Title: Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO’s)
1Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs)
- Jennifer Takach
- Joshua Richter
- Natasha Simanich
ITRN 603 Professor S. Malawer 8 March 2006
2GMO Issue A brief background
- Technological innovation and market integration
have changed the global scene in a political,
economical, and ecological aspect. - Changes involving technological innovation have
brought about many ethical, legal, scientific,
and institutional issues.
3What is Genetically Modified?
The modification of the genetic characteristics
of a microorganism, plant or animal by inserting
a modified gene or a gene from another variety or
species.
- Food Organisms
- Crops
- Livestock
- Fish
- Non-food applications
- Forestry
- Horticulture
4Associated Risks of GMOs
5Associated Benefits of GMOs
6International Law on GMOs
7WTO Agreements Involved in the Dispute
- Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Measures
Agreement - Articles 2, 5, 7, and 8 of the Agreement
- GATT 1994
- Articles I, III, X, and XI
- Agreement on Agriculture
- Article 4
- Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement
- Articles 2 and 5
8Codex the SPS Agreement
- Codex Alimentarius Commission - -
- Establishes food and safety standards within the
SPS - Provides a burden of proof on scientific data
- Agrees upon various ways of reducing risk
- Provides consistency in risk management decisions
- Establishing expert scientific guidance
- Adds to the SPS Agreement
- Agreed upon international food and safety
standards - Establishes scientific guidelines
- Leaves room for interpretation through burden of
proof and different ways of reducing risk
9The Complainants
- United States
- Canada
- Argentina
- Case Filed in 2003
- EU had an unfair 6 year moratorium.
- Not scientifically justified
- Violates SPS
- Oppose EU food labeling and traceability
regulations.
10(No Transcript)
11The Respondent
- European Union
- every country has the sovereign right to make
its own decisions on GMOs in accordance with the
values prevailing in society. - 2004 Labeling and Traceability Rules
12Panel Formation
- August 29th, 2003 Single panel established by
the DSB. - March 4th, 2004 Director-General composed the
panel. - The decision due date has been postponed numerous
times for various reasons - More time for countries to prepare rebuttals.
- Panels decision to seek scientific and technical
experts. - Panel to finalize their report.
- Currently, the due date of the official decision
from the Panel is the end of March 2006.
13Panels Unofficial Ruling
- February 7th, 2006 Announced that the 6 year
moratorium was a trade violation. - Final decision will officially be announced later
this year. - Still concern over how the EU will handle this
decision. - U.S. concerns with labeling.
- E.U. grocery stores stance.
14Current Trade and Related Issues
- Current WTO (Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures)
SPS Agreement applies to risks from additives,
contaminants, toxins or disease-causing
organisms, and it is not clear if potential risks
from GMO foods fit into one of those
categories(hard to have scientific certainty) - Trade issues on global level result from
different regulations in different countries - Institutional issues
- WHO CAN SAY WHAT IS BEST FOR SOCIETY?
15Current Trade and Related Issues
- The benefits of GM Technology is not yet reality
(most agricultural production happens in
developed countries) - Few GMO products so far benefit consumers
- Harder for developing countries to use GMO crops
on small scale farming
16GMOs in the NATIONAL Interest
US Interests in GMO Exports
- Trade and Economic Related - -
- US Patent Protection on Bio-engineering
- Access to markets (US is the single major
producer of biotech products) - As a result, US Corn Soybean exports are
threatened (high GMO content) - Unscientific Trade Restrictions
- Regulatory Oversight - -
- Crops and food products are regulated by 14
separate laws in the U.S. alone! - Farmers Producers - -
- GMO and non-GMO crops are combined in the crop
handling systems to separate would be costly
and in some cases impossible - Not only crops but food products could be
effected - Labeling tracing regulations are not necessary
and are misleading
17GMOs in the NATIONAL Interest
- The Science - -
- GMOs are as safe as natural counterparts
- Supported by 3200 international scientists
(including 20 Nobel Laureates) - 81 EU research projects resulted in no greater
risk of GMOs than conventional counterparts - Food aid is the same content as what US consumers
eat! - The benefits of GMOs - -
- Reduction in use of pesticides, increased
productivity, more crops yields on less land - Environmental and ecological testing is completed
before commercialization of GMOs - Bringing vital food and vitamin resources to
poor/starving nations - International Benefits - -
- Feed the poor stop food hunger!
18GMOs One European Reaction
- It is so much simpler to condemn something than
to attempt to understand it. We have a fine
tradition in Europe of burning those people we
do not understand, whether they be witches or
heretics, for it is much easier to do this than
to try and understand them.
