Ethics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Ethics

Description:

February 23rd Merck: Background Most admired company in America for 7 straight years in the 80s Edward M. Scolnick (Brilliant) in charge of Merck Research Labs ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: wouEduel7
Learn more at: https://people.wou.edu
Category:
Tags: ethics

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ethics


1
Ethics
  • February 23rd

2
Merck Background
  • Most admired company in America for 7 straight
    years in the 80s
  • Edward M. Scolnick (Brilliant) in charge of Merck
    Research Labs
  • Brought 15 unique new drugs to the market in just
    5 years in the 90s
  • For two decades Merck published more scientific
    papers and patented more compounds than its
    competitors

3
  • Fast Track FDA approval of new drugs
  • 13 new drugs approved on average in less than 11
    months
  • Vioxx approved in under 6 months
  • Pfizer face a review time of over two years
  • Culture of arrogance?

4
Fosamax (osteoporosis)
  • 280 million sales in first year
  • FDA wanted to withdraw from market after it
    learned than it caused erosion of the esophagus
    in some patients
  • Scolnick used an aggressive letter writing
    campaign and submitted more info to FDA
  • Fosamax re-labeled and allowed to remain on the
    market. (have to sit upright for an hour after
    taking it)
  • 2003 sales 2.7 billion

5
block busters
  • Cozaar Hypertension 2.5 billion
  • Crixivan HIV
  • Singulair 2 billion
  • Propecia Baldness
  • By 1999 the pipeline was empty Harder to
    develop new drugs. Merck came into the new
    millennium facing patent expirations and few
    miracle drugs in the offing

6
Vioxx
  • Last of Scolnicks blockbusters
  • Discovered in 1994
  • Cox-2 inhibitors
  • To replace common painkillers like ibuprofen
    which have the side effects of ulcers and
    gastrointestinal bleeding. Some estimated that
    these drugs killed 10,000 people a year due to
    intestinal bleeding
  • Direct-to-consumer marketing 500 million 2.5
    billion a year

7
Early warning signs
  • Even before FDA approval Pennsylvania study
    Cox-2 inhibitors interfered with enzymes that
    play key roles in warding off cardiovascular
    disease
  • Merck felt the evidence was inconclusive
  • 2000 own study showed Vioxx 3x more likely than
    Aleve (naproxen)
  • Merck argued that data misleading because
    naproxen good for heart

8
  • Merck Responsible
  • 60 Minutes
  • FDA cant protect
  • FDA Shares

9
Pfizer
  • Celebrex 1 brand of Cox-2
  • Also sales Bextra
  • Initial studies only showed Vioxx
  • Later studies indicated Celebrex and Bextra had
    same problems
  • Chose to not recall
  • FDA asked them to suspend direct-to-consumers
    marketing

10
Outlook for Merck
  • In 2003 work on potential blockbuster drugs for
    depression and diabetes didnt pan out. One
    didnt work in clinical trials and the other was
    linked to cancer
  • Zocor (5 billion a year) goes off patent in
    2006.
  • Stock price 95 in 2000 is under 30 in February
    2005

11
  • VIOXX back
  • Future?

12
Questions?
  • On balance do you think Merck is an ethical and
    socially responsible company? Pfizer?
  • How could the disaster with Vioxx been avoided in
    the first place?
  • What is your opinion of pharmaceutical
    advertising?
  • Should Merck have recalled Vioxx?

13
How do you respond to the following statements
from consumer advocacy groups?
  • The more than 10 billion Merck has hoarded
    attests to the obscene profits these drug
    companies are making at our expense
  • The FDA is in the pocket of the drug industry
    What a travesty this is.

14
What can be learned
  • Always be ready for the worst scenario
  • Be alert to early hints of trouble
  • Eagerness to sue should be factored into some
    decisions
  • The pharmaceuticals industry needs to improve its
    public image
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com