Chapter 7: Migration, genetic drift and non-random mating - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 90
About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter 7: Migration, genetic drift and non-random mating

Description:

Chapter 7: Migration, genetic drift and non-random mating Migration: movement of alleles between populations. Migration can cause allele and genotype frequencies to ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:424
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 91
Provided by: facultyPl5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter 7: Migration, genetic drift and non-random mating


1
Chapter 7 Migration, genetic drift and
non-random mating
  • Migration movement of alleles between
    populations.
  • Migration can cause allele and genotype
    frequencies to deviate from Hardy-Weinberg
    equilibrium.

2
Migration
  • Consider Continent-Island migration model.
  • Migration from island to continent will have no
    effect of continental allele frequencies.
    Continental population much larger than island.
  • However continent to island migration can greatly
    alter allele frequencies.

3
Empirical example of migrations effects
  • Lake Erie water snakes. Snakes range in
    appearance from unbanded to strongly banded.
  • Banding caused by single locus banded allele
    dominant over unbanded.

4
http//animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/account
s/pictures/Nerodia_sipedon.html
5
Lake Erie water snakes
  • Mainland almost all snakes banded.
  • Islands many snakes unbanded.
  • Unbanded snakes have selective advantage better
    camouflage on limestone rocks. Camouflage very
    valuable when snake is young.

6
Fig 6.6
7
Lake Erie water snakes
  • If selection favors unbanded snakes on islands
    why arent all snakes unbanded?
  • Migration introduces alleles for banding.

8
Fig 6.7
A unbanded, BC some banding, D strongly banded
9
Lake Erie water snakes
  • Migration of snakes from mainland makes island
    populations more like mainland.
  • This is general effect of migration Homogenizes
    populations (making them resemble each other).

10
Genetic Drift
  • Genetic drift results from the influence of
    chance. When population size is small, chance
    events more likely to have a strong effect.
  • Sampling errors are very likely when small
    samples are taken from populations.

11
Genetic Drift
  • Assume gene pool where frequency A1 0.6, A2
    0.4.
  • Produce 10 zygotes by drawing from pool of
    alleles.
  • Repeat multiple times to generate distribution of
    expected allele frequencies in next generation.

12
Fig 6.11
13
Genetic Drift
  • Allele frequencies much more likely to change
    than stay the same.
  • If same experiment repeated but number of zygotes
    increased to 250 the frequency of A1 settles
    close to expected 0.6.

14
6.12c
15
Empirical examples of sampling error Founder
Effect
  • Founder Effect when population founded by only a
    few individuals allele frequencies likely to
    differ from that of source population.
  • Only a subset of alleles likely to be represented
    and rare alleles may be over-represented.

16
Founder effect in Silvereye populations.
  • Silvereyes colonized South Island of New Zealand
    from Tasmania in 1830.
  • Later spread to other islands.

http//www.derwenttraders.com.au/contents /media/s
ilvereye-460.jpg
17
6.13b
18
Founder effect in Silvereyes
  • Analysis of microsatellite DNA from populations
    shows Founder effect on populations.
  • Progressive decline in allele diversity from one
    population to the next in sequence of
    colonizations.

19
Fig 6.13 c
20
Founder effect in Silvereyes
  • Norfolk island Silvereye population has only 60
    of allelic diversity of Tasmanian population.

21
Founder effect in human populations
  • Founder effect common in isolated human
    populations.
  • E.g. Pingelapese people of Eastern Caroline
    Islands are descendants of 20 survivors of a
    typhoon and famine that occurred around 1775.

22
Pingelap Atoll
http//people.brandeis.edu/msitzman/docs/pingelap
_large.html
23
Founder effect in human populations
  • One survivor was heterozygous carrier of a
    recessive loss of function allele of CNGB3 gene.
  • That gene codes for protein in cone cells of
    retina.
  • 4 generations after typhoon homozygotes for
    allele began to be born.

24
Founder effect in human populations
  • People homozygous for the allele have
    achromotopsia (complete color blindness, extreme
    light sensitivity, and poor visual acuity).
  • Achromotopsia is rare in most populations (lt1 in
    20,000 people). Among the 3,000 Pingelapese
    islanders the frequency is 1 in 20.