J.E. Beringer EC-sponsored research on Safety of
Genetically Modified Organisms School of
Biological Sciences, University of Bristol (UK),
19GMOs - - INTERNATIONAL Interests
International Interests in GMO Scientific Research
- Trade and Economic Related - -
- Rights of Farmers to have access to genetic
resources and biotech benefits - Scientific studies not conclusive enough in the
emerging science - Concern over Monopolization
- Regulatory Oversight - -
- Labeling for consumer choice and benefit
- Traceability standards in every step of the
process - Emerging laws and regulations dealing with the
scientific principles and dissemination of GMO
products
20GMOs - - INTERNATIONAL Interests
- The Science - -
- Long-term effects unknown
- Allergenicity Antimicrobial resistance
- Creation of new species as a result of modern
science - Farmers Consumers - -
- Causal Non-GMO food scares in Europe in
mid-1990s - Public Health Safety may be effected by unknown
risks - Lack of Knowledge in LDCs
21Proposed Solution
- Moratorium was a violation of fair trade laws.
- EU has a right to regulate and monitor
agricultural products. - Feasible Timeline Needed.
- Traceability Agreement.
- Label Agreement.
- Educate EU citizens on GM food benefits.
- US has a right (under WTO trade rules) to access
EU markets with agricultural products. - Internationally recognized health, food, and
safety standards (Codex _at_ WTO) in order to
reasonably conclude risk assessments and benefits
of GMOs.
22Food For Thought
- The following international consumers to a recent
Washington State University study found that they
are in favor of GMO products and crops if the
benefit is enhanced nutrients (although their
knowledge of risks associated with GMO is
directly related to their response) - Chile
- Mexico
- India
23Afterthoughts
- Technological advances have assisted with
productivity levels, food and production
resources, and environmentally safe products. - There are risks associated with GMOs, however,
can be scientifically reduced. - Many international standards on food safety that
may be counter to what national standards exist. - Benefits of GMOs yet to be realized by LDCs.
- Increased Consumer awareness programs Labeling
/ education. - Despite WTO ruling that GMO restrictions are in
violation of the trade agreements, there is still
much uncertainty as to the length of this dispute.
24Conclusion Implications
- Scientific data is now a part of trade disputes.
- There is no scientific evidence either way which
makes GMOs so controversial. - The EU has taken the precautionary approach and
doesn't want to include GMOs until proven safe. - The US claims that science can not progress until
is being applied.
What does the future hold?
25Discussion Question - Labeling
- Do you think that the EU should be allowed to
label GM food at their grocery stores? - How would labeling effect consumers and GMO
producers?
26Works Cited
- Ahearn, Raymond, US-European Union Trade
Relations Issues and Policy Changes, 23
December 2004, Congressional Research Service,
pg. 9-10. - BBC News. QA Trade battle of GM food.
February 8th, 2006. - http//newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/n
ews.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4690010.stm - Beringer, J. E., EC-Sponsored Research on Safety
of Genetically Modified Organisms, Data Sheet - http//europa.eu.int/comm/research/quality-of-life
/gmo/general-intro.html - Borak, Donna. WTO Rules against EU on GMOs
Washington Post. February 8, 2006. - http//binas.unido.org/binas/regs.php
- Concerns Over Biotechnology Challenge US
Agricultural Exports, General Accountability
Office, GAO-01-727 - Evaluation of Codex, Codex Alimentarius,
- www.codexalimenatrius.net/web/evaluation_en.jsp
- Larson, Alan P., Discussion on the WTO Case on
the EU Biotech Moratorium, Foreign Affairs Press
Release, 14 may 2003, - http//fpc.state.gov/fpc/20557.htm
27Works Cited
- Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology. August
2004. - http//pewagbiotech.org/resources/factsheets/displ
ay.php3?FactsheetID2 - Questions and Answers on U.S. Food Aid Donations
Containing Bio-Engineered Crops, Fact Sheet, US
Agency for International Development, 10 January
2003, - www.state.gov/e/eb/rls/fs/16736.htm
- Safety aspects of genetically modified foods of
plant origins joint FAO/WHO, World Health
Organization, 29 May 2 June 2000, pgs. 12-14,
49. - www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/biotech/ec_jun
e2000/en/index.html - Siv, Sichan, Bio-Engineered Crops, Statement at
the World Summit on Sustainable Development, 27
August 2002. - www.state.gov/p/io/rls/rm/2002/13587.htm
- World Trade Organization. Dispute Settlement
DS291. - http//www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_
e/ds291_e.htm - 20 Questions on Genetically Modified Foods,
World Health Organization, Question 13 Question
17 - www.who.int/foodsafety/publications/biotech/20ques
tions/en/index.html
28(No Transcript)