Sections 10 and 404: NMFS’ Oversight, Concerns and Actions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Sections 10 and 404: NMFS’ Oversight, Concerns and Actions

Description:

Sections 10 and 404: NMFS Oversight, Concerns and Actions Lisa Abernathy Lisa.Abernathy_at_noaa.gov * * Who we are: National Marine Fisheries Service NOAA Aquaculture ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: dnrLouisi
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Sections 10 and 404: NMFS’ Oversight, Concerns and Actions


1
Sections 10 and 404 NMFS Oversight, Concerns
and Actions
  • Lisa Abernathy
  • Lisa.Abernathy_at_noaa.gov

2
Who we areNational Marine Fisheries Service
  • NOAA Aquaculture Program
  • International Affairs
  • Law Enforcement
  • Office of Management and Budget
  • Office of Policy
  • Seafood Inspection Program
  • Sustainable Fisheries Division
  • Science and Technology Division
  • Protected Resources Division
  • Habitat Conservation Division

3
Habitat Conservation Division
  • The NOAA Fisheries Office of Habitat Conservation
    protects, restores, and promotes stewardship of
    coastal and marine habitat to support our
    nation's fisheries for future generations.
  • Our vision is a healthy and sustainable habitat
    that provides a range of benefits for abundant
    fish and wildlife, commercial and recreational
    opportunities, and resilient coastal communities
    that can withstand hurricanes, flooding, and
    other threats.

4
Essential Fish Habitat
  • those waters and substrates necessary to fish
    for spawning, breeding, or growth to maturity

5
  • Major portions of coastal Louisiana are
    categorized as EFH, including all offshore waters

6
Most commercially and recreationally important
fisheries are estuarine and wetlands dependent
  • Brown shrimp, white shrimp and red drum are
    federally managed species commonly found in most
    tidal wetlands in Louisiana, during some life
    stage

7
Other federally managed species include
  • Various snapper species
  • Groupers and mackerels
  • Some shark species
  • Highly migratory fishery
  • species such as tunas,
  • swordfish and sailfish

8
Why are we involved?
  • Rivers and Harbors Act
  • Clean Water Act
  • Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act
  • The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
    Management Act

9
Regulatory program interactions
  • COE Rivers and Harbors Act, Clean Water Act
    activities, permitting for wetland restoration
    projects, etc.
  • FERC interstate transmission pipelines, onshore
    natural gas terminals, alternative energy
    actions, etc.
  • USCG navigation issues with bridges, offshore
    natural gas terminals, etc.
  • FEMA repairs from past hurricanes, debris
    removal, etc.
  • BOEMRE (Formally MMS) sand mining and petroleum
    exploration activities in OCS waters, etc.
  • LADOTD roadways, bridges, etc.
  • LDNR CZM program

10
Types of projects comment on most
  • Oil and gas activities new canals/slips,
    pipelines
  • Camps not on least damaging configurations
  • Residential development
  • Marsh management activities (water control
    structures, levees, etc.)
  • Flood protection efforts

11
EFH ConsultationAction agency responsibilities
  • Evaluate the impact of the proposed actions on
    EFH
  • Avoid, minimize and mitigate
  • Initiate coordination with NMFS when the
    evaluation suggests an adverse impact is likely

12
EFH ConsultationNMFS Responsibilities
  • NOAA Fisheries reviews the Joint Public Notice,
    General Permits, Environmental Assessments, some
    State only Public Notices, etc.
  • NMFS uses existing processes to fulfill
    coordination requirements whenever possible we
    have findings with several agencies describing
    coordination processes
  • If adverse impacts to EFH are likely, NOAA
    Fisheries required by MSFCMA to submit EFH
    Conservation Recommendations to the Corps of
    Engineers or other action agency
  • The Corps of Engineers et al. must respond in
    writing to EFH Conservation Recommendations to
    conclude consultation

13
Permit Review What we need
  • Clear statement of purpose and need
  • Legible maps
  • Complete drawings of project features with
    accurate dimensions
  • Location of project footprint in relation to
    wetlands
  • Elevations of existing and created features
    relative to a datum (NGVD or NAVD88)
  • Mitigation for adverse impacts (2008 COE/EPA
    guidelines)
  • A little realism would be nice

14
(No Transcript)
15
What are we looking for?
  • Pre-application coordination on complex projects
  • Less damaging opportunities
  • Evaluation of offsite alternatives
  • Monitoring of project impacts
  • Compliance with regulations
  • Adequate compensatory mitigation

16
Types of compensatory mitigation
  • Marsh creation/terracing
  • Vegetative planting
  • Mitigation banks
  • In-lieu fee payment to
  • Louisiana wetland mitigation trust fund

17
  • Thank you!
  • National Marine Fisheries Service
  • Habitat conservation Division
  • c/o Louisiana State University
  • Baton Rouge, Louisiana
  • (225)-389-0508
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com