Title: Chapter 7: Migration, genetic drift and non-random mating
1Chapter 7 Migration, genetic drift and
non-random mating
- Migration movement of alleles between
populations. - Migration can cause allele and genotype
frequencies to deviate from Hardy-Weinberg
equilibrium.
2Migration
- Consider Continent-Island migration model.
- Migration from island to continent will have no
effect of continental allele frequencies.
Continental population much larger than island. - However continent to island migration can greatly
alter allele frequencies.
3Empirical example of migrations effects
- Lake Erie water snakes. Snakes range in
appearance from unbanded to strongly banded. - Banding caused by single locus banded allele
dominant over unbanded.
4http//animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/account
s/pictures/Nerodia_sipedon.html
5Lake Erie water snakes
- Mainland almost all snakes banded.
- Islands many snakes unbanded.
- Unbanded snakes have selective advantage better
camouflage on limestone rocks. Camouflage very
valuable when snake is young.
6Fig 6.6
7Lake Erie water snakes
- If selection favors unbanded snakes on islands
why arent all snakes unbanded? - Migration introduces alleles for banding.
8Fig 6.7
A unbanded, BC some banding, D strongly banded
9Lake Erie water snakes
- Migration of snakes from mainland makes island
populations more like mainland. - This is general effect of migration Homogenizes
populations (making them resemble each other).
10Genetic Drift
- Genetic drift results from the influence of
chance. When population size is small, chance
events more likely to have a strong effect. - Sampling errors are very likely when small
samples are taken from populations.
11Genetic Drift
- Assume gene pool where frequency A1 0.6, A2
0.4. - Produce 10 zygotes by drawing from pool of
alleles. - Repeat multiple times to generate distribution of
expected allele frequencies in next generation.
12Fig 6.11
13Genetic Drift
- Allele frequencies much more likely to change
than stay the same. - If same experiment repeated but number of zygotes
increased to 250 the frequency of A1 settles
close to expected 0.6.
146.12c
15Empirical examples of sampling error Founder
Effect
- Founder Effect when population founded by only a
few individuals allele frequencies likely to
differ from that of source population. - Only a subset of alleles likely to be represented
and rare alleles may be over-represented.
16Founder effect in Silvereye populations.
- Silvereyes colonized South Island of New Zealand
from Tasmania in 1830. - Later spread to other islands.
http//www.derwenttraders.com.au/contents /media/s
ilvereye-460.jpg
176.13b
18Founder effect in Silvereyes
- Analysis of microsatellite DNA from populations
shows Founder effect on populations. - Progressive decline in allele diversity from one
population to the next in sequence of
colonizations.
19Fig 6.13 c
20Founder effect in Silvereyes
- Norfolk island Silvereye population has only 60
of allelic diversity of Tasmanian population.
21Founder effect in human populations
- Founder effect common in isolated human
populations. - E.g. Pingelapese people of Eastern Caroline
Islands are descendants of 20 survivors of a
typhoon and famine that occurred around 1775.
22Pingelap Atoll
http//people.brandeis.edu/msitzman/docs/pingelap
_large.html
23Founder effect in human populations
- One survivor was heterozygous carrier of a
recessive loss of function allele of CNGB3 gene. - That gene codes for protein in cone cells of
retina. - 4 generations after typhoon homozygotes for
allele began to be born.
24Founder effect in human populations
- People homozygous for the allele have
achromotopsia (complete color blindness, extreme
light sensitivity, and poor visual acuity). - Achromotopsia is rare in most populations (lt1 in
20,000 people). Among the 3,000 Pingelapese
islanders the frequency is 1 in 20.
25Founder effect in human populations
- High frequency of allele for achromotopsia is not
due to a selective advantage, just a result of
chance. - Founder effect followed by further genetic drift
resulted in current high frequency.
26Effects of genetic drift over time
- Effects of genetic drift can be very strong when
compounded over many generations. - Simulations of drift. Change in allele
frequencies over 100 generations. Initial
frequencies A1 0.6, A2 0.4. Simulation run
for different population sizes.
276.15A
286.15B
296.15C
30Conclusions from simulations
- Populations follow unique paths
- Genetic drift has strongest effects on small
populations. - Given enough time, even in large populations
genetic drift can have an effect. - Genetic drift leads to fixation or loss of
alleles, which increases homozygosity and reduces
heterozygosity.
316.15D
326.15E
336.15F
34Conclusions from simulations
- Genetic drift produces steady decline in
heterozygosity. - Frequency of heterozygotes is highest at
intermediate allele frequencies. As one allele
drifts to fixation the number of heterozygotes
inevitably declines.
35Empirical studies on fixation
- Buri (1956) established 107 Drosophila
populations. - All founders were heterozygotes for an eye-color
gene called brown. Neither allele gives selective
advantage. - Initial genotype bw75/bw
- Initial frequency of bw75 0.5
36Buri (1956) study
- Followed populations for 19 generations.
