Title: Preventing Complications of Central Venous Catheterization
1Preventing Complications of Central Venous
Catheterization
- By
- Sivaruban Kanagaratnam,
- General Surgery Resident, R1.
- University of Saskatchewan
- September, 22, 2006.
2Central Venous Catheters
- By definition, a CVC is one whose tip is located
in a central vessel (i.e. the thoracic vena cava) - Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) is
a catheter inserted via a peripheral vein whose
tip terminates in the vena cava.
3Central Venous Catheters
- gt5 Million catheters inserted each year
- Used for many things, including hemodynamic
support to nutritional support - But, adverse events which are hazardous to the
patient and also expensive to treat. - gt15 of the patients develop complications.
- Preventing Complications of Central Venous
Catheterization
4Indication for Use
- Long term IV therapy-chemo, Antibiotic therapy,
TPN, blood products. - Recurrent blood draws
- Dialysis
5Advantages?
- Immediate access
- Easy access
- High flow and dilution of concentrated solutions
- Outpatient care
6Disadvantages and Contraindications?
- More invasive
- Potential for more complication
- Contraindications
- Sepsis
- Coagulopathy
7Types of Central Venous Catheters?
8Device Choice?
- Patients disease and status
- Number and types of solutions
- Flow required- internal vs external diameter
- Frequency required? i.e. tunneled vs port.
- Duration of use-days vs months.
- gt 7 days-PICC line
- 1-12 weeks-PICC line/tunneled catheter
- 12 weeks-6 months or greater- tunneled catheter
- gt6 months-Port.
- Preference- Dr./Patient.
9Catheterization Internal Jugular Approach
10Catheterization Subclavian Approach
11Central Venous Catheter Tip Position A
Continuing Controversy
12Central Venous Catheter Tip Position A
Continuing Controversy
- Superior Vena Cava vs upper right atrium?
- Concern for patient safety vs optimal catheter
performance. - Against R-atrial placement
- Cardiac performation and tamponade,
- Cardiac arrhythmias
- Catheter induced thrombosis
- For R-atrial placement
- Optimal performance and superior functional
durability - The incidence of catheter related problems
depends on the method used for diagnosis - Complications that occur during catheter
insertion vs placement
13Central Venous Catheter Tip Position A
Continuing Controversy
- Superior Vena Cava
- 1989-FDA
- 1996-Oncology Nursing Society
- 2000-Infusion Nurses Society
- Nurses were taught to not use CVC positioned in
the right atrium, will be held liable if
complications occurs.
- Right Atrium
- 1998-National Association of Vascular Acc.
Networks - PICC close to or in R-atrium
- 2001 Kidney Disease Quality Outcome Initiative
(K/DOQI) - Cuffed-tunneled hemodialysis catheters in
R-atrium - Non tunneled temp. in SVC/atrial junction
14Central Venous Catheter Tip Position A
Continuing Controversy
- Insufficient evidence to support or condemn-
R-atrium - Variables such as catheter type, insertion site,
the patients body habitus, and the intended use
of catheter are important. - On a CXR, the right tracheobronchial angle is the
best landmark to delineate the borders of the SVC
and the SVC/atrial junction.
15Central Venous Catheter Tip Position A
Continuing Controversy
- Important majority of the time, a catheter moves
extending 2-3cm. - So, a properly placed catheter within the
inferior (caudal) segment of the SVC will likely
move in and out of R-atrium as patient moves. - The most feared complications such as vascular
complications( Cardiac arrhythmias or
perforations) are rare(0.4-0.9) and occur
usually due to physician errors and during
catheter insertion.
16CVC Tip Position Summary.
- No clear evidence to state one way or another.
- A Continuing Controversy!!!
17Interventions to Prevent Complications
- Infection
- Mechanical
- Thrombotic
18Infection The use of Antimicrobial-Impregnated
Catheters
- Figure Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative
risk for catheter-related bloodstream infection. - The differences between groups are highly
significant (P 0.01, log-rank test).
