Title: 2 Year vs. 4 Year Colleges
12 Year vs. 4 Year Colleges
- By
- Lyle Culver
- Rolando Garcia
- Marta Menendez
- Anouchka Rachelson
2Does Community College vs. 4 year College
Attendance Influence Students Educational Plans?
- ByPascarella, Hagedorn, Edison, Terenzini, Nora
3Background
- 2 years students make same gains in standardized
measures as 4 year - 2 year 4 year students of similar educational
attainment background have parity in job
prestige, earnings, job stability, unemployment
rate, job satisfaction
4Background (cont)
- 2 year college students are significantly
disadvantaged in comparison to 4 year students in
terms of educational attainments - 2 year college students are 15 less likely to
complete a degree in the same amount of time as
students in a 4 year college
5Possible Reasons
- Difficulty in transferring from a 2 year to a 4
year - Acceptance into Institution
- Financial Aid
- Acceptance of credits
- Difficulty in adjusting to academic demands
- 2 year colleges lower students educational
aspirations goals - Cooling Out
6Purpose
- Test the Cooling Off hypothesis that CC lower
students precollege plans to obtain a BA degree.
7Methods
- 1,645 students from 18 4-year and 5 2-year
colleges from 16 states throughout the country
participated - Subjects were randomly sampled from incoming
first year class and given an NSSL-designed
precollege survey gathering data on - Student demographic characteristics and
background - Student lifetime educational plans
- Student expectations of college
- Students orientations toward learning
8Methods
- Participants completed reading comprehension,
mathematics, and critical thinking modules of the
CAAP - Follow up testing was conducted after 1st year
and 2nd year - Final sample was 1,645 students
- (119 attended 2-year and 1,526 attend 4-year)
- Drop out rates for 2-year students was 69.68
compared to 54.25 for 4-year students - Dependent variables
- End of 1st year and 2nd year lifetime educational
plans - Independent variable
- Student attended a 2-year or 4-year institution
9Results
- Cross Tabs (Institutional Populations)
- 1st year 11.8 of 2-year students lowered
lifetime educational plans vs. 5.2 of 4-year
students - 2nd year - 22.8 of 2-year students lowered
lifetime educational plans vs. 4.2 of 4-year
students
10Results (cont)
- Cross Tabs (National Populations)
- 1st year 15.97 of 2-year students lowered
lifetime educational plans vs. 4.9 of 4-year
students - 2nd year 21.0 of 2-year students lowered
lifetime educational plans vs. 4.3 of 4-year
students
11Results (cont)
- Regression (Institutional Populations)
- 1st year Controlling for confounding influences
there was no significant effect of 2-year vs.
4-year attendance on changing educational plans - 2nd year Controlling for confounding influences
there was a significant effect of 2-year vs.
4-year attendance on changing educational plans - The magnitude of this influence was
- 1st year 2-year students are 2.3 more likely
to change plans that 4-year students - 2nd year - 2-year students are 31 more likely to
change plans that 4-year students
12Results (cont)
- Regression (National Populations)
- 1st year Controlling for confounding influences
there was no significant effect of 2-year vs.
4-year attendance on changing educational plans - 2nd year Controlling for confounding influences
there was a significant effect of 2-year vs.
4-year attendance on changing educational plans - The magnitude of this influence was
- 1st year 2-year students are 3.4 more likely
to change plans that 4-year students - 2nd year - 2-year students are 19.8 more likely
to change plans that 4-year students
13Results (cont)
- Conditional Effects (Institutional Populations)
- Controlling for confounding influences, attending
a 2-year college had a modest (nonsignificant)
negative effect on end of first-year educational
plans for students with different levels of
precollege plans - For students who planned to obtain a graduate or
advanced professional degree, attending a 2-year
college had a small positive (nonsignificant)
effect. - For students with relatively low levels of
precollege plans, attending a 2-year college had
a significant negative effect.
14Results (cont)
- Conditional Effects (National Populations)
- Controlling for confounding influences, attending
a 2-year college had a significant negative
effect on end of first-year educational plans for
students with different levels of precollege
plans - For students who planned to obtain a graduate or
advanced professional degree, attending a 2-year
college had a small positive (nonsignificant)
effect. - For students with relatively low levels of
precollege plans, attending a 2-year college had
a substantial significant negative effect.
15Conclusions
- This study supports Clarks cooling out hypothesis
CC student 20 31 more likely to lower plans
by end of second year
16Conclusions (cont)
- Findings were based on correlational data
- Data did not allow researchers to identify
specific environmental factors in the 2-year
institutions that would cause students to lower
educational plans
17Policy Implication
- 2-year schools must provide support/mentoring to
students who enroll for the purpose of
transferring and obtaining a BA - Administrators must focus on removing the second
class status/aura attached to 2-year institutions - Advisors and counselors should not demonstrate
behaviors or attitudes that discourage students
from pursuing educational goals
18Rethinking Cooling Out at Public Community
Colleges
An Examination of Fiscal and Demographic Trends
in Higher Education and the Rise of Statewide
Articulation Agreements
19Article
- Anderson, Gregory M., Alfonso, Mariana, Sun,
Jefferey C. (2006). Rethinking Cooling Out at
Public Community Colleges An Examination of
Fiscal and Demographic Trends in Higher Education
and the Rise of Statewide Articulation
Agreements. Teachers College Record. 108, 422-451.
