Arguments in Philosophy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Arguments in Philosophy

Description:

Arguments in Philosophy Introduction to Philosophy Arguments Philosophy is the art of constructing and evaluating arguments It s all about the argument Arguments ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:135
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: cseBuffa8
Learn more at: https://cse.buffalo.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Arguments in Philosophy


1
Arguments in Philosophy
  • Introduction to Philosophy

2
Arguments
  • Philosophy is the art of constructing and
    evaluating arguments
  • Its all about the argument
  • Arguments are meant to be convincing
  • So philosophers must be sensitive to what makes
    an argument convincing
  • Or not

3
Thinking Critically
  • First step Think Critically
  • What is the argument trying to say?
  • Why does the argument succeed, or not?
  • Whats good, bad, or indifferent?
  • The form of the argument
  • Whats the point?
  • How do we get to the point?
  • Structure
  • How do the parts of the argument fit together?

4
General Structure
  • In general, arguments consist of
  • The thesis or position argued for
  • The conclusion
  • The reasons why the conclusion should be accepted
  • The premises
  • Usually this is written in standard form

Premise 1 (Justification) Premise 2
(Justification) Therefore, Conclusion
(Justification)
5
Two kinds of argument
  • In general, there are two kinds of argument
  • Deductive Arguments
  • Inductive Arguments
  • These arguments work (slightly) differently, so
    theyre evaluated differently

6
But lets be more specific
  • A statement is any unambiguous declarative
    sentence about a fact (or non-fact) about the
    world.
  • It says that something is (or isnt) the case.
  • An argument is a series of statements meant to
    establish a claim.
  • A claim or conclusion is the statement whose
    truth an argument is meant to establish.
  • A statements truth value is either true or
    false.
  • All statements have a truth value. A statement
    is false when what it says about the world is not
    actually the case. A statement is true when what
    it says about the world is actually the case.
  • A premise is a statement that is used in an
    argument to establish a conclusion.

7
Deductive Arguments
  • A deductive argument is
  • VALID if its premises necessarily lead to its
    conclusion.
  • That is, if you were to accept that the premises
    are all true, you must accept that the conclusion
    is true.
  • SOUND if it is valid and you accept that all its
    premises are true.
  • A good, convincing argument is sound.
  • A bad argument is any other kind of argument.
  • VALIDITY TRUE PREMISES SOUND
  • or, at least, accepted premises

8
Examples
  • All people are mortal. Socrates is a person.
    Therefore, Socrates is mortal.
  • Sound
  • All people are mortal. My dog is mortal.
    Therefore, my dog is a person.
  • Invalid.
  • Oranges are green. All green things make me
    sick. Therefore, oranges make me sick.
  • Valid. Not sound.
  • Whales know how to play hockey. Therefore,
    Canadians like winter.
  • Invalid.

9
Notice
  • Validity does not depend on the truth of the
    premises.
  • All people are mortal. My dog is mortal.
    Therefore, my dog is a person.
  • The premises are true. But the argument is still
    invalid.
  • Soundness does not depend on the truth of the
    conclusion.
  • An argument can be bad even if the conclusion is
    obviously true.

10
Evaluating Deductive Arguments
  • Good arguments must be sound.
  • If you want to accept of an argument, you would
    have to show both validity and soundness
  • Bad arguments can be bad in two ways
  • Invalid
  • You can show that the conclusion does not follow
    from the premises
  • Unsound
  • You can show that at least one premise is
    unacceptable

11
Inductive Arguments
  • Inductive arguments are not truth preserving
  • Even in a good inductive argument where the
    premises are true, the conclusion does not have
    to be true.
  • At most, the conclusion is most likely true.
  • Inductive arguments are meant to make conclusions
    more likely or more acceptable.

