Preventing Complications of Central Venous Catheterization - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 49
About This Presentation
Title:

Preventing Complications of Central Venous Catheterization

Description:

Preventing Complications of Central Venous Catheterization By Sivaruban Kanagaratnam, General Surgery Resident, R1. University of Saskatchewan September, 22, 2006. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1570
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 50
Provided by: medicineU7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Preventing Complications of Central Venous Catheterization


1
Preventing Complications of Central Venous
Catheterization
  • By
  • Sivaruban Kanagaratnam,
  • General Surgery Resident, R1.
  • University of Saskatchewan
  • September, 22, 2006.

2
Central Venous Catheters
  • By definition, a CVC is one whose tip is located
    in a central vessel (i.e. the thoracic vena cava)
  • Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) is
    a catheter inserted via a peripheral vein whose
    tip terminates in the vena cava.

3
Central Venous Catheters
  • gt5 Million catheters inserted each year
  • Used for many things, including hemodynamic
    support to nutritional support
  • But, adverse events which are hazardous to the
    patient and also expensive to treat.
  • gt15 of the patients develop complications.
  • Preventing Complications of Central Venous
    Catheterization

4
Indication for Use
  • Long term IV therapy-chemo, Antibiotic therapy,
    TPN, blood products.
  • Recurrent blood draws
  • Dialysis

5
Advantages?
  • Immediate access
  • Easy access
  • High flow and dilution of concentrated solutions
  • Outpatient care

6
Disadvantages and Contraindications?
  • More invasive
  • Potential for more complication
  • Contraindications
  • Sepsis
  • Coagulopathy

7
Types of Central Venous Catheters?
  • Central Line
  • Tunneled Catheters
  • PICC Line
  • Subcutaneous Ports

8
Device Choice?
  • Patients disease and status
  • Number and types of solutions
  • Flow required- internal vs external diameter
  • Frequency required? i.e. tunneled vs port.
  • Duration of use-days vs months.
  • gt 7 days-PICC line
  • 1-12 weeks-PICC line/tunneled catheter
  • 12 weeks-6 months or greater- tunneled catheter
  • gt6 months-Port.
  • Preference- Dr./Patient.

9
Catheterization Internal Jugular Approach
10
Catheterization Subclavian Approach
11
Central Venous Catheter Tip Position A
Continuing Controversy
12
Central Venous Catheter Tip Position A
Continuing Controversy
  • Superior Vena Cava vs upper right atrium?
  • Concern for patient safety vs optimal catheter
    performance.
  • Against R-atrial placement
  • Cardiac performation and tamponade,
  • Cardiac arrhythmias
  • Catheter induced thrombosis
  • For R-atrial placement
  • Optimal performance and superior functional
    durability
  • The incidence of catheter related problems
    depends on the method used for diagnosis
  • Complications that occur during catheter
    insertion vs placement

13
Central Venous Catheter Tip Position A
Continuing Controversy
  • Superior Vena Cava
  • 1989-FDA
  • 1996-Oncology Nursing Society
  • 2000-Infusion Nurses Society
  • Nurses were taught to not use CVC positioned in
    the right atrium, will be held liable if
    complications occurs.
  • Right Atrium
  • 1998-National Association of Vascular Acc.
    Networks
  • PICC close to or in R-atrium
  • 2001 Kidney Disease Quality Outcome Initiative
    (K/DOQI)
  • Cuffed-tunneled hemodialysis catheters in
    R-atrium
  • Non tunneled temp. in SVC/atrial junction

14
Central Venous Catheter Tip Position A
Continuing Controversy
  • Insufficient evidence to support or condemn-
    R-atrium
  • Variables such as catheter type, insertion site,
    the patients body habitus, and the intended use
    of catheter are important.
  • On a CXR, the right tracheobronchial angle is the
    best landmark to delineate the borders of the SVC
    and the SVC/atrial junction.

15
Central Venous Catheter Tip Position A
Continuing Controversy
  • Important majority of the time, a catheter moves
    extending 2-3cm.
  • So, a properly placed catheter within the
    inferior (caudal) segment of the SVC will likely
    move in and out of R-atrium as patient moves.
  • The most feared complications such as vascular
    complications( Cardiac arrhythmias or
    perforations) are rare(0.4-0.9) and occur
    usually due to physician errors and during
    catheter insertion.