Maki, D. G. et. al. Ann Intern Med
1997127257-266
19Infection The use of Antimicrobial-Impregnated
Catheters
Maki, D. G. et. al. Ann Intern Med
1997127257-266
20Infection The use of Antimicrobial-Impregnated
Catheters
- Use of these catheters decreases blood stream
infection - 4.6 regular catheter
- 1.0 antibiotic impregnated catheters
- Cost effective analysis save about
196USD/catheter inserted. - Chlorhexidine-Silver sulfadiazine and
Minocycline-Rifampin impregnated catheters - The Use of antibiotic impregnated catheters
should be considered at all circumstances! - The emergence of resistance is certainly of
concern.
N ENGL J MED 348 12, 2003
21Infection Insertion of Catheters at the
Subclavian Venous Site
- The risk of catheter-related infection is lower
with subclavian catheterization than with
internal jugular or femoral catheterization
22Infection The Use of Maximal Sterile-barrier
precautions during catheter insertion
- The use of mask, cap, sterile gown, sterile
gloves, and large sterile drape. - Has shown to reduce the rate of catheter-related
bloodstream infections and to save an estimate of
167 per catheter inserted.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 1994 15231-8
23Infection Avoiding the use of Antibiotic
Ointments
- The Use of ointments such as bacitracin,
mupirocin, neomycin, and polymyxin to catheter
insertion sites show - Increase the rate of colonization by fungi
- Promote bacterial resistance
- Has not shown to affect the risk of catheter
related bloodstream infection.
N ENGL J MED 348 12, 2003
24Infection Disinfecting Catheter Hubs
Microbes migrate intraluminally from colonized
hubs, less often from contaminated infusate.
- Catheter hubs are common sites of catheter
contamination
Annals of Internal Medicine, 132(5), 2000.
25Infection Disinfecting Catheter Hubs
TEGO CONNECTOR
- Reduces hub related infection
- High flow rate-600ml/min
- 7 days of microbial efficacy.
26Kaplan-Meier estimates of the cumulate likelihood
of freedom from CRBSI in the 2 treatment groups
Garland, J. S. et al. Pediatrics
2005116e198-e205
27Infection Routine Catheter Changes?
- Scheduled, routine replacement of central venous
catheters at a new site does not reduce the risk
of catheter related infection. - Scheduled, routine exchange of cathetres over
guide wire is associated with a trend toward
increased catheter related infections and
mechanical complications. - META analysis of 12-RCTs do not support.
- CVC should not be replaced on a scheduled basis.
N ENGL J MED 348 12, 2003
28Infection Remove when no longer needed.
- The probability of colonization and
catheter-related bloodstream infection increases
over time.
NON-Antiseptic Impregnated catheter
Antiseptic Impregnated catheter
Collin, G. R. Chest 19991151632-1640
29Infection Summary.
- Use antimicrobial-impregnated catheters
- Avoid inserting catheters at femoral venous site
- Use maximal sterile barrier precautions
- Avoid antibiotic ointments
- Disinfect catheter hubs
- Do not schedule routine catheter changes
- Remove catheter when no longer needed
30Interventions to Prevent Complications
- Infection
- Mechanical
- Thrombotic
31Mechanical Recognizing Risk Factors for
Difficult Catheterization
- A history of failed catheterization attempts or
the need for catheter at sites of prior surgery,
skeletal deformity or scarring suggests that
catheterization may be difficult
N ENGL J MED 348 12, 2003
32Mechanical Seek experienced help!
- Physician gt50 catheterization has 50 less
mechanical complications than someone who
performed lt50.
N ENGL J MED 348 12, 2003
33Mechanical Avoid Femoral Venous Catheterization
- The frequency of mechanical complication
- femoral gtgt subclaviani. jugular catheterization
N ENGL J MED 348 12, 2003
34Mechanical The use of U/S during Internal
Jugular Catheterization
- The use of U/S guided internal jugular
catheterization - Reduces time required for insertion
- Reduces number of unsuccessful catheterization
- Carotid artery puncture
- Hematoma formation
N ENGL J MED 348 12, 2003
35Mechanical Scheduling of Routine Catheter Changes
- Routine replacements at new sites increases
mechanical complications.