12
Inductive Arguments
  • An inductive argument is
  • STRONG if its premises make the conclusion
    probable
  • That is, if you were to accept the premises as
    true, then you would have to accept that the
    conclusion was probably true
  • COGENT if it is strong and its premises are
    accepted
  • A good, convincing argument is cogent.
  • STRENGTH TRUE PREMISES COGENT

13
Examples
  • This cooler contains 30 cans. 25 cans selected
    at random contained soda. Therefore, all the
    cans probably contain soda.
  • Cogent
  • This cooler contains 30 cans. 3 cans selected at
    random contained soda. Therefore, all the cans
    probably contain soda.
  • Weak
  • Every monkey Ive seen (over 500) has blue teeth.
    Therefore, the next monkey I see will probably
    have blue teeth.
  • Strong, but not cogent

14
Notice
  • Strength admits of degrees.
  • An argument can be stronger or weaker
  • Usually, the more evidence available, the
    stronger the argument
  • Strength does not depend on the truth of the
    premises

15
Evaluating Inductive Arguments
  • Good arguments must be cogent.
  • If you want to accept of an argument, you would
    have to show both strength and cogency
  • Bad arguments can be bad in two ways
  • Weak
  • You can show that the premises does not make the
    conclusion more probable
  • Not cogent
  • You can show that at least one premise is
    unacceptable

16
Argument by Analogy
  • One particular kind of inductive argument is an
    Argument by Analogy
  • Comparison of two or more things
  • Concludes that they share characteristic(s)
  • Because they share other characteristic(s)
  • Example
  • Watches exhibit order, function, and design.
    They were also created by a creator. The
    universe exhibits order, function, and design.
    Therefore, the universe probably was created by a
    creator.
  • Evaluated like other inductive arguments

17
In Practice
  • Identify the conclusion
  • What is the claim?
  • Identify the premises
  • How is the claim supported?
  • Often, we first have to get rid of anything
    unnecessary mere rhetorical flourishes,
    repetitions, and irrelevancies.
  • Reformulate the argument
  • Try to put it into standard form
  • Often, well have to add premises that are
    implied but not stated.

18
In Practice
  • Identify the form of the argument
  • How are the premises supposed to lead to the
    conclusion?
  • Deductive? Inductive?
  • Assumptions? Subarguments?
  • (This will help us add/delete premises)
  • Evaluate the argument
  • Valid? Sound?
  • Strong? Cogent?
  • WHY?

19
Example
  • For Death is to be as it were nothing, and to be
    deprived of all sensation... And if no sensation
    remains, then death is like a dreamless sleep.
    In this case, death will be a blessing. For, if
    any one compares such a night as this, in which
    he so profoundly sleeps as not even to see a
    dream, with the other nights and days of his
    life, and should declare how many he had passed
    better and more pleasantly than this night, I
    think that not only a private man, but even the
    great king himself, would find so small a number
    that they might be easily counted.

20
Example
  • For Death is to be deprived of all sensation...
    if no sensation remains, then death is like a
    dreamless sleep. ...death will be a blessing.
    ...if any one compares such a night of sleep
    without dreams... with the other nights and days
    of his life, and should declare how many he had
    passed better and more pleasantly than this
    night, I think.. he would find so small a
    number...

21
Example
  • Death is to be deprived of all sensation.
  • If no sensation remains, death is like a
    dreamless sleep.
  • Anyone will consider a dreamless sleep better
    than most days and nights.
  • ---
  • Death is a blessing.

22
Example
  • Death is to be deprived of all sensation.
  • If no sensation remains, death is like a
    dreamless sleep.
  • Death is like a dreamless sleep.
  • Anyone will consider a dreamless sleep better
    than most days and nights.
  • Anyone will consider death better than most days
    and nights.
  • Anything that is better than most days and nights
    is a blessing.
  • ---
  • Death is a blessing.

23
Example
  • Death is to be deprived of all sensation.
    (Assumption)
  • If no sensation remains, death is like a
    dreamless sleep. (Assumption)
  • Death is like a dreamless sleep. (Conclusion from
    1 and 2)
  • Anyone will consider a dreamless sleep better
    than most days and nights. (Assumption)
  • Anyone will consider death better than most days
    and nights. (Conclusion from 3 and 4)
  • Anything that is better than most days and nights
    is a blessing. (Assumption)
  • ---
  • Death is a blessing. (From 3, 5, and 6)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com