16
CVC Tip Position Summary.
  • No clear evidence to state one way or another.
  • A Continuing Controversy!!!

17
Interventions to Prevent Complications
  • Infection
  • Mechanical
  • Thrombotic

18
Infection The use of Antimicrobial-Impregnated
Catheters
  • Figure Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative
    risk for catheter-related bloodstream infection.
  • The differences between groups are highly
    significant (P 0.01, log-rank test).

Maki, D. G. et. al. Ann Intern Med
1997127257-266
19
Infection The use of Antimicrobial-Impregnated
Catheters
Maki, D. G. et. al. Ann Intern Med
1997127257-266
20
Infection The use of Antimicrobial-Impregnated
Catheters
  • Use of these catheters decreases blood stream
    infection
  • 4.6 regular catheter
  • 1.0 antibiotic impregnated catheters
  • Cost effective analysis save about
    196USD/catheter inserted.
  • Chlorhexidine-Silver sulfadiazine and
    Minocycline-Rifampin impregnated catheters
  • The Use of antibiotic impregnated catheters
    should be considered at all circumstances!
  • The emergence of resistance is certainly of
    concern.

N ENGL J MED 348 12, 2003
21
Infection Insertion of Catheters at the
Subclavian Venous Site
  • The risk of catheter-related infection is lower
    with subclavian catheterization than with
    internal jugular or femoral catheterization

22
Infection The Use of Maximal Sterile-barrier
precautions during catheter insertion
  • The use of mask, cap, sterile gown, sterile
    gloves, and large sterile drape.
  • Has shown to reduce the rate of catheter-related
    bloodstream infections and to save an estimate of
    167 per catheter inserted.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 1994 15231-8
23
Infection Avoiding the use of Antibiotic
Ointments
  • The Use of ointments such as bacitracin,
    mupirocin, neomycin, and polymyxin to catheter
    insertion sites show
  • Increase the rate of colonization by fungi
  • Promote bacterial resistance
  • Has not shown to affect the risk of catheter
    related bloodstream infection.

N ENGL J MED 348 12, 2003
24
Infection Disinfecting Catheter Hubs
Microbes migrate intraluminally from colonized
hubs, less often from contaminated infusate.
  • Catheter hubs are common sites of catheter
    contamination

Annals of Internal Medicine, 132(5), 2000.
25
Infection Disinfecting Catheter Hubs
TEGO CONNECTOR
  • Reduces hub related infection
  • High flow rate-600ml/min
  • 7 days of microbial efficacy.

26
Kaplan-Meier estimates of the cumulate likelihood
of freedom from CRBSI in the 2 treatment groups
Garland, J. S. et al. Pediatrics
2005116e198-e205
27
Infection Routine Catheter Changes?
  • Scheduled, routine replacement of central venous
    catheters at a new site does not reduce the risk
    of catheter related infection.
  • Scheduled, routine exchange of cathetres over
    guide wire is associated with a trend toward
    increased catheter related infections and
    mechanical complications.
  • META analysis of 12-RCTs do not support.
  • CVC should not be replaced on a scheduled basis.

N ENGL J MED 348 12, 2003
28
Infection Remove when no longer needed.
  • The probability of colonization and
    catheter-related bloodstream infection increases
    over time.

NON-Antiseptic Impregnated catheter
Antiseptic Impregnated catheter
Collin, G. R. Chest 19991151632-1640
29
Infection Summary.
  • Use antimicrobial-impregnated catheters
  • Avoid inserting catheters at femoral venous site
  • Use maximal sterile barrier precautions
  • Avoid antibiotic ointments
  • Disinfect catheter hubs
  • Do not schedule routine catheter changes
  • Remove catheter when no longer needed

30
Interventions to Prevent Complications
  • Infection
  • Mechanical
  • Thrombotic

31
Mechanical Recognizing Risk Factors for
Difficult Catheterization
  • A history of failed catheterization attempts or
    the need for catheter at sites of prior surgery,
    skeletal deformity or scarring suggests that
    catheterization may be difficult

N ENGL J MED 348 12, 2003
32
Mechanical Seek experienced help!
  • Physician gt50 catheterization has 50 less
    mechanical complications than someone who
    performed lt50.

N ENGL J MED 348 12, 2003
33
Mechanical Avoid Femoral Venous Catheterization
  • The frequency of mechanical complication
  • femoral gtgt subclaviani. jugular catheterization

N ENGL J MED 348 12, 2003
34
Mechanical The use of U/S during Internal
Jugular Catheterization
  • The use of U/S guided internal jugular
    catheterization
  • Reduces time required for insertion
  • Reduces number of unsuccessful catheterization
  • Carotid artery puncture
  • Hematoma formation

N ENGL J MED 348 12, 2003
35
Mechanical Scheduling of Routine Catheter Changes
  • Routine replacements at new sites increases
    mechanical complications.