N ENGL J MED 348 12, 2003
36Mechanical Summary
- Recognize risk factors
- Seek assistance with difficult cases
- Avoid femoral venous catheterization
- Use U/S guided jugular catheterization
- Dont schedule routine catheter changes
37Thrombosis
- Intermittently used catheters need to be replaced
frequently due to obstruction and or infection. - Clot formation is a major source of obstruction
38Thrombotic Insertion of the Catheter at the
Subclavian Site
- Subclavian catheterization carries a lower risk
of catheter related thrombosis than femoral or
internal jugular catheterization.
N ENGL J MED 348 12, 2003
39Keeping Central Venous Lines Open
- The use of anti-obstructive flushes such as
heparin, citrate and Vitamin C (Germans), have
associated complications - Bleeding,
- Thrombocytopenia-heparin induced
- Arrhythmia (citrate)
Intensive Care Med. 2002 281172-6
40Keeping Central Venous Lines Open a prospective
comparison of Heparin, Vit. C, and NaCl blocks
- Signif. longer patency with heparin(5000IU/ml)
- Vitamin C ineffective
- Group of 25 low dose heparin flushes(200IU/ml)
flushes showed catheter survival closer to saline
group. - So, high concentration of heparin flushes
recommended.
Intensive Care Med. 2002 281172-6
41PICC lines
Radiologists
Nurses
42PICC Indications
- Patient comfort (less pokes)
- Convenience
- Decreased risk (pneumothorax or bleeding)
- Long term access (0-432 days)
- Home therapy (safe, reliable, easy to manage)
43PICC Contraindications
- ABSOLUTE
- Peripheral venous obstruction
- Inadequate line care management
- Need for extensive blood products
- RELATIVE
- Septicemia
- Coagulopathy
- Ipsilateral paralysis or mastectomy
- Chronic central venous occlusion
- End stage renal disease
- Skin conditions-burns, infections.
44Venous Thrombosis Associated with the placement
of PICC lines.
- Comparison of left and right arms developing
thromboses after the placement of the initial and
subsequent PICCs. - All patients with history of PICC line placement
requiring dialysis access should undergo
venography prior to placement of permanent access
JVIR Nov-Dec 2000, 1309-1314
45Venous Thrombosis Associated with the placement
of PICC lines.
- Incidence of venous thromboses by vein developing
after PICC placement. - High rate of venous thrombosis, especially
cephalic thrombus.
JVIR Nov-Dec 2000, 1309-1314
46Complications and Cost for patients receiving TPN
via Subclavian or PICC access.
- Patients with the PICC line encountered more
complications sooner than the standard subclavian
approach - PICC have higher rate of thrombophlebitis and
more difficult to insert for standard TPN
patients - Cost
- PICC- US22.32- 2.74 per day.
- Subclavian US16.20-2.96 per day.
Clinical Nutrition, 2000, 19(4)237-243
47Complications of PICC in patients with solid
tumors
41
- Higher rate of serious complications (infection
and thrombosis) - solid tumor (29)
- non( 9)
- PICC lines should be used with caution solid
tumor malignancy
59
Internal Medicine Journal, 2004 34234-238
48PICC Fracture and Embolization
- may pose a potential risk of serious
consequences. - Rare 11/ 1650 children
- Non-factor
- Catheter size, and
- meds infused via catheter.
- Significance
- duration of placement, line complications
blockage or - leaking line
- Prudent to list fracture as a potential
complication when obtaining consent.
J. Pediatr 2003 142141-4
49SUMMARY
- There are many complications associated with
Central Venous Catheters - Infectious, Mechanical, and Thrombotic causes.
- There isnt one defined approach that works for
all - Need to have a case based approach.
- Shouldnt be trigger happy with PICC lines
- Not a fool proof method
- Perhaps not the savior that once we believed it
to be.