- Population size kept at 16 individuals.
- What do we predict will occur in terms of allele
fixation and heterozygosity?
37Buri (1956) study
- In each population expect one of the two alleles
to drift to fixation. - Expect heterozygosity to decline in populations
as allele fixation approaches.
38Buri (1956) study
- Distribution of frequencies of bw75 allele became
increasingly U-shaped over time. - By end of experiment, bw75 allele fixed in 28
populations and lost from 30.
39Fig 6.16
40(No Transcript)
41Buri (1956) study
- Frequency of heterozygotes declined steadily over
course of experiment. - Declined faster than expected because effective
population size was smaller than initial
population size of 16 (effective refers to number
of actual breeders some flies died, some did not
get to mate).
42Fig 6.17
43Allele fixation in natural populations
- Templeton et al. (1990) Studied Collared Lizards
in Ozarks of Missouri - Desert species occurs on remnant pieces of
desert-like habitat called glades.
44Templeton et al. (1990)
- Human fire suppression has resulted in loss of
glade habitat and loss of crossable savannah
habitat between glades. Areas between glades
overgrown with trees.
45Templeton et al. (1990)
- Based on small population sizes and isolation of
collared lizard populations Templeton et al.
(1990) predicted strong effect of genetic drift
on population genetics. - Expected low genetic diversity within
populations, but high diversity between
populations.
46Templeton et al. (1990)
- Found expected pattern. Genotype fixation common
within populations and different genotypes were
fixed in different populations. - Lack of genetic diversity leaves populations
vulnerable to extinction. - Found gt66 of glades contained no lizards.
47Templeton et al. (1990)
- What conservation measures could be taken to
assist Collared Lizard populations?
48Templeton et al. (1990)
- Repopulate glades by introducing lizards.
- Burn oak-hickory forest between glades to allow
migration between glades.
49Non-Random mating
- The last of the five Hardy-Weinberg assumptions
is that random mating takes place. - The most common form of non-random mating is
inbreeding which occurs when close relatives mate
with each other.
50Inbreeding
- Most extreme form of inbreeding is self
fertilization. - In a population of self fertilizing organisms all
homozygotes will produce only homozygous
offspring. Heterozygotes will produce offspring
50 of which will be homozygous and 50
heterozygous. - How will this affect the frequency of
heterozygotes each generation?
51Inbreeding
- In each generation the proportion of heterozygous
individuals in the population will decline.
52Inbreeding in California Sea Otters
- Because inbreeding produces an excess of
homozygotes in a population deviations from
Hardy-Weinberg expectations can be used to detect
such inbreeding in wild populations.
53Inbreeding in California Sea Otters
- Sea otters, once abundant along the west coast of
the U.S., were almost wiped out by fur hunters in
the 18th and 19th centuries.
photo www.turtletrack.org
54Inbreeding in California Sea Otters
- California population reached a low of 50
individuals (now over 1,500). As a result of
this bottleneck, the population has less genetic
diversity than it once had.
55Inbreeding in California Sea Otters
- Population is still at a low density and Lidicker
and McCollum (1997) investigated whether this
resulted in inbreeding. - They determined genotypes of 33 otters for PAP
locus, which has two alleles S (slow) and F (fast)
56Inbreeding in California Sea Otters
- The genotypes of the 33 otters were
- SS 16
- SF 7
- FF 10
- This gives approximate allele frequencies of S
0.6 and F 0.4
57Inbreeding in California Sea Otters
- If otter population in H-W equilibrium, genotype
frequencies should be - SS 0.6 0.6 0.36
- SF 20.60.4 0.48
- FF 0.40.4 0.16
- However actual frequencies were
- SS 0.485, SF 0.212, FF 0.303
58Inbreeding in California Sea Otters
- There are more homozygotes and fewer
heterozygotes than expected for a random mating
population. - Having considered alternative explanations for
deficit of heterozygotes, Lidicker and McCollum
(1997) concluded that sea otter populations show
evidence of inbreedng.
59General analysis of inbreeding
- Self-fertilization and sibling mating are the
most extreme forms of inbreeding, but matings
between more distant relatives (e.g. cousins) has
the same effect on the frequency of homozygotes,
but rate is slower.
60General analysis of inbreeding
- F Coefficient of inbreeding probability that
two alleles in an individual are identical by
descent (this means both alleles are copies of a
particular ancestors allele in some previous
generation). - F increases as relatedness increases.
61General analysis of inbreeding
- If we compare heterozygosity of an inbred
population Hf with that of a random mating
population Ho the relationship is - Hf Ho (1-F)
- or expressed in H-W terms the expected frequency
of heterozygotes in an inbred population would be
Hf 2pq (1-F) - Anytime Fgt0 frequency of heterozygotes is reduced
and frequency of homozygotes naturally increases.
62General analysis of inbreeding
- Calculating F. Need to use pedigree diagrams.