20- Large number of students entering community
colleges and identifying terminal certificates or
occupational associate degrees instead of A.As or
transfer credits - 1980s to 1990s major drive by community colleges
to form articulation agreements
21Purpose of community college ?
- Social Mobility
- Reducing racial-ethnic, gender, and class
inequalities - Cooling out diverting students from transfer
degrees to vocational degree and certificates
22Contradictory nature of community colleges
- Basis of study by Dougherty (1994)
- Reproduces of inequity
- Promoters of social mobility
23Basis of research question
- What fiscal, political and demographic forces
account for articulation agreements? - What role does the cooling out process play
when trying to account for the impact of
statewide articulation agreements?
24Research Hypothesis
- Interests of state politicians the cause for
increase in articulation agreements - Controlling costs of higher education in light of
other statewide expenditures
25Theoretical Frameworks to address research
questions
- Functionalists view community colleges as
integral to enhance educational opportunities for
underrepresented groups such as women and
minorities - Neo- Marxists - view community colleges as a
cooling out place offering vocational degrees
subject to the demands of industry - Institutionalists- state universities supported
development of community colleges so as not to
devalue the baccalaureate degrees. - Statists local, state, and federal government
support of community colleges as a means to serve
multiple interests - to create jobs and job
training
26Applicability of Theories
- Neo-Marxists do not take into account the fact
that corporations like Microsoft have their own
certification programs - Institutionalists delay of 2 years would not
stop the increase in the number of baccalaureate
degrees awards - Functionalists does not take into account the
special interests of state government and
conflicting roles - Statists articulation agreements seen as a
means for governments top stay in power by
diverting resources to areas other than education
as a response to the demands of a predominately
white and aging electorate
27Fiscal Trends in Higher Education
- From 1985 to 1995 financial decline for public
higher education relative to other state
expenditures - Sharp increases in state expenditure as a share
of gross state product - Significant disparities in FTE expenditures
between 2 and 4 yr institutions
28Articulation Agreements were a response to Fiscal
Woes
- Legislators viewed community colleges as a
cheaper alternative to 4 year degree institutions - Articulation agreements seen as policy to divert
students to community colleges for the first two
years - Lower FTE spending for the state
29Challenges and Tensions
- Electorate is predominately white and from 35 to
65 - Minorities and disadvantages groups still grossly
underrepresented despite growth in numbers of
students attending higher education - Tuition costs continue to escalate and family
income disparities continue to grow by 1025
only half of all eligible college bound seniors
will be able to attend higher education
30Impact to the middle class
- Important constituency
- State government trying to balance fiscal demands
with the demands of their consistency to provide
higher education - Community colleges seen as a cost effective means
of controlling the flow of incoming students to 4
year institutions enhancing cooling out process
- Middle class students seeing community colleges
as an affordable alternative facilitated by
articulation agreements
31Long Term Impacts
- Minority representation in community colleges
disproportionately high are most prone to
cooling out - Middle Class take over of community colleges
32Community College Effects on StudentsA Review
of Recent Evidence
33WHAT?
- 2 year community colleges
- - Diverse
- - Popular
- BUT---largely ignored
34WHY?
- Research Liberal Arts Colleges
- - set academic public standard Americans
follow - More deviation from standards
- less prestige
- lower academic excellence
- Viewpoint
- a catch basin for those few students unable or
unwilling to enter regular colleges
35Reason?
- Study by - American Council on Education
- Relatively Lower Cost
- community college vs. 4yr institution
- Tuition - community colleges vs. universities
- 44 of the average costs of 4 yr public
university - 10 of average costs of private university
36Developmental Impacts of Community Colleges
- Relatively new studies
- compared cognitive gains between CCs and 4-year
institutions - Small Samples
- 6 community colleges ? 6 states
- 4-year institutions ? 15 states
37 Developmental Impacts of Community Colleges
- Instruments used
- Collegiate Assessment of Academic Proficiency
(CAAP) - Tested in
- Reading Comprehension
- Quantitative Reasoning
- Critical Thinking
- Science Reasoning
- Writing Skills
- Measured
- intellectual skills capabilities acquired
during 1st 2 years in college
38Results
- Cognitive growth
- all students developed at about same level of
proficiency - CC students make significantly more progress in
1st year than 4-yr students.
39Conclusions
- CC students are 15 less likely to complete
degrees in same amount of time - CC attendance may grant selectivity to transfer
student - Economic advantages
- CCs foster cognitive growth at same degree of
proficiency as 4-year - Transfer students so as well in labor market as
4-year
40Conclusions
- Labor Market
- - Economic returns vary by field
- Largest payoffs for men
- Technical degrees (computers and engineering)
- Business
- Largest payoffs for women
- Business Health
- NOTE economic returns for women gt men for both
associates and vocational credentials
41References
- Pascarella, E. T. (1999). New studies track
community college effects on students. Community
College Journal, 69, 8-14.
