-section (71) or vaginal
delivery (29)
- 67 (290) with regional anesthesia
- 47 for headache, pain during anesthesia, back
pain, or emotional distress
- these are more commonly associated with regional
anesthesia
- almost all claims for pain during anesthesia are
associated with cesarean delivery
- inadequate analgesia for labor and vaginal
delivery is seldom a liability risk
- pain during cesarean section is a cause for
concern
20Obstetric ClaimsEVENTS LEADING TO INJURY
- respiratory events most common
- greatest incidence with general anesthesia
21Obstetric ClaimsEVENTS LEADING TO INJURY
- the single most common damaging event in the
obstetric closed claims files was convulsion
related to local anesthetic toxicity associated
with epidural anesthesia
- the number of claims involving convulsions has
decreased substantially since 1984
- using effective test doses, fractionating local
anesthetic injections, and not using 0.75 percent
bupivacaine has likely reduced the the risk of
this injury
22Obstetric ClaimsEVENTS LEADING TO INJURY
- nerve damage was the third most common maternal
injury claim
- appears to be a result of direct trauma to neural
tissue
- a prominent feature was severe pain or
paresthesia during needle or catheter placement
or during local anesthetic injection
- other mechanisms of injury, such as apparent
neurotoxicity and ischemic causes (epidural
abscess, hypotension or vascular insufficiency)
less common
23Obstetric ClaimsEVENTS LEADING TO INJURY
- No cases of epidural hematoma identified
24I cannot control the level of spinal anesthesia
- If you can, please share your method with me
25I cannot control the level of spinal anesthesia
26I cannot control the level of spinal anesthesia
27I cannot control the level of spinal anesthesia
- For longer operations I use bupivacaine (10-15
mg) exclusively
- For operations less than 1 hour I used to use
lidocaine, but no longer (TRI)
- I am now using chloroprocaine (this is an off
label use) in place of lidocaine
- I dont talk about it, either
28I no longer torture pregnant patients
- We would never tolerate the screaming that occurs
during labor if that patient was in the PACU
recovering from surgery
- What happened to JCAHOs fifth vital sign?
- Of course we can not force analgesia on a patient
who wants to have pain
29I no longer torture pregnant patients
- How often do you sedate a patient when doing an
epidural?
- I dont sedate all patients, but some patients
are so frightened by the procedure that it is
cruel not to sedate
30I no longer torture pregnant patients
- Patients not having an epidural often get
butorphanol for labor pain
- Why not something for the pain associated with an
epidural injection?
- Most patients get on average 20 ug of fentanyl
per hour epidurally
- Why not 50 to 100 ug fentanyl IV for the patient
who can not sit still during the epidural?
- Because weve always done it that way?
31Back to the Analogy of Anesthesia v. Flying
- If, as I say, flying is so much more dangerous
than doing anesthesia, then why are the airlines
so much safer than medicine?
32Back to the Analogy of Anesthesia v. Flying
- For the pilot, flying is more dangerous than for
the physician doing medicine
- For the patient, medicine is more dangerous than
airline travel
- Airlines never assume the risks that physicians
assume when caring for patients
- Airlines just dont fly when the risk is too great
- Physicians dont have that luxury
33Some Differences Between Airlines and Anesthesia
- Planes come with a manual and 100 hour
inspections
- Patients come with no manual and often no
inspections
- Planes abide by laws and rules of physics
- Patients abide by no laws or rules
- Pilots fly the same routes over and over
- Anesthesia conditions and routes vary widely
- Planes not airworthy are just not used
- Patients not anesthesia- worthy are often
flown
- Pilots will not take off if conditions are not
just right
- Anesthesiologists take off frequently when
conditions not right (emergencies)
34Could this by why the airline industry is so much
safer than medicine?!
35Twenty-five years of doing (regional) anesthesia.
I have learned something
It is better to be on the ground wishing you
were flying...
...than flying and wishing you were on the
ground.
36Thank youandfly safe!