- Example Female is daughter of two half-siblings.
- There are two ways the female could receive
alleles that are identical by descent.
63Calculating probability that two alleles in an
inbred individual are identical by descent
Male
Female
Male
Half-sibling mating
Male
Female
Fig 6.27a
64Fig 6.27b
65General analysis of inbreeding
- Total probability of scenario is 1/16 1/16
1/8.
66Inbreeding depression
- Inbreeding increases the frequency of homozygotes
and thus the probability that deleterious alleles
are visible to selection because an individual
will receive two copies of the deleterious
allele. - In humans, children of first cousins have higher
mortality rates than children of unrelated
individuals.
67Each dot on graph represents mortality rates for
a human population. Mortality rate for children
of cousins consistently about 4 higher than rate
for children of non-relatives.
Fig 6.28
68Inbreeding in humans
- Royal families have been particularly prone to
inbreeding. - In Ancient Egypt because royal women were
considered to carry the royal bloodline the
pharaoh routinely was married to a sister or
half-sister.
69Inbreeding in humans
- The most famous example of a genetic disorder
exacerbated by inbreeding is the Hapsburg jaw or
Hapsburg lip severe lower jaw protrusion . - (Hapsburgs were the ruling family of Austria and
Spain for much of the 1400s-1700s)
70Inbreeding in humans
- Extensive intermarriage of close Hapsburg
relatives occurred. - The last of the Spanish Hapsburgs, Charles II
(1661-1700) had such severe jaw protrusion he
could not chew his food properly. - Charles II also had a large number of other
recessively inherited genetic problems that
caused physical, mental, sexual and other
problems. Charles was infertile and the last of
the Spanish Hapsburg kings.
71http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_II_of_Spain
72Inbreeding depression
- Inbreeding depression (reduction in fitness
caused by inbreeding) also documented in studies
of wild animals. - E.g. Great Tit. Two studies show that survival of
inbred nestlings is lower than that of outbred
individuals and that hatching success of inbred
eggs is lower than that of outbred eggs.
73Fig. 6.30
74Inbreeding depression in plants
- Inbreeding depression best studied in plants.
- Can experimentally produce inbred and outbred
plants easily.
75Inbreeding depression in plants
- Patterns to emerge from studies
- Inbreeding effects are clearest when plants are
stressed (competition, under pest attack, grown
outdoors). - Inbreeding effects most often show up later in
life cycle. (Appears maternal effects i.e.
contributions from the mother to the offspring
e.g. provisioning of seed mask effect
initially). - Inbreeding depression varies among family
lineages.
76Fig 6.29
Open bars first year data. Filled bars second
year data. Coefficient of inbreeding
depression is measure of how much inbreeding
reduces values for various parameters.
Waterleaf (a biennial plant)
77Inbreeding avoidance
- Many mechanisms to avoid inbreeding have evolved.
Include - Dispersal.
- Genetically controlled self-incompatibility.
- Mate choice.
78Small populations and inbreeding
- In small populations inbreeding may be
unavoidable. - Even with random mating, a small population that
stays small and receives no immigrants will
become inbred. - Major problem for rare species such as California
sea otters.
79Population genetics and conservation of Prairie
Chickens
- Two hundred years ago Illinois covered with
prairie and home to millions of Greater Prairie
Chickens. - Steel plough allowed farmers to farm the prairie.
Acreage of prairie plummeted and so did Prairie
Chicken numbers.
80Lesser Prairie Chicken
81(No Transcript)
82Conservation of Prairie Chickens
- In 1960s habitat protection measures introduced
and population increased until mid 1970s. - Then population collapsed. By 1994 lt50 birds in
two populations in Illinois.
83Fig 6.3
84Conservation of Prairie Chickens
- Why did prairie chicken populations decline even
though available habitat was increasing? - Prairie destruction reduced numbers of birds and
isolated the populations from each other.
85Conservation of Prairie Chickens
- No migration between populations.
- Small populations vulnerable to genetic drift and
inbreeding depression. - Accumulation of deleterious recessive alleles
(genetic load) can lead to extinction of small
populations.
86Conservation of Prairie Chickens
- Problem exacerbated when exposure of deleterious
mutations further reduces population size and
increases effectiveness of drift. Extinction
vortex. - Prairie chickens showed clear evidence of
inbreeding depression. Egg hatching rates had
declined dramatically by 1990 lt 40 hatch rate.
87FIG 6.31
88Conservation of Prairie Chickens
- Illinois Prairie chicken populations showed less
genetic diversity than other populations and less
genetic diversity than they had in the past. - Illinois birds 3.67 alleles per locus rather than
5.33-5.83 alleles of other populations and 5.12
of Illinois museum specimens.
89Conservation of Prairie Chickens
90Conservation of Prairie Chickens
- In 1992 prairie chickens introduced from other
populations to increase genetic diversity. - Hatching rates increased to gt90.
- Population increased.