25
Founder effect in human populations
  • High frequency of allele for achromotopsia is not
    due to a selective advantage, just a result of
    chance.
  • Founder effect followed by further genetic drift
    resulted in current high frequency.

26
Effects of genetic drift over time
  • Effects of genetic drift can be very strong when
    compounded over many generations.
  • Simulations of drift. Change in allele
    frequencies over 100 generations. Initial
    frequencies A1 0.6, A2 0.4. Simulation run
    for different population sizes.

27
6.15A
28
6.15B
29
6.15C
30
Conclusions from simulations
  • Populations follow unique paths
  • Genetic drift has strongest effects on small
    populations.
  • Given enough time, even in large populations
    genetic drift can have an effect.
  • Genetic drift leads to fixation or loss of
    alleles, which increases homozygosity and reduces
    heterozygosity.

31
6.15D
32
6.15E
33
6.15F
34
Conclusions from simulations
  • Genetic drift produces steady decline in
    heterozygosity.
  • Frequency of heterozygotes is highest at
    intermediate allele frequencies. As one allele
    drifts to fixation the number of heterozygotes
    inevitably declines.

35
Empirical studies on fixation
  • Buri (1956) established 107 Drosophila
    populations.
  • All founders were heterozygotes for an eye-color
    gene called brown. Neither allele gives selective
    advantage.
  • Initial genotype bw75/bw
  • Initial frequency of bw75 0.5

36
Buri (1956) study
  • Followed populations for 19 generations.
  • Population size kept at 16 individuals.
  • What do we predict will occur in terms of allele
    fixation and heterozygosity?

37
Buri (1956) study
  • In each population expect one of the two alleles
    to drift to fixation.
  • Expect heterozygosity to decline in populations
    as allele fixation approaches.

38
Buri (1956) study
  • Distribution of frequencies of bw75 allele became
    increasingly U-shaped over time.
  • By end of experiment, bw75 allele fixed in 28
    populations and lost from 30.

39
Fig 6.16
40
(No Transcript)
41
Buri (1956) study
  • Frequency of heterozygotes declined steadily over
    course of experiment.
  • Declined faster than expected because effective
    population size was smaller than initial
    population size of 16 (effective refers to number
    of actual breeders some flies died, some did not
    get to mate).

42
Fig 6.17
43
Allele fixation in natural populations
  • Templeton et al. (1990) Studied Collared Lizards
    in Ozarks of Missouri
  • Desert species occurs on remnant pieces of
    desert-like habitat called glades.

44
Templeton et al. (1990)
  • Human fire suppression has resulted in loss of
    glade habitat and loss of crossable savannah
    habitat between glades. Areas between glades
    overgrown with trees.

45
Templeton et al. (1990)
  • Based on small population sizes and isolation of
    collared lizard populations Templeton et al.
    (1990) predicted strong effect of genetic drift
    on population genetics.
  • Expected low genetic diversity within
    populations, but high diversity between
    populations.

46
Templeton et al. (1990)
  • Found expected pattern. Genotype fixation common
    within populations and different genotypes were
    fixed in different populations.
  • Lack of genetic diversity leaves populations
    vulnerable to extinction.
  • Found gt66 of glades contained no lizards.

47
Templeton et al. (1990)
  • What conservation measures could be taken to
    assist Collared Lizard populations?

48
Templeton et al. (1990)
  • Repopulate glades by introducing lizards.
  • Burn oak-hickory forest between glades to allow
    migration between glades.

49
Non-Random mating
  • The last of the five Hardy-Weinberg assumptions
    is that random mating takes place.
  • The most common form of non-random mating is
    inbreeding which occurs when close relatives mate
    with each other.

50
Inbreeding
  • Most extreme form of inbreeding is self
    fertilization.
  • In a population of self fertilizing organisms all
    homozygotes will produce only homozygous
    offspring. Heterozygotes will produce offspring
    50 of which will be homozygous and 50
    heterozygous.
  • How will this affect the frequency of
    heterozygotes each generation?

