LOGIC AND CRITICAL THINKING - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

LOGIC AND CRITICAL THINKING

Description:

LOGIC AND CRITICAL THINKING The Way to the Good Reasoning and Making Good Argument 92 10 18 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:3145
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: mailScuE
Category:
Tags: and | critical | logic | thinking

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: LOGIC AND CRITICAL THINKING


1
LOGIC AND CRITICAL THINKING
  • The Way to the Good Reasoning and Making Good
    Argument

??92?10?18? ????????? ????? ???????
2
What Is Critical Thinking?
  • Think it twice Dont take things for granted so
    easily.
  • Always ask the why-question Try to find out the
    reason (the premises) why certain claim (the
    conclusion) can be supported.
  • Examine and evaluate the relationship between the
    reasons and the claim.

3
Paradoxes
  • Self-defeating paradox The concept of all
    powerful God
  • Zenos paradox An apparently unacceptable
    conclusion derived by apparently acceptable
    reasoning from apparently acceptable premises
  • Semantic paradox The liars paradox
  • The lawyers paradox
  • Prisoners dilemma
  • Russells paradox (Barbers paradox)
  • The lottery paradox

4
What is logic?
  • Logic is not an empirical science
  • Formal or informal science
  • Logic v.s.Psychology
  • 1. The Laws of Thinking
  • 2. The Science of Reasoning
  • 3. The Science of Argument
  • The study of the methods and principles used to
    distinguish good (correct) from bad (incorrect)
    reasoning or argument.
  • The way to the good reasoning (making good
    argument) and critical thinking

5
What Is an Argument?
  • An argument is the fundamental structure of the
    reasoning.
  • An argument consists of premises and conclusion.
  • An argument is used to provide reasons for
    supporting some claim or proposal.
  • Logic aims to the study of the various forms of
    argument.
  • The ultimate goal of logic is to evaluate
    arguments.

6
The Standard Form of Argument
  • P premise, C conclusion
  • There must be some kind of supporting
    relationship between premises and conclusion.
  • P1
  • P2
  • ?
  • ?
  • Pn (n?1)
  • C

7
Two Kinds of Argument
  • The traditional but mistaken distinction between
    deduction and induction
  • Deduction
    Induction
  • Some general principles Some particular
    cases
  • ? ?
  • A particular case A general principle

8
Deductive Argument
  • Deductive argument is the argument that the
    premises necessarily support the conclusion.
  • P1
  • P2
  • ?
  • ?
  • Pn
  • C

9
Inductive Argument
  • Inductive argument is the argument that the
    premises probably support the conclusion.
  • P1
  • P2
  • ?
  • ?
  • Pn
  • C

10
Evaluating An Argument
  • There are two ways of evaluating an argument.
  • Formal logic is to use the deductive criterion
    for evaluating arguments.
  • Informal logic is to use the inductive criterion
    for evaluating argument.

11
The Criterion for Evaluating a Deductive Argument
  • Deductive Argument
  • Valid Arg. Invalid Arg.
  • Sound Arg. Unsound Arg. Unsound Arg.
  • Good Arg. Bad Arg Bad Arg.

12
The Criterion for Evaluating an Inductive Argument
  • Inductive Argument
  • Strong Arg. Weak Arg.
  • Cogent Arg. Uncogent Arg.
    Uncogent Arg.

  • Good Arg. Bad Arg. Bad Arg.

13
What Is a Good Argument


14
The Deductive Systems
  • The truth table methods for evaluating deductive
    arguments
  • The formal system of natural deduction
  • 1. Propositional logic
  • 2. Predicate logic
  • The Aristotelian logic (Categorical Syllogism)
  • The axiomatic system

15
The Inductive Systems
  • The methods of analogy and the probable inference
  • Legal reasoning
  • Mills method and causality
  • Statistical reasoning and probability
  • Hypothetical reasoning

16
Informal Fallacies
  • A fallacy is an error in reasoning.
  • Fallacies of relevance When an argument relies
    upon premises that are not relevant to its
    conclusion, and therefore cannot possibly
    establish its truth
  • Fallacies of weak induction When the connection
    between premises and conclusion is not strong
    enough to support the reasoning
  • Fallacies of presumption, ambiguity, and
    grammatical analogy

17
The Uses of Logic
  • Evaluate someone elses argument by exposing its
    structure
  • Set up your own argument
  • Solve problems and puzzles by answering the
    why-questions (giving the reasons)
  • Inference to the best through using the present
    evidences
  • Thinking effectively and making decision wisely

18
Logic and Critical Thinking
  • Why should we become a critical thinker?
  • Be the master of your own life
  • To ask why? is to ask for the reasons for some
    beliefs and opinions (that is, to find out the
    premises for a certain conclusion)
  • To evaluate how the reasons successfully support
    the claim (that is, to evaluate how the premises
    support the conclusion )
  • A critical thinker is a truth-pursuer, and logic
    is truth-preserving.

19
The End!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com