Title: Military Offsets as a Tool for
1Military Offsets as a Tool for Development
Poland, A Case Study Â
2Military Offsets as a Tool for Development
F-16 Deal with Poland
- 1998 Poland admitted to NATO in 1998
- 2001 Polands Parliament approved 3.5 billion
to upgrade its fighter planes - 2002 US Congress approved 15-year, 3.8
billion loan to Poland - US Governments Deal with Poland
- 3.8 billion Foreign Military Financing loan
- Interest payment through 2010 Interest plus
principal 2011 through 201 - Advanced Medium- short-range air-to-air
missiles - Maverick air-to-ground missiles
- Laser-guided and other bombs
- Radio-frequency countermeasures
- Potential for acquisition of new F-35
- 2003 Poland negotiated a 6 billion offset
deal with Lockheed Martin
3Military Offsets as a Tool for Development
Offset Practices
- Reciprocity arrangements conditions on foreign
suppliers - Designed to compensate the buyer for selecting
a foreign supplier - Commit the seller to certain obligations
- Up to 100 of purchase price
- Used in reference to military
high-dollar-value civilian contracts - Buying Country Stategies
- Hard currency generation to alleviate shortages
of foreign exchange - Technology transfer to build competitiveness
- Domestic content to promote locally
manufactured goods - Marketing assistance
- Economic stimulants forming part of a countrys
economic recovery program - Selling Country Strategies
- Competitive or commercial reasons
- Standardization interoperability reasons
- Concern for job losses distortion of world
trade - Work to mutual advantage
- Low-cost suppliers
4Military Offsets as a Tool for Development
Offset Agreement for Procurement of Lockheed
Martin F-16s
- 3.5 Billion Contract for 44 F-16
- Improving NATO fleet interoperability and
standardization - 6 Billion Offset Arrangements
- Responsibility lies with Lockheed Martin
- 47 Projects
- Some of the Companies Organizations Involved
- Lockheed Martin
- Pratt Whitney
- Goodrich
- Halliburton
- CH2M Hill
- Sandia National Laboratories
- University of Texas
-
5Military Offsets as a Tool for Development
Offsets Their Valuations Creativity Leverage
- Setting Offset Values
- Buyer Seller work together to identify
projects potential investment value - Multipliers applied in many countries
- Set by law
- Dependent upon project type
- Result
- Less than reported value actually flows into
buying country
6Military Offsets as a Tool for Development
Benefits vs Cost
- Pros
- FDI Projects worth 6 billion
- Alignment w/govt strategy
- Countertrade
- US commercial aircraft parts
- Improve competitiveness thru technology
acquisition - Joint ventures in high tech areas
- Co-production
- Aftermarket opportunities
- Technology centers/institutes
- Improved infrastructure
- Telecommunications
- Increased foreign trade
- Establish markets in high tech areas
- Venture funding
- Training
- Joint ventures/mfg expertise
- Business development
- Managerial
7Military Offsets as a Tool for Development
Benefits vs Cost (cont.)
- Cons
- FDI Multipliers result in less dollars flowing
in - Use of scarce resources to buy military
- equipment
- 0.2 billion/yr (2004-2010)
- 0.8 billion/yr (2011-2015)
- Joint ventures independent of offset reqts
- Necessary infrastructure improvements
- neglected
- Roads
- Railroads
- Health service
- Agriculture
- Risk of losing EU funding
- Selling companies
- Slow on meeting investment reqts
- Market distorting
- Lack of openness
- Limit on forces to improve business climate
8Military Offsets as a Tool for Development
Summary
- Offsets Role
- Major role in decision contract negotiations
- Offset Function
- Major role in economy of buying country
- Issues
- Offset valuation
- Offset multipliers
- Developing countries spending resources on
large military equipment - Alternate use of resources
- Alternative FDI
- Market distortions
- Direct government intervention in markets
9Back-up
10Military Offsets as a Tool for Development
Offset Agreement for Procurement of Lockheed
Martin F-16s
11Military Offsets as a Tool for Development
Funding Offsets
- Selling Company Allocates Small Budget
- Typically 4 10 of selling cost
- Program funding used
- Typically charged back to buyer as part of
overhead cost of purchased equipment - Partner Companies
- Often through new or existing investments in
the buying country - Offset Credit Trading Account
- Sellers own account
- Purchased credits from other companies
12(No Transcript)
13Polish Stats
14Polish Stats