Title: DIAGNOSIS OF VIRAL INFECTION
1DIAGNOSIS OF VIRAL INFECTION
An Overview
2Diagnostic Methods in Virology
- 1. Direct Examination
- 2. Indirect Examination (Virus Isolation)
- 3. Serology
3Direct Examination
- 1. Antigen Detection immunofluorescence,
ELISA etc. - 2. Electron Microscopy morphology of
virus particles - immune electron
microscopy - 3. Light Microscopy histological
appearance - inclusion bodies
- 4. Viral Genome Detection hybridization with
specific nucleic acid probes
polymerase chain
reaction (PCR)
4Indirect Examination
- 1. Cell Culture cytopathic effect (CPE)
- haemabsorption
- immunofluorescence
- 2. Eggs pocks on CAM
- haemagglutination
- inclusion bodies
- 3. Animals disease or death
5Serology
- Detection of rising titers of antibody between
acute and convalescent stages of infection, or
the detection of IgM in primary infection. -
6Virus Isolation
- Cell Cultures are most widely used for virus
isolation, there are 3 types of cell cultures - 1. Primary cells - Monkey Kidney
- 2. Semi-continuous cells - Human embryonic kidney
and skin fibroblasts - 3. Continuous cells - HeLa, Vero, Hep2, LLC-MK2,
MDCK - Primary cell culture are widely acknowledged as
the best cell culture systems available since
they support the widest range of viruses.
However, they are very expensive and it is often
difficult to obtain a reliable supply. Continuous
cells are the most easy to handle but the range
of viruses supported is often limited.
7Cell Cultures
- Growing virus may produce
- 1. Cytopathic Effect (CPE) - such as the
ballooning of cells or syncytia formation, may be
specific or non-specific. - 2. Haemadsorption - cells acquire the ability to
stick to mammalian red blood cells. - Confirmation of the identity of the virus may be
carried out using neutralization,
haemadsorption-inhibition or immunofluorescence
tests.
8Cytopathic Effect (1)
Cytopathic effect of enterovirus 71 and HSV in
cell culture note the ballooning of cells.
(Virology Laboratory, Yale-New Haven Hospital,
Linda Stannard, University of Cape Town)
9Cytopathic Effect (2)
Syncytium formation in cell culture caused by
Resp. Syncytial Virus (top), and measles virus
(bottom). (courtesy of Linda Stannard,
University of Cape Town, S.A.)
10Haemadsorption
Syncytial formation caused by mumps virus and
haemadsorption of erythrocytes onto the surface
of the cell sheet. (courtesy of Linda Stannard,
University of Cape Town, S.A.)
11Problems with cell culture
- Long period (up to 4 weeks) required for result.
- Often very poor sensitivity, sensitivity depends
on a large extent on the condition of the
specimen. - Susceptible to bacterial contamination.
- Susceptible to toxic substances which may be
present in the specimen. - Many viruses will not grow in cell culture e.g.
Hepatitis B, Diarrhoeal viruses, parvovirus,
papillomavirus.
12Rapid Culture Techniques
- Rapid culture techniques are available whereby
viral antigens are detected 2 to 4 days after
inoculation. The CMV DEAFF (Detection of Early
Antigen Fluorescent Foci) test is the best
example, whereby - The cell sheet is grown on individual cover slips
in a plastic bottle. - Following inoculation, the bottle then is spun at
a low speed for one hour (to speed up the
adsorption of the virus) and then incubated for 2
to 4 days. - The cover slip is then taken out and examined for
the presence of CMV early antigens by
immunofluorescence.
13DEAFF test for CMV
(Virology Laboratory, Yale-New Haven Hospital)
14Viruses Isolated by Cell Culture
15Electron Microscopy
- 106 virus particles per ml required for
visualization, ? 50,000 - 60,000 magnification
normally used. Viruses may be detected in the
following specimens. - Faeces Rotavirus, Adenovirus
- Norwalk like viruses
- Astrovirus, Calicivirus
- Vesicle Fluid HSV
- VZV
- Skin scrapings papillomavirus, orf
- molluscum contagiosum
16Electronmicrographs
Rotavirus
Astroviruses
Adenovirus
(courtesy of Linda Stannard, University of Cape
Town, S.A.)
17Immune Electron Microscopy
- The sensitivity and specificity of EM may be
enhanced by immune electron microscopy. There are
two variants- - Classical Immune electron microscopy (IEM) - the
sample is treated with specific anti-sera before
being put up for EM. Viral particles present will
be agglutinated and thus congregate together by
the antibody. - Solid phase immune electron microscopy (SPIEM) -
the grid is coated with specific anti-sera. Virus
particles present in the sample will be absorbed
onto the grid by the antibody.
18Problems with Electron Microscopy
- Expensive equipment
- Expensive maintenance
- Require experienced observer
- Sensitivity often low
19Serology
- Criteria for diagnosing Primary Infection
- 4 fold or more increase in titre of IgG or total
antibody between acute and convalescent sera - Presence of IgM
- Seroconversion
- A single high titre of IgG (or total antibody) -
very unreliable - Criteria for diagnosing Reinfection
- fold or more increase in titre of IgG or total
antibody between acute and convalescent sera - Absence or slight increase in IgM
20Typical Serological Profile After Acute Infection
- Note that during reinfection, IgM may be absent
or present at a low level transiently
21Complement Fixation Test
Complement Fixation Test in Microtiter Plate.
