Traditional Ethical Theories - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Traditional Ethical Theories

Description:

Traditional Ethical Theories Reminder Optional Tutorial Monday, February 25, 1-1:50 Room M122 Reminder Showing of An Inconvenient Truth Next Tuesday, February 26 3:00 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:479
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: kellyingl
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Traditional Ethical Theories


1
Traditional Ethical Theories
2
Reminder
  • Optional Tutorial
  • Monday, February 25, 1-150
  • Room M122

3
Reminder
  • Showing of An Inconvenient Truth
  • Next Tuesday, February 26
  • 300-500
  • MB305
  • (Philosophy Dept. seminar room)

4
Quiz on February 28
  • Section one (40)
  • 10 short answer questions, 4 points each.
    Largely definition of terms and identification of
    philosophical positions with the appropriate
    philosopher or belief system.
  • Section two (60)
  • 1) One medium-length answer to a question on An
    Inconvenient Truth (20)
  • 2) One long answer to a question from a choice
    of two. The two questions will be chosen from the
    following list of four. (40)

5
Long-answer questions
  • Is eating honey (i.e. stealing the product of the
    bees labor) a moral issue? If not, why not? If
    so, is it justified or is it wrong, and why?
    Discuss in relation to at least two belief
    systems that we have studied.
  • What belief system that we have studied is most
    likely to result in an environmentally sound and
    sustainable society? Compare your choice with at
    least two other belief systems.
  • Is it better for people to live a more natural
    way? Explain what you mean by more natural. If
    it is not better, why not? If it is better, for
    whom is it better (i.e. for the individuals
    living the natural lifestyle, for people in
    general, for future generations, for sentient
    animals in general, or for the earth/nature as a
    whole), and why?
  • What has intrinsic value? Discuss in relation to
    at least two belief systems that we have
    discussed.
  • Note belief systems that we have discussed
    include Aristotelian teleology, virtue ethics,
    natural law ethics, Christianity, Buddhism,
    Taoism, deontological ethics, utilitarianism and
    the scientific world view/evolutionary theory.

6
Virtue Ethics (review)
  • Aristotle
  • Virtue consists of realizing our natural human
    potential as
  • rational animals (our telos).
  • The cultivation of human virtues
  • Kindness, courage, honesty, justice, etc.
  • Focus on motivations for actions, rather than
    consequences
  • Problems with virtue ethics
  • Do people really have a telos? If not, how can
    the virtues be justified?
  • Is cultivating the virtues really the best way
    for an individual to maximize his human
    potential?
  • People can do the wrong thing for the right
    reasons (e.g. ignorantly kind)

7
Natural Law Ethics (review)
  • Thomas Aquinas
  • What is natural is good because God made nature
    and God is good.
  • God gave us the innate ability to know what is
    good.
  • Morality is universal and objective it is a law
    of nature.
  • Problems for virtue ethics
  • Depends upon belief in God.
  • Without belief in God, there is no justification
  • for believing that what is natural must be
    good.

8
Deontological Ethics
  • Kant (1724-1804), German philosopher
  • Rightness of actions is independent of
    consequences.
  • The Categorical Imperative defines our moral
    duties.
  • Moral duties, e.g.
  • not to kill or harm innocent people
  • not to lie
  • to keep promises
  • to respect the rights of others
  • The Categorical Imperative can be understood
    through reason.

9
Deontological Ethics (cont.)
  • The Categorical Imperative can be worked out
    through the principle of universalizability
  • "Always act according to that maxim whose
    universality as a law you can at the same time
    will", and is the "only condition under which a
    will can never come into conflict with itself"
  • (Kant, Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals)
  • Rational beings have an intrinsic worth and
    dignity.
  • The end (purpose) of morality is in preserving
    the well-being and dignity of all rational
    agents
  • Act with reference to every rational being
    (whether yourself or another) so that it is an
    end in itself in your maxim
  • (Kant, Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals)
  • You must never treat a person as a means, but
    always as an end.

10
Problems with deontological ethics
  • Problem of justification for Categorical
    Imperative
  • where does it come from
  • Not all good actions can be universalized
  • Rigid
  • e.g. if we have a categorical imperative not to
    lie,
  • it is wrong to lie even if by lying to a mad
    gunman,
  • we can save an innocent persons life
  • It is not always possible never to treat a
    rational agent as an end, e.g. war

11
Utilitarianism
  • John Stuart Mill (1806-1873), English philosopher
  • A form of consequentialism
  • An act is judged to be moral or immoral according
    to its consequences.
  • Instrumentalist good vs. Intrinsic good
  • Instrumentalist good good as a means by which to
    realize an intrinsic good, e.g. medicine
  • Intrinsic good something good in and of itself,
    e.g. happiness

12
Utilitarianism (cont.)
  • Happiness and the absence of suffering are the
    ultimate intrinsic goods.
  • The goal of morality is to maximize happiness
    (the greatest good for the greatest number)
  • An act is good if it maximizes the collective
    happiness and minimizes the collective suffering.

13
Problems with Utilitarianism
  • Seemingly immoral acts can be judged moral, e.g.
    killing an innocent person.
  • Consequences are often difficult or impossible to
    predict.
  • The morality of an act may depend on chance (how
    the consequences happen to play out).
  • How can you calculate units of goodness (utiles)?
  • Happiness and lack of suffering may not be the
    only
  • intrinsic goods.

14
Varieties of Utilitarianism
  • Act utilitarianism
  • classic utilitarianism
  • Preference utilitarianism
  • aim to maximize the fulfillment of peoples
    preferences, rather than happiness
  • Rule utilitarianism
  • act in accordance with rules that, in the long
    run, tend to maximize happiness/preferences

15
Exam question on An Inconvenient Truth
  • Are Gores arguments for valuing nature primarily
    instrumentalist or intrinsic? Do you think his
    views could be best characterized as conforming
    to virtue ethics, natural law ethics, deontology
    or utilitarianism? Explain, with concrete
    examples.

16
Readings for next time
  • Required
  • Rachel Carson, Silent Spring, chapters 1, 2 and
    15, provided in handout
  • Optional
  • Rachel Carson, Silent Spring, chapter 16, The
    Rumblings
  • of an Avalanche, available on reserve (whole
    book) in
  • the Philosophy Department Office
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com