Part 1. Humans vs. Other Animals Continued class discussion

1
Lecture 2

• Part 1. Humans vs. Other Animals Continued (class
  discussion)
• Part 2. The Self and Uncertainty Orientation

2
(No Transcript)
3
(No Transcript)
4
Which o f these is a real difference?

• Speech, Sex for pleasure, sense of past, present,
  future, self awareness, complex and rational
  thought, opposable thumb, culture and religion,
  morals, bigger brains, systematic killing of same
  and other species, adaptation and improving life
  style, empathy, diverse social hierarchy,

5
Uncertainty Orientation and the Self

• A Person by Situation Theory of Self Regulation

6
The Uncertain Mind Individual Differences in
Facing the Unknown

• Richard Sorrentino, Chris Roney,
• Judy Short, and Students
• The University of Western Ontario

7
(No Transcript)
8
Two Types of Uncertainty Orientation
9
(No Transcript)
10
The Uncertainty-Oriented Person

• Needs to Know About the Self and the World
• Approaches Uncertain Situations in Order to
  Resolve the Uncertainty
• Most North American Social Psychologists believe
  all people are like this

11
(No Transcript)
12
The Certainty-Oriented Person

• Needs to maintain clarity about the self and the
  world
• Approaches Certainty and Avoids Confusion
• We believe the majority of North American people
  are in fact like this

13
Measurement of Uncertainty Orientation

• Two Components
• nUncertainty Used to infer ones desire to
  resolve uncertainty
• Authoritarianism Used to infer ones desire to
  maintain clarity
• Uncertainty-oriented (UO) Hi nUncertainty, Lo
  Authoritarianism
• Certainty-oriented (CO) Lo nUncertainty, Hi
  Authoritarianism

14
7
15
Uncertainty Orientation and Self-Assessment
16

• Self-assessment theories say that we want to find
  out about our abilities, regardless of whether we
  are likely to be good or bad at that ability.
• Self-enhancement theories say that we want to
  find out about our abilities only if we are good
  at them. We do not want to find out anything bad.
• The theory of uncertainty orientation says that
  uncertainty-oriented persons want to find out
  about their abilities, regardless of whether they
  are likely to be good or bad at that ability
• BUT
• certainty-oriented persons do not want to find
  out about their abilities, regardless of whether
  they are likely to be good or bad at that
  ability.

17
Mean number of subtest items chosen by
uncertainty-oriented (UO) and certainty-oriented
(CO) persons as a function of condition
diagnosticity. From Sorrentino Hewitt (1984).
18
Uncertainty Orientation and Information Processing

19
Previous theories relating personal relevance or
importance to information processing

• Automatic vs. Controlled (Fazio, Schneider
  Shriffin)
• Heuristic vs. Systematic (Chaiken Eagly)
• Peripheral vs. Central Routes (Petty Cacioppo)
• All say systematic forms of information
  processing increase and nonsystematic decrease
  with increased importance

20
WRONG !!!

• See two studies by Sorrentino, Bobocel, Gitta,
  Olson and Hewitt (1988)

21
Differences in Attitudes toward comprehensive
exams as a function of strength of arguments,
source expertise, and personal relevance for UOs
vs. COs
Note Bars indicate increases or decreases in
attitude as one goes from Low to High Personal
Relevance
22
Differences in Attitudes toward comprehensive
exams as a function of one-sided vs. two-sided
arguments, and personal relevance for UOs vs. COs
Note Bars indicate increases or decreases in
attitude as one goes from Low to High Personal
Relevance
23
Information Processing Model of Uncertainty
Orientation

• Increases in uncertainty will lead to increases
  in systematic processing of information for UOs
  but decreases for COs.
• Uncertainty includes imbalanced or incongruent
  situations, discrepant information,
  inconsistencies in thoughts or behaviors as well
  as not knowing what will happen in the future.
• Increases in certainty will lead to increases in
  systematic processing of information for COs but
  decreases for UOs.
• Certainty includes balanced or congruent
  situations, nondiscrepant information,
  consistencies in thoughts or behaviors, as well
  as knowing what will happen in the future.
• All of the above increases with increases in
  personal relevance.
• .

24
Uncertainty Orientation and Intelligence
25
SO FT
SO FT
Mean IQ Scores as a function of Uncertainty
Orientation, Achievement- related motives, and
Task Diagosticity. Note SO success-oriented, FT
failure-threatened, UO uncertainty-oriented,
CO certainty- oriented. From Sorrentino,
Brouwers, Hanna, Roney, 1996)
26
Uncertainty Orientation, Health and Clinical
Psychology
27
Uncertainty Orientation and Health Compliance
Behaviour

• Brouwers Sorrentino (1993)

28
Protection Motivation Theory (Rogers, Rogers and
Maddux) says that as threat (severity,
vulnerability) and efficacy (self efficacy and
response efficacy) increase, motivation
to undertake actions to protect the self
increases. We say that this is true for UOs, but
not for COs
29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
(No Transcript)
32
(No Transcript)
33
Uncertainty Orientation and Self-Disclosure

• Physiological Effects of Revealing Traumatic
  Events about the Self
• From Brouwers, Sorrentino, Roney, Hanna (in
  press)

34
Pennebakers self-penetration theory says that
revealing traumatic aspects about the self should
increase skin conductance and generally increase
physical and mental well-being. We say that
this would work for UOs, but might be harmful
for COs
35
CO
UO
CO
UO
Mean change in skin conductance as a function of
revealing A traumatic incident about the self o f
high or low intensity
36
Mean Change in Heart Rate as a function of High
and Low Disclosure Intensity. Borrowers
Sorrentino (submitted)
37
Uncertainty Orientation, Depression, and Control

• Information Processing and Performance when
  Moderately Depressed.
• From Walker Sorrentino (2000)

38
Weary and others argue that moderate depression
leads to increased information processing and
performance because moderately depressed persons
are motivated to restore control over their
lives. We say that this could be harmful for COs
39
(No Transcript)
40
Uncertainty Orientation and Close
Relationships
41
Trust and Uncertainty Orientation

• Sorrentino, Holmes, Hanna, Sharp (1995)

42
(No Transcript)
43
(No Transcript)
44
(No Transcript)