N ENGL J MED 348 12, 2003
36
Mechanical Summary
  • Recognize risk factors
  • Seek assistance with difficult cases
  • Avoid femoral venous catheterization
  • Use U/S guided jugular catheterization
  • Dont schedule routine catheter changes

37
Thrombosis
  • Intermittently used catheters need to be replaced
    frequently due to obstruction and or infection.
  • Clot formation is a major source of obstruction

38
Thrombotic Insertion of the Catheter at the
Subclavian Site
  • Subclavian catheterization carries a lower risk
    of catheter related thrombosis than femoral or
    internal jugular catheterization.

N ENGL J MED 348 12, 2003
39
Keeping Central Venous Lines Open
  • The use of anti-obstructive flushes such as
    heparin, citrate and Vitamin C (Germans), have
    associated complications
  • Bleeding,
  • Thrombocytopenia-heparin induced
  • Arrhythmia (citrate)

Intensive Care Med. 2002 281172-6
40
Keeping Central Venous Lines Open a prospective
comparison of Heparin, Vit. C, and NaCl blocks
  • Signif. longer patency with heparin(5000IU/ml)
  • Vitamin C ineffective
  • Group of 25 low dose heparin flushes(200IU/ml)
    flushes showed catheter survival closer to saline
    group.
  • So, high concentration of heparin flushes
    recommended.

Intensive Care Med. 2002 281172-6
41
PICC lines
Radiologists
Nurses
42
PICC Indications
  • Patient comfort (less pokes)
  • Convenience
  • Decreased risk (pneumothorax or bleeding)
  • Long term access (0-432 days)
  • Home therapy (safe, reliable, easy to manage)

43
PICC Contraindications
  • ABSOLUTE
  • Peripheral venous obstruction
  • Inadequate line care management
  • Need for extensive blood products
  • RELATIVE
  • Septicemia
  • Coagulopathy
  • Ipsilateral paralysis or mastectomy
  • Chronic central venous occlusion
  • End stage renal disease
  • Skin conditions-burns, infections.

44
Venous Thrombosis Associated with the placement
of PICC lines.
  • Comparison of left and right arms developing
    thromboses after the placement of the initial and
    subsequent PICCs.
  • All patients with history of PICC line placement
    requiring dialysis access should undergo
    venography prior to placement of permanent access

JVIR Nov-Dec 2000, 1309-1314
45
Venous Thrombosis Associated with the placement
of PICC lines.
  • Incidence of venous thromboses by vein developing
    after PICC placement.
  • High rate of venous thrombosis, especially
    cephalic thrombus.

JVIR Nov-Dec 2000, 1309-1314
46
Complications and Cost for patients receiving TPN
via Subclavian or PICC access.
  • Patients with the PICC line encountered more
    complications sooner than the standard subclavian
    approach
  • PICC have higher rate of thrombophlebitis and
    more difficult to insert for standard TPN
    patients
  • Cost
  • PICC- US22.32- 2.74 per day.
  • Subclavian US16.20-2.96 per day.

Clinical Nutrition, 2000, 19(4)237-243
47
Complications of PICC in patients with solid
tumors
41
  • Higher rate of serious complications (infection
    and thrombosis)
  • solid tumor (29)
  • non( 9)
  • PICC lines should be used with caution solid
    tumor malignancy

59
Internal Medicine Journal, 2004 34234-238
48
PICC Fracture and Embolization
  • may pose a potential risk of serious
    consequences.
  • Rare 11/ 1650 children
  • Non-factor
  • Catheter size, and
  • meds infused via catheter.
  • Significance
  • duration of placement, line complications
    blockage or
  • leaking line
  • Prudent to list fracture as a potential
    complication when obtaining consent.

J. Pediatr 2003 142141-4
49
SUMMARY
  • There are many complications associated with
    Central Venous Catheters
  • Infectious, Mechanical, and Thrombotic causes.
  • There isnt one defined approach that works for
    all
  • Need to have a case based approach.
  • Shouldnt be trigger happy with PICC lines
  • Not a fool proof method
  • Perhaps not the savior that once we believed it
    to be.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com