51
Inbreeding
  • In each generation the proportion of heterozygous
    individuals in the population will decline.

52
Inbreeding in California Sea Otters
  • Because inbreeding produces an excess of
    homozygotes in a population deviations from
    Hardy-Weinberg expectations can be used to detect
    such inbreeding in wild populations.

53
Inbreeding in California Sea Otters
  • Sea otters, once abundant along the west coast of
    the U.S., were almost wiped out by fur hunters in
    the 18th and 19th centuries.

photo www.turtletrack.org
54
Inbreeding in California Sea Otters
  • California population reached a low of 50
    individuals (now over 1,500). As a result of
    this bottleneck, the population has less genetic
    diversity than it once had.

55
Inbreeding in California Sea Otters
  • Population is still at a low density and Lidicker
    and McCollum (1997) investigated whether this
    resulted in inbreeding.
  • They determined genotypes of 33 otters for PAP
    locus, which has two alleles S (slow) and F (fast)

56
Inbreeding in California Sea Otters
  • The genotypes of the 33 otters were
  • SS 16
  • SF 7
  • FF 10
  • This gives approximate allele frequencies of S
    0.6 and F 0.4

57
Inbreeding in California Sea Otters
  • If otter population in H-W equilibrium, genotype
    frequencies should be
  • SS 0.6 0.6 0.36
  • SF 20.60.4 0.48
  • FF 0.40.4 0.16
  • However actual frequencies were
  • SS 0.485, SF 0.212, FF 0.303

58
Inbreeding in California Sea Otters
  • There are more homozygotes and fewer
    heterozygotes than expected for a random mating
    population.
  • Having considered alternative explanations for
    deficit of heterozygotes, Lidicker and McCollum
    (1997) concluded that sea otter populations show
    evidence of inbreedng.

59
General analysis of inbreeding
  • Self-fertilization and sibling mating are the
    most extreme forms of inbreeding, but matings
    between more distant relatives (e.g. cousins) has
    the same effect on the frequency of homozygotes,
    but rate is slower.

60
General analysis of inbreeding
  • F Coefficient of inbreeding probability that
    two alleles in an individual are identical by
    descent (this means both alleles are copies of a
    particular ancestors allele in some previous
    generation).
  • F increases as relatedness increases.

61
General analysis of inbreeding
  • If we compare heterozygosity of an inbred
    population Hf with that of a random mating
    population Ho the relationship is
  • Hf Ho (1-F)
  • or expressed in H-W terms the expected frequency
    of heterozygotes in an inbred population would be
    Hf 2pq (1-F)
  • Anytime Fgt0 frequency of heterozygotes is reduced
    and frequency of homozygotes naturally increases.

62
General analysis of inbreeding
  • Calculating F. Need to use pedigree diagrams.
  • Example Female is daughter of two half-siblings.
  • There are two ways the female could receive
    alleles that are identical by descent.

63
Calculating probability that two alleles in an
inbred individual are identical by descent
Male
Female
Male
Half-sibling mating
Male
Female
Fig 6.27a
64
Fig 6.27b
65
General analysis of inbreeding
  • Total probability of scenario is 1/16 1/16
    1/8.

66
Inbreeding depression
  • Inbreeding increases the frequency of homozygotes
    and thus the probability that deleterious alleles
    are visible to selection because an individual
    will receive two copies of the deleterious
    allele.
  • In humans, children of first cousins have higher
    mortality rates than children of unrelated
    individuals.

67
Each dot on graph represents mortality rates for
a human population. Mortality rate for children
of cousins consistently about 4 higher than rate
for children of non-relatives.
Fig 6.28
68
Inbreeding in humans
  • Royal families have been particularly prone to
    inbreeding.
  • In Ancient Egypt because royal women were
    considered to carry the royal bloodline the
    pharaoh routinely was married to a sister or
    half-sister.