Rows 1 and 2 exhibit complement fixation obtained
with acute and convalescent phase serum
specimens, respectively. (2-fold serum dilutions
were used)
22ELISA for HIV antibody
- Microplate ELISA for HIV antibody colored wells
indicate reactivity
23Western Blot
- HIV-1 Western Blot
- Lane1 Positive Control
- Lane 2 Negative Control
- Sample A Negative
- Sample B Indeterminate
- Sample C Positive
24Usefulness of Serological Results
- How useful a serological result is depends on the
individual virus. - For example, for viruses such as rubella and
hepatitis A, the onset of clinical symptoms
coincide with the development of antibodies. The
detection of IgM or rising titres of IgG in the
serum of the patient would indicate active
disease. - However, many viruses often produce clinical
disease before the appearance of antibodies such
as respiratory and diarrhoeal viruses. So in this
case, any serological diagnosis would be
retrospective and therefore will not be that
useful. - There are also viruses which produce clinical
disease months or years after seroconversion e.g.
HIV and rabies. In the case of these viruses, the
mere presence of antibody is sufficient to make a
definitive diagnosis.
25Problems with Serology
- Long period of time required for diagnosis for
paired acute and convalescent sera. - Mild local infections such as HSV genitalis may
not produce a detectable humoral immune response. - Extensive antigenic cross-reactivity between
related viruses e.g. HSV and VZV, Japanese B
encephalitis and Dengue, may lead to false
positive results. - immunocompromised patients often give a reduced
or absent humoral immune response. - Patients with infectious mononucleosis and those
with connective tissue diseases such as SLE may
react non-specifically giving a false positive
result. - Patients given blood or blood products may give a
false positive result due to the transfer of
antibody.
26CSF antibodies
- Used mainly for the diagnosis of herpes simplex
and VZV encephalitis - CSF normally contain little or no antibodies
- presence of antibodies suggest meningitis or
- meningoencephalitis
27Rapid Diagnosis Based on the Detection of Viral
Antigens
- Nasopharyngeal Aspirate RSV
- Influenza A and B
- Parainfluenza
- Adenovirus
- Faeces Rotaviruses
- Adenoviruses
- Astrovirus
- Skin HSV
- VZV
- Blood CMV (pp65 antigenaemia test)
28Immunofluorescense
Positive immunofluorescence test for rabies virus
antigen. (Source CDC)
(Virology Laboratory, Yale-New Haven Hospital)
29CMV pp65 antigenaemia test
(Virology Laboratory, Yale-New Haven Hospital)
30Advantages and Disadvantages
- Advantages
- Result available quickly, usually within a few
hours. - Potential Problems
- Often very much reduced sensitivity compared to
cell culture, can be as low as 20. Specificity
often poor as well. - Requires good specimens.
- The procedures involved are often tedious and
time-consuming and thus expensive in terms of
laboratory time.
31Specimens for Routine Tests
32Molecular Methods
- Methods based on the detection of viral genome
are also commonly known as molecular methods. It
is often said that molecular methods is the
future direction of viral diagnosis. - However in practice, although the use of these
methods is indeed increasing, the role played by
molecular methods in a routine diagnostic virus
laboratory is still small compared to
conventional methods. - It is certain though that the role of molecular
methods will increase rapidly in the near future.
33Classical Molecular Techniques
- Dot-blot, Southern blot are examples of classical
techniques. They depend on the use of specific
DNA/RNA probes for hybridization. - The specificity of the reaction depends on the
conditions used for hybridization. However, the
sensitivity of these techniques is not better
than conventional viral diagnostic methods. - However, since they are usually more tedious and
expensive than conventional techniques, they
never found widespread acceptance.
34Polymerase Chain Reaction (1)
- PCR allows the in vitro amplification of specific
target DNA sequences by a factor of 106 and is
thus an extremely sensitive technique. - It is based on an enzymatic reaction involving
the use of synthetic oligonucleotides flanking
the target nucleic sequence of interest. - These oligonucleotides act as primers for the
thermostable Taq polymerase. Repeated cycles
(usually 25 to 40) of denaturation of the
template DNA (at 94oC), annealing of primers to
their complementary sequences (50oC), and
primer extension (72oC) result in the exponential
production of the specific target fragment. - Further sensitivity and specificity may be
obtained by the nested PCR. - Detection and identification of the PCR product
is usually carried out by agarose gel
electrophoresis, hybridization with a specific
oligonucleotide probe, restriction enzyme
analysis, or DNA sequencing.
35Polymerase Chain Reaction (2)
- Advantages of PCR
- Extremely high sensitivity, may detect down to
one viral genome per sample volume - Easy to set up
- Fast turnaround time
- Disadvantages of PCR
- Extremely liable to contamination
- High degree of operator skill required
- Not easy to set up a quantitative assay.
- A positive result may be difficult to interpret,
especially with latent viruses such as CMV, where
any seropositive person will have virus present
in their blood irrespective whether they have
disease or not. - Very expensive.
36Schematic of PCR
Each cycle doubles the copy number of the target
37Other Newer Molecular Techniques
- Branched DNA is essentially a sensitive
hybridization technique which involves linear
amplification. Whereas exponential amplification
occurs in PCR. - Therefore, the sensitivity of bDNA lies between
classical amplification techniques and PCR. Other
Newer molecular techniques depend on some form of
amplification. - Commercial proprietary techniques such as LCR
(ligase chain reaction), NASBA (Nucleic Acid
Sequence Based Amplification) , TMA (Tissue Micro
Arrays) depend on exponential amplification of
the signal or the target. - Therefore, these techniques are as susceptible to
contamination as PCR and share the same
advantages and disadvantages. - PCR and related techniques are bound to play an
increasingly important role in the diagnosis of
viral infections. - DNA chip is another promising technology where it
would be possible to detect a large number of
viruses, their pathogenic potential, and their
drug sensitivity at the same time.
38Comparison between PCR and other nucleic acid
Amplification Techniques