The Revolt of the Engineers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

The Revolt of the Engineers

Description:

The Revolt of the Engineers Summary by David E. Goldberg University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana, IL 61801 Text Layton, Jr., E. T. (1986). – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: creativeD2
Category:
Tags: engineers | revolt

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Revolt of the Engineers


1
The Revolt of the Engineers
  • Summary by David E. Goldberg
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • Urbana, IL 61801

2
Text
  • Layton, Jr., E. T. (1986). The revolt of the
    engineers Social responsibility and the American
    engineering profession. Baltimore, MD Johns
    Hopkins University Press.

3
Topics
  • Engineer and business.
  • Evolution of a profession.
  • Ideology of engineering.
  • Revolt of the civil engineers.
  • Scientific management and reform.
  • Morris Cooke
  • Return to Normalcy
  • Depression and New Deal

4
Engineer Scientist Businessman
  • Veblen Assumed conflict would force engineers to
    become social revolutionaries!
  • 1816 30 engineers
  • 1850 2000 engineers
  • 1880-1920 7000 to 136,000 engineers

5
Key Conflict
  • Bureaucratic loyalty vs. Independence of
    professionalism.
  • Professional values
  • Autonomy
  • Colleagual control of professional work
  • Social responsibility
  • Professionalism vs. egalitarianism.

6
Business Influence on Engineering
  • Educationally Board of Trustees, curriculum.
  • Hierarchically in Companies price of
    advancement.
  • Rise results in loss of ID as engineers.
  • Censorship of engineering publication.
  • Companies supporting travel to engineering
    society meetings.

7
Evolution of a Profession
  • Professionally oriented Single society
    represents all.
  • Industry oriented Societies that serve needs of
    specific industries.
  • Scientifically oriented Require individuals with
    creative ability to do original work.

8
Origins Follow Scientific Society
  • 1829 Franklin Institute.
  • 1839 First effort to form engineering society on
    top of Franklin Institute.
  • 1848 Boston Society of Civil Engineers
  • 1852 American Society of Civil Engineers.
  • Two early majors AIME and ASCE (biz vs.
    professionalism)

9
ASCE
  • Elitist tendencies alienate
  • Local engineers
  • Engineers in industry
  • Young engineers
  • Maintain autonomy rather than expand influence

10
AIME
  • American Institute of Mining Engineers
  • Those practically engaged in mining, metallurgy,
    or metallurgical engineering.
  • One-man band Rossiter W. Raymond.
  • Engineer as a kind of businessman.
  • Resisted code of ethics.

11
ASME
  • 3 Founders
  • Sweet artisan
  • Holly businessman
  • Thurston educator
  • Inclusive membership, but elite governance of the
    society.

12
AIEE
  • Formed to compete with British society.
  • First president was president of Western Union.
  • But scientific advance in electricity brought
    rapid professionalism of AIEE.

13
Proliferation of Societies
  • Unhappiness with business v. professionalism
    calibration.
  • Business toward proliferation, professionalism
    toward unification.

14
Ideology
  • Engineers not philosophers.
  • No coherent metaphysical system.
  • Many assumptions about the world taken as
    self-evident.
  • System
  • Materialistic physics and material surroundings.
  • Idealistic Ethical imperatives and moralism.
  • Biz v. Science again!!

15
Herbert Spencer
  • Social darwinism.
  • Laissez faire.
  • Highly influential in late 1800s.
  • Spencer an engineer.
  • Could not reconcile with idealism.

16
Engineers Priests of Social Good
  • ASCEs Morrison We are the priests of material
    development, of the work which enables other men
    to enjoy the fruits of the great sources of power
    in Nature, and of the power of mind over matter.
    We are priests of the new epoch, without
    superstitions.

17
Self Image
  • Important social role.
  • Logical thinkers.
  • Concerned over status of engineers.
  • Seek scientific solutions to all things.
  • Similarity with reformers
  • Middle ground between labor and capital.
  • Nostalgia for individualism of the frontier.
  • Not the same faith in democracy.

18
Struggle for Status
  • AIEE took lead.
  • Code of Ethics 1906-1912.
  • Public policy forays largely unsuccessful.
  • Local vs. Center Locals were fairly strong. 1912
    rule limits local power.
  • New grade of member allowed businessmen in.
  • Shift from professionalism to biz mid teens to
    20s.

19
Revolt of the Civils
  • Overproduction of Civil degrees.
  • Complancy of ASCE.
  • No interest in unification.
  • Newell Reclamation Service head, Orwellian
    designs. Committee on Engineering Cooperation.
  • American Association of Engineers Grew to 20,000
    in just under 2 years.

20
Engineering Council
  • Answer to AAE, 1917.
  • Served government.
  • Didnt unify engineers, but neither did AAE.

21
Frederick Taylor
  • Scientific management.
  • Early engineers approach to management.
  • Time and motion study of industrial engineering.
  • All task, no relationship.
  • Threatened both labor and management.
  • Efficiency methods used in education!!
  • Morris Cooke efficiency and democracy.

22
Herbert Hoover
  • Engineering method personified.
  • Progressive but not radical.
  • Efficiency will eliminate waste. Engineering
    write large.
  • But had constrained view of what engineers could
    do.
  • President of Federated American Engineering
    Societies 1920.

23
Planning vs. the Individual
  • Scientific management and technocracy led to
    planning at the center.
  • Other engineers emphasized the individual and
    enterprise.
  • Depression look inward
  • ECPD 1932 licensure as way of controlling
    supply.
  • Unions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com