42Impacts of Two-Year and Four-Year College
Attendance on Learning Orientations
- Pierson, Wolniak, Pascarella, Flowers (2003)
Review of Higher Education
43Question
- Aside from academic achievement, what other
factors can researchers test to compare and
contrast the impact of attending a two-year
college versus a four-year college during the
first two years of study?
44Background
- Students who begin at 2-year colleges and aspire
a bachelors degree are 15 less likely to
complete than their 4-year peers. - There is evidence that 2-year college attendance
lowers students educational plans.
45Background (cont)
- However, if students from 2-year colleges
complete their bachelors degree, they enjoy
equal job stability, income, and job satisfaction.
46Background (cont)
- Students who transfer from 2-year
colleges - often can get accepted to more selective
4-year colleges. - - generally experience a drop in grades
after transferring to 4-year schools.
47National Study of Student Learning
- Longitudinal study
- Statistically controlled competing influences
(age, sex, ethnicity, ability, etc.) - Result 2-year college students made equal gains
as 4-year students regarding reading
comprehension, math, critical thinking, writing
skills, scientific reasoning.
48This study Effects on Students Learning
Orientations
- Method
- The team of researchers studied
- 18 four-year and 5 two-year colleges
- variety of institutions
- from 16 states
- using IPEDS data
49Student Sample and Instrument
- 1992- Initial data collection (pre-college)
- Random sample of incoming freshmen
- 3,840 students from 23 schools participated
- 1993- Follow-up (after 1st year)
- 2,685 students
- 1994 - Final data collection (after 2nd year)
- 1,761 students
- Response rate 2-year schools 53.2
- 4-year schools 65.6
50Variables
- Four measures of learning orientations with
sample survey items (Likert scale) - Openness to Diversity/Challenge
- I enjoy having discussions with people whose
ideas and values are different. - 2. Learning for Self-Understanding
- I prefer courses in which the material helps me
understand something about myself.
51Variables cont
- 3. Internal Locus of Attribution for Success
- The grade I get depends on how hard the
instructor grades, not how carefully I study. - 4. Preference for Higher-Order Cognitive
Activities - I prefer to do assignments in which I have to
analyze and interpret what Ive read rather then
just summarize and report.
522 Sets of Control Variables
- 1. Pre-college Characteristics
- Pre-college scores on all four learning
orientations from 1992 - Sex
- Race/ethnicity
- Socio-economic status
- Pre-college academic motivation
- Age
- High school grades
- ESL or not
- Previous volunteer work
- Academic ability (based on standardized composite
score)
53Control Variables cont
- 2. Measures of students experiences in college
- Cumulative credit hours completed
- Hours per week spent studying and working
- Self-reported college grades
- Perception of teaching received
- Course-related interaction with peers
- Extracurricular involvement
- College volunteer work
54Results
- Effects of attending a 2-year (versus 4-year)
college - Statistically significant growth in 1st and 2nd
year of study for Item 1 Openness to
Diversity/Challenge - Significant positive effect on 2nd year for Item
2 Learning for Self-understanding - Significant positive effect on end of 1st year
for Item 3 Internal Locus of Attribution for
Academic Success - No significant effects for Item 4 Preference for
Higher-Order Cognitive Activities
55Conditional Effects
- In both 1st and 2nd year of study, male students
benefited more from attending a community college
regarding Item 1 (Openness to Diversity) - Also males benefited from 1st year attendance at
CC regarding Item 4 (Learning for
Self-Understanding) - White students showed the largest positive
effects for Items 1 and 4
56Conditional Effects (cont)
- Students of color showed greater end of 2nd year
growth than Whites in Item 2
Preference for Higher-Order Cognitive
Activities - Overall, ESL students benefited from attending a
2-year college however, for end of 2nd year ESL
students attending a CC had a significant
negative effect regarding Item 2 (the effect on
native speakers was positive, but not significant
at alpha.05)
57Conclusions
- These results counter the common perception
that attending a 2-year college to a less
developmentally influential undergraduate
experience (p.315). - This study found that 2-year college students
showed equal or modestly larger positive changes
in learning orientations than their peers at
4-year institutions.
58Conclusions (cont)
- Despite adjusting the survey results for 25
different academic and non-academic factors, the
study could not find one factor that
significantly contributed to the greater gains
made by 2-year students. - It is possible that the demographic
characteristics at the chosen 2-year colleges
contributed to gains in Item 1 (Openness to
Diversity/Challenge)
59Conclusions (cont)
- Impacts of 2-year colleges tended to be mainly
conditional, not general. - There was also evidence that students from the
lower half of socio-economic distribution
benefited more from attending a 2-year school on
Items 2 and 4. For the upper half, however, the
opposite was true.
60Conclusions (cont)
- Finally, the positive effect of attending a
community college on two-year gains in Openness
to Diversity/Challenge was 16 times larger for
students who tested in the upper 50 of
pre-college academic ability.
61Questions Answers
- Questionnaire Discussion
- Q A