Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene STAR - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene STAR

Description:

The primary aim of the study was to determine which of the following three statements is true: ... Fractures of the hip, spine or wrist. Toxicity and side effects. 8 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:344
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: wongt
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene STAR


1
Study of Tamoxifen and RaloxifeneSTAR
  • Larry Wickerham, MD
  • NSABP STAR Project Officer

2
NSABP P1 Study
Invasive Breast Cancer
Noninvasive Breast Cancer
50
Events Placebo 250 Tamoxifen 14
5
Events Placebo 93 Tamoxifen 60

40
30
Cumulative Rate/1000
P 0.008
20
P lt 0.0001
10
0
Time to Breast Cancer (Years)
3
Study DesignSTAR
Risk-Eligible Postmenopausal Women
  • STRATIFICATION
  • Age
  • Gail Model Risk
  • Race
  • History of LCIS
  • Hysterectomy

Tamoxifen 20 mg/day x 5 years
Raloxifene 60 mg/day x 5 years
4
Inclusion and Exclusion CriteriaSTAR
  • Inclusion
  • At least 35 years of age
  • Postmenopausal
  • Risk eligible
  • Lobular carcinoma in situ or
  • 5-year Gail risk of breast cancer gt1.66
  • Exclusion
  • History of
  • Invasive breast cancer
  • Ductal carcinoma in situ
  • DVT, PE
  • CVA, TIA
  • Uncontrolled diabetes, hypertension or atrial
    fibrillation

5
Primary AimsSTAR
  • The primary aim of the study was to determine
    which of the following three statements is true
  • Compared to tamoxifen, raloxifene significantly
    reduces the incidence rate of IBC
  • Compared to raloxifene, tamoxifen significantly
    reduces the incidence rate of IBC
  • The statistical superiority of one of the
    treatments cannot be demonstrated and the choice
    of therapy should be based on benefit/risk
    considerations

6
Primary ObjectiveSTAR
  • Evaluate the effect of raloxifene versus
    tamoxifen in reducing the incidence of invasive
    breast cancer in postmenopausal women who are at
    increased risk.

7
Secondary Objectives STAR
  • Non-invasive breast cancer
  • Endometrial cancer
  • Ischemic heart disease
  • Fractures of the hip, spine or wrist
  • Toxicity and side effects

8
Screening, Accrual and Follow-upSTAR
  • Screened 184,460
  • Eligible 96,368
  • Randomized 19,747
  • Woman-years of follow-up 79,173
  • Average follow-up (years) 4.06

9
Baseline CharacteristicsSTAR
  • Age (mean) 58.5
  • Caucasian 93
  • Hysterectomy 51
  • First degree relative(s)with breast cancer 71
  • History of
  • Lobular carcinoma in situ 9
  • Atypical hyperplasia 23
  • 5-year predicted Gail risk ofinvasive breast
    cancer (mean) 4.03

10
Effects on Invasive Breast Cancer STAR
RR (95 CI) 1.02 (0.82, 1.27)
11
Invasive Breast Cancer STAR
325
173
168
12
Invasive Breast Cancer by 5-year Predicted
RiskSTAR
13
Invasive Breast Cancer Tumor CharacteristicsSTAR
14
Invasive Breast Cancer in Women with aHistory of
LCIS or Atypical Hyperplasia STAR
15
Non-Invasive Breast Cancer STAR
16
Non-Invasive Breast CancerSTAR
17
Uterine Cancer STAR
18
Uterine Hyperplasia and HysterectomySTAR
19
Ischemic Heart Disease STAR
20
Osteoporotic Fractures STAR
Columns not additive because one patient may
have had fractures at multiple sites.
21
MortalitySTAR
22
Venous Thromboembolic EventsSTAR
23
Cataracts and Cataract Surgery During
Follow-upSTAR
24
Summary STAR
  • Compared with tamoxifen, raloxifene was
  • similar in decreasing the risk of invasive breast
    cancer
  • not as effective at decreasing the risk of
    non-invasive breast cancer
  • associated with fewer
  • adverse events related to uterus
  • VTEs
  • cataracts and cataract surgery
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com