Title: Robert Cialdini’s Principles of Influence: Basic Concepts
1Robert Cialdinis Principles of Influence Basic
Concepts
- Overriding Principle
- Click-Whirr or Automatic Responding
- Mother Turkeys
- Jewelry at Twice the Price!
- Fixed Action Patterns at Copy Machine
- Betting the Shortcut Odds (Heuristics)
- Capitalizing on Genuine Principles
- We should listen to authorities
- Reciprocation is reasonable
- Problems if used inappropriately
2Principle 1 - Reciprocation
- Reciprocation
- You scratched my back, Ill scratch yours
- Get your free samples!
- Get a free Trip to Reno!
- Door-in-the-Face Technique
- Ask big, get turned down, make concession, then
ask small - Thats Not All Technique
- No chance to turn down initial request
3Principle 2 Commitment Consistency
- Commitment Consistency
- Cognitive Dissonance Leon Festinger
- We like our attitudes and behavior to be
consistent - When they are inconsistent, we feel tension
- Tension is uncomfortable, and we wish to reduce
it - We can change behavior or attitude to align the
two - Foot-in-Door Technique
- Ask for a small act of compliance, then build on
it - Low-Ball Technique
- Make a low offer, then increase it once people
are hooked
4Principle 3 Social Proof
5Principle 3 Social Proof
- Social Proof
- Conformity to Norms Asch and Sherif
- Laugh Tracks
- Best Seller Lists
- Descriptive vs. Injunctive Norms
- Descriptive Norms What the majority of others is
doing - Injunctive Norms What people should do
- Descriptive Norms and the Environment
- Littering, Petrified Wood, and Towel Reuse in
Hotels
Asch Experiment
6DAY 1 - Alone High Variability
7.5 Inches
1/2 Inch
2Inches
7DAY 2 - Group Medium Variability
8DAY 3 - Group Lower Variability
2 Inches
2.2 Inches
9DAY 4 - Group Norm Formed
2 Inches
2.1 Inches
10Sherifs Classic Study Results
InformationalInfluence
11Sherif vs. Asch Two Types of Influence
- Informational Influence
- Situation is ambiguous
- Information dependence
- We conform to gain information
- Sherif Autokinetic Study
- Normative Influence
- Situation is clear
- Outcome dependence
- We conform to receive rewards or avoid punishment
- Aschs Conformity Studies
12Environmental TheftThe (Negative) Power of
Descriptive Norms
- Message at Petrified Forest National
Park(Arizona) - Your heritage is being vandalized every day by
theft losses of petrified wood of 14 tons a year,
mostly a small piece at a time. - Conveys the message that everyone is taking it
- Experiment (Cialdini and colleagues 2003)
- Marked pieces of petrified wood in park
- Injunctive Norm Condition (Sign Read)
- Please dont remove petrified wood from the Park,
in order to preserve the natural state of the
Petrified Forest. - Descriptive Norm Condition (Sign Read)
- Many past visitors have removed petrified wood
from the Park, changing the natural state of the
Petrified Forest. - Theft Rates
- Injunctive Norm (1.67) vs. Descriptive Norm
(7.92) - Conclusion?
- When the socially undesirable action is prevalent
(lots of theft), PSAs should focus on injunctive
(not descriptive) norm
13LitteringMore Evidence for the Power of
Descriptive Norms
- Cialdini, Reno and Kallgren (1990)
- Subjects find a handbill on their windshield
which they can litter - Environment is either clean or littered
- Clean environment conveys descriptive norm that
people dont litter - Littered environment conveys descriptive norm
that people do litter - Subject sees another person (confederate) litter
or not - Observe whether people litter Results ?
14(No Transcript)
15Recycling Towels in HotelsEven More Evidence
for the Power of Descriptive Norms
Below Help Save Environment Control HELP SAVE
THE ENVIRONMENT. You can show your respect for
nature and help save the environment by reusing
your towels during your stay
Social Norm JOIN YOUR FELLOW GUESTS IN HELPING
TO SAVE THE ENVIRONMENT. Almost 75 of guests who
are asked to participate in our new resource
savings program do help by using their towels
more than once. You can join your fellow guests
in this program to help save the environment by
reusing your towels during your stay.
Goldstein, Cialdini, Griskevicius (2008, J of
Consumer Research)
16Principle 4 Liking
- Liking
- We are more likely to comply with requests from
those we like - Liking often based on
- Attractiveness
- Familiarity
- Similarity
17Similarity and ComplianceWhat a Coincidence!
- Four Experiments on Impact of Incidental
Similarity on Compliance with Requests for Help - Experiment 1
- Same Birthday DV help with a report
- Experiment 2
- Same Name DV donation to Cystic Fibrosis
Foundation - Experiment 3
- Same Personality (Either Common or Uncommon) DV
help with a report - Experiment 4
- Same Personality (but here DV rated attraction
to other person) - All studies show similarity (especially uncommon
similarity) increases compliance with requests
for help
Jerry Burger
18Principle 5 Authority
- Authority
- We are more likely to comply with requests from
authorities - Milgrams Classic Studies on Obedience to
Authority
Stanley Milgram
19Milgram Studies Basic Set Up
Confederate
Shock Generator
Real Participant
20BBC - Recreation
21Principle 6 Scarcity
- Scarcity
- We believe that things that are scare are more
valuable - More likely to pay more for scarce resources
- Overlapping appointments for selling cars
- Excuse me while I take this call
- One day only at the Bon Marche
22http//www.youtube.com/watch?vX4GZfvXx9Js