69
Inbreeding in humans
  • The most famous example of a genetic disorder
    exacerbated by inbreeding is the Hapsburg jaw or
    Hapsburg lip severe lower jaw protrusion .
  • (Hapsburgs were the ruling family of Austria and
    Spain for much of the 1400s-1700s)

70
Inbreeding in humans
  • Extensive intermarriage of close Hapsburg
    relatives occurred.
  • The last of the Spanish Hapsburgs, Charles II
    (1661-1700) had such severe jaw protrusion he
    could not chew his food properly.
  • Charles II also had a large number of other
    recessively inherited genetic problems that
    caused physical, mental, sexual and other
    problems. Charles was infertile and the last of
    the Spanish Hapsburg kings.

71
http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_II_of_Spain
72
Inbreeding depression
  • Inbreeding depression (reduction in fitness
    caused by inbreeding) also documented in studies
    of wild animals.
  • E.g. Great Tit. Two studies show that survival of
    inbred nestlings is lower than that of outbred
    individuals and that hatching success of inbred
    eggs is lower than that of outbred eggs.

73
Fig. 6.30
74
Inbreeding depression in plants
  • Inbreeding depression best studied in plants.
  • Can experimentally produce inbred and outbred
    plants easily.

75
Inbreeding depression in plants
  • Patterns to emerge from studies
  • Inbreeding effects are clearest when plants are
    stressed (competition, under pest attack, grown
    outdoors).
  • Inbreeding effects most often show up later in
    life cycle. (Appears maternal effects i.e.
    contributions from the mother to the offspring
    e.g. provisioning of seed mask effect
    initially).
  • Inbreeding depression varies among family
    lineages.

76
Fig 6.29
Open bars first year data. Filled bars second
year data. Coefficient of inbreeding
depression is measure of how much inbreeding
reduces values for various parameters.
Waterleaf (a biennial plant)
77
Inbreeding avoidance
  • Many mechanisms to avoid inbreeding have evolved.
    Include
  • Dispersal.
  • Genetically controlled self-incompatibility.
  • Mate choice.

78
Small populations and inbreeding
  • In small populations inbreeding may be
    unavoidable.
  • Even with random mating, a small population that
    stays small and receives no immigrants will
    become inbred.
  • Major problem for rare species such as California
    sea otters.

79
Population genetics and conservation of Prairie
Chickens
  • Two hundred years ago Illinois covered with
    prairie and home to millions of Greater Prairie
    Chickens.
  • Steel plough allowed farmers to farm the prairie.
    Acreage of prairie plummeted and so did Prairie
    Chicken numbers.

80
Lesser Prairie Chicken
81
(No Transcript)
82
Conservation of Prairie Chickens
  • In 1960s habitat protection measures introduced
    and population increased until mid 1970s.
  • Then population collapsed. By 1994 lt50 birds in
    two populations in Illinois.

83
Fig 6.3
84
Conservation of Prairie Chickens
  • Why did prairie chicken populations decline even
    though available habitat was increasing?
  • Prairie destruction reduced numbers of birds and
    isolated the populations from each other.

85
Conservation of Prairie Chickens
  • No migration between populations.
  • Small populations vulnerable to genetic drift and
    inbreeding depression.
  • Accumulation of deleterious recessive alleles
    (genetic load) can lead to extinction of small
    populations.

86
Conservation of Prairie Chickens
  • Problem exacerbated when exposure of deleterious
    mutations further reduces population size and
    increases effectiveness of drift. Extinction
    vortex.
  • Prairie chickens showed clear evidence of
    inbreeding depression. Egg hatching rates had
    declined dramatically by 1990 lt 40 hatch rate.

87
FIG 6.31
88
Conservation of Prairie Chickens
  • Illinois Prairie chicken populations showed less
    genetic diversity than other populations and less
    genetic diversity than they had in the past.
  • Illinois birds 3.67 alleles per locus rather than
    5.33-5.83 alleles of other populations and 5.12
    of Illinois museum specimens.

89
Conservation of Prairie Chickens
  • Conservation strategy?

90
Conservation of Prairie Chickens
  • In 1992 prairie chickens introduced from other
    populations to increase genetic diversity.
  • Hatching rates increased to gt90.
  • Population increased.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com